No changes for training cost in comparison to recent years:
Average or Stat
Cost
85
2,700,000
84
2,300,000
83
2,000,000
82
1,700,000
81
1,400,000
80
1,200,000
79
1,000,000
78
850,000
77
700,000
76
600,000
75
500,000
74
450,000
73
400,000
72
350,000
71
300,000
70
250,000
69
200,000
68
175,000
67
150,000
66
125,000
≤65
100,000
If the rider's average is higher than the stat you want to train, then the cost relates to the current average.
If the stat you want to train is higher than the rider's average, then the cost relates to the new value of that stat
The average value is always rounded: 74.4 = 74, 74.5 = 75
Rider Average Exemption
If the stat you want to train is more than 10 values worse than the rider's average, then the cost is different
The maximum a stat can be raised to using this method is 67.
A stat can only be raised by 2 points under this "rider average exemption" where the new value of the stat is more than 10 values less than the rider's rounded overall average. Also, no more than 2 different stats can be raised using this exemption method per season.
The following table is important:
67
150,000
66
125,000
65 or less
100,000
1st Increase: The cost relates to the table above.
2nd Increase: The cost is double that of the table above.
Restrictions
A rider can only be trained by a total of 2 stats each season. (Either twice in one stat, or once in two stats).
For specific examples, please also check last years thread, where some were asked already: https://pcmdaily....rowstart=0
If you train two different stats of the same rider using the exemption, does it cost 200k or 300k today? Basically, is the multiplier on the fee for the second stat raise for the specific rider, or the specific stat?
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
And another one, if the average value and the stat to be trained is the same number, do we pay the price according to that the stat is higher or the average? For me, it's 100K in difference.
Let's say the mountain stat is 75, and the average is 75.09, then the average will be rounded down to 75 and it's the exact same number. Which one will the payment go on? Average or stat? Thanks for the help
Bjartne wrote:
And another one, if the average value and the stat to be trained is the same number, do we pay the price according to that the stat is higher or the average? For me, it's 100K in difference.
Let's say the mountain stat is 75, and the average is 75.09, then the average will be rounded down to 75 and it's the exact same number. Which one will the payment go on? Average or stat? Thanks for the help
Whatever is higher counts. so if AvG is rounded 75 and you train from 75 to 76, you have to pay for 76
sammyt93 wrote:
If I train 2 different riders using the exemption is it 100k each or 100k for the first and 200k for the other rider?
The wording on the thread is a bit unclear, but this part:
1st Increase: The cost relates to the table above.
2nd Increase: The cost is double that of the table above.
Is referring to a rider getting the same stat trained twice using the exemption. If you use the 10-stats exemption on two different riders, the cost won't be double.
Quick example to make it completely clear:
If I train Viviani's 60 MO to 62 MO using the exemption twice, I'll pay 300k.
If I train Viviani's 60 MO to 61 MO and Sterbini's 56 MO to 57 MO, I'll pay 200k.
