PCM.daily banner
25-11-2024 10:35
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 57

· Members Online: 1
Ollfardh

· Total Members: 161,811
· Newest Member: eganyu
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Cycling
 Print Thread
News in January
issoisso
Schleck96 wrote:
issoisso wrote:
Unexpected? It was quite public back then, they made big offers to many big names such as Nibali, Cunego, Gilbert.

Aquarius wrote:
Team Blanco is investigating LLS relationships with Dr Fuentes around 2006.
It's assumed he was his "patient" at that time, while riding for Liberty-Seguros.


Yep, because the name "L. Sánchez" clearly written in the Puerto documents could've been anyone.

7 years later. Pathetic.


Testing Armstrong samples and other stuff 7+ years later isn't pathetic but this thing is? Nice logic


2 things, fanboy:

1. I never said testing Armstrong's samples 6 years later (not 7, get your facts straight) wasn't pathetic. Don't put words in my mouth

2. The Armstrong case was far more pathetic. They re-tested the samples just to improve the testing methods and did their best to keep who the samples belonged to under wraps.

If it wasn't for Damien Ressiot blowing the lid on the whole scandal it would've been buried so deep we still wouldn't know about it to this day
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
Schleck96
Fanboy? Did I in any word of that comment defend Armstrong? No I didn't.

1- I didn't say that you said this or that and I didn't say anything directly to you or to anyone in this forum, just in general.

2- I don't give a flying f*** if they re-tested the samples to improve this or that. They did it and that's all that matters.
Edited by Schleck96 on 28-01-2013 21:03
 
issoisso
Schleck96 wrote:
Fanboy? Did I in any word of that comment defend Armstrong? No I didn't.


Not in that one, no

Schleck96 wrote:
1- I didn't say that you said this or that and I didn't say anything directly to you or to anyone in this forum, just in general.


Yes you did. You commended my "great logic", implying that I had made stated it.

Schleck96 wrote:
2- I don't give a flying f*** if they re-tested the samples to improve this or that. They did it and that's all that matters.


So, you're agreeing you were wrong?
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
Schleck96
issoisso wrote:
Schleck96 wrote:
Fanboy? Did I in any word of that comment defend Armstrong? No I didn't.


Not in that one, no

Schleck96 wrote:
1- I didn't say that you said this or that and I didn't say anything directly to you or to anyone in this forum, just in general.


Yes you did. You commended my "great logic", implying that I had made stated it.

Schleck96 wrote:
2- I don't give a flying f*** if they re-tested the samples to improve this or that. They did it and that's all that matters.


So, you're agreeing you were wrong?


1- If you thought it was to you then you thought in a wrong way, I'm not the one to blame for that. Maybe you assumed it was too you because it is a really shittly logic.

2- I'm wrong in what? I just know that they re-tested those samples and used them many years later. And that's it,
 
issoisso
Come back when you know what argument you're trying to make :lol:
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
Crommy
So, the UCI disband the Independent Commission, and will launch their own Truth and Reconciliation Commission(TRC) instead
https://www.cyclin...commission

The UCI stated it would launch the TRC "later this year" and once it was complete a report would be published "in full".


In other news, Pope still Catholic
emoticons4u.com/happy/042.gif
 
ShortsNL
issoisso wrote:
Come back when you know what argument you're trying to make :lol:


The argument he's trying to make is that launching an investigation revolving around events that happened 6-7 years in the past is almost common practice in today's world of cycling, and therefore your statement that it's 'pathetic' seems out of place.

Also, I don't quite see how what he posted makes him a fanboy, nor of whom. It sounds in fact like a pointless ad hominem.
Edited by ShortsNL on 28-01-2013 22:15
 
Schleck96
ShortsNL wrote:
issoisso wrote:
Come back when you know what argument you're trying to make :lol:


The argument he's trying to make is that launching an investigation revolving around events that happened 6-7 years in the past is almost common practice in today's world of cycling, and therefore your statement that it's 'pathetic' seems out of place.

Also, I don't quite see how what he posted makes him a fanboy, nor of whom. It sounds in fact like a pointless ad hominem.


This.
 
Gustavovskiy
ShortsNL wrote:
issoisso wrote:
Come back when you know what argument you're trying to make :lol:


The argument he's trying to make is that launching an investigation revolving around events that happened 6-7 years in the past is almost common practice in today's world of cycling, and therefore your statement that it's 'pathetic' seems out of place.

Also, I don't quite see how what he posted makes him a fanboy, nor of whom. It sounds in fact like a pointless ad hominem.

Sorry but no. He compared the LL Sanchez situation with the re-testing of Armstrong's samples. You can't put the 2 in the same bag because they've got nothing to do with each other.
Get this: nobody is re-testing anything in this LL Sanchez case, they're just 'researching' data which has been known since the Operacion Puerto scandal
Manager of pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2024/Micros/eve.png Everesting pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2024/Micros/eve.png
 
Schleck96
I guess that you misreadead. I compared the time that has passed since the ending of the Operacion Puerto with the time that had passed on the Armstrong case. Not the situation itself.
 
baseballlover312
7 years = 12 years?
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/avatar.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/forumthread.png
i.imgur.com/VCXYUyF.png
i.imgur.com/4osUjkI.png
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 25-11-2024 10:35
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
issoisso
Crommy wrote:
So, the UCI disband the Independent Commission, and will launch their own Truth and Reconciliation Commission(TRC) instead
https://www.cyclin...commission

The UCI stated it would launch the TRC "later this year" and once it was complete a report would be published "in full".


In other news, Pope still Catholic


In 2 months: "TRC goes rogue. UCI threatens disbandment"
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
fickman
Crommy wrote:
So, the UCI disband the Independent Commission, and will launch their own Truth and Reconciliation Commission(TRC) instead
https://www.cyclin...commission

The UCI stated it would launch the TRC "later this year" and once it was complete a report would be published "in full".


In other news, Pope still Catholic


They almost make me cry. They really belive someone is going to belive they are searching the truth??? If u dont know anything about cycling u can even think WADA and USADA are the bad guys the way UCI made that bulletin.
 
Gustavovskiy
Schleck96 wrote:
I guess that you misreadead. I compared the time that has passed since the ending of the Operacion Puerto with the time that had passed on the Armstrong case. Not the situation itself.

Sorry mate but you're taking this the wrong way. If you want to overlook why these 2 different situations surfaced then imo there's no point in comparing them as identical.
Manager of pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2024/Micros/eve.png Everesting pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2024/Micros/eve.png
 
The-Pot
So much fun watching two portuguese arguing with each other in english.
 
Avin Wargunnson
The-Pot wrote:
So much fun watching two portuguese arguing with each other in english.

Correction: three Portugese Pfft
I'll be back
 
Ian Butler
Yeah, come on, it's good. Everyone meant something totally different, just don't kill each other okay? Pfft
 
TheManxMissile
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1...1/21240896

I'll put this here as it is about cycling for the most part.
I found it interesting at least
i.imgur.com/UmX5YX1.jpgi.imgur.com/iRneKpI.jpgi.imgur.com/fljmGSP.jpgi.imgur.com/qV5ItIc.jpgimgur.com/dr2BAI6.jpgimgur.com/KlJUqDx.jpg[/img[img]]https://imgur.com/yUygrQ.jpgi.imgur.com/C1rG9BW.jpgi.imgur.com/sEDS7gr.jpg
 
Crommy
Royal Spanish Cycling Federation (RFEC) call on the Spanish Sports Council to exempt Alberto Contador from the Operation Puerto investigations

https://inrng.tumb...sh-cycling
emoticons4u.com/happy/042.gif
 
Spilak23
https://twitpic.com/bxkxiz


And a question: Vicioso has never been suspended right?

EDIT: Looked again. The arrow from LLS also comes from AC so they both took the same as JJ.
Edited by Spilak23 on 29-01-2013 14:14
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Gesink
Gesink
PCM11: Funny Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,445 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,900 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.44 seconds