|
2005 DB
|
| baseballlover312 |
Posted on 14-04-2014 14:26
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 16452
Joined: 27-07-2011
PCM$: 10538.70
|
Discovery is spelled wrong. 
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy |
| |
|
|
| bigggassi |
Posted on 14-04-2014 14:27
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 832
Joined: 28-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
yeah i know. 
|
| |
|
|
| atlanta |
Posted on 14-04-2014 21:23
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1220
Joined: 31-07-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Hi i think LA should be 83. I would also lower Rasmussen recovery even more. As on 74 he could probz win the TDF v Armstrong. My experiance of PCM 13 is its mainly the mountains were its big gaps, sure LA would beat him in ITT but who no's Rasmussen could get it back if he as better fitness. |
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 23-12-2024 18:27
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| bigggassi |
Posted on 15-04-2014 09:00
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 832
Joined: 28-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
LA on 83? Well, I think its something we can talk about. But lowering Rasmussens REC-stat? I don't get that. 74 isn't that high already. And he'd done not bad in three week tours. Heck, two years later he's dominating the Tour.
|
| |
|
|
| Kirill Klimenkov |
Posted on 20-04-2014 18:36
|
Junior Rider
Posts: 30
Joined: 09-03-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Do you have some news about possible date of release? |
| |
|
|
| bigggassi |
Posted on 21-04-2014 18:11
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 832
Joined: 28-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Nope, not at this point.
|
| |
|
|
| michichiel |
Posted on 21-04-2014 18:18
|
Stagiare
Posts: 152
Joined: 28-05-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Boonen 79 on SP? He won the first and the second stage of the tour, should at least be 81 |
| |
|
|
| toonml |
Posted on 21-04-2014 18:56
|
Amateur
Posts: 8
Joined: 21-10-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
I want to ask one thing because I have downloaded the 2004 DB as well from someone else (I don't know who it was anymore). But in that DB there were a lot of unbalanced stats for a lot of riders and that really annoyed me. Like Hushovd had 85 sprinting and 65 acceleration. And some climbers had like 79 climbing and 67 hills. That's just ridiculous. I think those stats should just be like max 2 out of each other. So max like 78 CLI and 76 HILL for a climber, because every climber can climb a hill as well right?
The other way around its different of course, because for example Bettini is not a good climber, but he is awesome at small hills just like Gilbert.
Please do this to make the DB more realistic. |
| |
|
|
| ruben |
Posted on 21-04-2014 22:06
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7721
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
I agree with above up to a certain point. There are some pure climbers who are notoriously bad on hills, f.ex Perez Cuapio and Rujano..
|
| |
|
