PCM.daily banner
24-11-2024 22:11
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 88

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,803
· Newest Member: actronspareparts
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Cycling
 Print Thread
Sky Doping/Hate Thread
CLURPR
Likkivi wrote:
Likkivi wrote:
Took this from another site:

Gert Leinders, Sky,s Team Dr Has an "Interesting" History.

Forums elswhere are buzzing with incredulity at whats going on and the desciption "UK Postal" is geting used and it most certainly aint a compliment. ....and then we have this little revelation : "Leinders was team doctor for Sigma, Histor, Panasonic and Lotto before becoming team doctor for Rabobank in 1996. He left Rabobank in 2009 citing 'dissatisfaction with the policies of the new management of the cycling team'.

According to Rabobank one of those new policies bought in between 2007 and July 2009 was a 'zero tolerance' attitude to doping, a policy that followed an internal investigation into the use of doping within the team during the period Leinders was the team doctor, an investigation that was triggered by Michael Rasmussen’s expulsion from the Tour de France"

There's the evidence.


I noticed this argument stands alone. It's settled.

Now it's just a question of time before it leads to a ban.


Stop being an idiot, just because a doctor with doping history is on the team doesn't mean you have evidence. Keep your mouth shut from now on about banning Team Sky unless you have a positive test for me to look at Wink
 
Kirchen_75
This thread is such a good laugh. I'm actually in tears :lol:
 
Likkivi
gotlandrules wrote:
sutty68 wrote:
Coop wrote:
sutty68 wrote:
Coop wrote:
sutty68 wrote:
SKY = Hard work = Hard Training = Results Smile



Pretty sure Armstrong and Postal/Disco used that same story. What's your feelings on them?


The whole team were dopers as we already know Wink


So you agree that Sky are probably doping then!


No not at all, when Cofidis left the TDF in 2007 due to a failed dope test, Wiggins was going to retire from the sport, but was talked into continuing in the sport he loves, so NO he will not dope.
As for the others, the Team Sky regime is totally focused on training and fitness and is finally showing signs of working. Dont forget this is the third year of all these implementations so it has not just happened overnight Frown


Didn't the rabobank dope-doctor join around the same time though? =)


Yes. Because his doping work was spoiled after all the attention on Rasmussen. He was in need of a new project. And he sure has stocked up this time :lol:
 
Coop
marble wrote:
Some of Armstrong's teammates has already been caught. There is at least some evidence that makes questioning Armstrong reasonable. However we still have yet to see the same with this Sky team, so why bother speculating? I'm sure that if you take a look at watts we won't see the same extreme levels as some of the best climbers during the 90s, so it's not like they're inhuman or anything.


Yeah another recycled Armstrong defense! How old is Sky now? How long before the first Armstrong teammates were caught? Give it time!
 
gotlandrules
Likkivi wrote:
gotlandrules wrote:
sutty68 wrote:
Coop wrote:
sutty68 wrote:
Coop wrote:
sutty68 wrote:
SKY = Hard work = Hard Training = Results Smile



Pretty sure Armstrong and Postal/Disco used that same story. What's your feelings on them?


The whole team were dopers as we already know Wink


So you agree that Sky are probably doping then!


No not at all, when Cofidis left the TDF in 2007 due to a failed dope test, Wiggins was going to retire from the sport, but was talked into continuing in the sport he loves, so NO he will not dope.
As for the others, the Team Sky regime is totally focused on training and fitness and is finally showing signs of working. Dont forget this is the third year of all these implementations so it has not just happened overnight Frown


Didn't the rabobank dope-doctor join around the same time though? =)


Yes. Because his doping work was spoiled after all the attention on Rasmussen. He was in need of a new project. And he sure has stocked up this time :lol:


Looks like he's doing a marvelous job.
 
valverde321
jph27 wrote:
Maybe Sky are doping, but are you naive enough to think they are the only ones? And let's face it, they aren't stupid enough to get caught here.

This.

Also the doctors point made by Alakagom. If a Doctor only knows one way to get his riders fully prepared for a race, through use of dope, then gets suspended and comes back saying he'll never dope his riders again, but still only knowing one way to get his riders prepared, but is asked to get riders prepared again by the managers, what other way can he really get his riders prepared? Obviously he might have some knowledge being a doctor but if you are a dope doctor, you are a dope doctor imo. Or am I wrong, I dont know a whole lot about doctors, but it doesn't seem like a half bad assumption. I mean if you are a dope doctor and then you're not but your still making your riders improve their results by 100%, through the normal methods it just seems unlikely. Thats just my thoughts on the doctors with shady pasts.

Unless a doctor makes some sort of breakthrough like gluten free diet etc.
 
Rin
- Were at the beginning in a team that had a diffrent thinking wise about doping

Schumacher Team Telekom
Froome Barloworld

- Are at a team with suspicious people -> riders or staff

Schumacher Telekom and Gerolsteiner he wasn't the only one that doped (Leipheimer, Kohl..) and people like Henn as a DS
Froome Barloworld people like Pfannberger, Duenas etc. also Corti and now Sky and team doctor Leinders
i1215.photobucket.com/albums/cc512/ANFreeman/Jersey%20Sprites/bianchi.pngTeam Bianchi - 2012 Man-Game ProContinental Tour Championsi1215.photobucket.com/albums/cc512/ANFreeman/Jersey%20Sprites/bianchi.png
www.pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2013/Admin.png
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 24-11-2024 22:11
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
baseballlover312
It's funny because when the Armstrong allegations happened., the Americans flaired (including me) and were critisized. It's the exact same thing witht he Brits. guys, can't you see it?
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/avatar.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/forumthread.png
i.imgur.com/VCXYUyF.png
i.imgur.com/4osUjkI.png
 
Likkivi
CLURPR wrote:
Likkivi wrote:
Likkivi wrote:
Took this from another site:

Gert Leinders, Sky,s Team Dr Has an "Interesting" History.

Forums elswhere are buzzing with incredulity at whats going on and the desciption "UK Postal" is geting used and it most certainly aint a compliment. ....and then we have this little revelation : "Leinders was team doctor for Sigma, Histor, Panasonic and Lotto before becoming team doctor for Rabobank in 1996. He left Rabobank in 2009 citing 'dissatisfaction with the policies of the new management of the cycling team'.

According to Rabobank one of those new policies bought in between 2007 and July 2009 was a 'zero tolerance' attitude to doping, a policy that followed an internal investigation into the use of doping within the team during the period Leinders was the team doctor, an investigation that was triggered by Michael Rasmussen’s expulsion from the Tour de France"

There's the evidence.


I noticed this argument stands alone. It's settled.

Now it's just a question of time before it leads to a ban.


Stop being an idiot, just because a doctor with doping history is on the team doesn't mean you have evidence. Keep your mouth shut from now on about banning Team Sky unless you have a positive test for me to look at Wink


I see you have no counter argument so you get angry instead. Don't worry. That's normal.

But it doesn't change the fact of this time line.

Geert Leinders at Rabobank = Rasmussen kicked out of Tour

Geert Leinders stops at Rabobank = All Rabobank riders start declining

Geert Leinders at Sky: Froome out of nothing dominates Vuelta and Tour
 
valverde321
baseballlover312 wrote:
It's funny because when the Armstrong allegations happened., the Americans flaired (including me) and were critisized. It's the exact same thing witht he Brits. guys, can't you see it?


Its different Wink

There was substantial evidence on Armstrong. This is only suspicion since everything around the team is, and the results definitely raise eyebrows.
 
TheManxMissile
Likkivi wrote:
CLURPR wrote:
Likkivi wrote:
Likkivi wrote:
Took this from another site:

Gert Leinders, Sky,s Team Dr Has an "Interesting" History.

Forums elswhere are buzzing with incredulity at whats going on and the desciption "UK Postal" is geting used and it most certainly aint a compliment. ....and then we have this little revelation : "Leinders was team doctor for Sigma, Histor, Panasonic and Lotto before becoming team doctor for Rabobank in 1996. He left Rabobank in 2009 citing 'dissatisfaction with the policies of the new management of the cycling team'.

According to Rabobank one of those new policies bought in between 2007 and July 2009 was a 'zero tolerance' attitude to doping, a policy that followed an internal investigation into the use of doping within the team during the period Leinders was the team doctor, an investigation that was triggered by Michael Rasmussen’s expulsion from the Tour de France"

There's the evidence.


I noticed this argument stands alone. It's settled.

Now it's just a question of time before it leads to a ban.


Stop being an idiot, just because a doctor with doping history is on the team doesn't mean you have evidence. Keep your mouth shut from now on about banning Team Sky unless you have a positive test for me to look at Wink


I see you have no counter argument so you get angry instead. Don't worry. That's normal.

But it doesn't change the fact of this time line.

Geert Leinders at Rabobank = Rasmussen kicked out of Tour

Geert Leinders stops at Rabobank = All Rabobank riders start declining

Geert Leinders at Sky: Froome out of nothing dominates Vuelta and Tour


Rasmussen missed a test, did not have a positive test
All Rabo rider decline what?
i.imgur.com/UmX5YX1.jpgi.imgur.com/iRneKpI.jpgi.imgur.com/fljmGSP.jpgi.imgur.com/qV5ItIc.jpgimgur.com/dr2BAI6.jpgimgur.com/KlJUqDx.jpg[/img[img]]https://imgur.com/yUygrQ.jpgi.imgur.com/C1rG9BW.jpgi.imgur.com/sEDS7gr.jpg
 
Coop
sutty68 wrote:
Coop wrote:
sutty68 wrote:
Coop wrote:
sutty68 wrote:
SKY = Hard work = Hard Training = Results Smile



Pretty sure Armstrong and Postal/Disco used that same story. What's your feelings on them?


The whole team were dopers as we already know Wink


So you agree that Sky are probably doping then!


No not at all, when Cofidis left the TDF in 2007 due to a failed dope test, Wiggins was going to retire from the sport, but was talked into continuing in the sport he loves, so NO he will not dope.
As for the others, the Team Sky regime is totally focused on training and fitness and is finally showing signs of working. Dont forget this is the third year of all these implementations so it has not just happened overnight Frown



Wow, be sure to pull your head out of the sand before you take your next breathe. You do realize that you're using all the same excuses that Postal/Diso used right? They were better because they trained harder and longer than the other teams. So suddenly Sky is the only team to use modern science to train. By God, somebody on that squad deserves some sort of Nobel prize!
 
CLURPR
Likkivi wrote:
CLURPR wrote:
Likkivi wrote:
Likkivi wrote:
Took this from another site:

Gert Leinders, Sky,s Team Dr Has an "Interesting" History.

Forums elswhere are buzzing with incredulity at whats going on and the desciption "UK Postal" is geting used and it most certainly aint a compliment. ....and then we have this little revelation : "Leinders was team doctor for Sigma, Histor, Panasonic and Lotto before becoming team doctor for Rabobank in 1996. He left Rabobank in 2009 citing 'dissatisfaction with the policies of the new management of the cycling team'.

According to Rabobank one of those new policies bought in between 2007 and July 2009 was a 'zero tolerance' attitude to doping, a policy that followed an internal investigation into the use of doping within the team during the period Leinders was the team doctor, an investigation that was triggered by Michael Rasmussen’s expulsion from the Tour de France"

There's the evidence.


I noticed this argument stands alone. It's settled.

Now it's just a question of time before it leads to a ban.


Stop being an idiot, just because a doctor with doping history is on the team doesn't mean you have evidence. Keep your mouth shut from now on about banning Team Sky unless you have a positive test for me to look at Wink


I see you have no counter argument so you get angry instead. Don't worry. That's normal.

But it doesn't change the fact of this time line.

Geert Leinders at Rabobank = Rasmussen kicked out of Tour

Geert Leinders stops at Rabobank = All Rabobank riders start declining

Geert Leinders at Sky: Froome out of nothing dominates Vuelta and Tour


Froome didn't work with Leinders before the Vuelta, he worked exclusively with Bobby Julich Wink

EDIT: And since when did Rabobank riders begin declining?
Edited by CLURPR on 09-07-2012 17:04
 
baseballlover312
valverde321 wrote:
baseballlover312 wrote:
It's funny because when the Armstrong allegations happened., the Americans flaired (including me) and were critisized. It's the exact same thing witht he Brits. guys, can't you see it?


Its different Wink

There was substantial evidence on Armstrong. This is only suspicion since everything around the team is, and the results definitely raise eyebrows.

But what I'm saying is that the defenses are almost exactly the same.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/avatar.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/forumthread.png
i.imgur.com/VCXYUyF.png
i.imgur.com/4osUjkI.png
 
Likkivi
CLURPR wrote:
Likkivi wrote:
CLURPR wrote:
Likkivi wrote:
Likkivi wrote:
Took this from another site:

Gert Leinders, Sky,s Team Dr Has an "Interesting" History.

Forums elswhere are buzzing with incredulity at whats going on and the desciption "UK Postal" is geting used and it most certainly aint a compliment. ....and then we have this little revelation : "Leinders was team doctor for Sigma, Histor, Panasonic and Lotto before becoming team doctor for Rabobank in 1996. He left Rabobank in 2009 citing 'dissatisfaction with the policies of the new management of the cycling team'.

According to Rabobank one of those new policies bought in between 2007 and July 2009 was a 'zero tolerance' attitude to doping, a policy that followed an internal investigation into the use of doping within the team during the period Leinders was the team doctor, an investigation that was triggered by Michael Rasmussen’s expulsion from the Tour de France"

There's the evidence.


I noticed this argument stands alone. It's settled.

Now it's just a question of time before it leads to a ban.


Stop being an idiot, just because a doctor with doping history is on the team doesn't mean you have evidence. Keep your mouth shut from now on about banning Team Sky unless you have a positive test for me to look at Wink


I see you have no counter argument so you get angry instead. Don't worry. That's normal.

But it doesn't change the fact of this time line.

Geert Leinders at Rabobank = Rasmussen kicked out of Tour

Geert Leinders stops at Rabobank = All Rabobank riders start declining

Geert Leinders at Sky: Froome out of nothing dominates Vuelta and Tour


Froome didn't work with Leinders before the Vuelta, he worked exclusively with Bobby Julich Wink


In the knowledge of the public, sure. They at least make an attempt to hide it.

This is Deja vú from Vinokourov/Kascheckin
 
kirtley9
baseballlover312 wrote:
It's funny because when the Armstrong allegations happened., the Americans flaired (including me) and were critisized. It's the exact same thing witht he Brits. guys, can't you see it?

The "Brits" aren't saying they are 100% clean becasue noone apart from the riders themselves can tell you that just like you can't say they are definitely doping without having proper evidence.
Edited by kirtley9 on 09-07-2012 17:06
 
marble
Likkivi wrote:
Geert Leinders at Rabobank = Rasmussen kicked out of Tour

Geert Leinders stops at Rabobank = All Rabobank riders start declining


Rasmussen was kicked out by Rabobank though, so that doesn't really prove anything. Rabobank are still getting good results with Gesink and Mollema, and Kruijswijk, Slagter and Kelderman isn't looking bad either. Rabobank still has a good team, how exactly did all Rabobank riders start declining?
 
Alakagom
Likkivi wrote:
CLURPR wrote:
Likkivi wrote:
CLURPR wrote:
Likkivi wrote:
Likkivi wrote:
Took this from another site:

Gert Leinders, Sky,s Team Dr Has an "Interesting" History.

Forums elswhere are buzzing with incredulity at whats going on and the desciption "UK Postal" is geting used and it most certainly aint a compliment. ....and then we have this little revelation : "Leinders was team doctor for Sigma, Histor, Panasonic and Lotto before becoming team doctor for Rabobank in 1996. He left Rabobank in 2009 citing 'dissatisfaction with the policies of the new management of the cycling team'.

According to Rabobank one of those new policies bought in between 2007 and July 2009 was a 'zero tolerance' attitude to doping, a policy that followed an internal investigation into the use of doping within the team during the period Leinders was the team doctor, an investigation that was triggered by Michael Rasmussen’s expulsion from the Tour de France"

There's the evidence.


I noticed this argument stands alone. It's settled.

Now it's just a question of time before it leads to a ban.


Stop being an idiot, just because a doctor with doping history is on the team doesn't mean you have evidence. Keep your mouth shut from now on about banning Team Sky unless you have a positive test for me to look at Wink


I see you have no counter argument so you get angry instead. Don't worry. That's normal.

But it doesn't change the fact of this time line.

Geert Leinders at Rabobank = Rasmussen kicked out of Tour

Geert Leinders stops at Rabobank = All Rabobank riders start declining

Geert Leinders at Sky: Froome out of nothing dominates Vuelta and Tour


Froome didn't work with Leinders before the Vuelta, he worked exclusively with Bobby Julich Wink


In the knowledge of the public, sure. They at least make an attempt to hide it.


How do you know this shit man ? Pfft You don't work at Sky and you don't know if Froome ''worked'' with Leinders or not.

Anyway, Julich is a coach. Leinders is a doctor. Helps with injures etc. He had to help with everyone if he was at Sky in 2011 in my view. I've no idea.
Edited by Alakagom on 09-07-2012 17:08
pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/avatar.png


pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/admin.png
 
TheManxMissile
kirtley9 wrote:
baseballlover312 wrote:
It's funny because when the Armstrong allegations happened., the Americans flaired (including me) and were critisized. It's the exact same thing witht he Brits. guys, can't you see it?

The "Brits" aren't saying they are 100% clean becasue noone apart from the riders themselves can tell you that just like you can't say they are defintly doping without having proper evidence.


The 'Brits' are asking for people to wait until Sky turns up a failed or missed test.
If Sky fail then fine SKy are doped
If Sky dont fail, then you can suspect but dont just accuse them
i.imgur.com/UmX5YX1.jpgi.imgur.com/iRneKpI.jpgi.imgur.com/fljmGSP.jpgi.imgur.com/qV5ItIc.jpgimgur.com/dr2BAI6.jpgimgur.com/KlJUqDx.jpg[/img[img]]https://imgur.com/yUygrQ.jpgi.imgur.com/C1rG9BW.jpgi.imgur.com/sEDS7gr.jpg
 
Aquarius
TheManxMissile wrote:
kirtley9 wrote:
baseballlover312 wrote:
It's funny because when the Armstrong allegations happened., the Americans flaired (including me) and were critisized. It's the exact same thing witht he Brits. guys, can't you see it?

The "Brits" aren't saying they are 100% clean becasue noone apart from the riders themselves can tell you that just like you can't say they are defintly doping without having proper evidence.


The 'Brits' are asking for people to wait until Sky turns up a failed or missed test.
If Sky fail then fine SKy are doped
If Sky dont fail, then you can suspect but dont just accuse them

What's the difference when you're not a court or a legal representative of UCI or something official ?

As for your "no positive test" argument : how often did Riis, Ullrich, Virenque, etc. test positive ? Never. So they were unfairly condemned when they were in fact innocents ? Or is it slightly more complicated than that ?
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
 To the next sprint
To the next sprint
PCM13: Beautiful Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.31 seconds