PCM.daily banner
25-11-2024 03:23
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 66

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,805
· Newest Member: DP28
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Cycling
 Print Thread
De Ronde van Vlaanderen 2015
Shonak
Eden95 wrote:
Gotta feel for GVA, second straight podium and he put everything into it.

BMC had the numbers earlier on, they should have chased harder. Class ride by GVA once more though! As well as Sagan.
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
Strydz
Shonak wrote:
Eden95 wrote:
Gotta feel for GVA, second straight podium and he put everything into it.

BMC had the numbers earlier on, they should have chased harder. Class ride by GVA once more though! As well as Sagan.


GVA's attack on the Paterberg was MASSIVE! should of been closer to the front but them the classics
Hells 500 Crew and 6 x Everester
Don Rd Launching Place
Melbourne Hill Rd Warrandyte
Colby Drive Belgrave South
William Rd The Patch
David Hill Rd Monbulk
Lakeside Drive Emerald
https://www.everesting.cc/hall-of-fame/
 
Shonak
ryant wrote:
looks like its all aboard the Benoot hype train Grin very good day from him as well as Elmiger and Devolder Grin

Yeah Alak is probably raging hard reading our hype comments. Pfft
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
Kirchen_75
TIESJ HYPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
 
Shonak
Strydz wrote:
Shonak wrote:
Eden95 wrote:
Gotta feel for GVA, second straight podium and he put everything into it.

BMC had the numbers earlier on, they should have chased harder. Class ride by GVA once more though! As well as Sagan.


GVA's attack on the Paterberg was MASSIVE! should of been closer to the front but them the classics

Yeah, he was incredible. But before that attack, BMC had the numbers and they didn't do anything. Only Lotto Soudal I think? Should have kept it a bit closer and who knows what would have happened. Hoping for GVA or Vanmarcke in Paris-Roubaix but who am I kidding? Kristoff is the man to beat.
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
ryant
Ollfardh wrote:
Kristoff so strong today, well deserved. Terpstra was an idiot taking him to the line. Van Avermaet very strong as well, that Paterberg attack was the most impressive one I've seen.

Benoot is awesome. Like I said last week, Lotto should've given him leadership instead of letting him work for Roelandts.

Vanmarcke, I just don't know. It's not like him to be that far in the back without a reason.


Dont go that far... Roelandts is the proven and better classics rider now IMO, not that I'm bashing him, just that its a bit ludicrous to say he should have been leader (looked like he had a free role anyway, didn't work for Roelandts too much either)
i65.photobucket.com/albums/h220/ryant15/yorkshire_zpsw1qiv8uk.png

Banana John St Ledger in Team Bunzl-Centrica and Team U25Banana

Red Bull Driver in RFactor
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 25-11-2024 03:23
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
Stromeon
Gotta feel sorry for Terpstra: 2nd at Omloop, 2nd at Gent-Wevelgem, and now 2nd here.
i.imgur.com/55sT7og.png Coldeportes i.imgur.com/55sT7og.png

Vamos Nairo! #SueñoAmarillo
 
Wilier
Shonak wrote:
ryant wrote:
looks like its all aboard the Benoot hype train Grin very good day from him as well as Elmiger and Devolder Grin

Yeah Alak is probably raging hard reading our hype comments. Pfft


That's what you for being a hipster, hyping riders before they were cool. Pfft
 
Riis123
Shonak wrote:
Riis123 wrote:
Strydz wrote:
Extixx EPIC FAIL once again.... Kristoff is an animal


Nah, Kristoff was just better

Come on, he didn't even try once he and Kristoff were gone. Not even on Paterberg. He played some tactical games and then he was thinking, what? That he'd win against Kristoff. In a sprint. Suuure. :lol:


Look, if he was stronger, he had tried for sure, but probably bet his money on Kristoff needing to sit at the front for the last couple of kilometres to hold GVA and Sagan back which to me seemed like a solid tactic at the moment. Its easy to sit afterwards and say the QS played it all wrong etc. while ppl absolutely love to do, but I didnt see any tactical flaw in how they played it as a team and how Terpstra played the finale. If he felt he was stronger and indeed could leave him behind, guess what - he probably had done that.

No doubts in my mind that the strongest rider won today.
 
Wilier
Riis123 wrote:
Shonak wrote:
Riis123 wrote:
Strydz wrote:
Extixx EPIC FAIL once again.... Kristoff is an animal


Nah, Kristoff was just better

Come on, he didn't even try once he and Kristoff were gone. Not even on Paterberg. He played some tactical games and then he was thinking, what? That he'd win against Kristoff. In a sprint. Suuure. :lol:


Look, if he was stronger, he had tried for sure, but probably bet his money on Kristoff needing to sit at the front for the last couple of kilometres to hold GVA and Sagan back which to me seemed like a solid tactic at the moment. Its easy to sit afterwards and say the QS played it all wrong etc. while ppl absolutely love to do, but I didnt see any tactical flaw in how they played it as a team and how Terpstra played the finale. If he felt he was stronger and indeed could leave him behind, guess what - he probably had done that.

No doubts in my mind that the strongest rider won today.


+1 agree with you completely.
 
Strydz
Riis123 wrote:
Shonak wrote:
Riis123 wrote:
Strydz wrote:
Extixx EPIC FAIL once again.... Kristoff is an animal


Nah, Kristoff was just better

Come on, he didn't even try once he and Kristoff were gone. Not even on Paterberg. He played some tactical games and then he was thinking, what? That he'd win against Kristoff. In a sprint. Suuure. :lol:


Look, if he was stronger, he had tried for sure, but probably bet his money on Kristoff needing to sit at the front for the last couple of kilometres to hold GVA and Sagan back which to me seemed like a solid tactic at the moment. Its easy to sit afterwards and say the QS played it all wrong etc. while ppl absolutely love to do, but I didnt see any tactical flaw in how they played it as a team and how Terpstra played the finale. If he felt he was stronger and indeed could leave him behind, guess what - he probably had done that.

No doubts in my mind that the strongest rider won today.


Don't doubt Kristoff was stronger but in no way Extixx could of thought that Terpstra could of beaten him in the sprint. I just don't think Extixx have played the tactics well in this classics season
Hells 500 Crew and 6 x Everester
Don Rd Launching Place
Melbourne Hill Rd Warrandyte
Colby Drive Belgrave South
William Rd The Patch
David Hill Rd Monbulk
Lakeside Drive Emerald
https://www.everesting.cc/hall-of-fame/
 
Ollfardh
ryant wrote:
Ollfardh wrote:
Kristoff so strong today, well deserved. Terpstra was an idiot taking him to the line. Van Avermaet very strong as well, that Paterberg attack was the most impressive one I've seen.

Benoot is awesome. Like I said last week, Lotto should've given him leadership instead of letting him work for Roelandts.

Vanmarcke, I just don't know. It's not like him to be that far in the back without a reason.


Dont go that far... Roelandts is the proven and better classics rider now IMO, not that I'm bashing him, just that its a bit ludicrous to say he should have been leader (looked like he had a free role anyway, didn't work for Roelandts too much either)


Roelandts's only achievement is that 3rd place in Ronde he got due to smart riding and 2 guys dragging him along. What Benoot showed the last few weeks is incredible. I'm not saying the entire team should've worked for him, but he should've been co-leader at least.
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
Kirchen_75
Wilier wrote:
Riis123 wrote:
Shonak wrote:
Riis123 wrote:
Strydz wrote:
Extixx EPIC FAIL once again.... Kristoff is an animal


Nah, Kristoff was just better

Come on, he didn't even try once he and Kristoff were gone. Not even on Paterberg. He played some tactical games and then he was thinking, what? That he'd win against Kristoff. In a sprint. Suuure. :lol:


Look, if he was stronger, he had tried for sure, but probably bet his money on Kristoff needing to sit at the front for the last couple of kilometres to hold GVA and Sagan back which to me seemed like a solid tactic at the moment. Its easy to sit afterwards and say the QS played it all wrong etc. while ppl absolutely love to do, but I didnt see any tactical flaw in how they played it as a team and how Terpstra played the finale. If he felt he was stronger and indeed could leave him behind, guess what - he probably had done that.

No doubts in my mind that the strongest rider won today.


+1 agree with you completely.


+2. Kristoff won the race. Super strong
 
ryant
Riis123 wrote:
Shonak wrote:
Riis123 wrote:
Strydz wrote:
Extixx EPIC FAIL once again.... Kristoff is an animal


Nah, Kristoff was just better

Come on, he didn't even try once he and Kristoff were gone. Not even on Paterberg. He played some tactical games and then he was thinking, what? That he'd win against Kristoff. In a sprint. Suuure. :lol:


Look, if he was stronger, he had tried for sure, but probably bet his money on Kristoff needing to sit at the front for the last couple of kilometres to hold GVA and Sagan back which to me seemed like a solid tactic at the moment. Its easy to sit afterwards and say the QS played it all wrong etc. while ppl absolutely love to do, but I didnt see any tactical flaw in how they played it as a team and how Terpstra played the finale. If he felt he was stronger and indeed could leave him behind, guess what - he probably had done that.

No doubts in my mind that the strongest rider won today.



Yeah, if Terpstra had anything he would have attacked on the Paterberg but it became clear that he was the one suffering, not Kristoff, (might have been riding for 2nd after that, but I can always be wrong)
i65.photobucket.com/albums/h220/ryant15/yorkshire_zpsw1qiv8uk.png

Banana John St Ledger in Team Bunzl-Centrica and Team U25Banana

Red Bull Driver in RFactor
 
Atlantius
Riis123 wrote:
Shonak wrote:
Riis123 wrote:
Strydz wrote:
Extixx EPIC FAIL once again.... Kristoff is an animal


Nah, Kristoff was just better

Come on, he didn't even try once he and Kristoff were gone. Not even on Paterberg. He played some tactical games and then he was thinking, what? That he'd win against Kristoff. In a sprint. Suuure. :lol:


Look, if he was stronger, he had tried for sure, but probably bet his money on Kristoff needing to sit at the front for the last couple of kilometres to hold GVA and Sagan back which to me seemed like a solid tactic at the moment. Its easy to sit afterwards and say the QS played it all wrong etc. while ppl absolutely love to do, but I didnt see any tactical flaw in how they played it as a team and how Terpstra played the finale. If he felt he was stronger and indeed could leave him behind, guess what - he probably had done that.

No doubts in my mind that the strongest rider won today.


That. Would have been even more stupid by Terpstra to attack on the limit if he knew it would make him crack and lose the podium alltogether. Then much better to take the chance on Kristoff being too tired to sprint after having had to do most of the work in the last part.

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2013/teamstory.png

Svensk Proffscykling - Your gateway to news about Swedish Cycling
Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | Web
 
Shonak
Uh, he spectulacted to win a sprint against someone who had gone 1-1-1-3 in De Panne this week, won MSR last year and had already 8 wins this season. The problem is, He didn't even attack Kristoff once. Compare that to last year with the various moves and counter-moves. He betted on a sprint against Kristoff and that's the wrong decision in any possible scenario. Ergo, tactical fail no matter the outcome. At least try.
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
Strydz
Stromeon wrote:
Gotta feel sorry for Terpstra: 2nd at Omloop, 2nd at Gent-Wevelgem, and now 2nd here.


He has a Roubaix cobble in his trophy cabinet so I don't feel for him Wink He raced for 2nd here so its on him, would of been better making an attack if he had anything in the tank than do what he did.
Hells 500 Crew and 6 x Everester
Don Rd Launching Place
Melbourne Hill Rd Warrandyte
Colby Drive Belgrave South
William Rd The Patch
David Hill Rd Monbulk
Lakeside Drive Emerald
https://www.everesting.cc/hall-of-fame/
 
Shonak
Strydz wrote:
Stromeon wrote:
Gotta feel sorry for Terpstra: 2nd at Omloop, 2nd at Gent-Wevelgem, and now 2nd here.


He has a Roubaix cobble in his trophy cabinet so I don't feel for him Wink He raced for 2nd here so its on him, would of been better making an attack if he had anything in the tank than do what he did.

Yeah, he was racing for second and that's what he got. Seeing at how strong Stybar was, I am not sure thats good enough for this team. Its their most important race of the year after all.

Still, way better than the race they did here last year
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
Alakagom
Well I am not going to comment at this point much Pfft Let's savour this moment for a while..

2014: 3rd Ronde U23
2015: 5th Ronde

( only thing is his lacking tactically, visible stronger than Jurgen in last 20km yet still was pulling the entire group for him..or Lotto DS is Jurgen's uncle or something )
Edited by Alakagom on 05-04-2015 16:26
pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/avatar.png


pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/admin.png
 
Riis123
Shonak wrote:
Uh, he spectulacted to win a sprint against someone who had gone 1-1-1-3 in De Panne this week, won MSR last year and had already 8 wins this season. The problem is, He didn't even attack Kristoff once. Compare that to last year with the various moves and counter-moves. He betted on a sprint against Kristoff and that's the wrong decision in any possible scenario. Ergo, tactical fail no matter the outcome. At least try.


Gotta agree to disagree there then. My point just is, the only reason Terpstra didnt attack was that he bet on himself to outsprint Kristoff after he was doing all the work the last couple of K's due to him realising that Kristoff just was stronger than him. There is NO reason he otherwise wouldnt attack.

At the same time I just wanna say that what probably could seem like me being a total fanboy or whatever, most danes I dont wanna say despise, but dont like norwegians (probably due to them having much more success in cycling), me included. It just seemed crystal clear to me that Kristoff just was stronger than everyone else today and I dont like the notion that everytime QS lose, apparantly they just made a huge fckup. That was not the case at all today, at least not to me
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Equipment Overview
Equipment Overview
PCM11: General Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.38 seconds