PCM.daily banner
07-12-2025 01:52
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 92

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 54,920
· Newest Member: RodrigueGauthier
View Thread
PCM.daily » Pro Cycling Manager 2006-2020 » Pro Cycling Manager 2014
 Print Thread
All PCM 14 DBs
Ad Bot
Posted on 07-12-2025 01:52
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
Lachi
bogas21 wrote:
Lachi wrote:
Version 1 of the PCM Focus database has bugs as they have said themselves so a 10 cannot be justified.


Can you make more real stats for PCM Focus database??

No. But somebody else already did: https://pcmdaily.c...owstart=63
Edited by Lachi on 07-07-2014 17:54
 
ivato
In my opinion the spanishbase is the best db at the moment. It's simple to install because pcm espana made a video tutorial that explain the installation and it's simply, only copy two folders and the db is in your pcm and there are four links for download. The only bug i've seen is thet there are 5 pink squares.
Edited by ivato on 08-07-2014 00:36
 
MARSUPILAMI
ivato wrote:
In my opinion the spanishbase is the best db at the moment. It's simple to install because pcm espana made a video tutorial that explain the installation and it's simply, only copy two folders and the db is in your pcm and there are four links for download. The only bug i've seen is thet there are 5 pink squares.


Ivato, I said that you (all of you) can put here your evaluations. My opinion is that but your opinion it´s other. No problem with that
imgur.com/wPLoPQs.png

pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/missed.png
 
MC
I think that login in this forum to say that the Spanishbase or PCM Focus DB is the better when you are member of the forums that do the DB is cowards. You should be more objective with your opinions
Edited by MC on 08-07-2014 11:52
i.imgur.com/Z1dm6Ou.png
 
lluuiiggii
RMCF 1902 wrote:
I think that login in this forum to say that the Spanishbase or PCM Focus DB is the better when you are member of the forums that do the DB is cowards. You should be more objective with your opinions

Agreed. Besides, concerning ivato's post, how can the Spanishbase be the easiest to install when I see 7 download links in the thread but doesn't specify which ones should be installed? Besides, part of the installation has to be done manually (like deleting files that come with the game by yourself, instead of the DB overwriting them which would be much much easier) and also the sponsorkits, instead of it being a single .exe file which already does it all for yourself. In terms of 'how easy it is to install', I really really doubt the Spanishbase is the easiest to install.

As for the bugs, I also doubt that there are no other bugs than the 5 pink squares. Just by looking at Clos de Pirque - Trek you can already spot 3 different bugs: the team is declared as Colombian, when it should be Chilean; Antonio Cabrera in the DB is French, while he is Chilean too; and the sponsor is declared as Chinese when it should be Chilean.

With another 2 minutes, looking at Team Ecuador, you can already see more bugs: the team is set as Colombian, when it should be Ecuadorian; both Jonathan Caicedo and Carlos Quishpe are French in the DB, when they should be Ecuadorian.

On top of that, there's also the fact that some stats are really bad (for example, Juan Sebastian Tamayo, 3rd in last year's Vuelta a Guatemala, 4th in this year's Vuelta a Mexico, currently 50th in UCI America's Tour, has 68 FL and then 55 in ALL stats - except for 65 in SPR - sprint, really?? - and several riders who have 55 in ALL stats, including other 5 riders like that in team Funvic alone!) and other things like all new teams having "white" as auto-color color instead of their real color. There's really a lot of things that can be improved in the Spanishbase.
 
MARSUPILAMI
I'M NOT IN PCMESPAÑA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
imgur.com/wPLoPQs.png

pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/missed.png
 
MC
lluuiiggii wrote:
RMCF 1902 wrote:
I think that login in this forum to say that the Spanishbase or PCM Focus DB is the better when you are member of the forums that do the DB is cowards. You should be more objective with your opinions

Agreed. Besides, concerning ivato's post, how can the Spanishbase be the easiest to install when I see 7 download links in the thread but doesn't specify which ones should be installed? Besides, part of the installation has to be done manually (like deleting files that come with the game by yourself, instead of the DB overwriting them which would be much much easier) and also the sponsorkits, instead of it being a single .exe file which already does it all for yourself. In terms of 'how easy it is to install', I really really doubt the Spanishbase is the easiest to install.

As for the bugs, I also doubt that there are no other bugs than the 5 pink squares. Just by looking at Clos de Pirque - Trek you can already spot 3 different bugs: the team is declared as Colombian, when it should be Chilean; Antonio Cabrera in the DB is French, while he is Chilean too; and the sponsor is declared as Chinese when it should be Chilean.

With another 2 minutes, looking at Team Ecuador, you can already see more bugs: the team is set as Colombian, when it should be Ecuadorian; both Jonathan Caicedo and Carlos Quishpe are French in the DB, when they should be Ecuadorian.

On top of that, there's also the fact that some stats are really bad (for example, Juan Sebastian Tamayo, 3rd in last year's Vuelta a Guatemala, 4th in this year's Vuelta a Mexico, currently 50th in UCI America's Tour, has 68 FL and then 55 in ALL stats - except for 65 in SPR - sprint, really?? - and several riders who have 55 in ALL stats, including other 5 riders like that in team Funvic alone!) and other things like all new teams having "white" as auto-color color instead of their real color. There's really a lot of things that can be improved in the Spanishbase.


I think that the only work that they do is copy the shirts, stages and others files but i don't be anyone to say this because I won't download his DB. For me his work don't have value but I respect his effort.

MARSUPILAMI wrote:
I'M NOT IN PCMESPAÑA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I didn't say that you was in this group of members, but you only say that your DB is awesome while you are discrediting the work that do other forums
i.imgur.com/Z1dm6Ou.png
 
MARSUPILAMI
It's my opinion, now you can post here your evaluations...
imgur.com/wPLoPQs.png

pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/missed.png
 
Rin
Too bad Waghlon doesn't do DB reviews anymore, when he destroyed every single bad one with words..
i1215.photobucket.com/albums/cc512/ANFreeman/Jersey%20Sprites/bianchi.pngTeam Bianchi - 2012 Man-Game ProContinental Tour Championsi1215.photobucket.com/albums/cc512/ANFreeman/Jersey%20Sprites/bianchi.png
www.pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2013/Admin.png
 
Ton1Mart1n
Instead of all those DB's. Why not go together and create 1 fantastic !
If I decide to buy PCM 2014 i'll be confused seeing all those opportunities...
“When it’s hurting you, that’s when you can make a difference”
 
Jesleyh
That won't work. A lot of DBs have different philosophies.
Like a lot of teams/few teams(but quality), and BeNeLux focus/USA focus/Southern-Europe focus.

Plus, people will never agree about the stats and the stat matrix used.
And communication won't be easy either Wink
i1326.photobucket.com/albums/u660/jesleyh/Junk/0ca5fb14-ed59-44b1-8eb0-596097ba5c01_zps8e97f370.jpg

Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy


PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
 
Lachi
You are right, but it would be great if there would be a colaboration regarding images.

I have not checked all packages but if found many outdated images already. I believe that some DB makers re-use the images from their old DBs.

For example the rounded flags appeared 2 or 3 years ago and everybody still puts them into their package altough it does not fit into this years game. (To be honest, the flags which come with the game don't fit either.) I recommend the plain flags from Markene: https://pcmdaily.c...hp?did=799
(Sadly his package does not contain all flags but it makes the game look much better)
 
Ton1Mart1n
Jesleyh wrote:
That won't work. A lot of DBs have different philosophies.
Like a lot of teams/few teams(but quality), and BeNeLux focus/USA focus/Southern-Europe focus.

Plus, people will never agree about the stats and the stat matrix used.
And communication won't be easy either Wink


So which DB would you recommend?
“When it’s hurting you, that’s when you can make a difference”
 
Jesleyh
Not easy to say. No huge DBs out yet, but the Spanishdb, FDB and Adamb's DB all add quite some stuff Wink
I'd say FDB atm, but that's just my personal opinion Wink
i1326.photobucket.com/albums/u660/jesleyh/Junk/0ca5fb14-ed59-44b1-8eb0-596097ba5c01_zps8e97f370.jpg

Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy


PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
 
Kentaurus
So as for the stat matrix, I'd love to see something similar to [url=www.soccerwiki.com]SoccerWiki[/url] that we could simply have the whole PCM world use and evaluate. (I brought this up in another thread, however got no response). I don't have the technical abilities to do such a thing, but would be willing to help where I could.
AZTECA - NBCSN pcmdaily.com/files/Micros16/azt.png
 
pareisa
Kentaurus wrote:
So as for the stat matrix, I'd love to see something similar to [url=www.soccerwiki.com]SoccerWiki[/url] that we could simply have the whole PCM world use and evaluate. (I brought this up in another thread, however got no response). I don't have the technical abilities to do such a thing, but would be willing to help where I could.


Or something like 'futhead' for online stats.
pashaaa
 
MARSUPILAMI
First post updated with all DBs
imgur.com/wPLoPQs.png

pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/missed.png
 
MARSUPILAMI
Added FDB 2.0 and Expansion Pack´s download links
imgur.com/wPLoPQs.png

pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/missed.png
 
MARSUPILAMI
I have updated first post with all DBs at the moment.

I hope I haven´t forget any DB
imgur.com/wPLoPQs.png

pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/missed.png
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
poor Scarponi
poor Scarponi
PCM12: Funny Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 23,776 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 20,845 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 19,674 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 17,752 PCM$
bullet baseba... 13,639 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 24,090 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 20,300 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,820 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 17,700 PCM$
bullet Caspi 10,730 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.38 seconds