|
Race Planners 2013
|
| jack888 |
Posted on 25-12-2012 14:32
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1280
Joined: 09-06-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Maybe the rest day is included? 
|
| |
|
|
| jack888 |
Posted on 27-12-2012 15:14
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1280
Joined: 09-06-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Dam, I forgot to mention that I'm going away for a week over new years. If I can find access to excel it will probs not support macros.
I'll keep checkig pcm every day to see what the story is. Worst case scenario I send mine back next weekend.
|
| |
|
|
| jph27 |
Posted on 27-12-2012 20:43
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7339
Joined: 20-03-2010
PCM$: 900.00
|
At the moment, non-macro is preferred so I can open it on my tablet, so I'm happy to wait  |
| |
|
|
| SotD |
Posted on 28-12-2012 19:06
|
World Champion
Posts: 12188
Joined: 29-11-2006
PCM$: 2980.00
|
I will struggle to fill in mine until the 7th of january at the very earliest.
|
| |
|
|
| alexkr00 |
Posted on 28-12-2012 19:14
|
World Champion
Posts: 13915
Joined: 05-08-2008
PCM$: 300.00
|
So, should we just edit the files ourselves and put 8 instead of 9 stages for California?
|
| |
|
|
| Smowz |
Posted on 28-12-2012 19:30
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6479
Joined: 09-04-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Its what I've done alex.
|
| |
|
|
| SportingNonsense |
Posted on 29-12-2012 17:30
|
Team Manager
Posts: 33046
Joined: 08-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Yes, just change it yourself.
|
| |
|
|
| viking90 |
Posted on 29-12-2012 21:38
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4032
Joined: 24-01-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
My wildcard races isn´t in my race planner, shouldn´t them be there? |
| |
|
|
| Bjartne |
Posted on 29-12-2012 21:42
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 2907
Joined: 15-07-2007
PCM$: 300.00
|
Scroll all the way over to the right, and you'll find them behind the "Race day use" and "Race clashes" |
| |
|
|
| viking90 |
Posted on 29-12-2012 21:46
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4032
Joined: 24-01-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Scroll all the way over to the right, and you'll find them behind the "Race day use" and "Race clashes"
Well, it´s getting late isn´t? 
Haha, thanks! |
| |
|
|
| SotD |
Posted on 29-12-2012 22:28
|
World Champion
Posts: 12188
Joined: 29-11-2006
PCM$: 2980.00
|
A lot of races have extremely tough looking hilly stages, but no mountain stages.
What are the hill/mountain ratio of the stages in eg. Vuelta al Pais Vasco?
It's really difficult to spot whether it's a race doable for Ulissi or if it needs either Contador or Fothen. The same goes for both Paris-Nice and Tirreno-Adriatico.
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 24-11-2024 17:57
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| niconico |
Posted on 29-12-2012 22:31
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4102
Joined: 09-07-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Putting together Pluchkin's program of 49 race days has proved difficult, so watch out Bakelants! 
|
| |
|
|
| alexkr00 |
Posted on 29-12-2012 22:33
|
World Champion
Posts: 13915
Joined: 05-08-2008
PCM$: 300.00
|
niconico wrote:
Putting together Pluchkin's program of 49 race days has proved difficult, so watch out Bakelants!
Why would Bakelants fear Pluchkin?
|
| |
|
|
| Spilak23 |
Posted on 29-12-2012 22:34
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7357
Joined: 22-08-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
I agree SotD, especially with the new profiles used for pcm 12. They make it a lot harder to judge whether the hilly stage is mountainious or easier.
|
| |
|
|
| niconico |
Posted on 29-12-2012 22:39
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4102
Joined: 09-07-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
@alex: Well, he wants to win that Liege race, right?
|
| |
|
|
| alexkr00 |
Posted on 29-12-2012 22:40
|
World Champion
Posts: 13915
Joined: 05-08-2008
PCM$: 300.00
|
Spilak23 wrote:
I agree SotD, especially with the new profiles used for pcm 12. They make it a lot harder to judge whether the hilly stage is mountainious or easier.
Not really since now you can see the climb's category.
SotD, I would say most of those stages are for Ulissi rather than Contador even though they are a bit harder than the classics, I would say so Ulissi might struggle in them. I think puncheurs with a good back-up mountain stat are the best riders for those stages.
|
| |
|
|
| alexkr00 |
Posted on 29-12-2012 22:41
|
World Champion
Posts: 13915
Joined: 05-08-2008
PCM$: 300.00
|
niconico wrote:
@alex: Well, he wants to win that Liege race, right?
I thought Pluchkin's goal is to win the Tour, not Liege
Edited by alexkr00 on 29-12-2012 22:41
|
| |
|
|
| niconico |
Posted on 29-12-2012 22:43
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4102
Joined: 09-07-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Yeah that one too of course
|
| |
|
|
| Spilak23 |
Posted on 29-12-2012 22:45
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7357
Joined: 22-08-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Last year, brighter red meant steeper slope so you could judge the slopes much better which is more important imo but I understand the point you make
|
| |
|
|
| SotD |
Posted on 29-12-2012 22:45
|
World Champion
Posts: 12188
Joined: 29-11-2006
PCM$: 2980.00
|
SotD, I would say most of those stages are for Ulissi rather than Contador even though they are a bit harder than the classics, I would say so Ulissi might struggle in them. I think puncheurs with a good back-up mountain stat are the best riders for those stages.
Obviously I would put Ricco or Cunego into Tirreno if I had them, but I don't. So the question of whether putting the best possible hilly rider inthere or the subtop hilly rider, who are also the best climber of the team inthere is difficult I think.
For me it's pretty much a question as to whether or not I should sacrifice the Tour de France in terms of a GC rider. I don't exactly have a rider that will be able to podium in it anyway. And if I get a 10th place at the TdF, that could probably be better used somewhere else where Contador could podium.
|
| |
|
