Y'all must take into account that not only climbing values count when it comes to win a GT or a mountainous race. Stamina and, overall, recuperation values play a key role.
For me it's good, I just think Contador deserved a 81 instead of 82..., but one more acceleration...because of the explosion that makes me remember Armstrong...
For me it's good, I just think Contador deserved a 81 instead of 82..., but one more acceleration...because of the explosion that makes me remember Armstrong...
The only mistake so far that I can find is that Valverde is just too high in climbing - he was nowhere near Levi, and yet his stats are all higher (although the stat CRI could prove me completely wrong. What is sit in English?)
Only 77. Being a great climber does not mean you can give them a great value: great values for pure climbers are very rare to find since then they'll be fighting for GT's. The only exception is Leo Piepoli.
@Dankan: Rasmussen is allready riding again, just not for a team. I think this weekend he is riding a criterium about 100km from my home, and a week or 2 ago he rode one in denmark as well.
I just wondered, how about Discovery Channel? Is it your plan to just let em stay as Discovery, or will the team riders (those who wont have a transfer before your release) be on the free transfer list ?
Mechov toolow! Nobody saw him climbing in Vuelta? Sastre couldn'tget rid of him in even 1 stage, and Menchov ended a few times up in a group in front of him.. Menchov was definately looking better than sastre, and Piepoli also is a better climber than that.. He also climbed better than Sastre, don't see why Sastre is being secon best climber.. but that's my opinion