PCM.daily banner
23-11-2024 04:24
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 84

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,790
· Newest Member: Thomasloord
View Thread
PCM.daily » Pro Cycling Manager 2006-2020 » Pro Cycling Manager 2013
 Print Thread
PCM.daily DB Stats discussion
romaniangoat
Nieve really deserve 78 MO.3rd on Ventoux,strong performances on Ax 3 and Alpe d'Huez.For me he is in top 6 climbers of this year tour.He beat AC,Fuglsang in all mountain stages of this tour.Also overall he was better than Mollema,Ten Dam and D.Martin.
Edited by romaniangoat on 19-07-2013 18:48
ex Ventoux
 
baseballlover312
lluuiiggii wrote:
NTTHRASH wrote:
but really, the REC, RES, and STA are important in 10+ day races, and need to be discussed more.

Well, not that much in the current state of the game Pfft

Kaimelar wrote:
Resistance: Has no effect in 3D mode for human players
Recuperation: Has no effect for 3D mode for human players


Recovery is for between stages. Wouldn't make sense in 3D mode except for Porte.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/avatar.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/forumthread.png
i.imgur.com/VCXYUyF.png
i.imgur.com/4osUjkI.png
 
Kristoffer
Missing Betancour as one of the top climbers. In the Giro, on most mountain stages, I think he was the one capable of best following Nibali (except from that drugged Santambrogio). Also managed to burst away on some stages, mainley due to a really good ACC. Dont se him climb any worse than Valverde, Uran or Mollema at least.
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 23-11-2024 04:24
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
Alakagom
He's on the same level as Uran and Mollema (78), plus he has 79 in hill, as well as brilliant acceleration.
pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/avatar.png


pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/admin.png
 
issoisso
Alakagom wrote:as well as brilliant acceleration.


He really does.

Which makes sense. Smaller guys like him tend to accelerate so much faster than the tall climbers like Sánchez or Basso
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
ruben
hmm what I don't like is the idea of low potentials for current topriders which you are using for quite some time.

Some of them are -27 and should have more potential to grow, but because of the potential limits they all stay static. Which makes careers too predictable. I want to have careers where one time a guy like for example Nieve can turn into a monster, and the other time not. Ofcourse I could use random potential. But if you give him a potential of 6 and use the kentaurus XML files he could still turn out to be either great or sub-top.

No fear for potentials please! Pfft
 
Kristoffer
Alakagom wrote:
He's on the same level as Uran and Mollema (78), plus he has 79 in hill, as well as brilliant acceleration.


That acceleration is well deserved, for me should be higher than the likes of Quintana. For me, he is also a better climber than Mollema. I'll think i'd rather see Betancour as 79 than Mollema as 77 though.
 
SweatyViking
Alexis Vuillermoz 73 MO 72 HIL?
 
Alakagom
Froome 83
Quintana 82
Rodriguez 81
Valverde 80
Porte 80
Contador 80/79

Likely to be stats for the top climbers after the Tour. Contador is a tough one, a difficult choice.
pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/avatar.png


pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/admin.png
 
baseballlover312
Talansky should have 78 mtn or at least amazing recovery.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/avatar.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/forumthread.png
i.imgur.com/VCXYUyF.png
i.imgur.com/4osUjkI.png
 
Pellizotti2
Contador definitely 79 for me. Dropped by Valverde and Porte (on the stages he went max) on every hard stage.
i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys14/kzi.png Manager of Kazzinc Procycling i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys14/kzi.png

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/storywriter.png

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/stagemaker.png
 
admirschleck
I would put Nibbles on 82 aswell. He destroyed conpetition in Giro.
Agree with all other stats.
Manager of www.dodaj.rs/f/41/er/4zELHZA1/nor.pngTeam Nordeus www.dodaj.rs/f/41/er/4zELHZA1/nor.png
 
baseballlover312
Alakagom wrote:
Froome 83
Quintana 82
Rodriguez 81
Valverde 80
Porte 80
Contador 80/79

Likely to be stats for the top climbers after the Tour. Contador is a tough one, a difficult choice.


That better be just Tour climbers. Wink
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/avatar.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/forumthread.png
i.imgur.com/VCXYUyF.png
i.imgur.com/4osUjkI.png
 
Alakagom
baseballlover312 wrote:
Alakagom wrote:
Froome 83
Quintana 82
Rodriguez 81
Valverde 80
Porte 80
Contador 80/79

Likely to be stats for the top climbers after the Tour. Contador is a tough one, a difficult choice.


That better be just Tour climbers. Wink


From that list only Nibali is missing at 81, if you are talking about the strict elite.

About Talansky, he'll be either or as you said, we'll see about that.

Nibali will stay at 81 as 1) highest other rider in DB he beat at Giro where 78's 2) as Aquarius posted his numbers were improved from last year Tour, but not by that much hence I think it's unlikely he would have challenged either Froome or Quintana at Tour, on the long climbs at least.
Edited by Alakagom on 20-07-2013 16:49
pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/avatar.png


pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/admin.png
 
Ollfardh
baseballlover312 wrote:
Alakagom wrote:
Froome 83
Quintana 82
Rodriguez 81
Valverde 80
Porte 80
Contador 80/79

Likely to be stats for the top climbers after the Tour. Contador is a tough one, a difficult choice.


That better be just Tour climbers. Wink


Yeah, Nibali and VDB missing. Though I'm not sure if Quintana is a worse climber than Froome after the last stages.
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
baseballlover312
Someone please give Evans a 50 on recovery. Thank you!
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/avatar.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/forumthread.png
i.imgur.com/VCXYUyF.png
i.imgur.com/4osUjkI.png
 
baseballlover312
Ollfardh wrote:
baseballlover312 wrote:
Alakagom wrote:
Froome 83
Quintana 82
Rodriguez 81
Valverde 80
Porte 80
Contador 80/79

Likely to be stats for the top climbers after the Tour. Contador is a tough one, a difficult choice.


That better be just Tour climbers. Wink


Yeah, Nibali and VDB missing. Though I'm not sure if Quintana is a worse climber than Froome after the last stages.


Froome just trying to look human.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/avatar.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/forumthread.png
i.imgur.com/VCXYUyF.png
i.imgur.com/4osUjkI.png
 
romaniangoat
Froome 83
Quintana 82
Rodriguez 81(high rec)
Valverde 80
Porte 80
Contador 80/79

Continuation in my opinion

Kreuziger 79
Mollema 78(low rec)
Fuglsang 78
Talansky 78
Nieve 78(also low very low acc and high ftr)
Kwiatkowski 76 or maybe 77
Ten Dam 77

Nibali is ok at 81.He isn't on Quintana level.Also for me Purito is better than him.The level of competition in Giro was very low.
Edited by romaniangoat on 20-07-2013 17:00
ex Ventoux
 
juju33
when will the next uptodate pcmdaily available as the TDF is finished now?
and if it is possible someone could give me the stats of top 10 climbers.
 
Alakagom
juju33 wrote:
when will the next uptodate pcmdaily available as the TDF is finished now?
and if it is possible someone could give me the stats of top 10 climbers.


Few days after the Tour I expect to release a cdb. here.
pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/avatar.png


pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/admin.png
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Rob Peeters Crash
Rob Peeters Crash
PCM12: General Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.44 seconds