|
Best climber last 20 years.
|
| Forza-Diavolo |
Posted on 30-07-2015 09:10
|
Stagiare
Posts: 197
Joined: 22-07-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Can you make a list of the 20 best climber for the past 20 years? |
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 28-11-2024 17:23
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| Ollfardh |
Posted on 30-07-2015 09:27
|
World Champion
Posts: 14563
Joined: 08-08-2011
PCM$: 9100.00
|
Yes, you can.
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
|
| |
|
|
| dark_x2012 |
Posted on 30-07-2015 09:35
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 857
Joined: 13-05-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
20 best climbers is a lot. In the top 10 should be Pantani, Schleck, Heras, Ullrich, Sastre, Armstrong, Contador, Basso maybe as well. Not in this order ofc. |
| |
|
|
| cactus-jack |
Posted on 30-07-2015 11:08
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3936
Joined: 31-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
dark_x2012 wrote:
20 best climbers is a lot. In the top 10 should be Pantani, Schleck, Heras, Ullrich, Sastre, Armstrong, Contador, Basso maybe as well. Not in this order ofc.
Even though he's quite young, shouldn't Quintana be up there? Or do you think he needs to prove himself more?
There's a fine line between "psychotherapist" and "psycho the rapist"
|
| |
|
|
| Spilak23 |
Posted on 30-07-2015 11:12
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7357
Joined: 22-08-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Quick list from the top of my head. All of them but Lance and Ulle are considerd mainly climbers. List would probably be different if I did it again tomprrow
1. Marco Pantani
2. Alberto Contador
3. Roberto Heras
4. Lance Armstrong
5. Ivan Basso
6. Gilberto Simoni
7. Nairo Quintana
8. José Rujano
9. Michael Rasmussen
10. Chris Froome
11. Joseba Beloki
12. Jan Ullrich
13. Richard Virenque
14. Carlos Sastre
15. José Maria Jimenez
16. Andy Schleck
17. Iban Mayo
18. Emmanuele Sella
19. Fernando Escartin
20. Leonardo Piepoli
|
| |
|
|
| Ian Butler |
Posted on 30-07-2015 11:14
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 21854
Joined: 01-05-2012
PCM$: 400.00
|
Other names: Froome, Rodriguez (?) |
| |
|
|
| dark_x2012 |
Posted on 30-07-2015 11:16
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 857
Joined: 13-05-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
cactus-jack wrote:
dark_x2012 wrote:
20 best climbers is a lot. In the top 10 should be Pantani, Schleck, Heras, Ullrich, Sastre, Armstrong, Contador, Basso maybe as well. Not in this order ofc.
Even though he's quite young, shouldn't Quintana be up there? Or do you think he needs to prove himself more?
Completely forgot about him  I was looking mostly at past results and skipped Quintana. Maybe also Piti in his strongest years can be put there. Also Mayo and Beloki. |
| |
|
|
| udoi |
Posted on 30-07-2015 11:33
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1165
Joined: 16-05-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
1. Froome
2. Heras
3. Pantani
4. Simoni
5. Armstrong |
| |
|
|
| ianrussell |
Posted on 30-07-2015 11:49
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3440
Joined: 09-10-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
1. David Moncoutié
https://inrng.com/...moncoutie/ |
| |
|
|
| trekbmc |
Posted on 30-07-2015 11:53
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7366
Joined: 11-07-2014
PCM$: 700.00
|
Raises an interesting idea for something PCM (story? database?), where the very best riders (either overall or past 20 years) are sorted into 22 teams (national based or made to be equal ability) to race a GT. It would be an interesting type of comparison, you could sort each team to have 9 of the top 198 riders, based on who is (in dailys opinion?), the top climbers, sprinter, roleurs, etc. Would be interesting to be able to compare all these riders, especially on equal teams.
Although having an agreeable list of riders in the race or agreeable stats would be a challenge.
"What done is, is one." - Benji Naesen
|
| |
|
|
| sam1196 |
Posted on 30-07-2015 11:59
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1493
Joined: 11-10-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Not an easy question. Mainly because there isn't something like a definition for a climber. And offcourse the whole doping show.
Still, in my opinion i guess doping alone doesn't make you win a Tdf. A certain amount of talent is needed. So you'll need to include Armstrong, Pantani, ...
Mainly i agree with names listed above although based on talent i would say Valverde also. But maybe he isn't considered a pure climber.
VINO VINO VINO VINO VINO VINO VINO VINO VINO
|
| |
|
|
| Omloop |
Posted on 30-07-2015 12:04
|
Domestique
Posts: 433
Joined: 08-01-2014
PCM$: 200.00
|
Samuel Sanchez is definately woth a mention. |
| |
|
|
| sam1196 |
Posted on 30-07-2015 12:08
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1493
Joined: 11-10-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
A few years ago i had the impression Igor Anton was one of the more pure clmbers out there.
Mosquera also?
VINO VINO VINO VINO VINO VINO VINO VINO VINO
|
| |
|
|
| ianrussell |
Posted on 30-07-2015 12:11
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3440
Joined: 09-10-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
sam1196 wrote:
Not an easy question. Mainly because there isn't something like a definition for a climber. And offcourse the whole doping show.
Still, in my opinion i guess doping alone doesn't make you win a Tdf. A certain amount of talent is needed. So you'll need to include Armstrong, Pantani, ...
Mainly i agree with names listed above although based on talent i would say Valverde also. But maybe he isn't considered a pure climber.
That's the problem it's impossible to know...by all accounts Armstrong had limited talent at the top level until it all changed - recreational drug, different people different effect. Performance enhancing drug, different people different effect.
For example if you have a naturally low hemocrit then EPO is going to do way more for you than someone with a naturally high level. It becomes as much a physiological lottery as anything else with super responders or even other basic factors like financial clout, willingness to risk your health in the pursuit of victory (syrup like blood requiring a 3 am wake/exercise to maintain circulation - no problem!) and is anything but a level playing field.
So I'm sticking with Moncoutie and his 14th fastest Ventoux (see my post above with Inrng link too btw think 1999 was a Dauphine TT won by no other than Johnathan Vaughters)  https://www.climbi...es-on.html
p.s. I'm not saying all the dopers don't have any talent but where they would've ranked is impossible to know.
p.p.s granted you can simply disregard dopage too
Edited by ianrussell on 30-07-2015 12:32
|
| |
|
|
| sam1196 |
Posted on 30-07-2015 12:20
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1493
Joined: 11-10-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
You could stick with Moncoutié as a statement. But even though they got caught i think riders like Pantani, Valverde and Ullrich, Basso... Were more talented then Moncoutié.
We'll never know, that's for sure.
In that case it's quite a stupid question to ask for the best climber since 1995, since you can only hope to find something clean post 2006/2007.
Cycling lists are more fun when you disregard dope i guess.
PS; Makes me wonder about a new avatar  First time on Pcm.Daily since 2012, feels good to be back.
VINO VINO VINO VINO VINO VINO VINO VINO VINO
|
| |
|
|
| ianrussell |
Posted on 30-07-2015 12:35
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3440
Joined: 09-10-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Fair enough
This was a day when Vaughters put Vino in his place and Moncoutie was 7th in the Ventoux TT at the Dauphine:
https://autobus.cy...ne993.html
How things have changed?
Also what an interesting last line from that linked report:
"The ITT showed how good the riders of today are in comparison with the champions of yesteryear. On the same parcours in 1958 during the Tour de France, Luxembourg's Charly Gaul came first with a time of 1.02.09. That would have given him 28th place today. But the bikes are a significant improvement these days."
They were pretty good back in 1958 all considered! |
| |
|
|
| Strydz |
Posted on 30-07-2015 13:10
|
Team Leader
Posts: 5894
Joined: 02-08-2011
PCM$: 1625.00
|
Hells 500 Crew and 6 x Everester
Don Rd Launching Place
Melbourne Hill Rd Warrandyte
Colby Drive Belgrave South
William Rd The Patch
David Hill Rd Monbulk
Lakeside Drive Emerald
https://www.everesting.cc/hall-of-fame/ |
| |
|
|
| Strydz |
Posted on 30-07-2015 13:12
|
Team Leader
Posts: 5894
Joined: 02-08-2011
PCM$: 1625.00
|
If we are ignoring everything then Pantani straight up! Massive distance to 2nd
Hells 500 Crew and 6 x Everester
Don Rd Launching Place
Melbourne Hill Rd Warrandyte
Colby Drive Belgrave South
William Rd The Patch
David Hill Rd Monbulk
Lakeside Drive Emerald
https://www.everesting.cc/hall-of-fame/ |
| |
|
|
| dark_x2012 |
Posted on 30-07-2015 13:26
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 857
Joined: 13-05-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
Strydz wrote:
If we are ignoring everything then Pantani straight up! Massive distance to 2nd
I'm not ignoring anything and I know he was doped as hell but would still put him way before all cyclists. He was perhaps one of the most talented guys on earth. And I'd definitely put him in front of guys like Lance, Ulle, Schleck, Alberto, Froome, Heras, Mayo, Sastre, Quintana, etc. |
| |
|
|
| Forza-Diavolo |
Posted on 30-07-2015 13:28
|
Stagiare
Posts: 197
Joined: 22-07-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Can see there is someone who believes Heras was better climb than Armstrong.
how can it be? |
| |
|
