PCM.daily banner
24-11-2024 18:24
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 74

· Members Online: 1
wilibici

· Total Members: 161,803
· Newest Member: actronspareparts
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Cycling
 Print Thread
Critérium du Dauphiné 2017
Arberg27
binga58 wrote:
Raziz wrote:
Everyone saying that Porte had a bay day........just no.

He followed the wrong guy essentially and got ruined because of it. It was poor tactics, but come the Tour this will not happen because of stronger domestiques for both Froome and Porte. Porte actually had a better day than the rest considering the champion performance he put on the final climb.

I really dislike all this "bad day" talk, clearly he is a changed rider and throughout this year, he had 1 bad day (Paris-Nice Stage 2). Others have had so many more, so can you please look at the positives before you look at things that have had its time in the past.


Spot on! Richie had an amazing day, practically rode solo for most of the stage, a lot like Cadel and BMC. If Richie was in that chase group then he wins by a mile. Clearly wrong tactic on second last climb but he nearly pulled it off. Clearly the strongest rider at the moment.

Yes, Porte is clearly the best of them there is a level below Fuglsang.
 
Tamijo
Raziz wrote:
Everyone saying that Porte had a bay day........just no.

He followed the wrong guy essentially and got ruined because of it. It was poor tactics, but come the Tour this will not happen because of stronger domestiques for both Froome and Porte. Porte actually had a better day than the rest considering the champion performance he put on the final climb.

.


Even though I'm very happy for Fuglsang, have to agree with this.
 
Raziz
Tamijo wrote:
Raziz wrote:
Everyone saying that Porte had a bay day........just no.

He followed the wrong guy essentially and got ruined because of it. It was poor tactics, but come the Tour this will not happen because of stronger domestiques for both Froome and Porte. Porte actually had a better day than the rest considering the champion performance he put on the final climb.

.


Even though I'm very happy for Fuglsang, have to agree with this.



Yeah, Fuglsang had the race of his life there! Astana adding another variable to the Tour this year.

We are really delving into the unknown this year with Froome's poor condition (or so it seems), Porte's wondrous form, Contador's unpredictability, Movistar's ambiguous team (leader could be quintana, valverde or even soler) and Astana's angels.

Most open Tour for a while!
 
ringo182
Tamijo wrote:
Raziz wrote:
Everyone saying that Porte had a bay day........just no.

He followed the wrong guy essentially and got ruined because of it. It was poor tactics, but come the Tour this will not happen because of stronger domestiques for both Froome and Porte. Porte actually had a better day than the rest considering the champion performance he put on the final climb.

.


Even though I'm very happy for Fuglsang, have to agree with this.


Loosing over a minute on the last stage is a bad day, whatever the circumstances. You say he followed the wrong gut. He actually couldn't follow the right guys when it mattered.

TdF is open but I still make Froome favourite. He'll be in better shape in July.
"Ringo is exactly right", Shonak - 8 September 2016
 
Tamijo
ringo182 wrote:
Tamijo wrote:
Raziz wrote:
Everyone saying that Porte had a bay day........just no.

He followed the wrong guy essentially and got ruined because of it. It was poor tactics, but come the Tour this will not happen because of stronger domestiques for both Froome and Porte. Porte actually had a better day than the rest considering the champion performance he put on the final climb.

.


Even though I'm very happy for Fuglsang, have to agree with this.


Loosing over a minute on the last stage is a bad day, whatever the circumstances. You say he followed the wrong gut. He actually couldn't follow the right guys when it mattered.

TdF is open but I still make Froome favourite. He'll be in better shape in July.


He lost time to Jacob, but not to Christ, Alejandro or Alberto. It is only fair that he did not expect Jacob to be able to do what he did and seen it that light he did pretty good, was just not enough on the day.
 
Masterblaster01
Tamijo wrote:He lost time to Jacob, but not to Christ, Alejandro or Alberto. It is only fair that he did not expect Jacob to be able to do what he did and seen it that light he did pretty good, was just not enough on the day.

Agree with this. Porte had a fantastic ride but underestimated Fuglsang, can happen in those shorter tours. Not seeing it happen in the TdF. My money's still on the Portinator! Banana:lol:
image.prntscr.com/image/95-CbkKXQ6q8_gxIVC71wg.jpg
 
Shonak
Raziz wrote:
Everyone saying that Porte had a bay day........just no.

He followed the wrong guy essentially and got ruined because of it. It was poor tactics, but come the Tour this will not happen because of stronger domestiques for both Froome and Porte. Porte actually had a better day than the rest considering the champion performance he put on the final climb.

I really dislike all this "bad day" talk, clearly he is a changed rider and throughout this year, he had 1 bad day (Paris-Nice Stage 2). Others have had so many more, so can you please look at the positives before you look at things that have had its time in the past.

I think all people except for Ringo saw Porte here as the strongest rider and when you climb like that, he may had a weak moment but surely not a bad day.
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
Arberg27
Shonak wrote:
Raziz wrote:
Everyone saying that Porte had a bay day........just no.

He followed the wrong guy essentially and got ruined because of it. It was poor tactics, but come the Tour this will not happen because of stronger domestiques for both Froome and Porte. Porte actually had a better day than the rest considering the champion performance he put on the final climb.

I really dislike all this "bad day" talk, clearly he is a changed rider and throughout this year, he had 1 bad day (Paris-Nice Stage 2). Others have had so many more, so can you please look at the positives before you look at things that have had its time in the past.

I think all people except for Ringo saw Porte here as the strongest rider and when you climb like that, he may had a weak moment but surely not a bad day.

Fuglsang could easily follow him, was 10 seconds stronger and won two mountain stages.
 
Shonak
Arberg27 wrote:
Shonak wrote:
Raziz wrote:
Everyone saying that Porte had a bay day........just no.

He followed the wrong guy essentially and got ruined because of it. It was poor tactics, but come the Tour this will not happen because of stronger domestiques for both Froome and Porte. Porte actually had a better day than the rest considering the champion performance he put on the final climb.

I really dislike all this "bad day" talk, clearly he is a changed rider and throughout this year, he had 1 bad day (Paris-Nice Stage 2). Others have had so many more, so can you please look at the positives before you look at things that have had its time in the past.

I think all people except for Ringo saw Porte here as the strongest rider and when you climb like that, he may had a weak moment but surely not a bad day.

Fuglsang could easily follow him, was 10 seconds stronger and won two mountain stages.

So what? Fuglsang was super strong and I applaud his win and I think it's richly deserved but Porte was still the strongest rider, on the climbs and against the clock. The strongest doesnt always win and that's good because cycling lives off that, too.
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 24-11-2024 18:24
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
Arberg27
Shonak wrote:
Arberg27 wrote:
Shonak wrote:
Raziz wrote:
Everyone saying that Porte had a bay day........just no.

He followed the wrong guy essentially and got ruined because of it. It was poor tactics, but come the Tour this will not happen because of stronger domestiques for both Froome and Porte. Porte actually had a better day than the rest considering the champion performance he put on the final climb.

I really dislike all this "bad day" talk, clearly he is a changed rider and throughout this year, he had 1 bad day (Paris-Nice Stage 2). Others have had so many more, so can you please look at the positives before you look at things that have had its time in the past.

I think all people except for Ringo saw Porte here as the strongest rider and when you climb like that, he may had a weak moment but surely not a bad day.

Fuglsang could easily follow him, was 10 seconds stronger and won two mountain stages.

So what? Fuglsang was super strong and I applaud his win and I think it's richly deserved but Porte was still the strongest rider, on the climbs and against the clock. The strongest doesnt always win and that's good because cycling lives off that, too.
Fuglsang was the strongest mountain rider.
1 mountain stage: Fuglsang won
2: mountain stage: Fuglsang and Porte together over the finish line.
3: mountain stage: Fuglsang won and more than a minute stronger than Porte.
 
matt17br
Rolling Eyes
(Former) Manager of pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2020/Micros/gen.png Generali pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2020/Micros/gen.png
 
http://v.ht/Matt17
Shonak
Jeez man, whatever you say :lol:
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
trekbmc
Le Gac was also the strongest mountain rider!

1. Porte, Fuglsang and Froome may have beaten him with their teammates pacing but if they never would've dropped him 1 on 1.

2. If Le Gac had the proper support (say Pinot and Reichenbach at least) he would've finished at least 19 seconds faster than Aru on the second mountain stage.

3. He didn't have a bad tactical day but Porte did.



"What done is, is one." - Benji Naesen
 
Paul23
trekbmc wrote:
Le Gac was also the strongest mountain rider!

1. Porte, Fuglsang and Froome may have beaten him with their teammates pacing but if they never would've dropped him 1 on 1.

2. If Le Gac had the proper support (say Pinot and Reichenbach at least) he would've finished at least 19 seconds faster than Aru on the second mountain stage.

3. He didn't have a bad tactical day but Porte did.


But what, if Tony would've been allowed to climb? He's basically Dumoulin in good. Just think about that.
i.imgur.com/aJSlUNt.png
 
Guido Mukk
Arberg27 wrote:
Fuglsang was the strongest mountain rider.
1 mountain stage: Fuglsang won
2: mountain stage: Fuglsang and Porte together over the finish line.
3: mountain stage: Fuglsang won and more than a minute stronger than Porte.


4. Fuglsang won two stages..that makes also him as fastest sprinter.
man you are genius!
 
Paul23
Guido Mukk wrote:
Arberg27 wrote:
Fuglsang was the strongest mountain rider.
1 mountain stage: Fuglsang won
2: mountain stage: Fuglsang and Porte together over the finish line.
3: mountain stage: Fuglsang won and more than a minute stronger than Porte.


4. Fuglsang won two stages..that makes also him as fastest sprinter.
man you are genius!


Well, that is not wrong. I mean, look at this:

image.prntscr.com/image/aXJNNsn9QMSQs0Yg4s_YZA.png


Demare got badly outsprinted twice!
i.imgur.com/aJSlUNt.png
 
Riis123
Porte was the strongest rider, no doubt, but had a weak moment psychically and tactically on Colombiere which costed him the race-
 
ringo182
Shonak wrote:
Raziz wrote:
Everyone saying that Porte had a bay day........just no.

He followed the wrong guy essentially and got ruined because of it. It was poor tactics, but come the Tour this will not happen because of stronger domestiques for both Froome and Porte. Porte actually had a better day than the rest considering the champion performance he put on the final climb.

I really dislike all this "bad day" talk, clearly he is a changed rider and throughout this year, he had 1 bad day (Paris-Nice Stage 2). Others have had so many more, so can you please look at the positives before you look at things that have had its time in the past.

I think all people except for Ringo saw Porte here as the strongest rider and when you climb like that, he may had a weak moment but surely not a bad day.


Well he wasn't the strongest because he lost. Fulgsang was the strongest over the week.
If Porte was the strongest and lost then what chance does he have at the Tour when the big fish will be in top form?
"Ringo is exactly right", Shonak - 8 September 2016
 
Shonak
Porte whining about the teams not letting his guys come back :lol:

https://www.cyclin...-dauphine/

At least he sees it as a lesson for le Tour. Because there'll be more where that came from.
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
Shonak
ringo182 wrote:
Shonak wrote:
Raziz wrote:
Everyone saying that Porte had a bay day........just no.

He followed the wrong guy essentially and got ruined because of it. It was poor tactics, but come the Tour this will not happen because of stronger domestiques for both Froome and Porte. Porte actually had a better day than the rest considering the champion performance he put on the final climb.

I really dislike all this "bad day" talk, clearly he is a changed rider and throughout this year, he had 1 bad day (Paris-Nice Stage 2). Others have had so many more, so can you please look at the positives before you look at things that have had its time in the past.

I think all people except for Ringo saw Porte here as the strongest rider and when you climb like that, he may had a weak moment but surely not a bad day.


Well he wasn't the strongest because he lost. Fulgsang was the strongest over the week.
If Porte was the strongest and lost then what chance does he have at the Tour when the big fish will be in top form?

Uhm, sure man, whatever keeps you asleep at night. I can't be bothered to argue with people again, who don't care about the context of a race and apparently just bother to look at a result and derive from the odd difference from rider A to rider B who the strongest is. There's way too much of this discussion going on lately.
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Stats: Time Trial
Stats: Time Trial
PCM 08: PCM.daily's 2009 DB
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.55 seconds