PCM.daily banner
25-11-2024 19:13
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 52

· Members Online: 1
jaxika

· Total Members: 161,814
· Newest Member: maverick4121
View Thread
PCM.daily » Pro Cycling Manager 2006-2020 » Pro Cycling Manager 2016
 Print Thread
PCM.daily Projects WT Stat Discussion
Tafiolmo
Arberg27 wrote:
Tafiolmo wrote:
Arberg.
I've really no idea what you're jabbering on about.

Also you do realise that you can manually change the stats to your own taste? so instead of bitching why don't you get statting instead.

Looking into the results when you give stats? If yes, how did you figure out that Cavendish is not the best sprinter?

I would like to hear your arguments. Of course I have change it in my own.


We spent ages with you explaining this last year which you seem to have overlooked, about how Cav's sprint/acc ratio along with a great train makes him still one of the elite sprinters. .

You also realise that he has been ill this year and possibly may not have great form if he rides the Tour BUT his stats will still stay the same, which shows just how considerate we are.

Thatguy: Good point about Sagan acc and DH that will also be looked at
Edited by Tafiolmo on 24-05-2017 18:44
pcmdaily.com/files/exppack/Banner/DBTeam24.png
 
Paul23
@Tafiolmo: Just ignore him. It's the same old story. I also don't agree with all stats, but since I know that I disagree due to my bias, I just change them and that's it. I don't go around here, claiming, how Tony should be the strongest TTer or how Gilbert should have 81 HI and 80 COB.
i.imgur.com/aJSlUNt.png
 
Arberg27
Paul23 wrote:
Porte is a better allrounder. You have to look where the results come from. Kittel beats Cav in alot of sprints, Porte beats Froome in hilly stages.

Froome has not been good in a single race or mountain stage in year. Him and Cavendish must first be in shape to the tour Wink

Would you like to give Froome 78 in mountain now and after Tour 83 again? And Cavendish 78 sprint now and after Tour 82 again ?
 
Tafiolmo
Paul We could ignore him but that would be cruel and I'm a kind-hearted soul.
pcmdaily.com/files/exppack/Banner/DBTeam24.png
 
Paul23
Tafiolmo wrote:
Paul We could ignore him but that would be cruel and I'm a kind-hearted soul.

I know you are. You're doing well in the db Team I might add. I was pretty sceptical at the start, but you're really handling this thread really nice.
i.imgur.com/aJSlUNt.png
 
Tafiolmo
Paul23 wrote:
Tafiolmo wrote:
Paul We could ignore him but that would be cruel and I'm a kind-hearted soul.

I know you are. You're doing well in the db Team I might add. I was pretty sceptical at the start, but you're really handling this thread really nice.


It ain't easy statting a db and it's a daily routine almost but luckily with the rest of the stats team for backup I think we get most of them right but as always stats are always going to be subjective anyway.
pcmdaily.com/files/exppack/Banner/DBTeam24.png
 
marcoplv95
Imo Arberg27 doesn't deserve to be ignored, it's funny to look his comments, he's frank!
Anyways i agree with him about Cavendish, you told many times that you don't base stats over few months but longer. Well, then Cavendish deserves 82 after that tour, i don't think he can be worse than this Greipel!

Another point: I think Nibali deserves at least more REC than Quintana (maybe interchange their 83 and 84). And 80 STA would be fair too. And Quintana 74 in TTR if Nibali is 76. Then 80 MON and 83 could be reasonable.

EDIT: I though Nibali had 80 MON and Quintana 75 TTR...but instead 81 and 73, they're honest.
Edited by marcoplv95 on 31-05-2017 01:14
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 25-11-2024 19:13
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
Arberg27
Paul23 wrote:
Because he declined in the last years.

It is Kittel and Greipel there it is. Kittel since 2014 and Greipel since 2015.
Since then they have only won 1 stage in the Tour.

Contrary to Cavendish there still wins many stages in tour.
Edited by Arberg27 on 24-05-2017 19:33
 
Arberg27
marcoplv95 wrote:
Imo Arberg27 doesn't deserve to be ignored, it's funny to look his comments, he's frank!
Anyways i agree with him about Cavendish, you told many times that you don't base stats over few months but longer. Well, then Cavendish deserves 82 after that tour, i don't think he can be worse than this Greipel!

Another point: I think Nibali deserves at least more REC than Quintana (maybe interchange their 83 and 84). And 80 STA would be fair too. And Quintana 74 in TTR if Nibali is 76. Then 80 MON and 83 could be reasonable.
Nibali 81 MON. I agree with everything else Smile
 
Ian Butler
cio93 wrote:
I just got into my first offseason and I wanted to sign Eddy Merckx but I didn't find him anywhere??
You said you put in a lot of good free agents so I can't believe you missed him somehow. I mean he won the Tour FIVE times!! That's way more than Froome so I think he deserves really good stats.
He would be a great addition to my team so I hope you'll correct this mistake.


Just sign Pierre Latour and everything'll be fine.
 
Arberg27
MON:
82: Quintana
81: Nibali
80: Pinot, Landa
79: Dumoulin, Zakarin, Pozzovivo
78: Kruijswijk, Yates, Mollema
77: Rolland, TvG, Jungels, Formolo

SP:
81: Greipel
80: Gaviria, Ewan
Edited by Arberg27 on 27-05-2017 00:14
 
matt17br
So does that mean Froome is 76? Shock
(Former) Manager of pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2020/Micros/gen.png Generali pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2020/Micros/gen.png
 
http://v.ht/Matt17
Arberg27
matt17br wrote:
So does that mean Froome is 76? Shock

No that means you're writing a stupid comment!
83 of course, Porte 82 and Contador 81.
 
StevenGreen
Arberg27 wrote:
MON:
82: Quintana
81: Nibali
80: Pinot, Landa
79: Dumoulin, Zakarin, Pozzovivo
78: Kruijswijk, Yates, Jungels, Mollema
77: Rolland, TvG, Formolo

SP:
81: Greipel
80: Gaviria, Ewan


Jungels isn't at 78 MON yet. Mollema, Yates and Kruijswijk beat him on most mt stages this giro
 
Ian Butler
Dumoulin 85 fecal urgency
I hope next PCM will include traits. Dumoulin to have the trait 'dutch luck'
 
Paul23
Ian Butler wrote:
Dumoulin 85 fecal urgency
I hope next PCM will include traits. Dumoulin to have the trait 'dutch luck'


Shouldn't every dutch have that trait?
i.imgur.com/aJSlUNt.png
 
Paul23
matt17br wrote:
So does that mean Froome is 76? Shock


Yes, do it matt!
i.imgur.com/aJSlUNt.png
 
Ian Butler
Paul23 wrote:
Ian Butler wrote:
Dumoulin 85 fecal urgency
I hope next PCM will include traits. Dumoulin to have the trait 'dutch luck'


Shouldn't every dutch have that trait?


No there's still Terpstra and Van Der Poel.
 
jandal7
Arberg27 wrote:
matt17br wrote:
So does that mean Froome is 76? Shock

No that means you're writing a stupid comment!
83 of course, Porte 82 and Contador 81.

And Chaves 82?
24/02/21 - kandesbunzler said “I don't drink famous people."
15/08/22 - SotD said "Your [jandal's] humour is overrated"
11/06/24 - knockout said "Winning is fine I guess. Truth be told this felt completely unimportant."

[ICL] Santos-Euskadi | [PT] i.imgur.com/c85NSl6.png Xero Racing

i.imgur.com/PdCbs9I.png
i.imgur.com/RPIlJYr.png
5x i.imgur.com/wM6Wok5.png x5
i.imgur.com/olRsxdu.png
2x pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2021/funniest21.png x2
2x i.imgur.com/TUidkLG.png x2
 
Arberg27
StevenGreen wrote:
Arberg27 wrote:
MON:
82: Quintana
81: Nibali
80: Pinot, Landa
79: Dumoulin, Zakarin, Pozzovivo
78: Kruijswijk, Yates, Jungels, Mollema
77: Rolland, TvG, Formolo

SP:
81: Greipel
80: Gaviria, Ewan



Jungels isn't at 78 MON yet. Mollema, Yates and Kruijswijk beat him on most mt stages this giro
Yes, you are right!
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
How much can a 162-man field fill?
How much can a 162-man field fill?
PCM14: Funny Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,445 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,900 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.25 seconds