Andy is already little bit better.

Both the Schlecks probably deserve a higher mountain stat, dont forget that Frank won Alpe D'Huez last year

Totally agree SN

sorry if my english is bad

you're english is perfect Bjorni

What are O'Grady's stats (FL, SP, COB, STA)?

Arvesen only 70 in sprint...

what is Haedo's SP stat?

It looks like Voigt has still got 85 in fighting, "The Crab" as some call him!

arvesen - should have 74 at least in sprint
andy schleck - should have at least 79 in mountain
frank schleck - should have at least 80 in mountain

other than that it looks fine

80 is already crtitical for me...Piepoli is 80 Frank is not for me. I dont like databases where they are to many 84 climbers and sprinters.

Andys TT sklill is here biggest mistake.

I have to say....... with all my respect to the PCM team this is not good stats giving i mean come on.... Arvesen 70 in sprint!!
and all of the stats on the schleck bros. especially Andy are 2-3 times to low( i'm a big csc fan )..... And last voigt in Mountain is to low dont forget that he won Germany Tour and was sitting with the best riders(Leipheimer for exampel)

maybe we should see it in context of the other stats, if the other stats are as "bad" then the stats are perfect

Right DOMOMAN!

Arvesen should at least have 75 sp and Andy Schleck ~70 TT. Zabriskie maybe 73-75 in mountain

These stats suck. Look at Vande Velde. He was heralded as a top 10 finisher in the Giro last year and managed 24 last year in the tour after helping Sastre. Julich once stood on the podium on the Tour de France. Zabriskie TT? Silver medalist? frikken French have their heads up their ass.

Andy and franck should have better stats more better stats inn TT an mountain i think that the guys have forgotten the excellent performance of these both cyclists inj the last 2 seasons and don't forgot that Andy were the second in the giro d'Italia and that Franck won the Alpe D'Huez last Season.I hope that the stats are work on for the release of the game.

You can't look at single stats, there are so many parts that matter. It's not only MO stat that decides how well a rider can climb. It's several different stats. I can agree that a few stats are wrong, but Frank won one stage in tdf last year, Alpe d'Huez I know, but still only a stage. I think 78 is about right. Then Andy's stats is a bit to low, maybe 78 would be better.

I think Michaelsen should have 78 or 79 in cobbles. He prooved that in Paris-Roubaix.

I think that they should have made the stats as the last thing so we woulg be totally updated with the stats

don't u all agree

A lot of stats are wrong in this version of pcm... not only's csc so stay asured that it isn't subiectivism

Arvesen is the man!!!

Yeah! He has too low stats in sprint He took bettini in giro`d Italia! sprint....10th stage or somethin

Good site; where did you acquire the information for this post? I've read a couple of your posts so far and really like the way you write. Thank you so much, and please continue in my Paper Minecraft and your excellent work.