The Difficult Topics
|
Gulvplanke |
Posted on 29-04-2013 15:26
|
Stagiare
Posts: 229
Joined: 30-12-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Legal age is 16.
How hard can it be?
|
|
|
|
TheManxMissile |
Posted on 29-04-2013 15:27
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
Gulvplanke wrote:
Legal age is 16.
Well then its rape, and he is in the shit no matter what he says.
Of course if he was a footballer or professional sportsman, or a rapper he would be fine
|
|
|
|
cactus-jack |
Posted on 29-04-2013 15:44
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3936
Joined: 31-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
TheManxMissile wrote:
cactus-jack wrote:
By the way, this is one no way related to rape, just so it's clear. It was consensual, but morally corrupt seeing as how she was said to be going through a rough patch and he was a father figure.
There is no way on earth he can actually believe what he is saying.
Then what the fuck is the law in Norway! Legal age is what exactly?
and is there no such thing as statutory rape? (which would describe exactly that situation here)
Statutory rape is right on the money. The reason I said it wasn't "rape" as in non-consentual is because it's an important distinction.
Not that it makes it any better, of course. He is in knee-deep shit anyway. By going through with this appeal he has managed to hit rock bottom and then started digging.
There's a fine line between "psychotherapist" and "psycho the rapist"
|
|
|
|
baseballlover312 |
Posted on 29-04-2013 21:26
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 16429
Joined: 27-07-2011
PCM$: 10438.70
|
That guy has issues to say the least.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
|
|
|
|
Avin Wargunnson |
Posted on 30-04-2013 06:23
|
World Champion
Posts: 14236
Joined: 20-06-2011
PCM$: 300.00
|
Gulvplanke wrote:
Legal age is 16.
16? That is beyond stupid, people start their sexual lives and are ready for that physically way earlier. Here it is 15, but i think 14 would be the best border, also for the crimes responsibility...
Edited by Avin Wargunnson on 30-04-2013 06:23
|
|
|
|
Ad Bot |
Posted on 22-11-2024 04:07
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
IP: None |
|
|
TheManxMissile |
Posted on 30-04-2013 08:55
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
Avin Wargunnson wrote:
Gulvplanke wrote:
Legal age is 16.
16? That is beyond stupid, people start their sexual lives and are ready for that physically way earlier. Here it is 15, but i think 14 would be the best border, also for the crimes responsibility...
14! That would just be dumb. I cannot think of a single 14year old who is mature enough to make that choice. Especially as you know pedophiles would be all up in them legally, but still taking advantage etc.
However, in the UK at least, 16 still doesn't make sense. We can have sex, but cannot watch porn... Thats totally logical...
I can get someone pregnant but can't vote, can't drive, can't get married without permission...
The US is even worse as it has higher ages for legal drinking, and lower fro driving...
|
|
|
|
Ian Butler |
Posted on 30-04-2013 09:22
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 21854
Joined: 01-05-2012
PCM$: 400.00
|
What do you suggest, no sex until 18, you monk |
|
|
|
TheManxMissile |
Posted on 30-04-2013 09:24
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
Ian Butler wrote:
What do you suggest, no sex until 18, you monk
Hell no!!! Just that if you can have sex, surely you can watch porn and do some other things
And that 14 is too young
|
|
|
|
Ian Butler |
Posted on 30-04-2013 09:34
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 21854
Joined: 01-05-2012
PCM$: 400.00
|
I see your point. But to be honest, two 15-year old kids in a relationship won't wait until 16 because that makes it legal... It won't solve anything, changing the law. And what, the state is going to arrest two kids for having sex? |
|
|
|
TheManxMissile |
Posted on 30-04-2013 09:44
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
Ian Butler wrote:
I see your point. But to be honest, two 15-year old kids in a relationship won't wait until 16 because that makes it legal... It won't solve anything, changing the law. And what, the state is going to arrest two kids for having sex?
Its not about two 15 year olds. Its about a 40year old taking advantage of a 14-15 year old
|
|
|
|
Avin Wargunnson |
Posted on 30-04-2013 09:47
|
World Champion
Posts: 14236
Joined: 20-06-2011
PCM$: 300.00
|
But the law would also ban two 15year olds from having a sex, there cant be separate law for older and younger men having sex with underage girl, both is sex with underage person...
|
|
|
|
TheManxMissile |
Posted on 30-04-2013 09:50
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
Avin Wargunnson wrote:
But the law would also ban two 15year olds from having a sex, there cant be separate law for older and younger men having sex with underage girl, both is sex with underage person...
This is where the more subtle specifics in the law come in.
Two 15 year olds is just underage sex. If reported fuck all would happen, probably forced to see some help
If a 40 year old does a 15 year old, then thats different because of the age gap (would also apply if someone is 18+)
And its different again for 17 and 15 year old.
|
|
|
|
Avin Wargunnson |
Posted on 30-04-2013 09:53
|
World Champion
Posts: 14236
Joined: 20-06-2011
PCM$: 300.00
|
Wait, so having sex with 17years old girl when being 40+ is something bad? It is legal and i think nothing bad, if it is decision of both sides...
|
|
|
|
TheManxMissile |
Posted on 30-04-2013 10:00
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
Avin Wargunnson wrote:
Wait, so having sex with 17years old girl when being 40+ is something bad? It is legal and i think nothing bad, if it is decision of both sides...
is said 40 and 15, and 17 and 17...
And in the UK that is potentially illegal depending on the situation because an adult is 18+ (so 17 is a child in law, sort of)
|
|
|
|
Ian Butler |
Posted on 30-04-2013 10:02
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 21854
Joined: 01-05-2012
PCM$: 400.00
|
In Belgium the law is: 16 is ripe for sex, but everything 18 and above is illegal to have sex with everything below 18. So you can have someone from 18 and 40, but not someone from 17 and 19 |
|
|
|
Aquarius |
Posted on 30-04-2013 12:41
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 5220
Joined: 29-11-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
I reckon the local law say 16 is the age here, or two years difference maximum if both are at least 15. Otherwise you can be charged for something like "under age perversion felony". |
|
|
|
kumazan |
Posted on 30-04-2013 12:49
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6662
Joined: 02-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
In Spain the age of consent is 13, but if it's considered that there's been some kind of abuse, like the use of deceit or something like that, you could still be charged as long as the other person is under 16.
|
|
|
|
baseballlover312 |
Posted on 30-04-2013 20:37
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 16429
Joined: 27-07-2011
PCM$: 10438.70
|
kumazan wrote:
In Spain the age of consent is 13, but if it's considered that there's been some kind of abuse, like the use of deceit or something like that, you could still be charged as long as the other person is under 16.
That sounds right. Bunch of 7th graders hooking up.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
|
|
|
|
Avin Wargunnson |
Posted on 23-05-2013 08:13
|
World Champion
Posts: 14236
Joined: 20-06-2011
PCM$: 300.00
|
Can somebody find any reason and tell me why and what behind all those immigrants protests in Sweden? They are burning cars and figting police of state that gave them the chance to live there in peace,because of high unemployment and bad housing situation. So why they had not stay in their former countries and are begging for political asylum, when they are unhappy after it and rebel against goverment that gave them new chance to live?
There is 16% unemployment rate among young immigrants in Sweden, you call that bad and worth a rebellion? Such a rate is in many regions of Europe and people are not acting like animals because of it.
|
|
|
|
Crommy |
Posted on 23-05-2013 08:54
|
World Champion
Posts: 10018
Joined: 29-11-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
Avin Wargunnson wrote:
Can somebody find any reason and tell me why and what behind all those immigrants protests in Sweden? They are burning cars and figting police of state that gave them the chance to live there in peace,because of high unemployment and bad housing situation. So why they had not stay in their former countries and are begging for political asylum, when they are unhappy after it and rebel against goverment that gave them new chance to live?
There is 16% unemployment rate among young immigrants in Sweden, you call that bad and worth a rebellion? Such a rate is in many regions of Europe and people are not acting like animals because of it.
From the BBC
Police in the deprived, largely immigrant suburb of Husby shot a man dead last week after he reportedly threatened to kill them with a machete.
The founder of a local youth group told Swedish media the riots were a reaction to "police brutality".
However, local people accused the police of racism.
Rami al-Khamisi, a law student and founder of the youth organisation Megafonen, told the Swedish edition of online newspaper The Local that he had been insulted racially by police. Teenagers, he said, had been called "monkeys".
He said the crowd was reacting to a "growing marginalisation and segregation in Sweden over the past 10, 20 years" from both a class and a race perspective.
Any Swedes know more about this?
|
|
|