PCM.daily banner
24-11-2024 22:02
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 70

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,803
· Newest Member: actronspareparts
View Thread
PCM.daily » Pro Cycling Manager 2006-2020 » Pro Cycling Manager 2012
 Print Thread
Mountains and the peloton
Rasmusen
CrueTrue wrote:
CountArach wrote:
Wasn't there something posted up a while ago about resistance being far more important than it used to be? I doubt most modded DBs were away of that.


As I said, this was with the OfficialRelease, Cyanide's own DB.

I also want to point out that the results were alright on paper. The right riders won and some minor time gaps were registered. However, that doesn't change the fact that it was actually a bunch sprint between 20 riders despite hard pace from kilometre 0..


Well finally i succeed to thinout the bunch, its harder then before,
I did it on the mountain stage in swiss, and a giro stage.

Started last climb with 15 riders, small groups enterd the finish, while the mountains before 20 till max 50 riders

What i did the better flat riders relay 70 till 75, then last couple of km (20 to 30) before the first climb put them on 80 till 90 % before they die 99%
then as soon as the climb start, the good climbers on relay 75 till 80%, oo and the guys who died, keep position 75%.

Then riders start 2 lose connection and the final thin out i put my 2nd best climber on 80 infinityrelay, take his wheel with my main climber.
They will fall off like raindrops, and you will see the better climbers move up if the a bit behind in the pack.

Also i used a db from pcmbenelux
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 24-11-2024 22:02
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
PCM rulezz
Is there a difference between stage mode and career mode? I played a single stage and the results were awful (official release and RSM-news DB 2012). I had simulated to the giro in career mode ones and I don't think I had strange results there. What the hell is wrong with this game.
Winners never quit, quitters never win.

It's difficult not to be happy when you're surrounded by Belgians. - Mark Cavendish


 
Ennyzor
Well if you just play a single stage, every rider will be fit. In a Tour or Career mode, not all riders are gonna recover at the same rate, and their form wont be the same as all the other riders. I believe this is the reason why you get these wierd results on single stages.


If the Tour de France was only one stage IRL, then you would see some completely different results aswell.
Edited by Ennyzor on 14-07-2012 11:36
 
CountArach
Ennyzor wrote:
Well if you just play a single stage, every rider will be fit. In a Tour or Career mode, not all riders are gonna recover at the same rate, and their form wont be the same as all the other riders. I believe this is the reason why you get these wierd results on single stages.


If the Tour de France was only one stage IRL, then you would see some completely different results aswell.

I thought of this earlier. It might be worth seeing what the effect of the random fitness in career and stage mode would be.
i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys/PCT/bps_zps2b426596.png Manager of Team Bpost - Vlaanderen i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys/PCT/bps_zps2b426596.png

Follow me on Twitter
(All opinions expressed are not guaranteed to reflect reality)
 
PCM rulezz
Ennyzor wrote:
Well if you just play a single stage, every rider will be fit. In a Tour or Career mode, not all riders are gonna recover at the same rate, and their form wont be the same as all the other riders. I believe this is the reason why you get these wierd results on single stages.


If the Tour de France was only one stage IRL, then you would see some completely different results aswell.


That can be the reason, I didn't never think about that
Winners never quit, quitters never win.

It's difficult not to be happy when you're surrounded by Belgians. - Mark Cavendish


 
alex valceanu
Its all about REC . In a stage every rider will have excellnet recovery , but in stage race yhe GC riders will be very good and the others average/good and there wont be such a big peloton in the mountains .btw i said it before in this threadWink
 
CrueTrue
But as I also showed, I didn't really get remarkably better results in career mode despite playing with the latest patch and official DB.
 
http://www.pcmdaily.com
Vinofan
I used quite some time on the editor to make the REC differences between the best guys and the second best guys bigger. Everything seems to work better now actually (playing career mode and doing the tour atm with Radioshack)
 
purepasd
i785.photobucket.com/albums/yy134/purepasd/SaxoBlog/PCM0006.png
Just got this amazing realistic result with the OfficialRelease with 1.2.0.0 patch. It seems that It gives more realistic results than with the RSMDB, as some of you have also mentioned. I think it's something with the Resistance stat, which quite high in the RSMDB, but i of course don't know for sure.
 
purepasd
What would be the best way to get realistic results, when I have already started a career? Smile
 
tozequio
Problem is not just moutain AI. I've run some tests in Amstel Gold Race using PCM 2011 and 2012, and it was defintely better in 2011. For example, in PCM 2011, 30 km from the line, there was already some selection, with a main peloton of some 60 riders, and lots of attacks. In PCM 2012 the pack is almost complete (170 riders), and the one or other attack is quickly overriden by the bunch, which is only natural as teams have all the riders to work.

All tests with the last patch and original Cyanide DB. It seems to me the AI is defintely broken.
Edited by tozequio on 17-07-2012 22:35
 
lluuiiggii
Since you mentioned classics, it's a nice time to remember this, from one of Cyanide's interview (this one):
We also focused on the famous "écrémage" (dropping the riders in mountain/hills). This should look strange but we first tightened the difference between good and bad climbers, so it should be less powerfull in theory, but we also worked on a specific AI to make the riders save their energy when this is appropriate.

IRL, a lots of riders could hang more in the mountains than they do, however this is the first thing you learn when you're a non-climber neo-pro: do not waste your energy to make a top-40, save it for later when your sprinter or your leader will need you!

When I read that I didn't like it. Ok, the stage races might get more realistic, but what about the classics? Like 5 and 8 rider groups finishing together in P-R wasn't enough, the difference between riders will now be even closer?
 
tozequio
lluuiiggii wrote:
Since you mentioned classics, it's a nice time to remember this, from one of Cyanide's interview (this one):
We also focused on the famous "écrémage" (dropping the riders in mountain/hills). This should look strange but we first tightened the difference between good and bad climbers, so it should be less powerfull in theory, but we also worked on a specific AI to make the riders save their energy when this is appropriate.

IRL, a lots of riders could hang more in the mountains than they do, however this is the first thing you learn when you're a non-climber neo-pro: do not waste your energy to make a top-40, save it for later when your sprinter or your leader will need you!

When I read that I didn't like it. Ok, the stage races might get more realistic, but what about the classics? Like 5 and 8 rider groups finishing together in P-R wasn't enough, the difference between riders will now be even closer?

Even in stage races it doesn't work well IMO. Just had a finish on stage 4 of the Giro del Trentino, in Passo Pordoi, in career mode, where 44 riders arrived in the same time of the winner. Original DB, last patch.
 
CrueTrue
I never got around to try the previous patches much, but from what I have been told the gameplay was much better in the V1 of the game.

I'll probably revert back at some point next week to try it out, but it'd be nice too if other could give it a try.
 
http://www.pcmdaily.com
petz_e
Weren't these the exact words in a press release earlier this year about the new features?

"Another mountain change is the fact riders who don't have ambitions on a certain stage will decide to drop off earlier rather than fighting to hang on. In real life, a lots of riders could hang for longer in the mountains than they actually do, however this is the first thing you learn when you're a non-climber neo-pro: do not waste your energy to make a top-40, save it for later when your sprinter or your leader needs you."

I really hope that Cyanide will look into this an provide a fix in the next update. Are they aware that there might be a problem with this?

.

 
Lachi
They have so many things to fix, that I doubt they will tweak the AI. But you are free to post this problem on their forum if you have not already.
 
tellico
tozequio wrote:
Problem is not just moutain AI. I've run some tests in Amstel Gold Race using PCM 2011 and 2012, and it was defintely better in 2011. For example, in PCM 2011, 30 km from the line, there was already some selection, with a main peloton of some 60 riders, and lots of attacks. In PCM 2012 the pack is almost complete (170 riders), and the one or other attack is quickly overriden by the bunch, which is only natural as teams have all the riders to work.

All tests with the last patch and original Cyanide DB. It seems to me the AI is defintely broken.

I just played Amstel in career mode, and play was great. Lots of attacks, finish Gilbert, Vinokurov and my Chavanel. Next: few small groups and two main. For me its great. Patch 1.1.0.3, DB PCM France v3.
 
Avin Wargunnson
tellico wrote:
tozequio wrote:
Problem is not just moutain AI. I've run some tests in Amstel Gold Race using PCM 2011 and 2012, and it was defintely better in 2011. For example, in PCM 2011, 30 km from the line, there was already some selection, with a main peloton of some 60 riders, and lots of attacks. In PCM 2012 the pack is almost complete (170 riders), and the one or other attack is quickly overriden by the bunch, which is only natural as teams have all the riders to work.

All tests with the last patch and original Cyanide DB. It seems to me the AI is defintely broken.

I just played Amstel in career mode, and play was great. Lots of attacks, finish Gilbert, Vinokurov and my Chavanel. Next: few small groups and two main. For me its great. Patch 1.1.0.3, DB PCM France v3.

Well, install 1.2.0.0 and your gameplay will start to suck Smile
I'll be back
 
MacC
I have to say i haven't done any big mountians atges yet but I have done the Mountain satge in Oman and Aundulicia ( I think) and the game play was fine- I even attacaked and all

That was in career mode with new patch and real name DB
Edited by MacC on 18-07-2012 11:28
 
purepasd
MacC wrote:
I have to say i haven't done any big mountians atges yet but I have done the Mountain satge in Oman and Aundulicia ( I think) and the game play was fine- I even attacaked and all

That was in career mode with new patch and real name DB

I just did exactly the same stages, and the gameplay sucked.
1.2.0.0 and RSM.
The peloton came to the finish all together, in all the stages.
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
The devil is here!
The devil is here!
PCM 08: Official Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.35 seconds