sobrano wrote:
the 1st stage of "settimana ciclista lombarda" (in the end of august) is a normal stage considered as a TT
so this stage is a TT stage of 170km!!!
It's already reported (always read the first post to see if your bug has already been reported). You can fix it by opening the DB, finding the first stage (STA_stage) of the Setmana Lombarda and changing the fkID_stage_type from 2 to 1.
I'm adding/editing some races and using the PCMdaily 2012 DB as a base, while checking the variants I found out that:
- most 2012 races are not included as variants so they will only be played in 2012 and never again after that (I know you already know this lluuiiggii but I just wanted to put it in this thread since it's the bug report )
- Can't remember if it was v5_top_vuelta_01_svam or v5_top_vuelta_02_svam (in Gran vuelta a Espana_05.descr) is mentioned without _svam, I noticed after opening it with notepad that it is in the line above.
timpiej wrote:
- Can't remember if it was v5_top_vuelta_01_svam or v5_top_vuelta_02_svam (in Gran vuelta a Espana_05.descr) is mentioned without _svam, I noticed after opening it with notepad that it is in the line above.
Yes, it's the stage 2 which has this problem. This bug though hasn't and wouldn't be reported here because the .rules file of the Vuelta do not include variants 4, 5 and 6 (added in the 2012 DB). Not sure which bug is worse (3 vuelta's missing from the variants or a stage which would crash because of mispelled file name) At least on the way it was released it doesn't crash.
sobrano wrote:
Euskaltel have a ghost back whell in TT stages
i fixed myself this issue changing the number of "fkIDequipment_marques_roue" in DYN_team xml file, i changed 43 in 50 to apply campagnolo set to Euskaltel.
now anything work well
So, if you want to change this, you need to look into the STA_bonus_superprestige , and change the value for gene_ilist_bonus, because the game put into this column the (240,150,120,108,96,84,72,60,53,48,
43,39,35,31,28,25,23,21,19,17,15,13,
12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5,5,5,5,5,5,5,5,5,5,5) valor for monuments, and this is wrong.
P.S. Sorry for my englihs, i hope you can understand Edited by canojuancho on 04-04-2012 19:21
Although those are not the exact the values used by CQ, there's a difference between the points given by monuments (which they classify as 1.WT1) and the other WT classics (classified as 1.WT2), as can be seen here: https://cqranking.com/men/asp/gen/cate...?year=2011
Btw, could you enter a space between the numbers.. makes the message area of the page wider and messes up the layout of the site, quite annoying
Edit: oh wait, just checked in the DB and it seems I misunderstood you.. I thought you said that the game gave more points for monuments compared to the other WT classics (which, as I wrote above, would be normal for CQ Ranking), but what you're saying is actually that the game gives the same amount of points for both races (when in fact it should be different)?
Edited by lluuiiggii on 04-04-2012 19:24
Edit: oh wait, just checked in the DB and it seems I misunderstood you.. I thought you said that the game gave more points for monuments compared to the other WT classics (which, as I wrote above, would be normal for CQ Ranking), but what you're saying is actually that the game gives the same amount of points for both races (when in fact it should be different)?
You are still misunderstood me, the game, gives (240,150,120,108,....) for WT Classics like Gent, or E3, but, for monuments the value is the same, which is wrong according the CQ system points, that gives 275, 180, 145, 132, ... etc.
Edit: oh wait, just checked in the DB and it seems I misunderstood you.. I thought you said that the game gave more points for monuments compared to the other WT classics (which, as I wrote above, would be normal for CQ Ranking), but what you're saying is actually that the game gives the same amount of points for both races (when in fact it should be different)?
You are still misunderstood me, the game, gives (240,150,120,108,....) for WT Classics like Gent, or E3, but, for monuments the value is the same, which is wrong according the CQ system points, that gives 275, 180, 145, 132, ... etc.
Yes, that's what I understood later: what you're saying is the game gives the same amount of points for both races when it should be different (WT classics are kinda ok, but monuments should receive more).
Yes, I already understood, since the edit of my first post. I also agree monuments could have a bit more points with it. Also remember that this isn't a DB bug, the original DB is like that (I don't think this has been edited for the Daily DB - and unlikely in other DBs as well). There are several differences between the CQ Ranking point matrix and this one. It doesn't really represent the CQ Ranking, it justs represents a 3rd ranking in the game and since the CQ is one of the most popular, the DB makers usually change this ranking name to 'CQ'. Another difference from this and the CQ ranking is that the TdF gives the same amount of points as the Giro & Vuelta in this one, while it doesn't in CQ.
There can be several disadvantages to changing the ranking system. It may not matter in PCM11, but in previous games, it could break the sponsor happiness part of the game if you tweaked it too much.
the second stage of second year of vuelta di espana have a crash after about 100km
the stage is (Granada-Cordoba)
i turned around at the bug by a graphic detail redution to 0-0-0-0
with any graph detail set to 0 the stage work well, so
i think the cause of the crash is in some fail bulding.
Edited by sobrano on 06-04-2012 01:23
)
At least on the way it was released it doesn't crash.
