|
PCM 2013
|
| MartijnVDD |
Posted on 10-08-2013 19:23
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 801
Joined: 26-06-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
In real life, prize money goes to the rider instead of the team. |
| |
|
|
| Lachi |
Posted on 10-08-2013 19:23
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8516
Joined: 29-06-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
This has been discussed before. In short it has changed in this years game. Maybe because in real cycling the team doesn't get any money. Or to make the finances more predictable. |
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 22-11-2024 19:02
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| atlanta |
Posted on 11-08-2013 23:23
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1220
Joined: 31-07-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Gus isit possible tochange the Tour de Polond date and the Vuelta etc, also the wc. As in seconds season EBH was doing theTDF and he had to do Nor NC's and as a result wasted his peak. |
| |
|
|
| warchex |
Posted on 12-08-2013 22:39
|
Under 23
Posts: 63
Joined: 25-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
The AI riders are completely idiots in NC races. I just go in a breakaway with all my riders, and win with 50 min or so. Happened many times. Should be fixed Mr.Cyanide. |
| |
|
|
| Spilak23 |
Posted on 12-08-2013 22:45
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7357
Joined: 22-08-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
You shouldn't go in a break with all your riders. No surprise the AI is bad when you do that.
But breaks almost always survive in NC's, it's because of the smaller field.
|
| |
|
|
| lluuiiggii |
Posted on 12-08-2013 22:47
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8542
Joined: 30-07-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Spilak23 wrote:
You shouldn't go in a break with all your riders. No surprise the AI is bad when you do that.
Tbh if you do this in a normal race the peloton will instantly chase you; so it's not the "going in a break with all riders" that messes up the AI, it's just that AI in NCs is stupid (because of small fields) 
But Cyanide should really do something about it. Not even talking about the NCs, but it's not rare to experience weird AI in races with even 10, 12 teams (quite common in the lower level races).
Ah, and if free agents could take part in NCs as well it could help (at least one team would have 9 riders to chase).
Edited by lluuiiggii on 12-08-2013 22:48
|
| |
|
|
| Jesleyh |
Posted on 12-08-2013 22:50
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15274
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Yes, always been like that, also in PCM 12. Though I don't have a problem at bigger NCs(e.g. france, Belgium, NL, Italy)
Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy
PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
|
| |
|
|
| atlanta |
Posted on 13-08-2013 03:52
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1220
Joined: 31-07-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
atlanta wrote:
Gus isit possible tochange the Tour de Polond date and the Vuelta etc, also the wc. As in seconds season EBH was doing theTDF and he had to do Nor NC's and as a result wasted his peak.
Anyone? |
| |
|
|
| Ian Butler |
Posted on 13-08-2013 08:27
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 21854
Joined: 01-05-2012
PCM$: 400.00
|
lluuiiggii wrote:
Spilak23 wrote:
You shouldn't go in a break with all your riders. No surprise the AI is bad when you do that.
Tbh if you do this in a normal race the peloton will instantly chase you; so it's not the "going in a break with all riders" that messes up the AI, it's just that AI in NCs is stupid (because of small fields)
But Cyanide should really do something about it. Not even talking about the NCs, but it's not rare to experience weird AI in races with even 10, 12 teams (quite common in the lower level races).
Ah, and if free agents could take part in NCs as well it could help (at least one team would have 9 riders to chase).
But to be fair, in those .2 races, breakaway wins are muuuch more common than in WT races, so it isn't at all unrealistic  unless it happens every time... |
| |
|
|
| Avin Wargunnson |
Posted on 13-08-2013 08:57
|
World Champion
Posts: 14236
Joined: 20-06-2011
PCM$: 300.00
|
I doubt it is more than 10% in real life Ian, it is certainly much more in the game.At least from my exprience, when i am not pulling like crazy from the start.
|
| |
|
|
| lluuiiggii |
Posted on 13-08-2013 17:00
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8542
Joined: 30-07-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
I wasn't talking about normal breakaway wins (in NCs, yes, I was talking about that; in the small-field races part of the post, I just said "weird AI" ). More specifically, I meant ridiculous breakaway wins, where the peloton doesn't even try to chase the breakaway (and they win by 10~15 minutes, ruining the GC), or sometimes when the favorites of several teams attack towards the end of the stage and the peloton just stops completely, even if it means that a 5th place rider will lose his place on GC (just because he has a team mate who attacked, so he "feels" he doesn't have to do any work).
|
| |
|
|
| atlanta |
Posted on 14-08-2013 00:06
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1220
Joined: 31-07-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Can someone answer my goddamn question please  ? He he |
| |
|
|
| cactus-jack |
Posted on 14-08-2013 00:18
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3936
Joined: 31-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Lachi wrote:
This has been discussed before. In short it has changed in this years game. Maybe because in real cycling the team doesn't get any money. Or to make the finances more predictable.
Or just because Cyanide.
There's a fine line between "psychotherapist" and "psycho the rapist"
|
| |
|
|
| pavuk |
Posted on 14-08-2013 08:38
|
Free Agent
Posts: 147
Joined: 28-08-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
lluuiiggii wrote:
I wasn't talking about normal breakaway wins (in NCs, yes, I was talking about that; in the small-field races part of the post, I just said "weird AI" ). More specifically, I meant ridiculous breakaway wins, where the peloton doesn't even try to chase the breakaway (and they win by 10~15 minutes, ruining the GC), or sometimes when the favorites of several teams attack towards the end of the stage and the peloton just stops completely, even if it means that a 5th place rider will lose his place on GC (just because he has a team mate who attacked, so he "feels" he doesn't have to do any work).
I play mostly .2 races with my small CT and win a break 3 times (no more wins from others seen) most of gain time was about 2min 30sec, one time sprinters from peloton were just few bikes behind me. Had a 12 min lead once with group of 8 people, but we all lost it about 10 km before finish, so far I do not see a problem here
when i think about how many times is that, I would say probably 1:8, maybe a little more than in real, but I saw plenty of local races end with early break win, especially hilly ones with no big mountain so for me its ok.
Yep, thats me down here...
...The Wall. |
| |
|
|
| cio93 |
Posted on 11-09-2013 00:54
|
World Champion
Posts: 10845
Joined: 29-10-2007
PCM$: 500.00
|
So did anyone have sprint gameplay issues arise recently?
I'm playing this game since it's release and sprints were fine all the way (except for the acceleration bug).
In an OPQS career with FCD v1.21, everything went fine until the Giro.
Now, suddenly with ~6 km to go at the latest, all other sprint trains apart from mine fall apart without a visible reason, very few sprinters chose to follow mine (if at all) and the rest of the first 40 positions in the bunch is all GC riders.
Most others sprinters either slow down behind the destructed other trains or are just not visible at all.
Granted, the sprint field wasn't impressive, but the game usually does trains for 75 sprinters as well.
This happened in the Giro and continued until Eneco Tour where I am now.
I had stages where nothing except my sprint preparations indicated it's the closing kilometres of a flat stage.
I know there's the slow down bug (which sometimes seems to occur together with this), but at least there's some sort of a sprint later on there.
I'm really puzzled what changed the gameplay. I played several seasons with this database and the usual Patch 1.0.2.0 workaround for the participation bug without any problem.
Just an example of an incredibly ridiculous (even for PCM GT standards) Giro flat stage result...
Edited by cio93 on 11-09-2013 00:56
|
| |
|
|
| bhlloy |
Posted on 11-09-2013 01:55
|
Amateur
Posts: 5
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
I see maybe a similar thing in a career I started about a week ago, also with FCD 1.21. Not very far along but in the early tours, sprint finishes are usually my sprinter, maybe one or two other OK sprinters (but not necessarily the best) and then some GC guys. Figured I was just having some weird run of races until I saw your post.
I'm on Steam so not impossible a hotfix or update got installed without my knowledge but that's not something cyanide does right? Bizarre. I'll screenshot or copy some results shortly
EDIT - I guess don't have the results in latest results anymore, but notable ones I've been able to dig up include Santaromita podium place on stage 1 and stage 2 of Tour De San Luis, Acevedo podium place in flat stage of San Luis and Mzansi tour. Results maybe not as damning as I'd remembered but I do remember it was noticeable how there were no sprint trains
Edited by bhlloy on 11-09-2013 02:14
|
| |
|
|
| cio93 |
Posted on 11-09-2013 02:11
|
World Champion
Posts: 10845
Joined: 29-10-2007
PCM$: 500.00
|
Good to see I'm probably not paranoid
I don't use Steam, and I have all patches needed for the workaround on my HDD, so I'm pretty sure the data itself didn't change.
Which would lead to the conclusion that the game randomly decided to change important gameplay algorithms 
Edited by cio93 on 11-09-2013 02:12
|
| |
|
|
| bhlloy |
Posted on 11-09-2013 02:16
|
Amateur
Posts: 5
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
well, I'm going to continue this career until the patch comes out, so if I see anything again I'll try to screenshot it. But yes, my issue sounds very much like yours and I only see it in one career so far. Very strange. |
| |
|
|
| sammyt93 |
Posted on 11-09-2013 03:04
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3634
Joined: 03-07-2012
PCM$: 300.00
|
If you're both using the fcd DB then could it be something to do with that?
|
| |
|
|
| bhlloy |
Posted on 11-09-2013 03:31
|
Amateur
Posts: 5
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
It could definitely, although it would be hard to understand what effect a DB could have on AI like that. One thing the FCD does is have a lower limit at 60 (so there are no sprinters below 60 in the DB) which maybe has an evening out effect? But again, I've played a few test careers with earlier FCD versions and a couple with 1.21 specifically and haven't seen this issue before. That being said I do tend to sim most of the flat stages. I'm at a bit of a loss, was just strange that I've seen it in the last few days and boom, Cio's post comes up. |
| |
|
