PCM.daily banner
25-11-2024 09:06
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 65

· Members Online: 2
Laurens147, jt1109

· Total Members: 161,810
· Newest Member: ValerieSchippers
View Thread
PCM.daily » Pro Cycling Manager 2006-2020 » Pro Cycling Manager 2016
 Print Thread
PCM.daily Projects CT Stat Discussion
Ad Bot
Posted on 25-11-2024 09:06
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
jpgm97
Croatia14 wrote:
jpgm97 wrote:
Did he? If he crashed, I didn't knew anything about that. But yesterday we could only watch the last 40km or less, and there is nothing on the live feed. I only knew there was an early crash and Joshua Stritzinger and Isaac Rabat had to leave the race, but I didn't knew we was there. Where did you see that?
Daniel Silva should not be leading the team in normal circunstances, as they presented Rui Sousa as the leader. But he is 40 now, and he is not the same he was 2/3 years ago. Even thought Rui today attacked many times whitout results, and in the Torre stage he often does a good performance, even if he has a bad day a stage before. Also I don't know if Daniel can keep up like he is doing, because he is know for not being regular in his performances. And also he loses between 1 and 2 minutes to Rui in a TT. So Rui may even pass him in the GC. Yesterday I forgot to refer that in stage 3 Rui Sousa crashed when passing his hometown(of which he is president) and injured a wrist. It wasn't serious, but that migh have affected him.
For today i would not suggest stats change, as didn't see anything to justify it. Tomorrow is rest day. And wednesday is the queen stage(Torre).
And one more thing, what are you doing with my suggestions/tendencies? Sorry but I am curious about thatSmile. I know that I am not am no expert in stats and some may not be accurate. Just for curiositie.


https://www.radsport-news.com/sport/sp...100084.htm: A diary of Florian Nowak (riding for Christina Jewelry at the Volta) on radsport-news.com, where he explained the struggle after the crash, where the whole team tried to bring back Schuhmacher.

I compare this to other suggestions & race reports and then adjust the information and suggestions to our stat matrix for implementing them. Though I always doublecheck if some suggestions might be biased, which I guess is normal just to judge things from the most possible objective view.
As you give much more quality than findable reports I really take over a lot of your suggestions.

Interesting thoughts on Rui and Daniel!

@irdalopez: Yes, all the guys got updated after the Tour Alsace. Remember that Schachmann and Davies came from a break (so they got improved stats for succesful attacks in the mountains), while Mas and Frankiny are already on the Top of the U23 eligeable climbers list.


Thanks for the reply. I didn't know that website, even thought i don't speak german, but it can be understood by translanting with help of google.
Also Schumacher came here for the second time. He came here in 2014 and only did 27th, having his best results in the TT, like the last one when he did third, behing Victor de la Parte and Gustavo Veloso(who won) .
He isn't having good results in the last years. Also he has stats that are better than some of our best riders. Even still he think he may deserve only a little downgrade, not what I suggested before, without knowing the fall.
 
jpgm97
Croatia14 wrote:
& I have another question: can somebody explain me how Jaroslav Marycz came 5th at the RideLondon Classic? I mean, was it really him? He did nothing on Pro Cycling Level really for two years before...has somebody seen the last kilometers as the results also look kind of strange...

The last km can been seen here https://www.youtu...OSM-YrwgM.
I've watched the video and it's really him. I think it' a big surprise because of his latest resulsts. And he is aldredy 29. Hardly a rider will improve his abilities a this age.
Also it's a surprise the results of Wippert, Oss, and Swift. They have qualitie to fight for the win.
Maybe his result may be expained for the lack of qualitie or shape of the riders that are behind him in the classification(some may not be in good shape, and others aren't good sprinters).
Or maybe he simple improved. It's hard to know...
Edited by jpgm97 on 02-08-2016 11:44
 
jpgm97
As this stage is the Queen stage, and the last moutain stage, I will do a more complete report.
It was a very hard stage with two Special Categories(the biggest mountain in continental Portugal), even though they were very far from the end. But enought to select only 11 riders. After that there were some third categories, but it was still hard to ride(so hard that any rider who lost contact never came back to the main group) and then a more flat part. Mostly of the last km was uphill(Rui Sousa attacked, but didn't work, and then lost time) and had a part with 21% elevation with cobbles, in which Veloso attacked and won with a gap of 5 seconds to Daniel Silva. Raul Alarcón, Veloso team mate, did third.
Even thought there were 11 in front after the moutains, 5 were from W52-FC Porto Canal(Veloso, Vinhas, Carvalho, Alarcón and Mestre), 3 from Rádio Popular Boavista(Sousa, Silva and Figueiredo) and De Mateos(who now is 6th! We was only a good sprinter in our country until this year(even thought he aldredy won a sprint tage in the Volta, but now can keep up with the best clibers, without any team mate, and hold on on mountains with almost 2000 metres...what a surprise!), Casimiro, Amaro Antunes and Jóni who was in a breakway. Jóni attacked alone 86 km to the finish(no one countered), and only was catched 2 km to the finish. even though W52-FC Porto-Porto controlled all the race and the chase(no other rider from other team relayed in front), and accellerated in the right moments. The riders who done mainly the relaying to control and chase Jóni were Ricardo Mestre(who was relaying a lot in front the last days, in the most hard parts) and when he was tired and lost contact, António Carvalho applied a mad pace for many km until they reached to Jóni, who lost today 21 seconds to Veloso.
Tomorrow will be the first real flat stage, even thought there were others stage before ending in the sprint, but they had many climbs, even category 2 moutains. But our sprinters can pass well there, and fight for the stage. Then we will have two stages which can end in a sprint, but are more hard than tomorrow stage, but should not change many things in GC, in exception for Di Mateos who can get bonus seconds in the end.
Suggestions:
-Nocentini performed very bad today for a favourite to the GC, that he lost many time and now is 21th. He had a fall some days ago, but it wasn't anything serious that could make lose time, that even he said he was felling well and was going for a stage win today. Is truth that is team Sporting Clube de Portugal/Tavira hasn't many good riders, as some were hired at least minute, but didn't expect to perform like that. I really don't know what changes should I suggest to him, than dowgrading many points his stats.
-Rui Vinhas-he deserves at least 70 mountain and hills stats, as also pretty decent backup stats. The same for Carvalho, but his stats should be a little better than Vinhas, as he is the second best rider in the team.
-Raul Alarcón-around 69 moutains and hills, and also better backup stats.
-Jóni Brandão-What he done today shoud award him better backup stats, I think.
-Wilson Díaz-I know I aldredy said that, but for a rider who is in a trial with Funvic he is performing very good, and has the climber's jersey, which should be hard to get out of him, as he is attacking every day and there aren't that many moutains poinst to win.
-Di Mateos-His moutains and hills should at least 69 because he can not only keep up with the some of the best climbers, but also is in front of Amaro Antunes, who did 10th in Volta ao Algarve behind Aru, and many WT riders. I would never think he would perform like that.
-Daniel Silva-He should have same mountain and hills stats as Amaro Antunes and similar backup stats, as he is 3rd(even thought he may lose some places in the last stage that is a long TT) and he is finally showing his quality.
-Rui Sousa-He is still a good climber. Not the same from last years, but still better than Marque, Benta and Vilela(who came here to do a good place on the GC, not like José Gonçalves who came here to prepare the Vuelta, even thought Vilela may be there).So something around I suggestedsome time ago, may fit him.
-Henrique Casimiro-70 moutains, hills around 69/70 and backups around 67 for his good performance.
-Daniel Mestre-At least 66 or more at mountains. He may not be a climber but he is ahead of Nocentini in the GC, and can pass hard moutains, but he has to work for Jóni.

PS:Maybe you think I am exagerating in the stats of the riders of W52-FC Porto-Porto Canal, but this team dominates here in Portugal. First Marque won the Volta there with help of Veloso(the team had other name),and then he changed team, and Veloso won 2 in a row. The team this year is part of FC Porto, a very good football team, and in 4 years of existance, it prepares to have 4 wins in the Volta. The 5 riders who were in the main group, mostly of the stage could lead any team in Portugal. Mestre even won one in Clube de Ciclismo de Tavira. Maybe in some time it is possible to go to Pro Continental, as I think is now the objective of the team.

After today should not be many changes to suggest, only if some riders that are well classified, or underperforming, starts to show something different. In the TT, I will do a report of changes for the ones who fight for the GC, or others riders who performs well in that stage, and his stats are low to his performance.
Edited by jpgm97 on 04-08-2016 11:10
 
jpgm97
Croatia 14, even thought there are 4 stages to the Volta a Portugal ending, do you need help in others races? I may be avaiable to do that if you want.
Edited by jpgm97 on 04-08-2016 17:28
 
jpgm97
Today, José Gonçalves in the only real flat stag beat Samuel Caldeira(2nd, launched by Veloso, who did 4th) and Francesco Gavazzi(3rd).So he may deserve 70 flat and 71 sprint, to be in level of our best sprinters(the sprinters of portuguese teams), that are Di Mateos and Samuel Caldeira. Also I would give too 70 flat to the last two, and 69 to Gustavo Veloso.
PS: Di Mateos has better performances on more hard sprint endings(even thought he can perform well in flat endings), with small climbs. So maybe giving 69 flat would be better. Also he deserves backup stats around 68.
Edited by jpgm97 on 05-08-2016 21:32
 
matt17br
Thanks for all your inputs so far jpgm, it's hard to follow a Volta but your summaries make it all easier Smile
(Former) Manager of pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2020/Micros/gen.png Generali pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2020/Micros/gen.png
 
http://v.ht/Matt17
Spilak23
José Goncalves surely deserves more than 70 flat. He's easily the best rider outside a Volta. Showed last year during la Vuelta that he is WT level.

Stats should be something like 73 flat, 73 MO, 74 HI, 72 TT, good backups, 71 sprint, 73 acc and high fighter.
 
Croatia14
@jpmg: were the final few meters of the stage Ezquerra won steeply uphill?

Would also take some information on the last Burgos stage. Great to see Pardilla back up after that horrible time, but was it a breakaway or was he the strongest?
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/moty.png
 
Jorge14
Pardilla was the strongest and Ezquerra won by an attack with 5km to go and left the breakway
 
baseballlover312
Adrien Costa has been super impressive in Utah so far, but I want to see how he does up the summit finish today before I make a stat suggestion.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/avatar.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/forumthread.png
i.imgur.com/VCXYUyF.png
i.imgur.com/4osUjkI.png
 
jpgm97
Spilak23 wrote:
José Goncalves surely deserves more than 70 flat. He's easily the best rider outside a Volta. Showed last year during la Vuelta that he is WT level.

Stats should be something like 73 flat, 73 MO, 74 HI, 72 TT, good backups, 71 sprint, 73 acc and high fighter.

I agree with most of what you said, ´
I would suggest better on flat than I said, but as I am also portuguese(and he is one of my favourite riders), so maybe I am not the best person to give opinion on that. Maybe a 71 or 72 for now. And I would give 80 fighterWink. And also his backups are too low, for a rider who attacked almost everyday in the Vuelta, last year
I don't know if he is the best rider in the Volta. He could do 2nd place if he peakead por that. I doubt he could be Veloso. Also 73 accelaration seens to low for him, for what he done in one of the first hills stage of the Vuelta last year. Eurosport in Portugal even thought he was Valverde(because both had a green jersey that day) with that attack he managed to do. Maybe if he attacked a bit latter, he had the won the stage.
Edited by jpgm97 on 06-08-2016 21:27
 
jpgm97
Croatia14 wrote:
@jpmg: were the final few meters of the stage Ezquerra won steeply uphill?

Would also take some information on the last Burgos stage. Great to see Pardilla back up after that horrible time, but was it a breakaway or was he the strongest?


Sorry for not giving a report of the last stages, like I have done before. I've some changes to suggest, but I would wait for the end of the Volta, and I will post them in a row.
He was in the breakway like Jorge14 said. But the answer to your question is no. He attacked on downhill, and he was never catched, so maybe a downhill bost to around 70 would fit him. But the race yesterday was very akward. The main group went to the wrong way, and stayed there for 4 km, even thought the breakway got in right course. The organization then decided to stop the race for some time. I don't know if that affected the riders, but the breakway would lost much more time.
Also Daniel Mestre won today on a breakway.
Pardilla attacked on the 4km to the end and was never catched.
Edited by jpgm97 on 06-08-2016 21:28
 
jpgm97
Rui Vinhas has just won the Volta a Portugal, when no one expected, thanks to that breakway!
The stage(a long TT(more than 30km) and almost only flat) was won by Gustavo Veloso(team mate of Rui Vinhas), but Vinhas did the best TT of his carrer and got a 4th place in the stage, only losing 44 seconds. Raul Alarcón did the second place, Daniel Silva third(he really improved his TT), and Ricardo Mestre did 5h, which means that W52-FC Porto-Porto Canal placed 4 riders in the top 5! Rafael Reis could also be there, but he admitted he had "akward sensations" and was very tired(he was the first to work for his team mates in the all the stages, alongside Joaquim Silva) and couldn't go for the stage win. Rui Sousa had an problem in the stage(it wasn't reveald what was), but still managed to do a fairly good TT(9th place in the stage and in the GC) and Di Mateos had a puncture, and had to change to a normal bike, so he lost 2 places in the GC(but is still is a good place for a sprinter).
Wilson Díaz(Funvic- won the climber's jersey and was one of the most active riders here(attacking almost every day). Even thought he is in trial at Funvic, he most likely sign contract there or go to other Pro-Continental team, as he is a good rider. Gavin Mannion also fell, and the injurie seen serious, so he had to finish on foot holding his bike, with problems in walking.
The points jerseys went to Gustavo Veloso, thanks to his 3 stages wins, and always being well placed in the intermediate and final sprinters.
Alexander Vdovin won the youth jersey, that in the Volta is for riders with less than 23 years.
The Suggestions for what I seen today and some corrections:
Stefan Schumacher-Croatia 14, do you know how was he affected by the fall some days ago? He didn't performed bad today, but I was expecting better from him, so I would lower his TT to around 71/70, Please don't take my suggestion if the fall affected his performance.
Rafael Reis-Even thought he wasn't on his best shape today, and seens to perform better on prologues, than long TTs, even thought he done last year third in a similiar TT(he was 23 years old back then), also in the Volta behind José Gonçalves and Gustavo Veloso(who won) and this year did third in the National ITT Championship(that the course is also similar), with the same time of the second(José Mendes) losing 1.13 to Nélson Oliveira. So I would give 72 in prologue and for now I would keep his 71 TT, and the suggestions I gave some time ago.
-Gustavo Veloso-He was the strongest rider here, and also is the best Time-Trialist we have. He deserves 72TT and 72 Prologue.
-Raul Alarcón-70 in TT and also 69 prologue.
-Daniel Silva-68 Prologue and 69 TT. I think I aldredy suggested better backups for him, and the other GC riders, because they deserve it.
-Alejandro Marque-67 TT and Prologue. I think he hardly would do a Top 10 once again in the Volta, even thought his win in 2013.
-Rui Vinhas-69 TT, 68 endurance, 69 resistance and 70 recovery.
-Ricardo Mestre-68 Prologue and 69 TT.
-Jóni Brandão-70 Prologue and 68 TT.
-Rui Sousa-66 Prologue, 69TT and 69 recovery.
-Amaro Antunes(67 Prologue and 68 TT), Eloy Teruel(67 Prologue and 68 TT), Nocentini(69 Prologue and 68 TT), Henrique Casimiro(68 Prologue and 68 TT), António Carvalho(69 Prologue and 68 TT) and Daniel Mestre((68 Prologue and 68 TT).
-William Clarke-65 mountains and 66 hills).
-Jesús Ezquerra-64 moutains
-Samuel Caldeira-71 Sprint, 64 mountains and 66 hills.
-Davide Viganó-64 moutains.
-António Barbio-64 moutains and 65 hills, and also slighty better backup stats, even thougth he is a rider that I still don't know his real value.
-De Mateos-69 Prologue and around 67TT, as the puncture didn't let me realize how much he improved.
-Hugo Sabido-67 hills and decreasing 1 point in every other stat, as he lost days in a row, contact very easilywith the main group. He was one of the best here some time ago, but now every Volta he does, he has worse results.

I also have questions:
Oscar Brea-why isn't he in the game?
Domingos Gonçalves-why is his downhill 73? I don't remember performing like that. Maybe i am wrong.
And I think it's all for the Volta a Portugal.

If you have any question, I will try to reply in the same day.
Also I feel happy to contribute for the DB have more realistic stats of our portuguese teams, and if you need help to cover others race I am avaiable.
 
kodman
@Jpgm97 Just got a chance to read over your last few reports. Awesome job with great attention to detail, very informative for me as I didn't really get a chance to watch the Volta live except for maybe one sprint stage Embarassed
To answer your questions, 1st off Oscar Brea is in the DB, he's just named Oscar Gonzalez. Secondly, I think Domingos Goncalves has a 73 DH because of his good 2014 season with La Pomme Marseille, although I could be wrong, I didn't work on stats for the db back then in 2014.
If you've got any more suggestions, keep posting them because they're helping me out when I'm working on stats (for example I was working on stats for Wilson Rincon the other day and your suggestions helped out a lot)

For everyone else who reads or posts in this thread, I know me and Croatia (and Matt, and anyone who does stats in the db) appreciate suggestions on stats, so keep em coming Smile
 
jpgm97
kodman wrote:
@Jpgm97 Just got a chance to read over your last few reports. Awesome job with great attention to detail, very informative for me as I didn't really get a chance to watch the Volta live except for maybe one sprint stage Embarassed
To answer your questions, 1st off Oscar Brea is in the DB, he's just named Oscar Gonzalez. Secondly, I think Domingos Goncalves has a 73 DH because of his good 2014 season with La Pomme Marseille, although I could be wrong, I didn't work on stats for the db back then in 2014.
If you've got any more suggestions, keep posting them because they're helping me out when I'm working on stats (for example I was working on stats for Wilson Rincon the other day and your suggestions helped out a lot)

For everyone else who reads or posts in this thread, I know me and Croatia (and Matt, and anyone who does stats in the db) appreciate suggestions on stats, so keep em coming Smile


Thanks, I try to help in the stats of riders I know the most. It's understandble that the people who do the stats can't cover all the races. I've been watching the Volta for years,so I know well most of the riders.
What I fell is this thread han't many movement of suggestions compared to WT one, even thought that one doens't need that many suggestions because the stat makers watch that races. I mean, the stat makers watch that races regularly, but races of category 2.1 like Volta a Portugal(some years ago it were 2HC) it's hard to cover. And I want to help more than I did. So if there's a race you think you won't be avaiable to watch, say that I may be avaiable to do it, in order to make PCM 2016 more realistic.
About Domingos Gonçalves I didn't watch that racehe performed well, but the stats seens high compared to Filipe Cardoso downhill(it doesn't mean Domingos don't deserve 73), who is the rider with most technique in our teams. He can create gaps in downhills, and sometimes he has to stop a bit, in order that his team Efapel can follow him.
About Oscar González. It's a rider that I didn't know well, and every time his name appeared it was Oscar Brea. I had a slight suspect that he was in game, because he is part of his team since the start of 2016 season. I should have checked PCS.Embarassed., because I wanted to suggest changes for him. He could have done a good prologue, but had a mechanical problem in the end, wich made him lost time, so I think he deserves 68 in Prologue. As for TT, maybe around 66/67.
Another question, why has Rui Vinhas 70 in downhill? Maybe it's the right for him, but I am not certain.
PS: I forgot to mention that Hernâni Broco will retire in the end of the season
 
jpgm97
Another suggestion. Raul Alarcón deserves aroud 73/74 barouder and an example of that it's the the Climber's Jerseys he won in Castilla y León and Asturias.
 
Croatia14
Almost all of your suggestions have been implemented, some though with 1-2 points higher/lower. Still the wall of text are great help, even if I didn´t answer directly to some of them I wrote everything, verified it and implemented it.

To Schumacher: I have no real idea, in Nowaks diary in radsportnews.com he only told that the last 3 were just happy to reach the finishing line. For an injury we don´t know how much impact it had the result was reasonable I guess.

Counting in his other result I'd suggest 72/70.

To your offer: We´ll tell if we have some questions to races (the way we did today). But racing reports like yours with implemented stats suggestions always help us Smile

To Goncalves: This decision was also before my time and I honestly have never seen him descending. But I guessed that you don´t just give a rider a comparibly high DH just for random issues. If you say that he´s not that good I'll of course lower his downhill.
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/moty.png
 
asoutar
This isn't based on any recent results but just a general point. Chris Lawless is now the main sprinter at JLT Condor and should have slightly improved sprint stats while Downing and Briggs should be reduced because they look well passed it and operate in supporting roles for Lawless.
 
Croatia14
asoutar wrote:
This isn't based on any recent results but just a general point. Chris Lawless is now the main sprinter at JLT Condor and should have slightly improved sprint stats while Downing and Briggs should be reduced because they look well passed it and operate in supporting roles for Lawless.


thx for the input...put Lawless up to 71 Sprint while decreased Downing and Briggs to 70 sprint!
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/moty.png
 
jpgm97
Croatia14 wrote:
Almost all of your suggestions have been implemented, some though with 1-2 points higher/lower. Still the wall of text are great help, even if I didn´t answer directly to some of them I wrote everything, verified it and implemented it.

To Schumacher: I have no real idea, in Nowaks diary in radsportnews.com he only told that the last 3 were just happy to reach the finishing line. For an injury we don´t know how much impact it had the result was reasonable I guess.

Counting in his other result I'd suggest 72/70.

To your offer: We´ll tell if we have some questions to races (the way we did today). But racing reports like yours with implemented stats suggestions always help us Smile

To Goncalves: This decision was also before my time and I honestly have never seen him descending. But I guessed that you don´t just give a rider a comparibly high DH just for random issues. If you say that he´s not that good I'll of course lower his downhill.


About Domingos Gonçalves the problem is that he didn't really showed his real value like his twin brother José, even thought he had better results than him, when they were younger.
Now he even admitted in the Volta, in the stage he fell and had to leav the race, that he might leave cycling because he didn't wanted to be only one more rider, but maybe he was only frustrated. We expected more from him, but now he is 27 and if he not retires, it's hard for him to become a better rider. Still I hope he improves his results.
And his downhill I just can say 73 is high for him. I really don't know what value to give him than 70 or lower. But the person who gave him that stat may be right, because as some don't cover the Volta, I didn't saw other races he had good results(even thought there weren't many) like 2014 Tour of Almaty, when he did 4th.

I have other suggestion I just remembered now when I was writing this post.
-Victor de la Parte-For a rider who did 11th this year on the Tour of Suisse and other interesting results I fell his backup stats are too low. Something around 70 would fit him I think. And his time trial is low also, maybe 71. At least 70. I remember when he was part of Efapel in Volta 2014, where whe won the Prologue and Gustavo Veloso did second and Luis Léon Sánchez did third. Also in the the long TT he was only beaten by Veloso. Also Delio Fernández deserves also improved backup stats, as he is having decent results, and the last two year we was in the Volta a Portugal, he was the second best rider behind Veloso, even thougth in 2014 when he was in the front with Rui Sousa in the Torre Stage with Rui Sousa(who won the stage), he was asked to stop and help Gustavo Veloso(who had aldredy the Yellow Jersey), who was in a group behind him, when he could win the stage and maybe do second place on the GC, and last year he lost his second place because of a fall in the long TT.

Now I am really curious about how my suggestions where implemented into stats in game. But I will have to wait for the DB being uploaded, when you think it's done. So I have no hurry, and also I am happy for finally the Portuguese teams can have more realist stats in game.Smile
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Major crash
Major crash
PCM11: General Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,445 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,900 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.28 seconds