ACC stat has some effect in mountain stages? because i think that Froome is the rider who accelerates stronger and faster than any other climber in my opinion you need to considerate that stat in all climbers.
Edited by canojuancho on 22-07-2013 19:04
canojuancho wrote:
ACC stat has some effect in mountain stages? because i think that Froome is the rider who accelerates stronger and faster than any other climber in my opinion you need to considerate that stat in all climbers.
It affects how fast you go when attacking.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
canojuancho wrote:
ACC stat has some effect in mountain stages? because i think that Froome is the rider who accelerates stronger and faster than any other climber in my opinion you need to considerate that stat in all climbers.
That's his full retard mode. Usually, he slowly works his way back.
canojuancho wrote:
ACC stat has some effect in mountain stages? because i think that Froome is the rider who accelerates stronger and faster than any other climber in my opinion you need to considerate that stat in all climbers.
That's his full retard mode. Usually, he slowly works his way back.
I wouldn't call it retard mode, since it get him the Tour win with quite some minutes to spare
canojuancho wrote:
ACC stat has some effect in mountain stages? because i think that Froome is the rider who accelerates stronger and faster than any other climber in my opinion you need to considerate that stat in all climbers.
That's his full retard mode. Usually, he slowly works his way back.
I wouldn't call it retard mode, since it get him the Tour win with quite some minutes to spare
Exactly why cio is right.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
Froome deserves high ACC but it would make him unbeatable in mountain top finish sprints (sprint stat doesn't matter in this case) which isn't realistic so I would leave him at mid 70~
canojuancho wrote:
ACC stat has some effect in mountain stages? because i think that Froome is the rider who accelerates stronger and faster than any other climber in my opinion you need to considerate that stat in all climbers.
That's his full retard mode. Usually, he slowly works his way back.
I wouldn't call it retard mode, since it get him the Tour win with quite some minutes to spare
Exactly why cio is right.
So attacking on a mountain, shaking all competition and winning the Tour with 4'20" is retard mode?
canojuancho wrote:
ACC stat has some effect in mountain stages? because i think that Froome is the rider who accelerates stronger and faster than any other climber in my opinion you need to considerate that stat in all climbers.
That's his full retard mode. Usually, he slowly works his way back.
I wouldn't call it retard mode, since it get him the Tour win with quite some minutes to spare
.
Exactly why cio is right.
So attacking on a mountain, shaking all competition and winning the Tour with 4'20" is retard mode?
Please explain this to me
2 words: Mont Ventoux
Edited by Miguel98 on 22-07-2013 19:56
EDIT: or is that just about the way he looks when attacking? I thought it was mentally, as in stupid-decision moronic.
Edited by Ian Butler on 22-07-2013 19:59
In other words, he should've held back from showing his absolute top for 2 reasons:
1. It's a stage race. If you do that you fade at the end
2. He could've at least made his performances credible
And that's why we started saying he should've never gone full retard
EDIT: The original term comes from that fact that if you portray a realistically mentally handicapped person on a movie you won't win an oscar.
If you instead portray a slow but charismatic character that's nowhere near a realistic depiction of a retarded person...you'll probably win the oscar.
Sean Penn in I Am Sam was amazing. No Oscar because his character was realistically challenged and Hollywood only likes 'Inspirationally Challenged'
Edited by issoisso on 22-07-2013 20:02
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
Alakagom wrote:
Discussion is going off topic. Discuss this somewhere else please.
Why do you hate movies?
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
