PCM.daily banner
22-11-2024 21:01
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 83

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,788
· Newest Member: Robertner
View Thread
PCM.daily » PCM Stories & Story Games » Story Games
 Print Thread
ICL16 - General | Development
sutty68
Do you have the most up to date DB ?
 
Bikex
sutty68 wrote:
Do you have the most up to date DB ?


Can always be found in the ICL Download thread
Or here: https://www.mediafire.com/download/z32...6-ICL.xlsx
 
sutty68
Bikex wrote:
sutty68 wrote:
Do you have the most up to date DB ?


Can always be found in the ICL Download thread
Or here: https://www.mediafire.com/download/z32...6-ICL.xlsx

Thanks mate !!!!
 
knockout
Bikex wrote:
Race Planning

#4 WT teams, make sure you only send riders with AVG less than 76,0.


This sentence does not seem complete to me. I suppose you refer to the CT.2 races here.
I'd like to complain about this one. I'm pretty sure it was announced beforehand that the limit was no more than 76.0 .
A Big Thank You To All MG Reporters!

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2015/Manteam.pngpcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/mgmanager.png
 
knockout
Bikex wrote:
written by The Rider:


Race Day Numbers:

WT: WT teams have 205 race days of which they already spend 168 on WT races. The rest will be in CT. The teams have the option to ride up to 15 CT.2 racedays. However in these races they aren't allowed to use riders with an average of better than 76.]
[/quote]

And yes. That makes a huge difference to me.
A Big Thank You To All MG Reporters!

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2015/Manteam.pngpcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/mgmanager.png
 
Bikex
knockout wrote:
Bikex wrote:
Race Planning

#4 WT teams, make sure you only send riders with AVG less than 76,0.


This sentence does not seem complete to me. I suppose you refer to the CT.2 races here.
I'd like to complain about this one. I'm pretty sure it was announced beforehand that the limit was no more than 76.0 .


Oops. Embarassed

Wasn't sure about the second one, but the 2nd post agrees with you so now the rule is no more than 76.0, which makes Senechal eligible for you. Smile
 
knockout
Awesome Grin
A Big Thank You To All MG Reporters!

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2015/Manteam.pngpcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/mgmanager.png
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 22-11-2024 21:01
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
Tamijo
Making life harder for the weak teams is allways great, kick their sorry asxxxes
Pfft
 
Ollfardh
rip cobbled CT.2 races
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
trekbmc
I always do so badly at this part. Pfft

Also For me there are no race days lost for signing up for the chronos des nations.



"What done is, is one." - Benji Naesen
 
The Rider
Ah, the most important doc of the season! Thanks for that Bikex, as TMM said in the weekly news we could be on for a start before Christmas, as in previous seasons if people can't do the whole planning in a reasonable time then they should just send in the first month or two so we don't get a major halt.

Oh and Rheden GP = 9 teams, very pleased to be in that! Cool
 
Bikex
I just realized I fucked up a little with last year's research.
I totally forgot to include the mediator in the renewals, so I'd just say, that money spent by some teams will just go back into research for this season for those teams?
Teams affected:
Illes Balears: 90
Prorace: 80
Italo: 50
Leopard: 100
Is this a fair solution, or what do you think?

Also I forgot to ask about the Fitness Trainer in time. This feature, though, can still be included. The following teams please PM me with, who you want to spend your additional race days on:
Illes Balears: +5 Racedays
Carbonsports: +1 Racedays, +2 Racedays
Italo: +5 Racedays

And nobody commented on the focus races, so I guess we'll keep them the way they were last season?
 
Ollfardh
Sounds fair to me, I wouldn't even mind that the teams get a 10% extra.

About the focus races, I think it's important to look at the rider quality (more or less like I did in EPIC). If for example Shonak with Rodriguez targets Fleche Wallonne, Liege-Bastogne-Liege and Vuelta, his results should be better than mine if I target the same races with Mollema (just an example of course).
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
Croatia14
I wouldn´t mind too Pfft Some unexpected extra points to spend Grin
Focus races were tough last year, as it wasn´t clear what goals to achieve with the team. Is this also about regional focus? F.e. I went for the Tour of Estonia last year just because it was the home race despite not having the riders for that...
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/moty.png
 
knockout
Mediator money can go into current budget. Fully agree with that.

Focus races were okay I guess. And I disagree with Ollfardh once again Pfft A top 5 in e.g. MSR should be treated the same for every WT team. The effect of the focus races should only depend on the race category of the race , the success of your team and the team's division.

Only 9 teams at Rheden? Sound like a great race Cool
A Big Thank You To All MG Reporters!

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2015/Manteam.pngpcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/mgmanager.png
 
Bikex
Sorry Ollfardh, but I also agree with knockout. I don't want to punish teams with a strong rider. In EPIC the teams were only picked so it was fair to even things out with the goals, but in ICL every manager basically had the same chances to sign a top rider.

@Croatia: At goal races the goal was always to score as much points as possible. The reward was based on the percentage the team could get out of all points awarde compared to other teams.

I kind of like system as it is, as if e.g. a captain crashes in a stage race the other riders still have the option to score points through other results as the GC. For example for my team if I'd pick the Giro as focus race and send Nibali and Viviani there and Nibali crashes out, the reward from the goal isn't lost yet as Viviani could save the race by sprint results. If the goal structure would be like get a Top 5 in Giro, then it would've been lost without Nibali. That way every achievement in a race counts towards fulfilling the sponsor demands in a goal race.
Second advantage is that it's much easier to implement for me. I have my rankings files and in there is already calculated if a race was a success.

Only 9 teams at Rheden? Sound like a great race Cool


This is a big problem this season. For CT.1 races, often just not enough teams apply. I'm still missing 5 main teamsand 3 U23 teams, but currently the average of teams per race in CT.1 is as low as 13,1. At the Vuelta a Mallorca for example not even the Spanish teams bother to show up. Similarly with USAPCC and Tour of Britain.
On the other hand CT.2 races are bursting full. Here the average is 16,7 which doesn't sound that high, but no CT.2 race is having too less teams so far with still some to be added. For the Volta a Portugal I already had to reject an application, because it is full. And some other races have also already around 20 entries.
 
knockout
Could you maybe explain how the different race categories have impacts on the focus race points ? I would be very interested in that!
A Big Thank You To All MG Reporters!

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2015/Manteam.pngpcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/mgmanager.png
 
jandal7
Wait didn't see Mallorca. Will change (at expense of CT.2 probably) Smile
24/02/21 - kandesbunzler said “I don't drink famous people."
15/08/22 - SotD said "Your [jandal's] humour is overrated"
11/06/24 - knockout said "Winning is fine I guess. Truth be told this felt completely unimportant."

[ICL] Santos-Euskadi | [PT] i.imgur.com/c85NSl6.png Xero Racing

i.imgur.com/PdCbs9I.png
i.imgur.com/RPIlJYr.png
5x i.imgur.com/wM6Wok5.png x5
i.imgur.com/olRsxdu.png
2x pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2021/funniest21.png x2
2x i.imgur.com/TUidkLG.png x2
 
The Rider
I get Ollfardh's opinion ie that if Mollema outshines the likes of Froome/Contador in a stage race, comparatively, then there are grounds for him being more rewarded.

However, I feel that something like that would be very hard to add to the game/ not worth the effort. So I'd prefer to keep it the way Bikex has in mind. Focus races involving at least two different types of riders is a great move. Wink

Though I would like to know if you get more rewarded for targeting a monument or a stage race.

Adding that mediator money to the research budget, I am good with that.
 
trekbmc
Sorry, but are the riders meant to use race days for Chronos des nations and the World TTT championships? because they aren't on my sheet, I really need to know to complete my planning. Wink



"What done is, is one." - Benji Naesen
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
A new talent
A new talent
PCM10: General Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.41 seconds