sounds pretty good lol neilstrung =p

I think I saw a French rider
Somewhere... in the bottom...

how can these stats be true? OMG

Gesink massively underrated.
Good job Cya.

Are you serious? Evans higher than Basso?
Vinokourov higher than Gesink?

What has Cyanide been smoking

Edit: wait what? Cunego even?

Ffs total fuckup

lol at rubens call but yeah abit overrated with some stats..

Evans at 82? Sastre at 82? LOL

Evans and Sastre at 82 is ok, but if Andy schleck is at 82 too, if basso is at 81 and if contador is at 83, there is a big problem

conta wins tour at 80% of his max fitness..

Valverde........

It´s good that there are not many riders with 77+ but some stats are really weird

I can´t understand those who criticize the PCM-DB stats, but this stats have to be changed

lol at the hill-stat of Gesink...

Gesink and Kreuziger underated again,with these stats they would hardly compete for something

How can Soler have 78??? He has been shit for a long time. 75-76 in my opinion.

Hey, keep in mind people that one stat alone doesn't necessarily say too much about a rider when all comes to all. A rider who have a higher mountain-stat than you might think realistic might not be so super in the mountains after all if he doesn't have the stamina-stats to back it up. And same thing goes with many stats that to some extent walk hand in hand. In MOST cases I think Cya have done well with the stats, or so it seems at least. I will change some riders stats slightly though to make it as realistic as possible in my own eyes. It's a shame we don't see a screenshot with stamina stats, as that is probly the most central stat i nthe game.

Lance worse than Cunego and Leipheimer??

The Official Database of PCM suks every year. Just download the new releases

i think, that the datas are not much different then the datas from last year

Soler wtf...

Evans, Cunego and Sastre to high
Gesink, Van den Broek, Sanchez and Mosquera should have at least 80 in Mountain.

3rd in TDF 09 gets... 78?