PCM.daily banner
22-11-2024 11:43
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 64

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,781
· Newest Member: mahisharma
View Thread
PCM.daily » Pro Cycling Manager 2006-2020 » Pro Cycling Manager 2012
 Print Thread
Expansion Pack: Stat Discussion
Alakagom
Well obviously there will be cobbled updates after Robuaix. I already did some, but Robuaix means end of cobbled classics so I can go through all of them and pickout riders that need increases and others that should decrease. Then after Ardennes, the hilly stats.

And after that with my update as of March 2013 of the PCT teams, we might release stat update after that. We'll see.
Edited by Alakagom on 31-03-2013 20:27
pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/avatar.png


pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/admin.png
 
SweatyViking
74 RES should also be OK, he is a tough nut, he never cracked in the Tirreno, and kept going and going today in the Flanders.
 
Pellizotti2
SweatyViking wrote:
74 RES should also be OK, he is a tough nut, he never cracked in the Tirreno, and kept going and going today in the Flanders.

It'd put him as 3rd highest in that stat in the whole DB, alongside a.o. Wiggins, Gilbert, Froome and Purito...
i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys14/kzi.png Manager of Kazzinc Procycling i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys14/kzi.png

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/storywriter.png

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/stagemaker.png
 
SweatyViking
Pellizotti2 wrote:
SweatyViking wrote:
74 RES should also be OK, he is a tough nut, he never cracked in the Tirreno, and kept going and going today in the Flanders.

It'd put him as 3rd highest in that stat in the whole DB, alongside a.o. Wiggins, Gilbert, Froome and Purito...


Didn't consider the fact that the highest stat is 76 Wink

Why is it like that BTW? We would probably see a lot more gaps and smaller groups if the whole scale was used.
 
lluuiiggii
SweatyViking wrote:
Why is it like that BTW? We would probably see a lot more gaps and smaller groups if the whole scale was used.

It's in fact the other way around. According to people's experience when the game was released, decent gameplay was only achieved by lowering the resistance stats:
https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....ost_533313
https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....ost_547230
 
MartijnVDD
I've always thought Roelandts' stats were a bit low, but now that he's actually proven himself several times I think it's time to raise them.

He's shown he's worth more than 74 cob, imo. He did pretty well in almost every cobbled race since his bad fall (including Muur stage in Eneco Tour). 75/76 cob?
I'm not sure about his hill stat. He won a hilly stage in Tour Med and finished 8th in Tirreno 30% climb stage, but he shouldn't be too strong. 72/73 hill?
 
Ollfardh
A lot of cobblers need updates, but I think the one that needs it most is Stijn Vandenbergh, he was there every race.
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
TTspecialist
Flecha to 79COB and Boonen to 80-81COB (from what we've seen in this season)
 
MartijnVDD
TTspecialist wrote:
Boonen to 80-81COB (from what we've seen in this season)

So if your preparation gets interrupted twice by illness and injury and you're forced to abandon twice due to a fall, you're less able to ride cobbled sections?
I thought he was quite impressive in E3, considering he had bad form, accelerated on the Taaienberg and finished 7th.
I don't remember Cancellara getting a drop in COB after his fall last year.

I agree about Flecha, though.
 
Ollfardh
TTspecialist wrote:
Boonen to 80-81COB (from what we've seen in this season)


Don't forget to set Ballan to 50 cobble Rolling Eyes
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 22-11-2024 11:43
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
TheManxMissile
why do people insist on talking about the big name riders from the big name races?
I am 1000000% certain Alakagom knows about these riders and races and will give them appropriate stats
i.imgur.com/UmX5YX1.jpgi.imgur.com/iRneKpI.jpgi.imgur.com/fljmGSP.jpgi.imgur.com/qV5ItIc.jpgimgur.com/dr2BAI6.jpgimgur.com/KlJUqDx.jpg[/img[img]]https://imgur.com/yUygrQ.jpgi.imgur.com/C1rG9BW.jpgi.imgur.com/sEDS7gr.jpg
 
Jesleyh
Okay.
In that case.

Maurits Lammertink(VCD)


I would give him a higher sprint value, and a bit higher hill value.

I explain:
He got 2 Vuelta a Catalunya Top 10's. One on a uphill sprint, one on a more downhill/flat one. I know that the field is weak, but your sprint is better than 60 if you can do that Wink
Also, he got 9th in the Ronde van Drenthe, and 18th(not that bad) in Volta Limburg.
He was pretty good last year too(A lot of U23 races, and 7th in Rund um Köln)

My suggestions are:
FL 62 -> 67
HI 67 -> 70
SP 60 -> 67
ACC 63-> 69
Little bit better energy stats.

Also, I wanted to post stats suggestions for Elmar Reinders, a 20 year old Dutchmen, who's having a pretty good season in CT, but then I realised that he rides for Metec and is probably not in-game Wink




i1326.photobucket.com/albums/u660/jesleyh/Junk/0ca5fb14-ed59-44b1-8eb0-596097ba5c01_zps8e97f370.jpg

Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy


PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
 
SweatyViking
Yoann Bagot should get a FL and HIL boost to around 71 after his performance on today's hilly stage in Pais Vasco...

1 Simon Gerrans (Aus) Orica-GreenEdge 4:06:33
2 Peter Velits (Svk) Omega Pharma-Quick Step
3 Angel Vicioso Arcos (Spa) Katusha
4 Francesco Gavazzi (Ita) Astana Pro Team
5 Jacob Fuglsang (Den) Astana Pro Team
6 Sergio Luis Henao Montoya (Col) Sky Procycling
7 Alberto Contador Velasco (Spa) Team Saxo-Tinkoff
8 Richie Porte (Aus) Sky Procycling
9 Nairo Alexander Quintana Rojas (Col) Movistar Team
10 Pieter Weening (Ned) Orica-GreenEdge
11 Tejay Van Garderen (USA) BMC Racing Team
12 Yoann Bagot (Fra) Cofidis, Solutions Credits
13 José Herrada Lopez (Spa) Movistar Team
14 Simon Spilak (Slo) Katusha
15 Rui Alberto Faria Da Costa (Por) Movistar Team
16 Alexsandr Dyachenko (Kaz) Astana Pro Team
17 Roman Kreuziger (Cze) Team Saxo-Tinkoff
 
fickman
I notice Taylor Phinney has 74 in Sprint, isnt that to high? I mean Dumoulin has also 74 and im not sure that Phinney is as good as Dumoulin sprinting.
 
Pellizotti2
fickman wrote:
I notice Taylor Phinney has 74 in Sprint, isnt that to high? I mean Dumoulin has also 74 and im not sure that Phinney is as good as Dumoulin sprinting.

He's better than you might think, but he doesn't show it too often due to targeting classics rather than sprints.

https://www.cqranking.com/men/asp/gen/...ceid=23998
https://www.cqranking.com/men/asp/gen/...ceid=23976
https://www.cqranking.com/men/asp/gen/...ceid=23153
https://www.cqranking.com/men/asp/gen/...ceid=22733
i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys14/kzi.png Manager of Kazzinc Procycling i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys14/kzi.png

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/storywriter.png

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/stagemaker.png
 
fickman
My mistake I was only looking at the CQ Sprint Subranking where Dumoulin has 84 points while Phinney only has 28.
Edited by fickman on 02-04-2013 16:39
 
Smal
Alakagom, I think the potential stats need a massive overhaul altogether. I got 3 or 4 seasons into the game and there are just way too many riders with high stats, especially in MO, compared to the beginning of the game.

July 2015
https://gyazo.com/...fad98c1351

https://gyazo.com/...877ecc6587

https://gyazo.com/...668fa49a67

Jan 2013
https://gyazo.com/...a62ad6219b

(and I think a couple of those like Sánchez and Gesink could come down a point anyway, but that's another matter).

As you can see there's 3 and a half pages in 2015 before you get a rider with as low as 78 MO, which is ridiculous considering 78 MO starts on the second page of riders in the original DB.

It's not only down to that level either, there's loads of riders with higher mountain stats than they'll ever achieve between 73-77 as well.

To solve the problem I've gone through quite a lot of riders and lowered their potential to 3/4/5/6 and kept a few at 7 depending on their age and how promising they look. For example I don't think anyone over 30 years old or so should be having a potential of over 4 really as they aren't going to get much better. I've also gone and given the top couple of hundred climbers a limit to their MO stat so the DB doesn't become unbalanced. When you've got domestiques of a fairly decent age like Cataldo and people of that ilk getting to 78/79 MO the game doesn't play as well.

I also think the age decline option could be used better so some riders start declining earlier so it's better balanced.

I'll happily share the file for you to have a look at it if you can recommend somewhere decent to upload it.
Edited by Smal on 06-04-2013 11:46
 
Jesleyh
Alakagom was talking about lowering potentials for current top-riders earlier, so he will look into it Wink

And Gesink won't be lowered, a lot of discussion has already took place about him here.
Maybe he gets lowered if he ruins his Giro(+ TdF) Wink
i1326.photobucket.com/albums/u660/jesleyh/Junk/0ca5fb14-ed59-44b1-8eb0-596097ba5c01_zps8e97f370.jpg

Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy


PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
 
Kentaurus
Smal wrote:
Alakagom, I think the potential stats need a massive overhaul altogether. I got 3 or 4 seasons into the game and there are just way too many riders with high stats, especially in MO, compared to the beginning of the game.


Smal take a look at the XML flies in my sig, this will help some... otherwise the biggest thing you need to do when starting a game is lower the evolution slider down to .2 or .3, this will keep most of the veterans from ever reaching their full potential.

Otherwise you could change the potential of riders down, which wouldn't be too hard to do. In fact I've modified the DB and uploaded it for you. Every rider has 1 less potential.
Kentaurus attached the following file:
pcmdaily2013db-lp.cdb [438.76kB / 74 Downloads]

Edited by Kentaurus on 06-04-2013 18:01
AZTECA - NBCSN pcmdaily.com/files/Micros16/azt.png
 
Dominik Nerz
Smal you are wasting your time if you think Gesink will ever get stats according to his performances. He could finish 100 at Giro and Tour and still get better stats than some guys in the top 10. If he crashes then he will keep his or even get better ones because we will never know what he could have done excuse and if not and he performs bad then he will keep his stats because hey he is just Robert Gesink. He is in the Database the Grand Tour winner that never was close to win a Grand Tour IRL and never will.
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Quite good so far...
Quite good so far...
PCM11: General Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.36 seconds