PCM.daily banner
25-11-2024 04:46
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 61

· Members Online: 1
hillis91

· Total Members: 161,806
· Newest Member: jacksonhudson651
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Cycling
 Print Thread
Tour de France, Stage 9 - Monday, July 9th Arc-et-Senans - Besançon
Smal
People in this country aren't that interested in cycling. We have barely any high quality domestic races and we have the most popular football league to distract people. Our media know they will sell more papers in the summer by making up football transfer rumours and writing them instead of TdF stuff
 
doddy13
Down side is, it's quite clear the people in charge don't really have much of an interest in a top level race either. Despite the fact it would get the crowds.
There's no point slapping a schleck - Sean Kelly on "Who needs a slap"
 
Coop
Tehgriefer wrote:
I really can't understand how some trolls blame on Wiggins saying he's doped, this is the result of almost 2 years of training, study, lab work, and an excelent preparation, he has more than 100.000 metres of high-quality climbing this year, Sky made an awesome job at Teide, Canarias (Spain). I personally think that this kind of cyclism is not very passional, even can be boring but.... he deserves it, so trolls, STFU.



Wow, 22 teams in the TDF and only 1 decided to train for it, how original. Replace the "Wiggins" with "Armstrong" and you get the cynicism. Same old fanboy excuses, just a different team.
 
doddy13
Coop wrote:
Tehgriefer wrote:
I really can't understand how some trolls blame on Wiggins saying he's doped, this is the result of almost 2 years of training, study, lab work, and an excelent preparation, he has more than 100.000 metres of high-quality climbing this year, Sky made an awesome job at Teide, Canarias (Spain). I personally think that this kind of cyclism is not very passional, even can be boring but.... he deserves it, so trolls, STFU.



Wow, 22 teams in the TDF and only 1 decided to train for it, how original. Replace the "Wiggins" with "Armstrong" and you get the cynicism. Same old fanboy excuses, just a different team.


Please go back to the doping thread. Both of you. Keep this thread about race discussion, as I'd much rather read and comment on that.
There's no point slapping a schleck - Sean Kelly on "Who needs a slap"
 
issoisso
Grats Wiggins. I was hoping Froome would beat him so we could have some excitement in the intra-team battle, but it was a long shot
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
9-Ball
Well, that was moderately painful to watch. I may have odd biases but I don't like the GT courses being designed to suit (to put it very mildly indeed) TT specialist. It's just not in the spirit of the race, in my view. It's way over-balanced in favor of TTs this year, especially with the paucity of major mountain stages/finishes, overall. We'll see what the rest of Week 2 brings but something of a bitter taste in the mouth after today's stage.
It was eleven more than necessary.
Jacques Anquetil
 
Goldberger
9-Ball wrote:
Well, that was moderately painful to watch. I may have odd biases but I don't like the GT courses being designed to suit (to put it very mildly indeed) TT specialist. It's just not in the spirit of the race, in my view. It's way over-balanced in favor of TTs this year, especially with the paucity of major mountain stages/finishes, overall. We'll see what the rest of Week 2 brings but something of a bitter taste in the mouth after today's stage.



Well, the hillier stages so far have not been suited at all to TT specialist. Both La Planche des Belles Filles stage and the Porrentruy stage had short steep climbs that were designed to give them trouble. Also two small hilltop finishes in the first week could have caused them problems were it not for a few crashes. Also this TT was rolling and wasn't the worst TT for climbers.

Lets wait and see for further mountain stages, I haven`t studied the profile very much yet.
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 25-11-2024 04:46
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
Goldberger
9-Ball wrote:
Well, that was moderately painful to watch. I may have odd biases but I don't like the GT courses being designed to suit (to put it very mildly indeed) TT specialist. It's just not in the spirit of the race, in my view. It's way over-balanced in favor of TTs this year, especially with the paucity of major mountain stages/finishes, overall. We'll see what the rest of Week 2 brings but something of a bitter taste in the mouth after today's stage.



Well, the hillier stages so far have not been suited at all to TT specialist. Both La Planche des Belles Filles stage and the Porrentruy stage had short steep climbs that were designed to give them trouble. Also two small hilltop finishes in the first week could have caused them problems were it not for a few crashes. Also this TT was rolling and wasn't the worst TT for climbers.

Lets wait and see for further mountain stages, I haven`t studied the profile very much yet.
 
sylvao
At least Froome will not focus on the KoM jersey now but more on the individual classification. Maybe future fights between PINOT and KESSIAKOFF, or SORENSEN. Hopefully there are races in the race Smile
 
tfernandes
Rui Costa Cool
 
niconico
I'm not pointing fingers or judging in any way here, since I don't have the knowledge about being a professional cyclist to do so.

But to see a big guy like Bradley Wiggins. A guy who couldn't even muster a decent time trial when he turned to the road. A guy coming from the track who's now as accomplished in the mountains as the best ones and all of the sudden absolutely superior in time trials.

I don't know, it just seems.....odd.
i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys14/bampo.png
 
ruben
like it's so suprising Froome and Wiggins beat a 35-year old Evans. A not-in-top shape Cancellara and a hurt Tony Martin.

Not to mention the other competitors. Over-the-top Menchov. Nibali who did his best ITT ever (he usually finished between 15-20) and for the rest worn and beaten contenders and left-over guys who normally don't even top 15 (Monfort, Zubeldia).

Contador in top form would sweep the floor with the Sky duo uphill (let's not forget, JvdB put pressure on those two yesterday. Contador rode away from JvdB like he was not even there in the past). And I don't think Contador in top form would lose more than 45 seconds on Wiggins in an ITT. (=Froome level).
 
baseballlover312
ruben wrote:
like it's so suprising Froome and Wiggins beat a 35-year old Evans. A not-in-top shape Cancellara and a hurt Tony Martin.

Not to mention the other competitors. Over-the-top Menchov. Nibali who did his best ITT ever (he usually finished between 15-20) and for the rest worn and beaten contenders and left-over guys who normally don't even top 15 (Monfort, Zubeldia).

Contador in top form would sweep the floor with the Sky duo uphill (let's not forget, JvdB put pressure on those two yesterday. Contador rode away from JvdB like he was not even there in the past). And I don't think Contador in top form would lose more than 45 seconds on Wiggins in an ITT. (=Froome level).

Wait, Cancellara is in top shape.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/avatar.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/forumthread.png
i.imgur.com/VCXYUyF.png
i.imgur.com/4osUjkI.png
 
mb2612
ruben wrote:
like it's so suprising Froome and Wiggins beat a 35-year old Evans. A not-in-top shape Cancellara and a hurt Tony Martin.

Not to mention the other competitors. Over-the-top Menchov. Nibali who did his best ITT ever (he usually finished between 15-20) and for the rest worn and beaten contenders and left-over guys who normally don't even top 15 (Monfort, Zubeldia).

Contador in top form would sweep the floor with the Sky duo uphill (let's not forget, JvdB put pressure on those two yesterday. Contador rode away from JvdB like he was not even there in the past). And I don't think Contador in top form would lose more than 45 seconds on Wiggins in an ITT. (=Froome level).


You have underrrated Nibali here massively, he said he wanted to be with 90 seocnds of Wiggins, and that over 2 minutes would be bad. 2'01" is a massive disappointment for him. Barring the Dauphine it's the largest time gap he has ever given to Wiggins in a TT, he only lost a minute in the Vuelta, when he was clearly out of form.

In fact the only time trial since 2008 where he has lost more to a GT contender was in 2009 where he lost 2'06" to Contador.

Wiggins and Froome were amazing today. I hope it rains in the mountains, because then Nibali can at least make a go of closing the gap.
i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys/PT/std_zpsb6c2f350.png[url=www.pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=33182]Team Santander Media Thread[/url]i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys/PT/std_zpsb6c2f350.png

Please assume I am joking unless otherwise stated
 
Aquarius
The bright side, with such gaps, is that any contender with ambition will have to attack from further than Purito or Valverde usually do.
Dark side, after their Planche-des-Belles-Filles and their ITT show, Sky look unbeatable, on the flat as well as when climbing is involved. I hope we won't see a "race for third place" race too soon.
 
ruben
baseballlover312 wrote:
ruben wrote:
like it's so suprising Froome and Wiggins beat a 35-year old Evans. A not-in-top shape Cancellara and a hurt Tony Martin.

Not to mention the other competitors. Over-the-top Menchov. Nibali who did his best ITT ever (he usually finished between 15-20) and for the rest worn and beaten contenders and left-over guys who normally don't even top 15 (Monfort, Zubeldia).

Contador in top form would sweep the floor with the Sky duo uphill (let's not forget, JvdB put pressure on those two yesterday. Contador rode away from JvdB like he was not even there in the past). And I don't think Contador in top form would lose more than 45 seconds on Wiggins in an ITT. (=Froome level).

Wait, Cancellara is in top shape.


No he is not. Cancellara has done much much better performances in the past in time trials, relative to the people he left behind him. A top Cancellara would have a much bigger gap on the rest and much closer to the time of Wiggins than this year.

I couldn't disagree more if you say this is the top Cancellara
 
ruben
No mb2612, Nibali overrated himself massively, if he thinks he can be within 1'30 of Wiggins. That would mean top 5 time trial. He has almost never done top 5 in a time trial.

I think my assesment is better
 
mb2612
ruben wrote:
No mb2612, Nibali overrated himself massively, if he thinks he can be within 1'30 of Wiggins. That would mean top 5 time trial. He has almost never done top 5 in a time trial.

I think my assesment is better


My point is, the gap between Wiggins and Nibali has become massive this year because Wiggins has gotten better, not that Nibali is a good time trialler.

Nibali is normally closer than this in absolute time. the feild is weak this year, meaning Nibali's position has improved, but in time from the leader, this is as far away as he has been for a several years.
i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys/PT/std_zpsb6c2f350.png[url=www.pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=33182]Team Santander Media Thread[/url]i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys/PT/std_zpsb6c2f350.png

Please assume I am joking unless otherwise stated
 
Aquarius
I reckon counting in time loss per km is more relevant than absolute gaps, which will of course vary according to the distance.
Nibali lost almost 3 seconds per km to Wiggins today.
 
baseballlover312
mb2612 wrote:
ruben wrote:
No mb2612, Nibali overrated himself massively, if he thinks he can be within 1'30 of Wiggins. That would mean top 5 time trial. He has almost never done top 5 in a time trial.

I think my assesment is better


My point is, the gap between Wiggins and Nibali has become massive this year because Wiggins has gotten better, not that Nibali is a good time trialler.

Nibali is normally closer than this in absolute time. the feild is weak this year, meaning Nibali's position has improved, but in time from the leader, this is as far away as he has been for a several years.

As mb#### (Pfft) said, Nibali is 6-8 against Wiggins in time trials, so why wouldn't he be able to get within 1:30?
Edited by baseballlover312 on 09-07-2012 22:19
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/avatar.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/forumthread.png
i.imgur.com/VCXYUyF.png
i.imgur.com/4osUjkI.png
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Big crash
Big crash
PCM 08: General PCM-screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.25 seconds