PCM.daily banner
24-11-2024 16:39
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 66

· Members Online: 1
hector247

· Total Members: 161,802
· Newest Member: JDPRICE
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Cycling
 Print Thread
News in May
sutty68
No news is good news Pfft
 
Aquarius97
Well, Moscon's ban discsussion should have been in this thread
Manager of [MG] Repsol - Netflix


pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/newmember.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/newmanager.pngpcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/improved.png
 
Yellow Jersey
Nibali looses Ramunas Navardauskas for the Giro.
And of course, I think that the Giro "descent classification" is already a May topic Grin I think it is a horrible idea, as probably many people think, because it was supposed to come up with new ideas to ensure the safety of cycling races and this "classification" encourages the riders to take wild risks in descents.
And right after the unfortunate death of Chad Young in simillar circumstances... I just don't understand.
 
ringo182
Aquarius97 wrote:
Well, Moscon's ban discsussion should have been in this thread


Not a great weekend for Italy on the racism front with the Muntari incident in Serie A. I suppose Reza should be grateful the race wasn't in Italy otherwise he would have been suspended for complaining about being racially abused.
"Ringo is exactly right", Shonak - 8 September 2016
 
clamel



Is this a joke ??? They seem to have included a downhill competition, so who knows this might be true. Horrible indeed.
Smile____________________________________________Smile


--------------------
“We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.” Rolling Eyes

"If thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into thee."
--------------------
 
Ian Butler
clamel wrote:



Is this a joke ??? They seem to have included a downhill competition, so who knows this might be true. Horrible indeed.


A joke, a response to downhill competition
 
ringo182
It is a competition in very bad taste, especially given the death of Wouter Weylandt only a few years ago at the Giro.

In an ideal World no-one will try to win this award and whoever does win it will refuse to go to the podium. I guess that might be wishful thinking though.
"Ringo is exactly right", Shonak - 8 September 2016
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 24-11-2024 16:39
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
Ollfardh
Exactly my thoughts, Weylandt crashed in a descent 6 years ago and then they do this. I wonder if the cycling world will protest hard enough so this award will be withdrawn.
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
Selwink
At least the Cyclist's Union CPA has voiced its opposition, along with Bobbie Traksel, member of the UCI athletes commission. Good chance this will not go through I think
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/micro/npn.png[PCT] Novatek-Panarmenian.net
[ICL] Sugoi-Xanterra & Canada Dry Dev Team
Stages (Requests closed)

i.imgur.com/vR8EVAA.png

'But why were [...] they helped to get to space? To find answers, we must look at predictions not of science, but of science-fiction.'
Ancient Aliens
 
Spilak23
What a pathetic peloton ffs.

descents are part of the route. THey should be raced. it's an important skill.

Everyone knows the risks and can decide for themselves what risks they're willing to take
 
matt17br
Call me crazy but I see nothing wrong with this, it's not like riders are forced to race for that prize?

Whoever was going to take risks downhill is going to do it anyways, everyone else that wanted to be careful will keep avoiding risks, and I doubt anyone will change their racing style downhill because of such a minor competition.

There were people on twitter bitching about this and saying that they would have preferred a climbs prize yada yada, did they forget about the KoM competition present in every WT race? Pfft Downhill specialists/great bike handlers will be recognized for once, it's often an overlooked aspect of bike racing and it's only noticeable when done to an extreme extent - see Sagan or Nibali before he got a daughter.
(Former) Manager of pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2020/Micros/gen.png Generali pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2020/Micros/gen.png
 
http://v.ht/Matt17
cio93
Spilak23 wrote:
Everyone knows the risks and can decide for themselves what risks they're willing to take


Tell that to the countless people who drive responsibly and still get killed in car crashes caused by reckless others every year.


I see lots of comparisons drawn to sprints and the points jersey by the few people that defend this. Besides the long history of it, there's one inherent flaw to that logic though:
In a sprint, all the good sprinters are at the front. If you don't want to get involved, stay behind them.
The best descender however could be anywhere in the race. He could try and sneak past you at any moment.
 
TheManxMissile
cio93 wrote:
I see lots of comparisons drawn to sprints and the points jersey by the few people that defend this. Besides the long history of it, there's one inherent flaw to that logic though:
In a sprint, all the good sprinters are at the front. If you don't want to get involved, stay behind them.
The best descender however could be anywhere in the race. He could try and sneak past you at any moment.


I watched Tour of Yorkshire over the weekend. Crash in the sprint on stage 1, happened at the front amongst the sprinters, and the innocent guys hanging back got stuffed up with no time to break and ended up on the deck through no fault of their own.
Happens in the Tour, Vuelta, Giro etc. etc.

Now this is an argment against the descent competition, an innocent rider can be caught in a crash through no fault of their own. But it applies to all other aspects of a race as well, and no-one complains about that.
i.imgur.com/UmX5YX1.jpgi.imgur.com/iRneKpI.jpgi.imgur.com/fljmGSP.jpgi.imgur.com/qV5ItIc.jpgimgur.com/dr2BAI6.jpgimgur.com/KlJUqDx.jpg[/img[img]]https://imgur.com/yUygrQ.jpgi.imgur.com/C1rG9BW.jpgi.imgur.com/sEDS7gr.jpg
 
krisa
Nobody complained to tram tracks, several years already in races like de panne, croatia,... did they forget Goddaert crashed due to stupid tram tracks and then got killed by a bus who rode behind him
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/jerseydesigner.pngi.imgur.com/vR8EVAA.png
i.imgur.com/psfC63E.png
 
Ollfardh
The difference is, it's definitely a goal to win a race. It should not become a goal to get the fastest descent on its own, only as a way of winning the race. The difference with the KoM is the risk involved.
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
Spilak23
cio93 wrote:
Spilak23 wrote:
Everyone knows the risks and can decide for themselves what risks they're willing to take


Tell that to the countless people who drive responsibly and still get killed in car crashes caused by reckless others every year.


those people assess the risk of riding on public roads. There's always a small change someone rides over you/into you. It's a risk you take when you go on public roads. If you're not willing to take that small risk, stay inside.
 
cio93
TheManxMissile wrote:
cio93 wrote:
I see lots of comparisons drawn to sprints and the points jersey by the few people that defend this. Besides the long history of it, there's one inherent flaw to that logic though:
In a sprint, all the good sprinters are at the front. If you don't want to get involved, stay behind them.
The best descender however could be anywhere in the race. He could try and sneak past you at any moment.


I watched Tour of Yorkshire over the weekend. Crash in the sprint on stage 1, happened at the front amongst the sprinters, and the innocent guys hanging back got stuffed up with no time to break and ended up on the deck through no fault of their own.
Happens in the Tour, Vuelta, Giro etc. etc.

Now this is an argment against the descent competition, an innocent rider can be caught in a crash through no fault of their own. But it applies to all other aspects of a race as well, and no-one complains about that.


You don't have to complain about the status quo to complain about newly added dangers for no other purpose than marketing.



Spilak23 wrote:
cio93 wrote:
Spilak23 wrote:
Everyone knows the risks and can decide for themselves what risks they're willing to take


Tell that to the countless people who drive responsibly and still get killed in car crashes caused by reckless others every year.


those people assess the risk of riding on public roads. There's always a small change someone rides over you/into you. It's a risk you take when you go on public roads. If you're not willing to take that small risk, stay inside.


While that is true, would you approve if you rode on a highway and see a new poster on the side of the road saying
"Daily contest: Whoever has the highest average speed over the next 5 kilometres wins 100€ - The Government"?
 
Maddox
Also keep in mind that, in spite of how tragical WW108's death was, Tom Simpson died on a mountain, so if you follow your logic, you should not include KoM's either. Smile
 
TheManxMissile
Maddox wrote:
Also keep in mind that, in spite of how tragical WW108's death was, Tom Simpson died on a mountain, so if you follow your logic, you should not include KoM's either. Smile


Well Tom died chasing GC glory and taking incredible actions and risks to do so. F*ck GC competitions
i.imgur.com/UmX5YX1.jpgi.imgur.com/iRneKpI.jpgi.imgur.com/fljmGSP.jpgi.imgur.com/qV5ItIc.jpgimgur.com/dr2BAI6.jpgimgur.com/KlJUqDx.jpg[/img[img]]https://imgur.com/yUygrQ.jpgi.imgur.com/C1rG9BW.jpgi.imgur.com/sEDS7gr.jpg
 
TheManxMissile
UCI has called on RCS to drop the competition, so that should settle it all out with the competiton being removed.... or RCS totally go bananas and the civil war of cycling kicks off
i.imgur.com/UmX5YX1.jpgi.imgur.com/iRneKpI.jpgi.imgur.com/fljmGSP.jpgi.imgur.com/qV5ItIc.jpgimgur.com/dr2BAI6.jpgimgur.com/KlJUqDx.jpg[/img[img]]https://imgur.com/yUygrQ.jpgi.imgur.com/C1rG9BW.jpgi.imgur.com/sEDS7gr.jpg
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Movistar
Movistar
PCM17: General Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.57 seconds