|
ICL19 - General | Rider Development
|
| Bikex |
Posted on 12-09-2018 14:47
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7255
Joined: 25-08-2012
PCM$: 600.00
|
Post Development/First 2019 Database: https://www.mediafire.com/file/enm6b2m....xlsx/file
Changes:
- Retiring riders removed
- 60 riders announcing to retire after the 2019 season
- Riders development
- talents added
Please make sure your riders have the correct stats and all talents you signed are on your team.
Retired riders in spoiler
Spoiler Robert Wagner
Koldo Fernández
Sergey Lagutin
Sébastien Turgot
Daniel Lloyd
Martijn Maaskant
Pierrick Fédrigo
Guillaume Le Floch
Yauheni Hutarovich
Christian Knees
Edward King
Philippe Gilbert
Luis León Sánchez
Jorge Azanza
Kenny De Ketele
Stephen Cummings
Sébastien Minard
Gustavo César Veloso
Manuel Cardoso
José Luis Roldán
Cristiano Fumagalli
Iljo Keisse
Philip Deignan
Fumiyuki Beppu
Matthew Hayman
Niels Brouzes
Olivier Kaisen
Filippo Pozzato
Gil Suray
Fabrice Jeandesboz
Aitor Hernández
Mauro Santambrogio
Christophe Riblon
Perrig Quemeneur
Brent Bookwalter
Saïd Haddou
Kasper Jebjerg
Jure Kocjan
Steve Morabito
Lieuwe Westra
Maxime Bouet
Maarten Wynants
Imanol Erviti
Mads Christensen
Fausto Fognini
Paolo Tomaselli
Samuel Sánchez
Tiziano Dall'Antonia
Alan Marangoni
Michal Golas
Grégory Rast
Timothy Gudsell
Francesco Gavazzi
Romain Feillu
Steve Chainel
Eloy Teruel
Antonio Piedra
Nikolai Trussov
Huub Duyn
Francesco Ginanni
Andrei Kunitski
René Mandri
Mateusz Mroz
Fabian Wegmann
Fränk Schleck
Fabio Taborre
Michael Rogers
Florian Guillou
Chad Beyer
Pablo Urtasun
Rory Sutherland
Pieter Weening
Johan Vansummeren
Lloyd Mondory
Juan José Cobo
Mathieu Sprick
Steven Caethoven
Francis De Greef
Theo Bos
Guillermo Lana
Cameron Wurf
Dieter Cappelle
Sergio Pardilla
Adam Sznitko
Marcin Tomaszewski
Max Jenkins
Dirk Finders
Michael Schweizer
Leonardo Pinizzotto
Patrick Schubert
Alex Arseno
Andris Buividas
Alex Coutts
Abdelbasset Hannachi
Antonio Jesús
Alexey Shmidt
Bernhard Oberholzer
David Belda
Daniel Petrov
Daniel Vaillancourt
Evan Oliphant
Edwin Parra
Evgeny Reshetko
Eric Van de Meent
Graham Howard
Gabriel Sorin Pop
Juan Francisco Mourón
Josef Kugler
Jesper Laustsen
Jacek Morajko
Julián Muñoz
Jonathan Patrick McCarty
Jesús Rosendo
Joshua Wilson
Jure Zrimsek
Lucas Persson
Lukas Stanek
Michael Blanchy
Matthias Friedemann
Martin Hansen
Muradjan Halmuratov
Matija Kvasina
Masahito Nakakura
Marek Rutkiewicz
Masahiro Shinagawa
Miha Svab
Mateusz Taciak
Nicolas Baïolet
Otto Eikeseth
Óscar GarcÃa-Casarrubios
Pierre Drancourt
Peter Ladd
Pirmin Lang
Robert Gaszmayr
Robert Lea
Sjoerd Botter
Steve Bovay
Simone Bruson
Seon Ho Park
Stijn Hoornaert
Sun Jae Jang
Simon Richardson
Travis Allen
Tom Criel
Taiji Nishitani
Tim Reinhart
Thijs Van Amerongen
Tim Walker
Vladimir Likhachev
Vid Ogris
Vladimir Tuychiev
Valerey Valynin
William Muñoz
Yohan Cauquil
Yasuharu Nakajima
Zdenek Mach
Vitaliy Popkov
Bruno Pinto
Celestino Pinho
Ludovic Baptista
Jan Barta
Davide D'Angelo
Bruno Pires
Mario Costa
Robert Retschke
Edgar Pinto
Filipe Cardoso
Daniel Foder
Stian Remme
Adam Carr
Guillaume Bourgeois
Guillaume Dessibourg
Gianfranco Visconti
Marco Carletti
Rob Britton
Jonathan Cantwell
Jay Thomson
Tyler Wren
Jeremy Powers
Will Routley
Joeri Calleeuw
Geoffrey Coupe
Dan Bowman
Stefan Schäfer
Ben Greenwood
Graham Briggs
Thomas Soladay
James Moss
Otavio Didier Bulgarelli
William Aranzazu
Sebastian Körber
Chris Winn
Dalivier Ospina
Raymond Künzli
Kin San Wu
Pengda Jiao
Stijn Ennekens
Benoit Drujon
René Hooghiemster
Mattia Gavazzi
Antonio Testa
Nathaniel English
João Benta
Patrick Van Leeuwen
Abderrahmen Bourezza
Abdelmalek Madani
Oleksandr Surutkovych
Wim Botman
Jim Van den Berg
Yilin Liu
Jesús Castaño
Julian Rodas
Cleberson Weber
Sung Yeon Je
Alexander Schrangl
Ondrej Pavek
Adrie Lindeman
Saeid Safar Zedeh
Daniel Abraham
David Albos
Ricardo Paredes
Nelson Sánchez
Frédéric Obiang
Gislain Ndong
Phetetso Monese
Badr Banihammad
|
| |
|
|
| Ollfardh |
Posted on 12-09-2018 14:50
|
World Champion
Posts: 14563
Joined: 08-08-2011
PCM$: 9100.00
|
Not Phil! Not Cobo!
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
|
| |
|
|
| Yellow Jersey |
Posted on 12-09-2018 15:33
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 2809
Joined: 16-04-2013
PCM$: 900.00
|
Wow Kwiatkowski in CT will be as scary as Martin was 
I'm gonna need a very good transfer season, or I won't have a chance of keeping up with the big guys.
|
| |
|
|
| Aquarius97 |
Posted on 12-09-2018 15:38
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4191
Joined: 13-09-2015
PCM$: 300.00
|
Fuck, Kwiato in CT. That could totally ruin my plans this season 
And Aru, Majka, Herklotz are also real beasts  Will see how many of these remain in the divison though after renewals
|
| |
|
|
| Shonak |
Posted on 12-09-2018 15:56
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15615
Joined: 16-07-2013
PCM$: 350.00
|
Some well-known names leaving the game, farewell Samu most of all.
Any ideas about a rough schedule from here on out?
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
|
| |
|
|
| dominox |
Posted on 12-09-2018 16:04
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1452
Joined: 23-07-2014
PCM$: 5533.75
|
Oh, do I just saw CCC ranked in WT? How Am I supposed to build a team in this division? 
Edited by dominox on 12-09-2018 17:18
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 22-11-2024 02:29
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| Yellow Jersey |
Posted on 12-09-2018 17:21
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 2809
Joined: 16-04-2013
PCM$: 900.00
|
dominox wrote:
Oh, do I just saw CCC ranked in WT? How Am I supposed to build a team in this division?
Pray to god we can hire a beast
|
| |
|
|
| Bikex |
Posted on 12-09-2018 17:50
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7255
Joined: 25-08-2012
PCM$: 600.00
|
Shonak wrote:
Some well-known names leaving the game, farewell Samu most of all.
Any ideas about a rough schedule from here on out?
I hope to start with Steals tomorrow. Renewals should be done in about a week. After that transfers should start. I have some plans to make them faster this time.
I want to turn the transfer phase into being continuous instead of the rounds, while keeping the system similar to how it is now.
The bidding will remain in the hidden, but you'll get to make new bids right away after seeing their success.
Good/bad idea?
Something else I'm thinking about is balancing transfers, so it is not too easy for the already big teams to increase their gap to the weaker ones. Any ideas how that could be accomplished?
One idea could be some kind of transfer cap, which limits the maximum a team can gain through transfers with other teams.
Steals are atm imo by far the best way to keep the game a little bit balanced, as successful teams will suffer much more from these offers. As mentioned it will now become possible to block steals. Something else I thought about are compensations in case of successful steal attempts to create an incentive for more big riders to change teams. In return it could be made impossible to sell riders for whom you have countered a steal attempt. I'm not a fan of teams countering steal attempts just to sell the rider later and make profit.
Would like to get some oppinions on all of this before deciding.
TheManxMissile wrote:
I think 8390 Noah Farias has the wrong RD, as he has 68.5AVG the same as two other riders on my team but gets more RD than them and more RD than two more riders with worse AVG.
That's how it's supposed to be sprinters get a few days more. |
| |
|
|
| Scatmaster111 |
Posted on 12-09-2018 17:58
|
Domestique
Posts: 409
Joined: 07-11-2014
PCM$: 200.00
|
It's been a while since I've been in ICL of course, and I never did steals the first go around so I'm not too familiar with the ins and outs, but it sounds like a good idea to disallow teams from selling a rider they've countered a steal offer for. If you insist on protecting a rider from a steal, it should be because you plan on keeping them. Outside of steals, I don't have any big ideas off the top of my head for balancing.
|
| |
|
|
| Aquarius97 |
Posted on 12-09-2018 17:59
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4191
Joined: 13-09-2015
PCM$: 300.00
|
One question, i think i read somewhere that you after renewals you have to be within your budget. So do stealed rider's wage count against budget already?
|
| |
|
|
| Bikex |
Posted on 12-09-2018 18:07
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7255
Joined: 25-08-2012
PCM$: 600.00
|
Aquarius97 wrote:
One question, i think i read somewhere that you after renewals you have to be within your budget. So do stealed rider's wage count against budget already?
Yes they do
@Scatmaster: Yes that's what I think. However there is a difference between blocked riders (you decide before renewals to pay the rider more so he doesn't listen to outside offers. You don't know if the rider would get any outside offers) and countering steals (paying a rider more after he got a steal offer). Do you think in both cases it shouldn't be allowed to sell the rider or only in the second?
Imo in the first case it could be okay to still sell the rider, but in the second I don't really like to see it, as possibly a steal would only get countered because the manager found out of that other riders are interested to then sell the rider. |
| |
|
|
| Scatmaster111 |
Posted on 12-09-2018 18:13
|
Domestique
Posts: 409
Joined: 07-11-2014
PCM$: 200.00
|
Bikex wrote:
@Scatmaster: Yes that's what I think. However there is a difference between blocked riders (you decide before renewals to pay the rider more so he doesn't listen to outside offers. You don't know if the rider would get any outside offers) and countering steals (paying a rider more after he got a steal offer). Do you think in both cases it shouldn't be allowed to sell the rider or only in the second?
Imo in the first case it could be okay to still sell the rider, but in the second I don't really like to see it, as possibly a steal would only get countered because the manager found out of that other riders are interested to then sell the rider.
I think I agree that in the first case it could be okay to sell the rider. Deciding to increase his budget beforehand at least shows that you were already committed to selling this rider from the get-go, and didn't use him as bait to see if anyone would bite first.
|
| |
|
|
| Shonak |
Posted on 12-09-2018 18:23
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15615
Joined: 16-07-2013
PCM$: 350.00
|
Cool I prefer a more continuous bidding over the round system but I don't mind the latest system either.
As for compensations, I think only if investments have made along the way, i.e. PoY, training, it would be fair to receive some cash back in the case of steal. If someone decides to transfer his rider, no refund should be made.
I don't like the idea that riders have to be kept after a team made a large steal attempt on a rider. This reduces flexibility greatly in the transfer windows and there is little action going as it is. Selling an overpaid rider (due to steal attempts) is a good way to free up cash on a rider you would have kept. Not everything can be planned in advance.
I would very welcome a transfer cap similiar to the ManGame and think that ICL has been missing one since the start. So yes please
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
|
| |
|
|
| TheManxMissile |
Posted on 12-09-2018 18:25
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
Bikex wrote:
TheManxMissile wrote:
I think 8390 Noah Farias has the wrong RD, as he has 68.5AVG the same as two other riders on my team but gets more RD than them and more RD than two more riders with worse AVG.
That's how it's supposed to be sprinters get a few days more.
Didn't know that small detail, and where three of them are next to each other in the DB it looked real strange.
Also Steals from tomorrow... err... i'm away Friday-Monday. So if it's just that i write down stuff tomorrow, all cool! If i'll need to do anything over the weekend, there could be issues. And i really really really don't want to miss Steals for the second year in a row!
|
| |
|
|
| Bikex |
Posted on 12-09-2018 19:31
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7255
Joined: 25-08-2012
PCM$: 600.00
|
Shonak wrote:
Cool I prefer a more continuous bidding over the round system but I don't mind the latest system either.
As for compensations, I think only if investments have made along the way, i.e. PoY, training, it would be fair to receive some cash back in the case of steal. If someone decides to transfer his rider, no refund should be made.
Can you explain why you'd prefer no compensation?
I can imagine it would have been more likely for you to let Contador during steals go last season if you'd have gotten a monetary compensation for that. Also you maybe would've found the system fairer.
I don't like the idea that riders have to be kept after a team made a large steal attempt on a rider. This reduces flexibility greatly in the transfer windows and there is little action going as it is. Selling an overpaid rider (due to steal attempts) is a good way to free up cash on a rider you would have kept. Not everything can be planned in advance.
If you do not want to keep a rider, just don't counter the steal attempt. If the rider is not worth that much to you, you shouldn't renew him for that amount.
Not paying an insane wage is also a good way to free up cash.
Imo it is unfair to managers attempting a steal if you decide to sell the rider later. With the new option to block steal attempts entirely on selected riders, you have enough riders you can plan flexibly with.
I understand why managers of strong teams like you and knockout are opposed to this, but imo it is necessary to give other teams a shot at closing up.
I would very welcome a transfer cap similiar to the ManGame and think that ICL has been missing one since the start. So yes please
The ManGame has a salary cap which is something different then what I was suggesting. I don't really want to have a salary cap at ICL, as it should be possible to have teams with completely different amount of wages paid. With a salary cap everyone will just try to fill that and just plans with the money above that for other stuff.
The suggested transfer cap would just limit the cash interchanged between teams. Still think it's a good idea?
@TMM: I'll try to be quick tomorrow, so you won't have to do anything on the weekend.  |
| |
|
|
| Shonak |
Posted on 12-09-2018 19:51
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15615
Joined: 16-07-2013
PCM$: 350.00
|
Depends on the price tag, but I would have received some of the invested sums into Contador back (4 years of PoY, well over 1k in training), I would have had considered it. The problem is that all these costs sink into the gutter once you give in which makes sustainable, long-term strategies a bit tricky. That said, I much prefer the option of blocking riders from steal attempts to any other method.
No compensation in case of rider transfer bc the manager already gets something in return in that case, i.e. Contador vs Bananito. To regulate this with some compensation would turn into too much trickery, imo, and it's better to keep it simple and comprehensible.
Yeah, I understood the transfer cap as this. Still very much ok with it.
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
|
| |
|
|
| Bikex |
Posted on 12-09-2018 20:05
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7255
Joined: 25-08-2012
PCM$: 600.00
|
Shonak wrote:
Depends on the price tag, but I would have received some of the invested sums into Contador back (4 years of PoY, well over 1k in training), I would have had considered it. The problem is that all these costs sink into the gutter once you give in which makes sustainable, long-term strategies a bit tricky. That said, I much prefer the option of blocking riders from steal attempts to any other method.
No compensation in case of rider transfer bc the manager already gets something in return in that case, i.e. Contador vs Bananito. To regulate this with some compensation would turn into too much trickery, imo, and it's better to keep it simple and comprehensible.
Yeah, I understood the transfer cap as this. Still very much ok with it.
No compensation in transfers, I agree with you there, if two managers agree on a transfer they surely are both happy with it. I was only thinking about a possible compensation in case a team looses a rider due to a steal. Either paid by the UCI or by the stealing team.
I have not tracked how much of training and research packages have gone into each rider individually so it will be (almost) impossible to base it on that.
With steals blocking you can at least plan long-term with a few riders. Imo it's okay that it's not possible to 100% plan to keep all of your riders long-tern.
Good to know about the cap! How high should it be?
Also about blocking steals on some riders, how much higher should their requested wage be compared to what they would have demanded normally? About 25% higher? |
| |
|
|
| knockout |
Posted on 12-09-2018 20:12
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7735
Joined: 21-12-2010
PCM$: 400.00
|
A few thoughts:
Transfer Cap: I reckon a transfer cap would be a bigger handicap to weaker teams than for bigger teams. We're already at the point where most big deals are rider swaps and i think it would get worse. If you limit cash income then swap deals could become the norm which is a big disadvantage for new teams that dont have assets to trade yet.
If you do not want to keep a rider, just don't counter the steal attempt. If the rider is not worth that much to you, you shouldn't renew him for that amount.
Not paying an insane wage is also a good way to free up cash.
Imo it is unfair to managers attempting a steal if you decide to sell the rider later. With the new option to block steal attempts entirely on selected riders, you have enough riders you can plan flexibly with.
Example: Rider wants 500, someone steals for 600, i value him at 800. Of course ill keep him for now but why should i not be allowed to sell him for 200 if i get that and if i dont get that i can still keep him. Its very rarely a case where you keep a rider you wouldnt want at all. Its in 99% of cases that you are okay with keeping him but wouldnt mind letting him go if a decent offer comes in.
And another point remains: Both teams are often better off when you pay a team 300 as a fee than offering 300 more wage as a steal which is why steals arent used very often and seen critical by many managers. If you want to change this a possibility would be to make steals the only chance to get riders riding for another team (no more transfers. basically as it is in RL) but i dont think thats a change we should decide while some important offseason tasks (signing u23 riders, development) are done already.
A Big Thank You To All MG Reporters! |
| |
|
|
| Scatmaster111 |
Posted on 12-09-2018 20:38
|
Domestique
Posts: 409
Joined: 07-11-2014
PCM$: 200.00
|
knockout wrote:
A few thoughts:
Transfer Cap: I reckon a transfer cap would be a bigger handicap to weaker teams than for bigger teams. We're already at the point where most big deals are rider swaps and i think it would get worse. If you limit cash income then swap deals could become the norm which is a big disadvantage for new teams that dont have assets to trade yet.
This is a pretty important point. One solution would be to waive any transfer cap for new teams, but then that may skew unfairness in the other direction. Maybe a transfer cap only for the later transfer rounds? But then, Bikex already mentioned they want to change the whole 'round' structure, so idk what the best solution is for that rn, and it probably should be something to discuss as a possibility for next season.
Example: Rider wants 500, someone steals for 600, i value him at 800. Of course ill keep him for now but why should i not be allowed to sell him for 200 if i get that and if i dont get that i can still keep him. Its very rarely a case where you keep a rider you wouldnt want at all. Its in 99% of cases that you are okay with keeping him but wouldnt mind letting him go if a decent offer comes in.
Why I mentioned that I haven't ever taken part in steals is because I don't necessarily know the mindset, motives, and tactics, taken either by the stealer or the defending team, and it's good to read this. I think I'm still in favour of having some sort of negative impact when outright blocking steals, because while obviously not every manager goes through this process with the malicious intent of scoping out market desire or what have you, that is still something that is possible under the rules now as I understand it. I just believe that the rules have to first get to a point where they are absolute, definite, and counteract potential abuses, before they can then be flexed to specific circumstance.
And another point remains: Both teams are often better off when you pay a team 300 as a fee than offering 300 more wage as a steal which is why steals arent used very often and seen critical by many managers. If you want to change this a possibility would be to make steals the only chance to get riders riding for another team (no more transfers. basically as it is in RL) but i dont think thats a change we should decide while some important offseason tasks (signing u23 riders, development) are done already.
I think that steals are still an important thing to have, maybe not for established managers with top-flight teams, but for the weaker teams, new teams, CT teams promoting to WT, etc. I personally feel that there's already enough purpose for steals to justify their existence, but maybe that's just me. While the example where both teams end up better off in a fair and agreed-upon trade is true, and it's always nice to have most business like that, steals ensure that all riders are potentially available, and that they can't be hoarded away indefinitely (I remember this being thrown back and forth a lot the last time I was here for a steals discussion).
|
| |
|
|
| Scatmaster111 |
Posted on 12-09-2018 20:51
|
Domestique
Posts: 409
Joined: 07-11-2014
PCM$: 200.00
|
knockout wrote:
Example: Rider wants 500, someone steals for 600, i value him at 800. Of course ill keep him for now but why should i not be allowed to sell him for 200 if i get that and if i dont get that i can still keep him. Its very rarely a case where you keep a rider you wouldnt want at all. Its in 99% of cases that you are okay with keeping him but wouldnt mind letting him go if a decent offer comes in.
Sorry I wanted to talk on this point a bit more, after reading everything over a few more times. I don't really know what the solution here is, because I realise that there was an important point I'm missing here. If you value rider X at 800, that doesn't necessarily mean you want to keep him, but that you don't want to give him away for less than you believe he's worth. And this is exactly why I need to practice waiting until I've read something about ten times before I reply lol.
Wait hold on though, ok to be honest I don't know if I'm following correctly, so somebody correct me if I'm wrong here. For steals, the defending team sets a value, and if a bidding team gets over that value, then the steal is successful, unless the defending team then blocks the steal attempt outright. Do I have that right?
|
| |
|
![imgur.com/KlJUqDx.jpg[/img[img]]https://imgur.com/yUygrQ.jpg](https://imgur.com/KlJUqDx.jpg[/img[img]]https://imgur.com/yUygrQ.jpg)
