PCM.daily banner
22-11-2024 16:26
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 76

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,786
· Newest Member: noxairindia
View Thread
PCM.daily » Pro Cycling Manager 2006-2020 » Pro Cycling Manager 2015
 Print Thread
PCMdaily DB Stat Discussion - PCM15
HerakleX
marcoplv95 wrote:

Uran: Yes probably deserves 77...i just don't get last stage how was him better than Chaves...


Remember he's been suffering from bonchitis since the TT, and he wasn't even full recovered the last mountain stage. You should take that into account.
 
j0nne
Landa 81
Nibali 81
Valverde 80
Kruijswijk 80
Zakarin 80
Majka 79
Chaves 79
Fuglsang 78
Pozzovivo 78
Uran 78
Scarponi 77
Nieve 77
Jungels 77
Dumoulin 77
Amador 77
Hesjedal 77
Kangert 77
Roche 77
Atapuma 76
Siutsou 76
Firsanov 76
Dombrowski 76
Dupont 76
Anton 75
Taaramae 75
Henao 75
Formolo 75
Brambilla 75
Visconti 75
Cardoso 75
Ulissi 75
Foliforov 75????
 
TheManxMissile
I love Nibali's GT record since 2012. 3rd behind Sky in 2012 TDF, 1st 2013 Giro, 2nd behind the nuclear Horner Vuelta 2013, 1st 2014 TDF, 1st 2016 Giro.
Only once since 2012 has he finished off a GT podium, and that was last years TDF. Since 2010 he's only had one other non-podium GT finish in the 2011 Vuelta.

Lets add his MTN stage win and GC in Oman 2016, and numerous other MTN stage/race results in the last few years. Nibali is one of the best climbers and GC racers in the peloton full stop.
i.imgur.com/UmX5YX1.jpgi.imgur.com/iRneKpI.jpgi.imgur.com/fljmGSP.jpgi.imgur.com/qV5ItIc.jpgimgur.com/dr2BAI6.jpgimgur.com/KlJUqDx.jpg[/img[img]]https://imgur.com/yUygrQ.jpgi.imgur.com/C1rG9BW.jpgi.imgur.com/sEDS7gr.jpg
 
Paul23
HerakleX wrote:
marcoplv95 wrote:

Uran: Yes probably deserves 77...i just don't get last stage how was him better than Chaves...


Remember he's been suffering from bonchitis since the TT, and he wasn't even full recovered the last mountain stage. You should take that into account.


Well, when Tony made a solid effort on last years Amstel Gold, whilst having knee problems, and didn't get an upgrade, Uran should be treated the same.
i.imgur.com/aJSlUNt.png
 
Paul23
marcoplv95 wrote:
If my grandfather had 3 balls he would have been a flipper.


So if, I win by the better riders crashing, I should get an extreme stat? Nibali hasn't proven to be the strongest in the Giro. He was dropped on several occasions and he could only beat Kruijijswijijk, when Steven was hurt.
i.imgur.com/aJSlUNt.png
 
Tafiolmo
I can see quite a few people are going hammer and tongs with these Giro stats which of course is good. Without giving too much away before they are finalized we are 90% already there, Riders like Nibali will be on 81 mtn, Kruijswijk 80 mtn (I hate writing that name as it's hard to spell) and Chaves 79 mtn, with particular attention being made to their backup stats all the way down to riders like Foliforov on 75 mtn due to two great climbing stages..

Just for the record Uran sucked at TT's and lost his race there but he climbed well and stayed with the leaders on a lot of the days and was very good on stage 20 so he'll be at 78 mtn no problem (illness taken into consideration) whereas somebody like Pozzovivo got a deserved decrease.

We have just the REC stats to bash out over the next couple of days and all the Giro stats have been completed with every stage having been taken into consideration.
pcmdaily.com/files/exppack/Banner/DBTeam24.png
 
Arberg27
TheManxMissile wrote:
I love Nibali's GT record since 2012. 3rd behind Sky in 2012 TDF, 1st 2013 Giro, 2nd behind the nuclear Horner Vuelta 2013, 1st 2014 TDF, 1st 2016 Giro.
Only once since 2012 has he finished off a GT podium, and that was last years TDF. Since 2010 he's only had one other non-podium GT finish in the 2011 Vuelta.

Lets add his MTN stage win and GC in Oman 2016, and numerous other MTN stage/race results in the last few years. Nibali is one of the best climbers and GC racers in the peloton full stop.
And only 8:36 minutes behind Froome :lol:
 
MARSUPILAMI
Nibali, Kruijswijk - 81
Chaves - 80
Valverde, Zakarin - 79
Jungels, Majka - 78
Urán, Amador, Nieve, Kangert - 77
Atapuma, Siutsou, Scarponi, Taaramae - 76
Cunego, Visconti, Plaza, Ulissi (or even 76) - 75
imgur.com/wPLoPQs.png

pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/missed.png
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 22-11-2024 16:26
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
matt17br
No way is Cunego going to get 76 or even 75 the way he rode this Giro... He could only gather points when he had no serious contention. When he had to try to win the blue jersey he always was not good enough to battle it out with his rivals.
Edited by matt17br on 29-05-2016 18:36
(Former) Manager of pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2020/Micros/gen.png Generali pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2020/Micros/gen.png
 
http://v.ht/Matt17
AiZaK
I think Cunego with 74 (and 75 hills) is perfect for him
 
Tafiolmo
Yep Cunego is your typical 74 mtn rider with a decent FS.
pcmdaily.com/files/exppack/Banner/DBTeam24.png
 
clamel
Now some question on US cyclists
Perhaps you should in next update add the recently by Rally signed mountain-biker Sepp Kuss ? He did some really good results in Gila and San Dimas and a stage win in Redland Classics.
Team Rally liked it and signed him prior to the USA National, but he didn't finish that.
Perhaps with some moderate stats on DH and Hills, coming over to the road from mountain-biking. He could be another up-coming US rider like Powless. Who knows
He got some good results on Strava, some only second to Tom Davidson.
Think you can form an opinion on what stats should be good on these two links.

https://firstcycling.com/rider.php?r=4...hp?r=48008
https://cyclingtips.com/2016/04/meet-s...s-classic/
Smile____________________________________________Smile


--------------------
“We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.” Rolling Eyes

"If thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into thee."
--------------------
 
Ton1Mart1n
Cunego mo stat in his winning days - 81? 82?
“When it’s hurting you, that’s when you can make a difference”
 
Riis123
Ton1Mart1n wrote:
Cunego mo stat in his winning days - 81? 82?


I didn't watch that Giro, but from what I've been told and what little research I've made on that race, Cunego was never a dominant climber in that race either. 82 is what too high. Maybe 81, but I lean towards 80 with superb hill and finishing abilities.
 
Ton1Mart1n
Riis123 wrote:
Ton1Mart1n wrote:
Cunego mo stat in his winning days - 81? 82?


I didn't watch that Giro, but from what I've been told and what little research I've made on that race, Cunego was never a dominant climber in that race either. 82 is what too high. Maybe 81, but I lean towards 80 with superb hill and finishing abilities.


As I remember him he was a very fast finisher and had a high ACC like Valverde.

I was wondering about the best sprinting GC/MO rider of all time.. Valverde? Jalebert? Di Luca?
What do you guys think?
“When it’s hurting you, that’s when you can make a difference”
 
Croatia14
clamel wrote:
Now some question on US cyclists
Perhaps you should in next update add the recently by Rally signed mountain-biker Sepp Kuss ? He did some really good results in Gila and San Dimas and a stage win in Redland Classics.
Team Rally liked it and signed him prior to the USA National, but he didn't finish that.
Perhaps with some moderate stats on DH and Hills, coming over to the road from mountain-biking. He could be another up-coming US rider like Powless. Who knows
He got some good results on Strava, some only second to Tom Davidson.
Think you can form an opinion on what stats should be good on these two links.

https://firstcycling.com/rider.php?r=4...hp?r=48008
https://cyclingtips.com/2016/04/meet-s...s-classic/


Sepp Kuss already made it into our db, with 65 FL/MO, 66 HI & 67 DH/ACC - you´ll see him in the next release Smile
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/moty.png
 
clamel
He should have a little plus on aggresive/fighter I do believe, He was in early breaks in US National and in other races too
Smile____________________________________________Smile


--------------------
“We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.” Rolling Eyes

"If thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into thee."
--------------------
 
Jorge14
Kuss for me is like; 4Potential
65Flat
65Mountain
60Cobbles
70Downhill
63TT
61Prologue
62SP
67Acc
64Endurance
65Resistance
64Recovery
66Hills
68Fighter

Dont know if anyone likes
 
Croatia14
clamel wrote:
He should have a little plus on aggresive/fighter I do believe, He was in early breaks in US National and in other races too


it´s at 66 currently
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/moty.png
 
Ollfardh
I know we talked about Baptiste Plackaert not too long ago, but I wasn't satisfied with his stats at the time and since he just keeps improving, so I want to bring him back to the table. He has shown to be a great sprinter the last few years and this year he showed he can do a bit of classic work as well. He's 18th in this year's CQ ranking with a few wins and results that should give him higher stats:

https://www.cqrank...;current=0
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Credit Agricole in the landscape
Credit Agricole in the landscape
PCM 08: Official Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.34 seconds