|
Frank Schleck Positive
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 25-11-2024 07:33
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| deek12345 |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:12
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 2761
Joined: 13-06-2009
PCM$: 360.00
|
was it a performance enhancing drug,cos hes been shit all year obviously didnt work
Edited by deek12345 on 17-07-2012 20:12
|
| |
|
|
| alexkr00 |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:12
|
World Champion
Posts: 13915
Joined: 05-08-2008
PCM$: 300.00
|
issoisso wrote:
alexkr00 wrote:
Yeah, it's awesome how some guys accuse others of doping but when it's about their favorite riders: no, no way he would do that.
I'm sure even after proven guilty (like the Fuentes thing wasn't enough) some Schleck fan boys still won't admit that he's been doping.
Look on the bright side: It's the first positive news the Schlecks have had all season
Also, I'm surprised one of Bruyneel's guys gets caught while riding for his team. They usually got caught after they've left the team.
|
| |
|
|
| doddy13 |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:12
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7891
Joined: 04-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
rest day.
duh.
There's no point slapping a schleck - Sean Kelly on "Who needs a slap"
|
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:13
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
sutty68 wrote:
So, All you people who have been accusing SKY of being the dopers within the TDF are now eating your words 
Frank ''DRUGGY'' Schleck is the rider who has been caught, bet you didn't see that coming
Makes you wonder how many other Radioshack riders will be caught within the coming days doesn't it
A guy we've been criticizing for years for being a doper, and who is a proven client of Dr. Fuentes, we didn't see that coming?
Wow, that's....dumb on so many levels.
Seriously sutty...
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
| |
|
|
| Guido Mukk |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:13
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15830
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
sutty68 wrote:
So, All you people who have been accusing SKY of being the dopers within the TDF are now eating your words
there is no reason to give up accusing SKY. Fränk positive test makes SKY rides 100% clean?..it does not make sense
Edited by Guido Mukk on 17-07-2012 20:14
|
| |
|
|
| alexkr00 |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:14
|
World Champion
Posts: 13915
Joined: 05-08-2008
PCM$: 300.00
|
laidbackmarc wrote:
fcancellara wrote:
This is also not a good thing for the Armstrong case; Bruyneel again involved in a doping case.
What do you mean with not good? Is it "not good" if cheaters like Bruyneel, Fränk Schleck and Lance Armstrong (yes) get's punished?
This is no surprise BTW, Schleck has always been suspicious. Schleck was riding for Bjarne, he have two peaks every season: ardennes and the Tour etc...
It's not good from Armstrong's point of view 
|
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:14
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Guido Mukk wrote:
sutty68 wrote:
So, All you people who have been accusing SKY of being the dopers within the TDF are now eating your words
there is no reason to give up accusing SKY. Fränk positive test makes SKY rides 100% clean..it does not make sense
Yeah, that part of his post is equally WTF
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
| |
|
|
| doddy13 |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:15
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7891
Joined: 04-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Guido Mukk wrote:
sutty68 wrote:
So, All you people who have been accusing SKY of being the dopers within the TDF are now eating your words
there is no reason to give up accusing SKY. Fränk positive test makes SKY rides 100% clean..it does not make sense
ahh yes. But... it's funny cause Kirchen said to wait for a B Sample to accuse him of doping, however he's been happy to accuse Sky based on not even having an A Sample.
There's no point slapping a schleck - Sean Kelly on "Who needs a slap"
|
| |
|
|
| Kirchen_75 |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:15
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7702
Joined: 24-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Alakagom wrote:
Kirchen_75 wrote:
Before we come to conclusions and render Frank Schleck doper we should wait for B-Sample
Seems very ironic coming from you
However, I wonder what he tried too mask. Makes me wonder now when he started all those excuses ' I am too tired for Tour', ' I had a long season'. Now I can see why he said that
I'm saying because why would he dope during the Tour. He had no chance of a good result. Why would you do that... It's that ridiculous to dope in his situation that i hardly can believe he doped. |
| |
|
|
| lluuiiggii |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:15
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8542
Joined: 30-07-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
sutty68 wrote:
So, All you people who have been accusing SKY of being the dopers within the TDF are now eating your words
Frank ''DRUGGY'' Schleck is the rider who has been caught, bet you didn't see that coming
Makes you wonder how many other Radioshack riders will be caught within the coming days doesn't it
Yes, the same Frank Schleck who is arguably among the best climbers in the world, doped, cannot keep up with Sky boys in the mountains. I can't see how that helps Sky's accusation.
|
| |
|
|
| ruben |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:15
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7721
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
sutty68 wrote:
So, All you people who have been accusing SKY of being the dopers within the TDF are now eating your words
Yes because Schleck doping proves Sky is clean
 |
| |
|
|
| felix_29 |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:16
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3054
Joined: 08-08-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
roberpesca wrote:
No surprise here. Every professional cyclist is on drugs.
You´re the expert, no doubt about that.
|
| |
|
|
| Ybodonk |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:16
|
Domestique
Posts: 510
Joined: 24-07-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Guido Mukk wrote:
issoisso wrote:
Or if you're using it to mask other drugs in doping tests...
This is more like it
Agreed.
But in reality it doesnt make him a bigger "cheater" compared to the others. They are on the same, and uses the same methods. Franck Schleck was at his peaking maybe in top 5 of the best climbers in the world. This really puts his accomplisments in perspective , compared to the very best in the world.
But like i have mentioned and critized before was that he made a big money transfer to E.Fuentes back in the day. And he didnt get any penalty because they bought his stupid explanation :" I was buying training programs from Mr.Fuentes" yeah right 
Anyway its sad because once again we have to listen to all the critics about cycling being a dopers sport. All this negative PR will lead to less sponsors = less money = less interest and so on.
Sad sad.. I really hope they just soon will allow everyone to have a maximum of lets say 55 haemotocrit value, so everyone will dope up until that, and everyone have equal chances to do the same thing.
This will go on, cycling will soon die if they continue to "catch" dopers.
Valverde
Contador
Pantani
Virenque
Vinokourov
Kaschekin
Ullrich
Basso
Mancebo
Sevilla
Shumacher
M.Rasmussen
Iban Mayo
Di Luca
Garzelli
Beloki
Hamilton
Landis
Ricco
Botero
The whole old Team Telekom+USP
The list goes on 
I really miss all these BIG names, and many many GC stars.
Most of these guys was forced out because of O.P Puerto and made a comeback way weaker than before.
We are losing so many fantastic and entertaining riders because of this stupid system.
In the Armstrong era, everyone in top 10-15 have been caught or involved with doping. Do they really want to rewrite the whole history ? Let number 59 be the winner of TDF.
The surface of the cycling world does look cleaner but come on, everything is still going on as always. They are just better at hiding it. Maybe they should let it be that way, or accept doping as a part of cycling and let everyone dope up to the exact same haemotocrit value. |
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:16
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Radioshack announce they've pulled him from racing.
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
| |
|
|
| Alakagom |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:18
|
World Champion
Posts: 10891
Joined: 19-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Kirchen_75 wrote:
Alakagom wrote:
Kirchen_75 wrote:
Before we come to conclusions and render Frank Schleck doper we should wait for B-Sample
Seems very ironic coming from you
However, I wonder what he tried too mask. Makes me wonder now when he started all those excuses ' I am too tired for Tour', ' I had a long season'. Now I can see why he said that
I'm saying because why would he dope during the Tour. He had no chance of a good result. Why would you do that... It's that ridiculous to dope in his situation that i hardly can believe he doped.
Diuretic is a masking agent. That means he probably doped before the Tour and used Xipamide to hide it. It's certainly interesting though.
|
| |
|
|
| Kirchen_75 |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:18
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7702
Joined: 24-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Also i'd like to say Fränk Schleck IS NOT my favourite rider and i don't try to defend him. Just saying his case is that much of RIDICILOUS one you would have to be INCREDIBLY stupid to use doping in his situation, there is no need to do this. That's why i say wait for B-Sample... |
| |
|
|
| SweatyViking |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:18
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1040
Joined: 19-06-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Who's next in line? |
| |
|
|
| SweatyViking |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:19
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1040
Joined: 19-06-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
OlegTinkov wrote:
Schleck = RadioShack-Nissan = Team RadioShack = Leopard Trek = Astana = Discovery Channel = US Postal Service = Bruyneel = Gallopin = de Mol = Ekimov = Azevedo = Yates = Lapage = Osipon = Doping = Armstrong = Schleck = RadioShack-Nissan = Team RadioShack = Leopard Trek = Astana = Discovery Channel = US Postal Service = Bruyneel = Gallopin = de Mol = Ekimov = Azevedo = Yates = Lapage = Osipon = Doping = Armstrong = Schleck = RadioShack-Nissan = Team RadioShack = Leopard Trek = Astana = Discovery Channel = US Postal Service = Bruyneel = Gallopin = de Mol = Ekimov = Azevedo = Yates = Lapage = Osipon = Doping = Armstrong = Schleck = RadioShack-Nissan = Team RadioShack = Leopard Trek = Astana = Discovery Channel = US Postal Service = Bruyneel = Gallopin = de Mol = Ekimov = Azevedo = Yates = Lapage = Osipon = Doping = Armstrong = Schleck = RadioShack-Nissan = Team RadioShack = Leopard Trek = Astana = Discovery Channel = US Postal Service = Bruyneel = Gallopin = de Mol = Ekimov = Azevedo = Yates = Lapage = Osipon = Doping = Armstrong
Gallopin? Excuse-moi? |
| |
|
|
| felix_29 |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:20
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3054
Joined: 08-08-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Please, Oleg, with that logic you could make any rider a doper.
|
| |
|
|
| Alakagom |
Posted on 17-07-2012 20:21
|
World Champion
Posts: 10891
Joined: 19-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
SweatyViking wrote:
Gallopin? Excuse-moi?
Alain Gallopin. DS at RSNT.
|
| |
|
