ryant wrote: ryant is the politician and now he wants your vote!!!
I'm not buying the whole "you may be town but its better to kill you off" tactic, this is a clear mafia tactic that removes all accountability for their action when it comes out quadsas is town. (potentially)
I'd have a look at all 3 of those voters on that lynch train
but for now I'll lynch Marcovdw, at best we kill a mafia member, worst its just town
I have no idea how that strategy is any worse than just killing someone because they are inactive, or any other reason before the first night kill. Could you explain that instead of blindly defending the guy who has caused more trouble in this town than even the mafia has to this point?
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
ryant wrote: ryant is the politician and now he wants your vote!!!
I'm not buying the whole "you may be town but its better to kill you off" tactic, this is a clear mafia tactic that removes all accountability for their action when it comes out quadsas is town. (potentially)
I'd have a look at all 3 of those voters on that lynch train
but for now I'll lynch Marcovdw, at best we kill a mafia member, worst its just town
I have no idea how that strategy is any worse than just killing someone because they are inactive, or any other reason before the first night kill. Could you explain that instead of blindly defending the guy who has caused more trouble in this town than even the mafia has to this point?
hm. jandal, marco and baseballlover in cahoots against me and a revealed politician. I suggest you all keep an eye on this block.
ryant wrote: ryant is the politician and now he wants your vote!!!
I'm not buying the whole "you may be town but its better to kill you off" tactic, this is a clear mafia tactic that removes all accountability for their action when it comes out quadsas is town. (potentially)
I'd have a look at all 3 of those voters on that lynch train
but for now I'll lynch Marcovdw, at best we kill a mafia member, worst its just town
I have no idea how that strategy is any worse than just killing someone because they are inactive, or any other reason before the first night kill. Could you explain that instead of blindly defending the guy who has caused more trouble in this town than even the mafia has to this point?
From my point of view, quadsas has been deliberately provocative and said a lot of things which has ultimately 'alienated' himself from the town - but that is just another way to say the mafia gets an easy lynch. He has stood out dramatically and has tried to generate some voting patterns early on, which is something I see as a pro town thing to do. Now of course if quadsas agreed to be less abrasive we can still work with him IMO.
I feel like killing an inactive member is pointless, gives mafia an excuse to hide and we gain no new information - and I feel like the same is the case for jumping on the quadsas lynch train
John St Ledger in Team Bunzl-Centrica and Team U25
ryant wrote: ryant is the politician and now he wants your vote!!!
I'm not buying the whole "you may be town but its better to kill you off" tactic, this is a clear mafia tactic that removes all accountability for their action when it comes out quadsas is town. (potentially)
I'd have a look at all 3 of those voters on that lynch train
but for now I'll lynch Marcovdw, at best we kill a mafia member, worst its just town
I have no idea how that strategy is any worse than just killing someone because they are inactive, or any other reason before the first night kill. Could you explain that instead of blindly defending the guy who has caused more trouble in this town than even the mafia has to this point?
hm. jandal, marco and baseballlover in cahoots against me and a revealed politician. I suggest you all keep an eye on this block.
You think if I and the other two were mafia, we'd all decide to form an outspoken, unified bloc this early in the game? How stupid do you think I am? I've won this game as mafia before, and that is not how you do it. Way too obvious, especially this early. In fact, I'd be trying to keep you alive as long as possible as a distraction.
Obviously I can't vouch for Marco or Jandal. They could easily be mafia, but I have nothing to tell me they are. However, I think if you took an honest look at your actions the last few days, it'd be pretty damn obvious why people are voting for you without needing to be in "cahoots." You tried to piss everyone off, did, and now you're claiming that your attacks and poor strategies, harmful to the town, attracted only mafia members. That's asinine.
Also, going against the politician isn't some sacred rule not to be broken, The politician has no more insight than any of the rest of us, he just can break a tied vote.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
ryant wrote: ryant is the politician and now he wants your vote!!!
I'm not buying the whole "you may be town but its better to kill you off" tactic, this is a clear mafia tactic that removes all accountability for their action when it comes out quadsas is town. (potentially)
I'd have a look at all 3 of those voters on that lynch train
but for now I'll lynch Marcovdw, at best we kill a mafia member, worst its just town
I have no idea how that strategy is any worse than just killing someone because they are inactive, or any other reason before the first night kill. Could you explain that instead of blindly defending the guy who has caused more trouble in this town than even the mafia has to this point?
From my point of view, quadsas has been deliberately provocative and said a lot of things which has ultimately 'alienated' himself from the town - but that is just another way to say the mafia gets an easy lynch. He has stood out dramatically and has tried to generate some voting patterns early on, which is something I see as a pro town thing to do. Now of course if quadsas agreed to be less abrasive we can still work with him IMO.
I feel like killing an inactive member is pointless, gives mafia an excuse to hide and we gain no new information - and I feel like the same is the case for jumping on the quadsas lynch train
Well I've apologised to dftrek for attacking him, as I and you said, I was being a provocateur, and I think I did a good job in actually installing some voting blocks and patterns here, I think I've made a decent job in exposing people intentions.
And I've mentioned, marco begged people not to vote hillis and then jumped on me when people started voting. That's something that cannot be ignored. Especially when pretty much everyone has agreed that I am very likely to be town, and his reasoning was that 'he was the dick so please ill just vote here and everyone pls forget I did'
ryant wrote: ryant is the politician and now he wants your vote!!!
I'm not buying the whole "you may be town but its better to kill you off" tactic, this is a clear mafia tactic that removes all accountability for their action when it comes out quadsas is town. (potentially)
I'd have a look at all 3 of those voters on that lynch train
but for now I'll lynch Marcovdw, at best we kill a mafia member, worst its just town
I have no idea how that strategy is any worse than just killing someone because they are inactive, or any other reason before the first night kill. Could you explain that instead of blindly defending the guy who has caused more trouble in this town than even the mafia has to this point?
hm. jandal, marco and baseballlover in cahoots against me and a revealed politician. I suggest you all keep an eye on this block.
You think if I and the other two were mafia, we'd all decide to form an outspoken, unified bloc this early in the game? How stupid do you think I am? I've won this game as mafia before, and that is not how you do it. Way too obvious, especially this early. In fact, I'd be trying to keep you alive as long as possible as a distraction.
Obviously I can't vouch for Marco or Jandal. They could easily be mafia, but I have nothing to tell me they are. However, I think if you took an honest look at your actions the last few days, it'd be pretty damn obvious why people are voting for you without needing to be in "cahoots." You tried to piss everyone off, did, and now you're claiming that your attacks and poor strategies, harmful to the town, attracted only mafia members. That's asinine.
Also, going against the politician isn't some sacred rule not to be broken, The politician has no more insight than any of the rest of us, he just can break a tied vote.
Well I'll say stupid enough to vote for someone you think is town. And trying to convince a politician that you should vote someone who both of you think is town is fucking stupid. If you can't vouch for marco, then why are you voting the guy you think is town? That just doesn't make sense. Therefore there has to be something going on between you two.
Where do you get the idea I'm defending hillis? Sure, I said I wouldn't lynch him yet because he hasn't been online. If everyone did that then hillis would've been dead halfway through the day if he got more than half the vote without a chance to say anything. Then I went on to say I didn't see any other thing to go on other than your actions (and hillis inactivity).
Then you went even further into your provoking mafia thing, which made me decide to lynch you. But that has nothing to do with hillis. If he doesn't get online and say something, he'll be modkilled anyway.
Ok, I can understand somehow quasdas strategy. But as someone told (I don't remember exactly), on mafia mind it's better to keep you alive after all the chaos created, that was also a tactic used by me last game with ryant. So I'm not 100% sure if some mafia members should vote for you quasdas.
Btw despite you were very sharp, you don't need to apologise. That's the game. But I hope in the future you won't take offensive tones again.
df_Trek wrote:
Ok, I can understand somehow quasdas strategy. But as someone told (I don't remember exactly), on mafia mind it's better to keep you alive after all the chaos created, that was also a tactic used by me last game with ryant. So I'm not 100% sure if some mafia members should vote for you quasdas.
Btw despite you were very sharp, you don't need to apologise. That's the game. But I hope in the future you won't take offensive tones again.
You not voting with a confirmed townie and a very likely (as said by almost everyone) townie is not a good look for you. I've also said that not everyone who voted me is mafia. And in any case it's much better for you (if you are town) to vote marco than anyone else and kill me. I suggest you roll with the townie block rather than unconfirmed and likely evil one, and vote marco
To be honest I have no a fucking idea on who is more suspicious than who, I didn't say any action that can lead me to a confident vote. I'm rereading everything right now. If I think you are likely town? Yes. Have I to vote for Marco to save you? Not sure, but imo it's a way to target someone on who I have less certainty. I'm thinking about it also.
I hope to find a solution in few moments to be in time
df_Trek wrote:
To be honest I have no a fucking idea on who is more suspicious than who, I didn't say any action that can lead me to a confident vote. I'm rereading everything right now. If I think you are likely town? Yes. Have I to vote for Marco to save you? Not sure, but imo it's a way to target someone on who I have less certainty. I'm thinking about it also.
I hope to find a solution in few moments to be in time
You will have to vote, simply as. While others may have an excuse of 'oh i was busy and wasn't online', you saw and read everything, and if you choose not to align with a block, your life in the game is in great danger. Remember that me and ryant only need one vote if he is a politician, and do I need to make it more clear, noone has counter claimed him. If you do not vote, competent town will 100% lynch you tomorrow
df_Trek wrote:
Im going out for a long bike ride now. When I'm back, to be clear, I'll vote for the less active player as the one got more profit with the situation we will be with 3/5 hours to go, unless something very striking will happen.
Ok then, I remain with my first idea and I lynch Sammyt93, because despite he was online today remained silent (from almost 44 hours now), and imo there are enough arguments to say something about. Hope this can wake up him, or someone else what think about it.
df_Trek wrote:
Im going out for a long bike ride now. When I'm back, to be clear, I'll vote for the less active player as the one got more profit with the situation we will be with 3/5 hours to go, unless something very striking will happen.
Ok then, I remain with my first idea and I lynch Sammyt93, because despite he was online today remained silent (from almost 44 hours now), and imo there are enough arguments to say something about. Hope this can wake up him, or someone else what think about it.
Remember town, df_Trek, at this point, is without a doubt mafia. Kill him tommorow, don't waste a night looking him up or anything, he must die. He couldn't have made his allegiance more obvious
Edited by quadsas on 15-06-2019 17:21
ryant wrote: ryant is the politician and now he wants your vote!!!
I'm not buying the whole "you may be town but its better to kill you off" tactic, this is a clear mafia tactic that removes all accountability for their action when it comes out quadsas is town. (potentially)
I'd have a look at all 3 of those voters on that lynch train
but for now I'll lynch Marcovdw, at best we kill a mafia member, worst its just town
I have no idea how that strategy is any worse than just killing someone because they are inactive, or any other reason before the first night kill. Could you explain that instead of blindly defending the guy who has caused more trouble in this town than even the mafia has to this point?
hm. jandal, marco and baseballlover in cahoots against me and a revealed politician. I suggest you all keep an eye on this block.
You think if I and the other two were mafia, we'd all decide to form an outspoken, unified bloc this early in the game? How stupid do you think I am? I've won this game as mafia before, and that is not how you do it. Way too obvious, especially this early. In fact, I'd be trying to keep you alive as long as possible as a distraction.
Obviously I can't vouch for Marco or Jandal. They could easily be mafia, but I have nothing to tell me they are. However, I think if you took an honest look at your actions the last few days, it'd be pretty damn obvious why people are voting for you without needing to be in "cahoots." You tried to piss everyone off, did, and now you're claiming that your attacks and poor strategies, harmful to the town, attracted only mafia members. That's asinine.
Also, going against the politician isn't some sacred rule not to be broken, The politician has no more insight than any of the rest of us, he just can break a tied vote.
Well I'll say stupid enough to vote for someone you think is town. And trying to convince a politician that you should vote someone who both of you think is town is fucking stupid. If you can't vouch for marco, then why are you voting the guy you think is town? That just doesn't make sense. Therefore there has to be something going on between you two.
Because how the hell could I vouch for anyone? Nobody's even freaking died yet!
Also, I never said I think you are town. Never. I have no idea where you're getting that. I said I'm not sure, and that I'm not sure about anyone, but that you acting like an asshat all of Day 1 made you the most suspicious of anyone to me. That's why I'm voting for you.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
ryant wrote: ryant is the politician and now he wants your vote!!!
I'm not buying the whole "you may be town but its better to kill you off" tactic, this is a clear mafia tactic that removes all accountability for their action when it comes out quadsas is town. (potentially)
I'd have a look at all 3 of those voters on that lynch train
but for now I'll lynch Marcovdw, at best we kill a mafia member, worst its just town
I have no idea how that strategy is any worse than just killing someone because they are inactive, or any other reason before the first night kill. Could you explain that instead of blindly defending the guy who has caused more trouble in this town than even the mafia has to this point?
hm. jandal, marco and baseballlover in cahoots against me and a revealed politician. I suggest you all keep an eye on this block.
You think if I and the other two were mafia, we'd all decide to form an outspoken, unified bloc this early in the game? How stupid do you think I am? I've won this game as mafia before, and that is not how you do it. Way too obvious, especially this early. In fact, I'd be trying to keep you alive as long as possible as a distraction.
Obviously I can't vouch for Marco or Jandal. They could easily be mafia, but I have nothing to tell me they are. However, I think if you took an honest look at your actions the last few days, it'd be pretty damn obvious why people are voting for you without needing to be in "cahoots." You tried to piss everyone off, did, and now you're claiming that your attacks and poor strategies, harmful to the town, attracted only mafia members. That's asinine.
Also, going against the politician isn't some sacred rule not to be broken, The politician has no more insight than any of the rest of us, he just can break a tied vote.
Well I'll say stupid enough to vote for someone you think is town. And trying to convince a politician that you should vote someone who both of you think is town is fucking stupid. If you can't vouch for marco, then why are you voting the guy you think is town? That just doesn't make sense. Therefore there has to be something going on between you two.
Because how the hell could I vouch for anyone? Nobody's even freaking died yet!
Also, I never said I think you are town. Never. I have no idea where you're getting that. I said I'm not sure, and that I'm not sure about anyone, but that you acting like an asshat all of Day 1 made you the most suspicious of anyone to me. That's why I'm voting for you.
df_Trek wrote:
Im going out for a long bike ride now. When I'm back, to be clear, I'll vote for the less active player as the one got more profit with the situation we will be with 3/5 hours to go, unless something very striking will happen.
Ok then, I remain with my first idea and I lynch Sammyt93, because despite he was online today remained silent (from almost 44 hours now), and imo there are enough arguments to say something about. Hope this can wake up him, or someone else what think about it.
Remember town, df_Trek, at this point, is without a doubt mafia. Kill him tommorow, don't waste a night looking him up or anything, he must die. He couldn't have made his allegiance more obvious
df_Trek wrote:
Im going out for a long bike ride now. When I'm back, to be clear, I'll vote for the less active player as the one got more profit with the situation we will be with 3/5 hours to go, unless something very striking will happen.
Ok then, I remain with my first idea and I lynch Sammyt93, because despite he was online today remained silent (from almost 44 hours now), and imo there are enough arguments to say something about. Hope this can wake up him, or someone else what think about it.
Remember town, df_Trek, at this point, is without a doubt mafia. Kill him tommorow, don't waste a night looking him up or anything, he must die. He couldn't have made his allegiance more obvious
Also, we probably should not even be considering ryant the confirmed politician yet just because no one has counter claimed him. I mean, I have no reason not to believe him, but only 4 other people have been at all active in the thread since. A lot of people are MIA right now.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
baseballlover312 wrote:
Also, we probably should not even be considering ryant the confirmed politician yet just because no one has counter claimed him. I mean, I have no reason not to believe him, but only 4 other people have been at all active in the thread since. A lot of people are MIA right now.
