|
TdF'13 Stage 11: Avranches to Mont-Saint-Michel (July 10)
|
| SSJ2Luigi |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:39
|
World Champion
Posts: 11971
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 400.00
|
Rzrassman wrote:
Can someone plz update Froome-bot Stats for PCM 13?
MO 85
HL 85
TT 83
RS 80
that's too unrealistic. you need to low the competition to around 73 or something like that
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 25-11-2024 13:45
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| Spilak23 |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:39
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7357
Joined: 22-08-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
2 minutes between 2 and 13. Atleast that fight will be exciting
|
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:40
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
doddy13 wrote:
Rzrassman wrote:
Can someone plz update Froome-bot Stats for PCM 13?
MO 85
HL 85
TT 83
RS 80
Not going to lie, in PCM06 I changed all of my teams riders on the DB to 85 in everything. Well, it's fun to win right?
Mads Kaggestad
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
| |
|
|
| CountArach |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:40
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8290
Joined: 14-07-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Current GC:
https://www.procyc...?id=132524
|
| |
|
|
| Strydz |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:40
|
Team Leader
Posts: 5894
Joined: 02-08-2011
PCM$: 1625.00
|
poznaniakk1986 wrote:
MICHAŁ KWIATKOWSKI - AMAZING TALENT!
I think he will fade in the Alps but yes he really is coming along and it will be interesting to see what type of rider he becomes.
Hells 500 Crew and 6 x Everester
Don Rd Launching Place
Melbourne Hill Rd Warrandyte
Colby Drive Belgrave South
William Rd The Patch
David Hill Rd Monbulk
Lakeside Drive Emerald
https://www.everesting.cc/hall-of-fame/ |
| |
|
|
| doddy13 |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:41
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7891
Joined: 04-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
issoisso wrote:
doddy13 wrote:
Rzrassman wrote:
Can someone plz update Froome-bot Stats for PCM 13?
MO 85
HL 85
TT 83
RS 80
Not going to lie, in PCM06 I changed all of my teams riders on the DB to 85 in everything. Well, it's fun to win right?
Mads Kaggestad
Obviously 
There's no point slapping a schleck - Sean Kelly on "Who needs a slap"
|
| |
|
|
| arthon |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:41
|
Domestique
Posts: 581
Joined: 22-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Can somebody explain to me, since he's obviously stronger than any other contenders, why wouldn't Froome be content with just following any major attacks, instead of obliterating the field? A 10 minute winning gap would be terrible for his image. |
| |
|
|
| Miguel98 |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:41
|
World Champion
Posts: 10497
Joined: 23-06-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
issoisso wrote:
doddy13 wrote:
Rzrassman wrote:
Can someone plz update Froome-bot Stats for PCM 13?
MO 85
HL 85
TT 83
RS 80
Not going to lie, in PCM06 I changed all of my teams riders on the DB to 85 in everything. Well, it's fun to win right?
Mads Kaggestad
|
| |
|
|
| cosmic |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:41
|
Stagiare
Posts: 171
Joined: 28-06-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Spilak23 wrote:
2 minutes between 2 and 13. Atleast that fight will be exciting
Not really, cause UK Postal will ride the crap out of everyone, so no one are capable of attacking. It's gonna be the same boring shit as last year  |
| |
|
|
| abysmo |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:42
|
Free Agent
Posts: 129
Joined: 08-06-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
2:14 separating 2nd from 10th. this could have been a great race, if not for that shameless doped-up cyborg.
someone feed him a spoiled fish already. and some sour milk. might throw in some poisonous mushrooms, too, while they're at it. still not sure that is enough to stop him. |
| |
|
|
| Strydz |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:43
|
Team Leader
Posts: 5894
Joined: 02-08-2011
PCM$: 1625.00
|
arthon wrote:
Can somebody explain to me, since he's obviously stronger than any other contenders, why wouldn't Froome be content with just following any major attacks, instead of obliterating the field? A 10 minute winning gap would be terrible for his image.
Greed
Hells 500 Crew and 6 x Everester
Don Rd Launching Place
Melbourne Hill Rd Warrandyte
Colby Drive Belgrave South
William Rd The Patch
David Hill Rd Monbulk
Lakeside Drive Emerald
https://www.everesting.cc/hall-of-fame/ |
| |
|
|
| Jacdk |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:43
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 910
Joined: 20-07-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Dont know about the rest of you, but this to me shows the sport isent more clean
1 C. Froome Team Sky 42:29:24
2 A. Valverde Movistar +3:25
3 B. Mollema Belkin +3:37
4 A. Contador Saxo-Tinkoff +3:54
5 R. Kreuziger Saxo-Tinkoff +3:57
Top 5 without Froome
1 A. Valverde Movistar 45:33:00
2 B. Mollema Belkin +12
3 A. Contador Saxo-Tinkoff +29
4 R. Kreuziger Saxo-Tinkoff +32
5 L. ten Dam Belkin +46
Also how great would it be for the race if the 2nd was true.
Edited by Jacdk on 10-07-2013 16:44
|
| |
|
|
| CountArach |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:43
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8290
Joined: 14-07-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
arthon wrote:
Can somebody explain to me, since he's obviously stronger than any other contenders, why wouldn't Froome be content with just following any major attacks, instead of obliterating the field? A 10 minute winning gap would be terrible for his image.
Because Froome wants to make this so completely destructive to everyone that he is guaranteed Tour leadership for the rest of his career.
|
| |
|
|
| Ste117 |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:44
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3684
Joined: 21-02-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
I wish the 2nd was true also as Valverde is my favourite rider 
MG Team manager Team Ticos Air Costa Rica
 |
| |
|
|
| Pellizotti2 |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:44
|
World Champion
Posts: 10121
Joined: 01-05-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
CountArach wrote:
arthon wrote:
Can somebody explain to me, since he's obviously stronger than any other contenders, why wouldn't Froome be content with just following any major attacks, instead of obliterating the field? A 10 minute winning gap would be terrible for his image.
Because Froome wants to make this so completely destructive to everyone that he is guaranteed Tour leadership for the rest of his career.
This. Trying to prove that there wouldn't be any discussion, even if Wiggins were to return to 2012 form.
|
| |
|
|
| Roman |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:45
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4386
Joined: 29-05-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
So in the end, today one doper beats another.
Really nice stage by Kreuziger anyway, he showed he is as strong as Contador even in a time trial, fantastic. Hopefully Riis will allow him to ride for himself and not look after Contador all the time in mountains as podium is really, really close to him...
|
| |
|
|
| black_alecs_x |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:45
|
Junior Rider
Posts: 25
Joined: 15-04-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Froome isn't doped. He use trainers, you know "God Mode Enabled". |
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:46
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Pellizotti2 wrote:
CountArach wrote:
arthon wrote:
Can somebody explain to me, since he's obviously stronger than any other contenders, why wouldn't Froome be content with just following any major attacks, instead of obliterating the field? A 10 minute winning gap would be terrible for his image.
Because Froome wants to make this so completely destructive to everyone that he is guaranteed Tour leadership for the rest of his career.
This. Trying to prove that there wouldn't be any discussion, even if Wiggins were to return to 2012 form.
Yep, he wants to prove to everyone that Wiggins shouldn't have the slightest say in team leadership no matter what
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
| |
|
|
| Stromeon |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:46
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3507
Joined: 06-10-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Jacdk wrote:
Top 5 without Froome
1 A. Valverde Movistar 45:33:00
2 B. Mollema Belkin +12
3 A. Contador Saxo-Tinkoff +29
4 R. Kreuziger Saxo-Tinkoff +32
5 L. ten Dam Belkin +46
Also how great would it be for the race if the 2nd was true.
Indeed - those gaps are quite close and the race for second should be interesting.
Might skip the Alps and watch the Ashes - far more interesting and less one-sided 
|
| |
|
|
| juszta |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:46
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1175
Joined: 24-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Roman wrote:
So in the end, today one doper beats another.
Isn't that what cycling is about?  |
| |
|
