News in February
|
Paul23 |
Posted on 27-02-2015 15:48
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4411
Joined: 10-08-2011
PCM$: 400.00
|
@Strydz: You mean Nibbles -> Quickstep? I would need to start liking him then
|
|
|
|
Kirchen_75 |
Posted on 27-02-2015 16:05
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7702
Joined: 24-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
That's like linking Messi to Chelsea because adidas can sponsor the move. I don't believe these rumours. |
|
|
|
superider2010 |
Posted on 27-02-2015 16:35
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 979
Joined: 17-06-2010
PCM$: 300.00
|
uci won't do a shit,astana will remain in world tour
|
|
|
|
Ad Bot |
Posted on 25-11-2024 04:59
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
IP: None |
|
|
TheManxMissile |
Posted on 27-02-2015 16:46
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
superider2010 wrote:
uci won't do a shit,astana will remain in world tour
ermmm, the UCI has already "done sh*t" in handing the case off to the Licence Commision which is a separate entity
|
|
|
|
Dippofix |
Posted on 27-02-2015 18:14
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3906
Joined: 29-01-2013
PCM$: 300.00
|
TheManxMissile wrote:
TheManxMissile wrote:
2) It has nothing to do with cycling
E3 is a good race! It has so much to chose from in an ad campagin. The cobbles, the stars, the history, the scenery etc etc Instead they dive straight for lowest demographic of "sex sells"[quote]
[quote]Avin Wargunnson wrote:
1)So lets say british races organisers cant use Wiggins or Froome with pictures in yellow jersey from Tour, since it happened in France and in different race.
So that's your point #1 dealt with nice and cleanly. A race is perfectly within it's right to base advertising on the big name riders taking part in the race, in fact for many races that's a great way to advertise and draw crowds. Hell it's at least half the reason riders go to events like San Luis!
However that E3 advert does not reference to any stars or racing. Ok the hand is wearing a cycling glove, a light blue one so i'm guessing Astana (because Astana needs more controersy ). Astana did win the TDF cobbled stage, so perhaps it's not quite as bad as is looks.
Avin Wargunnson wrote:
2)E3 race organisers have long history of using women...
It is their right to use whatever they want to promote their race, of course it cant be against the law or anything. Girls in knickers are not illegal iirc....
Ludicrous comparision incoming - For a long time it wasn't illegal to judge a man based on the color of his skin or his sexuality and then racially abuse that man, or hurt him, or deny him basic human rights purely because he was a different race of sexuality. Just because something isn't illegal doesn't make it ok.
Back to the poster. Yes E3 has a history in this area, and actually i like the cheeky (excuse the pun) nature of them. It's nice to have something different around. But there is a difference between have cyclists riding over a woman and the implied harrassment/assult of this years image.
My complaints are not on the fact there's a pretty woman there, but on what the content is reffering to and the implications that raises. The podium girl was upset in 2013, and even Sagan came out and said he shouldn't have done it. But you know, apparently it's ok to laugh about it now. Ludicrous comparision incoming - Hey i saw this black man fall down today, it was hilarious! You know what was even funnier? I liked it so much i made another black man fall down just so i could laugh.
Avin Wargunnson wrote:
3)...
I'm not going to quote the whole piece to make sure this doesn't get too long.
Like it or not modern feminism does come into this, in the same way it came into the incident in 2013. Yes a lot of the time it's completely f*cking blown overboard to point of idiocy, i will agree with that.
I guess by trying to stay away from the non-relative areas i didn't make my point clear. Like in many sports Cycling has parity issues between it's Mens and Womens sides. Yes different commercial interests will change the money available to each side, and Womens is less popular so will get less money/exposure/races/etc. I'm not an idiot i know all this.
I was alluding to some basic issues in the UCI which have been re-highlighted this week. Adverts for secretarial positions specifically target at women. A provision in the rules that "Six maids-of-honor who will carry on the World Champion jersey(s), medals, the trophy and bouquets of flowers". Basically all sports have podium girls, i don't have issue with that, but making it part of the rule-book as far as i'm aware is uniqe to cycling and completely f*cking nuts.
Avin Wargunnson wrote:
You are the usually the first to drool over any girl pic use on the forum, you are the one with several chicks posters in your signature. I suppose these are there because they are good actresses, not at all as object of sexual desire?
Iirc you are also pretty big fan of How i met your mother show, the most sexist and fecal jokes show recently produced and now you are the judge in this case? Laughable
Thanks for making it personal first, fills me with confidence and a sense of righteousness knowing i've already won now, thanks
Yes i have them as avatars because i like them, i like the films and shows they've been in, and yes they are atractive. You know what? I guess i am a disgusting person i should probably go and find a way to scouer these impure thoughts from my mind immediately (i can't take this bit seriously, sorry).
I don't recal ever calling HIMYM particularly high-brow or anything, i know it's pretty basic and not that critically brilliant. A lot of the jokes arn't great and a number poke fun at women. Doesn't mean i can't enjoy it. I guess because i like Blazing Saddles i'm a racist as well. Christ i'm just a horrible person at heart. And now i've used the Lords name in vain, just insulting and attacking Christians! F*ck i just can't stop being a d*ck. Sh*t, a reference to male genitalia, clearly this is a sign of patriarchy overtaking my mind to exclusion and derision of all women, trans-genders and non-genders... f*ck.
Started off with some saliant points on the subject. E3 does have a history in this area and if you take the hand away and change the slogan it wouldn't be an issue. But the hand is there along with the slogan and it changes the whole situation from "sex sells" to promoting 50's style "harmless" groping.
To be clear, i'm not saying the past E3 ads are wrong. Nor am i saying this one is completly abhorent. But that it crosses over a line because of what it implies in a wider context.
And as an Ad it's doing a good job. Instead of focusing on Omloop or KBK column inches are being given over to E3. "Any publicity is good publicity" isn't quite something i agree with fully, but brand awareness for E3 has reached huge new high this week for sure.
And thanks again for going personal
Have to say I agree with Avin. Until you take the women out of your profile pics and signature, I can't possibly take you seriously. It's like complaining about Hitler while wearing an SS uniform, that's just not how it works. I agree that the ad should be removed, but IMO it's not actually much better or worse than the concept of podium girls. It's actually kind of funny imo, but as an ad it's taking things a bit too far.
And the whole equality issue is something completely different. It's a bit like in tennis, where women get paid equally for playing 1-3 sets less and most of the time less interesting tennis. I honestly don't get it, but it'a not up to me to decide.
And another last thing: Your last paragraph shows that you've no response to what Avin said and have actually lost the argument already yourself.
Spoiler Sorry if that all seems a bit short and contextless, but I'm on my phone and cba to write more.
|
|
|
|
superider2010 |
Posted on 27-02-2015 18:21
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 979
Joined: 17-06-2010
PCM$: 300.00
|
in time will see what's happen but right now i'm betting that uci won't ban or relegate astana from world tour
hadn't katiusha a problem with licensing?
i don't remember but astana had a doper last year,no? why they don't take the same actions on tinkoff saxo because of kreuziger.tinkoff has contador and baso with doping history
if uci start to do a thing then do it well
Edited by superider2010 on 27-02-2015 18:22
|
|
|
|
tsmoha |
Posted on 27-02-2015 18:24
|
Directeur Sportif
Posts: 11819
Joined: 19-07-2010
PCM$: 300.00
|
About E3:
Time time..
About Astana:
Time time...
Nuff said
|
|
|
|
Strydz |
Posted on 27-02-2015 18:46
|
Team Leader
Posts: 5894
Joined: 02-08-2011
PCM$: 1625.00
|
superider2010 wrote:
in time will see what's happen but right now i'm betting that uci won't ban or relegate astana from world tour
hadn't katiusha a problem with licensing?
i don't remember but astana had a doper last year,no? why they don't take the same actions on tinkoff saxo because of kreuziger.tinkoff has contador and baso with doping history
if uci start to do a thing then do it well
This isn't the same as what happened with Katusha, that was more of a power struggle within the UCI and Makarov won, Astana do not have a figure like that to depend on. The case against Astana from this distance looks stronger and it will be interesting as to what has come out of the Padua investigation as I think thats what has forced the UCI's hand. I have a feeling they wouldn't have announced this without a firm legal footing but this will go to CAS so who knows. Astana also had multiple doping cases last season and the Kreuziger case also stems from his time whilst at Astana. There could be something coming out of CIRC which might force Riis out of the sport so that would affect Saxo, also with Contador and his positive also came whilst on the Astana squad.
Oh @tsmoha I love the avatar
Edited by Strydz on 27-02-2015 18:49
Hells 500 Crew and 6 x Everester
Don Rd Launching Place
Melbourne Hill Rd Warrandyte
Colby Drive Belgrave South
William Rd The Patch
David Hill Rd Monbulk
Lakeside Drive Emerald
https://www.everesting.cc/hall-of-fame/
|
|
|
|
tsmoha |
Posted on 27-02-2015 18:54
|
Directeur Sportif
Posts: 11819
Joined: 19-07-2010
PCM$: 300.00
|
Thanks, Strydz! Yeah, i love it, too. It's made by a German artist, who made a couple of good drawings earlier this year. I fear i forgot his name/website though
|
|
|
|
rjc_43 |
Posted on 27-02-2015 19:06
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6716
Joined: 13-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
UCI pass the case to the License Committee, who will agree with the findings, remove the World Tour license.
Astana will take the case to CAS.
CAS will rule in favour of Astana as the UCI/License Committee are preventing 28ish riders from earning a wage, and however many backup staff from earning one too.
Too large an impact at the wrong time.
That's what I think will happen anyway.
[url=cleavercycling.co.uk] [/url]
|
|
|
|
tsmoha |
Posted on 27-02-2015 19:07
|
Directeur Sportif
Posts: 11819
Joined: 19-07-2010
PCM$: 300.00
|
tsmoha wrote:
Thanks, Strydz! Yeah, i love it, too. It's made by a German artist, who made a couple of good drawings earlier this year. I fear i forgot his name/website though
I didn't
And there are several more drawings added, too: https://www.horst-brozy.de/MainD/Back_..._Back.html
|
|
|
|
the_hoyle |
Posted on 27-02-2015 19:48
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7651
Joined: 28-05-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
The drawings are amazing!
.: Manager of :.
.: My Awards :.
|
|
|
|
krisa |
Posted on 27-02-2015 20:24
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3962
Joined: 12-04-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
UCI sucks balls
|
|
|
|
TheManxMissile |
Posted on 27-02-2015 20:35
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
Dippofix wrote:
Have to say I agree with Avin. Until you take the women out of your profile pics and signature, I can't possibly take you seriously. It's like complaining about Hitler while wearing an SS uniform, that's just not how it works. I agree that the ad should be removed, but IMO it's not actually much better or worse than the concept of podium girls. It's actually kind of funny imo, but as an ad it's taking things a bit too far.
And the whole equality issue is something completely different. It's a bit like in tennis, where women get paid equally for playing 1-3 sets less and most of the time less interesting tennis. I honestly don't get it, but it'a not up to me to decide.
And another last thing: Your last paragraph shows that you've no response to what Avin said and have actually lost the argument already yourself.
Spoiler Sorry if that all seems a bit short and contextless, but I'm on my phone and cba to write more.
Not wishing to go back over old ground in terms of a story pretty much well covered by now, but seeing as this doesn't appear to be about the news but is about me...
The reason i didn't give much attention to Avins final paragraphs where he questioned me personally is because it was about me and not about the news discussion.
I'm fully preppared to discuss the news itself because there are potentially interesting arguements on both sides relating to a varied range of related topics.
Instead Avin went straight into a personal attack. Not even a couple of back-and-forths where we were getting stubbon. Nope, straight to the personal attack, and well done on joining in with him on the personal side, classy move.
I am fully preppared to talk about the ad and it's related topics. Some interesting stuff there on both sides, as i already said. But i'd would appreciated the basic level of courtesy i would expect in say the Difficult Topics thread where discussion doesn't get personal.
|
|
|
|
CountArach |
Posted on 27-02-2015 21:29
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8290
Joined: 14-07-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
rjc_43 wrote:
UCI pass the case to the License Committee, who will agree with the findings, remove the World Tour license.
Astana will take the case to CAS.
CAS will rule in favour of Astana as the UCI/License Committee are preventing 28ish riders from earning a wage, and however many backup staff from earning one too.
Too large an impact at the wrong time.
That's what I think will happen anyway.
You are 100% spot on. I don't see how CAS will rule in the UCI's favour. However, Astana will be refused a license for next year once they have their license reviewed or are refused a new license (I can't remember how long their current license runs for).
Alakagom wrote:
CCC with aspiration to become WT team. They are paying 3.1 million already for the PCT team, but now are ending ties with basketball sponsorship and are fully focusing on the cycling team.
Oh please no.
|
|
|
|
Dippofix |
Posted on 27-02-2015 22:40
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3906
Joined: 29-01-2013
PCM$: 300.00
|
TheManxMissile wrote:
Dippofix wrote:
Have to say I agree with Avin. Until you take the women out of your profile pics and signature, I can't possibly take you seriously. It's like complaining about Hitler while wearing an SS uniform, that's just not how it works. I agree that the ad should be removed, but IMO it's not actually much better or worse than the concept of podium girls. It's actually kind of funny imo, but as an ad it's taking things a bit too far.
And the whole equality issue is something completely different. It's a bit like in tennis, where women get paid equally for playing 1-3 sets less and most of the time less interesting tennis. I honestly don't get it, but it'a not up to me to decide.
And another last thing: Your last paragraph shows that you've no response to what Avin said and have actually lost the argument already yourself.
Spoiler Sorry if that all seems a bit short and contextless, but I'm on my phone and cba to write more.
Not wishing to go back over old ground in terms of a story pretty much well covered by now, but seeing as this doesn't appear to be about the news but is about me...
The reason i didn't give much attention to Avins final paragraphs where he questioned me personally is because it was about me and not about the news discussion.
I'm fully preppared to discuss the news itself because there are potentially interesting arguements on both sides relating to a varied range of related topics.
Instead Avin went straight into a personal attack. Not even a couple of back-and-forths where we were getting stubbon. Nope, straight to the personal attack, and well done on joining in with him on the personal side, classy move.
I am fully preppared to talk about the ad and it's related topics. Some interesting stuff there on both sides, as i already said. But i'd would appreciated the basic level of courtesy i would expect in say the Difficult Topics thread where discussion doesn't get personal.
We can take this to PM if you like, but I'd just geniunely like to know why you don't find it hypocritical. I mean, on the one hand, you're bitching about the objectification of women, on the other hand, look at your sig.
|
|
|
|
TheManxMissile |
Posted on 28-02-2015 00:29
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
Dippofix wrote:
We can take this to PM if you like, but I'd just geniunely like to know why you don't find it hypocritical. I mean, on the one hand, you're bitching about the objectification of women, on the other hand, look at your sig.
I won't answer to hypocracy of the objectification of women because no argument i made was about the objectification of women. In fact i distinctly recall saying i kind of liked the ad's of the last couple of years that included women on them. I have no shame in saying that.
My arguments, on the feminist side, were based around straight up harrassment or implied harassment. The arguments of not using a woman full stop were because i feel there are better ways to advertise a cycling race, followed by examples.
If i was to bash the advert for focusing purely on the female form to drive impressions then yes that would make me hypocritical, because i choose my adverts because they look nice (although tbf that's how i choose all my avatars, like the one that depicted Charly Gaul for example).
But to clarrify, that was not the argument i made nor the one i'm making now.
|
|
|
|
baseballlover312 |
Posted on 28-02-2015 00:37
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 16429
Joined: 27-07-2011
PCM$: 10438.70
|
Well, some girl answered a casting call for a poster in which the only way she is seen in being smacked in the buttocks.
She obviously doesn't think highly of herself and doesn't care about the poster, so why should we?
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
|
|
|
|
kadtagenero |
Posted on 28-02-2015 02:28
|
Domestique
Posts: 480
Joined: 29-04-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Well, the Astana theme is just something they should do with a lot of teams... Im thinking in Sky and Tinkoff... but hey, they never do anything... so, we´ll have to wait...
Meanwhile, in Colombia we are having a race with 2 continental teams and a lot of amateurs, and today this happened:
It's something like this: "Doping test, there isn't, doctors did not attend"
So, this isn't serious... in the highest level or the lower ones... our sport is doomed, nobody cares...
|
|
|
|
CountArach |
Posted on 28-02-2015 02:57
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8290
Joined: 14-07-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
kadtagenero wrote:
Meanwhile, in Colombia we are having a race with 2 continental teams and a lot of amateurs, and today this happened:
It's something like this: "Doping test, there isn't, doctors did not attend"
So, this isn't serious... in the highest level or the lower ones... our sport is doomed, nobody cares...
I'm pretty sure the same thing happened in China in their small races (or possibly another eastern/central European race.... I can't remember which one). The Pro Continental teams kicked up a huge fuss about it.
|
|
|