|
Sky Doping/Hate Thread
|
| CLURPR |
Posted on 19-07-2012 17:20
|
Domestique
Posts: 452
Joined: 19-01-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
felix_29 wrote:
SweatyViking wrote:
Didn't fool you with the "Wiggo positive" thread 
Even kindergarten kids would not laugh about your not funny, just plain stupid and unnecessary threads that no forum needs.
This and that his location on his profile sums him up really  |
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 24-11-2024 11:36
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| cio93 |
Posted on 19-07-2012 17:22
|
World Champion
Posts: 10845
Joined: 29-10-2007
PCM$: 500.00
|
CLURPR wrote:
felix_29 wrote:
SweatyViking wrote:
Didn't fool you with the "Wiggo positive" thread
Even kindergarten kids would not laugh about your not funny, just plain stupid and unnecessary threads that no forum needs.
This and that his location on his profile sums him up really
Talking about profile, did he just got banned? His profile link redirects to the main page atm.
|
| |
|
|
| Coop |
Posted on 19-07-2012 17:23
|
Under 23
Posts: 77
Joined: 06-02-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Looks like the fanboys are starting to get their feelings hurt. So there is no proof, but one either believes Sky is doping, or one does not. What drives me batty is when the fanboys pipe on about training harder, better, more efficiently, etc... Yada yada yada! Recycled excuses from the Armstrong days, only with proper English! |
| |
|
|
| CLURPR |
Posted on 19-07-2012 17:23
|
Domestique
Posts: 452
Joined: 19-01-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
cio93 wrote:
CLURPR wrote:
felix_29 wrote:
SweatyViking wrote:
Didn't fool you with the "Wiggo positive" thread
Even kindergarten kids would not laugh about your not funny, just plain stupid and unnecessary threads that no forum needs.
This and that his location on his profile sums him up really
Talking about profile, did he just got banned? His profile link redirects to the main page atm.
I'm guessing so  I think it was because he started the entire editing the Wikipedia thing. |
| |
|
|
| CLURPR |
Posted on 19-07-2012 17:24
|
Domestique
Posts: 452
Joined: 19-01-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Coop wrote:
Looks like the fanboys are starting to get their feelings hurt. So there is no proof, but one either believes Sky is doping, or one does not. What drives me batty is when the fanboys pipe on about training harder, better, more efficiently, etc... Yada yada yada! Recycled excuses from the Armstrong days, only with proper English!
Got any hard evidence to prove Sky are doping? |
| |
|
|
| lluuiiggii |
Posted on 19-07-2012 17:28
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8542
Joined: 30-07-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
CLURPR wrote:
1. and 2. Leinders isn't at the Tour for a start and hasn't been at any of the Tenerife training camps with them only Kerrison and a couple of other staff such as mechanics etc.
Yeah, out-of-competition doping does not exist and has no effects whatsoever. And of course we can affirm with certainty who was and who wasn't in certain places at any time.
CLURPR wrote:
4. Wiggins? No name? 4th in TdF in 2009 and has been consistently good over the past 2 years. Froome I can understand with that point but has shown he can climb at Vuelta.
Yeah.. something people tend to do when we say "Froome came out of nowhere", of course we're not talking about this year, and instead talking about the Vuelta. Same goes for Wiggo, when we say he started climbing well out of nowhere we're talking about the 2009 Tour. But we can't also ignore the fact that this year they stepped up to be the best climbers in the world (behind Contador and Schleck), certainly an evolution from 2009&2011.
CLURPR wrote:
6. Not acting like a victim just pissed/angry/frustrated at all the sniping going on over Twitter and on the Wikipedia page like some silly childish people have been editing
He acted very differently in the years before when talking about doping. In this year's TdF thought he started to "explode" and cursing everyone when talking about the same subject. Remember Wiggins said that before last year's Tour, it was not possible to win it clean. By his 2012 logic, he's also a fucking wanker right?
|
| |
|
|
| SportingNonsense |
Posted on 19-07-2012 17:31
|
Team Manager
Posts: 33046
Joined: 08-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
cio93 wrote:
CLURPR wrote:
felix_29 wrote:
SweatyViking wrote:
Didn't fool you with the "Wiggo positive" thread
Even kindergarten kids would not laugh about your not funny, just plain stupid and unnecessary threads that no forum needs.
This and that his location on his profile sums him up really
Talking about profile, did he just got banned? His profile link redirects to the main page atm.
I've given him a short enforced break from the forum, so he can hopefully calm down from his frenzy.
|
| |
|
|
| Koener |
Posted on 19-07-2012 18:46
|
Junior Rider
Posts: 46
Joined: 08-02-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Anyway wether they did or didn't they did it better then the rest.
Edited by Koener on 19-07-2012 18:48
Koener
|
| |
|
|
| baseballlover312 |
Posted on 19-07-2012 18:47
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 16429
Joined: 27-07-2011
PCM$: 10438.70
|
Koener wrote:
Anyway wether they did or dıdn't they did it better then the rest.
? wut?
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy |
| |
|
|
| xeroxi |
Posted on 19-07-2012 18:47
|
Junior Rider
Posts: 28
Joined: 13-05-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
50 pages of speculation in this thread, 10 pages in franks scientifically confirmed doping
haters gonna hate |
| |
|
|
| Eden95 |
Posted on 19-07-2012 18:48
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4505
Joined: 05-10-2010
PCM$: 900.00
|
housoe wrote:
Likkivi wrote:
Gulvplanke wrote:
This thread went from being interesting to become more childish then the average kindergarten.
It's already concluded that they are on something. Everything hints that:
1. Geert Leindeers.
2. Training Camp - why are the 5 riders from the same training camp the ones performing FAR better than their other team mates
3. Wiggins' and Froomes attitude during the whole Tour
4. No way some old no names suddenly are the best cyclists in the world due to "revoloutionary training"
5. The other riders being reluctant to even try anything
6. Wiggins acting like a victim everytime asked about doping
This thread has fullfilled it's purpose. But we are here because the PCM police arrested us.
1) that's no proff many teams have doctors prior connected to doping.
2) Because it was a super awesome training camp.
3) You don't have to be doping to be an arogant ***hole.
4) Who are those old no names, Wiggins and Rogers, they always been good, just not this good, and certainly not no names.
5) That's because Sky seems to strong to bother, when have being the best been evidence of cheating.
6) When everyone hints he are cheating, if he don't cheat he actually is a victim, therefore acts as one.
They are horrible arguments.
Indosat - ANZ HQ
"This Schleck sandwich is going to cause serious indigestion for Evans" - Phil Liggett |
| |
|
|
| Wilier |
Posted on 19-07-2012 18:53
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 5405
Joined: 28-04-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
CLURPR wrote:
Coop wrote:
Looks like the fanboys are starting to get their feelings hurt. So there is no proof, but one either believes Sky is doping, or one does not. What drives me batty is when the fanboys pipe on about training harder, better, more efficiently, etc... Yada yada yada! Recycled excuses from the Armstrong days, only with proper English!
Got any hard evidence to prove Sky are doping?
Well, is there any evidence that they aren't. It's not like when they don't provide positive tests they're not doping. Stop coming up with that argument. I've heard that too much from Armstrong fans.
Their performance is making them very suspicous, not to mention the huge improvements of their riders. Just suspicious. Time will tell if they're doping or not. |
| |
|
|
| Koener |
Posted on 19-07-2012 18:54
|
Junior Rider
Posts: 46
Joined: 08-02-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
How did Cobo ever win the vuelta ??
Was he better prepared than Sky
Koener
|
| |
|
|
| Wilier |
Posted on 19-07-2012 18:58
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 5405
Joined: 28-04-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Koener wrote:
How did Cobo ever win the vuelta ??
Was he better prepared than Sky
That depends on what you mean by 'prepared'. You mean doped? Possibly. |
| |
|
|
| Alakagom |
Posted on 19-07-2012 19:01
|
World Champion
Posts: 10891
Joined: 19-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Koener wrote:
How did Cobo ever win the vuelta ??
Was he better prepared than Sky
1. Froome would have won Vuelta if not bonus seconds actually.
2. Sky supported the wrong leader after stage 11. If Froome wasn't made to do work for Wiggins from stage 11 - onwards - he would have won Vuelta.
Edited by Alakagom on 19-07-2012 19:01
|
| |
|
|
| franki28 |
Posted on 19-07-2012 19:01
|
Stagiare
Posts: 236
Joined: 27-02-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
xeroxi wrote:
50 pages of speculation in this thread, 10 pages in franks scientifically confirmed doping
haters gonna hate
it's just normal... here we can argue but on Frank we can only comment on a fact |
| |
|
|
| drugsdontwork |
Posted on 19-07-2012 19:02
|
Free Agent
Posts: 123
Joined: 20-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Wilier wrote:
Well, is there any evidence that they aren't. It's not like when they don't provide positive tests they're not doping. Stop coming up with that argument. I've heard that too much from Armstrong fans.
This is a terrible argument. Using this logic everyone positive test or not is a doper.
On that basis Wilier is a doper! 
Nobody is normal
|
| |
|
|
| Alastairhufc |
Posted on 19-07-2012 19:04
|
Domestique
Posts: 432
Joined: 19-11-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
The last thing I am going to say in this thread is this:
If you had wanted something all you life, would you like it if a load of people who had never met you and are jealous of what you have, how would you like it?
Maybe just lay off him and let this thread die. |
| |
|
|
| Koener |
Posted on 19-07-2012 19:05
|
Junior Rider
Posts: 46
Joined: 08-02-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
ok i know why they lost, but in view of doping accusations, i just wonder how Cobo could even follow. Being the core point if Sky is doing it, they are not alone thus my previous "wheter they did or didn't, they did it better then the rest
Koener
|
| |
|
|
| Wilier |
Posted on 19-07-2012 19:18
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 5405
Joined: 28-04-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
drugsdontwork wrote:
Wilier wrote:
Well, is there any evidence that they aren't. It's not like when they don't provide positive tests they're not doping. Stop coming up with that argument. I've heard that too much from Armstrong fans.
This is a terrible argument. Using this logic everyone positive test or not is a doper.
On that basis Wilier is a doper!
I'm don't race cycling races anymore, so I can take whatever doping I can.
My point is a rider not testing positive doesn't mean he's not doping. And that's a fact.
Edited by Wilier on 19-07-2012 19:20
|
| |
|
