Ian Butler wrote:
Also, if you come back and give yourself a time machine, there are two. Reminds me of Futurama timetravel movie

On her 30th birthday, a woman who wishes to build a time machine is visited by a future version of herself. This future self explains to her that she should not worry about designing the time machine, as she has done it in the future. The woman receives the schematics from her future self and starts building the time machine. Time passes until she finally completes the time machine. She then uses it to travel back in time to her 30th birthday, where she gives the schematics to her past self, closing the loop.

A professor travels forward in time, and reads in a physics journal about a new equation that was recently derived. He travels back to his own time, and relates it to one of his students who writes it up, and the article is published in the same journal which the professor reads in the future.

A woman builds a time machine. She goes into the future and steals a valuable gadget. She then returns and reveals the gadget to the world, claiming it as her own. Eventually, a copy of the device ends up being the item the woman originally steals. In other words, the device is a copy of itself and it is not possible to state where the original idea for the device came from.

A man with a time machine takes the complete plays of Shakespeare, translated into Elizabethan English, and travels back in time to Tudor England. He then gives the plays to the young William Shakespeare before he wrote them, telling him to publish them as his own work. He does, and a copy of the 'original' publication is what is taken back in time. This means that nobody wrote the plays of Shakespeare, as he essentially gave them to himself, thereby closing the loop.

An old woman gives a young man a watch; the young man then goes back in time and hands the watch to a young woman; she later grows into the older woman who hands the watch to him. The watch therefore has no point of origin.

TheManxMissile wrote:
As i said it's all about which therories you use because use a non-predeterminist theory and the above all change.

Jakstar22 wrote:
So I know its early on in the story but what does everyone think of my new Quintana story?

TheManxMissile wrote:


Does it involve Time Travel?

Ian Butler wrote:
If not, it's very off-topic here

Ian Butler wrote:


If not, it's very off-topic here

trekbmc wrote:
3. Has anybody thought of having a 'random scientific and mathematical things that don't need to be talk about but somehow find their way into innocent threads' thread? I might make one.

TheManxMissile wrote:


You mean Café Pedro 10: Mostly Harmless

Ian Butler wrote:
Hmm depends on what you want the story to be. Maybe some lay-out additions to make it easier to look at. Or maybe some character development, give us some real insights in the character. But it's all up to you, of course !