61 is a bit too much for Scott
And Cav better than Ciolek no way

That's his overall average sam

Ciolek may be a better sprinter than Cavendish (pretty much the same anyway) but Cav has a good TT on him and is fairly handy on the cobbles

I know its the overall, thats why I said it. Imo its exactly the other way round, Cav is the better sprinter but Ciolek better in the allround(better on hills f.e.)

Yeah I have no doubt, there aren't many riders worse than Cav up the hills, but I think the main reason for him being better rated is because of his TT stat and maybe his cobble which are 70 and 67 respectively

Speaking of Cavs abilities on hills, did I see a 61 hill stat on the best u23s screen??

(How I love to argue about stats )

Just HIL stat, to allow him go through steep slopes like the ones in the stages of the Volta a Catalunya he won last year.

Edvald boasson Hagen is Norwegian^^
And so am I

Wow, want a cookie?

Yeah, i actually would like one...a cookie is just what i need

Just enjoyed this old pic. Ciolek > Cavendish. Unfortunately 4 month later Cavendish won his first TdF stages and became the best sprinter and Ciolek doesn`t increase at Milram

I like Ciolek, but hes no way better than Cav!

#10: Look at this now...

Ciolek has obviously proven to be waaaaay better than Cavendish over time!