Armstrong stops fighting doping charges - USADA wants him banned and stripped for titles
|
Bookie |
Posted on 11-10-2012 09:15
|
Under 23
Posts: 83
Joined: 24-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
People still defending Armstrong are as sick in the head as their grand example.
Can't put it any other way. |
|
|
|
joerre |
Posted on 11-10-2012 09:16
|
Free Agent
Posts: 147
Joined: 19-06-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
kumazan wrote:
joerre wrote:
he may or may not be doped but strip him from his titles ?! And give them to who ? Ullrich ... Basso ... ?! Like they are clean riders ?
Oh ffs, are we still there? Even most of his most deluded fanboys have admitted it by now...
i'm not even a fanboy i think he was doped like most of the riders in the 90's
Pain is temporary. Fame For ever !
|
|
|
|
jph27 |
Posted on 11-10-2012 09:29
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7339
Joined: 20-03-2010
PCM$: 900.00
|
Thanks to Sylvester on the CN forum for translating the main parts of the Bertagnolli affidavit. Here are the important points:
* Bertagnolli started working with Ferrari in 2006, to have his thyroid problems treated.
* In July 2007, he went to St. Moritz to see Ferrari, who provided him with EPO, to be injected intravenously. Bertolini, Chicchi, Gasparotto and Pellizotti were with him in St. Moritz. Bertagnolli also recalls seeing Vinokourov and a group of other cyclists with Ferrari in Livigno, 2006.
* Bertagnolli started taking EPO in 2003, as advised by doctor Manelli, but in a very amateuristic way: Ferrari showed him how to use the product properly, in order not to test positive.
* A lot of Bertagnolli's Liquigas colleagues also went to Ferrari: he names Pellizotti, Chicchi, Gasparotto... and Kreuziger. He recalls seeing Popovych and Bileka at Ferrari's house and also mentions Morris Possoni.
* In 2007 Bertagnolli started with blood transfusions. Ferrari told him which refrigerator to buy to store his blood in the best way (at the right temperature). He stored his blood in plastic bags. He affirms he did not transfuse blood prior to working with Ferrari, and it scared him a lot.
* In 2008 Liquigas forbid its riders to work with Ferrari, so Bertagnolli only performed a single transfusion. In 2009 he did "some", in 2010 the transfusions were three.
* Bertagnolli met Ferrari at the end of 2010. Ferrari told him to "throw away all evidence", because he knew of the ongoing Popovych investigation. Ferrari told him to consider using polypropylene blood bags or "flebi di vetro" (an object in glass used for transfusions).
August 27, 2010: in an intercepted conversation in Ferrari's mobile camper, Ferrari and Bertagnolli talk about a number of riders and doping practices:
* Bertagnolli says "everybody is going a little slower"; Ferrari says it's because the riders don't take EPO anymore
* Bertagnolli says "Pozzovivo hurts us on the climbs"; Ferrari says it's because he weighs about 50 kg; Bertagnolli answers he never ever saw him do things like that, "he's all muscles"
* Ferrari says some riders are using AICAR, but the product can be detected and it has to be imported
* Bertagnolli says the product comes from Slovenia; he names Grega Bole and Spilak as possible users, and also Chiarini
* Ferrari thinks it's madness to use AICAR because the molecule is easily detectable
(some less important parts and an interruption in the registration)
* Bertagnolli thinks "for Scarponi it's important to see how the Petacchi case will pan out"
* Ferrari responds Petacchi is in trouble although Bernucci took all of the blame
* Bertagnolli thinks it's incredible some riders still go to Manelli (the first doping doctor Bertagnolli himself consulted): Astarloa, Bernucci, Celestino and Honchar were some of his clients, and they all tested positive
* Ferrari asserts the Mapei Lab is a joke and the tests there don't prove anything
* Retacrit is another detectable EPO molecule; Maccanti and Biondo have been found positive for NESP after using Retacrit and thus, Ferrari thinks it's a molecule for "suicidal fools"; he wonders why the testers don't always detect it
Another conversation, September 28, 2010 (due to technical problems the Italian police only recorded the first 30 minutes of the conversation):
* Ferrari shows he's better at interpreting blood data than the UCI
* Ferrari is "obsessively monitoring" the blood data of his clients
Some pages seem to be missing here, or I didn't read the document too well.
December 1, 2010, another conversation:
* Ferrari asks Bertagnolli which blood bags he used, Contador might have used bags in PVC, Bertagnolli has been using polypropylene bags which are not detectable, so he's not in trouble
* some stuff about blood transfusions, no details
* riders who want to dope can't go to Teide anymore because the place is "bruciata" - monitored and known by the antidoping authorities
* Ferrari speculates someone in the lab might have spiked Contador's blood with clenbuterol
* Bertagnolli asks if Contador might have used Actovegin, but Ferrari says no; "Actovegin is made of calf's blood, normally they don't use clen for that" |
|
|
|
CountArach |
Posted on 11-10-2012 09:41
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8290
Joined: 14-07-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Thanks for reposting that. Super interesting. Also explains why Contador failed the plasticiser test.
|
|
|
|
Alphabet |
Posted on 11-10-2012 09:42
|
Junior Rider
Posts: 44
Joined: 11-09-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
USADA are supposed to be releasing a document of over a thousand pages of evidence. Anyone fancy trawling through it? |
|
|
|
jph27 |
Posted on 11-10-2012 09:47
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7339
Joined: 20-03-2010
PCM$: 900.00
|
CountArach wrote:
Thanks for reposting that. Super interesting. Also explains why Contador failed the plasticiser test.
Also this quote from Ferrari talking about AICAR, once again thanks to the same poster:
I forgot to translate some interesting parts on AICAR: "it's a powder", "it's only for experimentational purposes, experiments on humans, that is" and "it's extremely expensive".
Ferrari states "it can be traced easily because it's not body-own, maybe they won't see exactly what it is but they can see the peaks and sooner or later they will detect it, like in the Balco case". The testers use "mass spectometry" with some kind of base line and subsequently they should always be able to detect a peak of a certain molecule, they might not know for sure it's AICAR but they can easily see there's something wrong. |
|
|
|
Ad Bot |
Posted on 26-11-2024 02:32
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
IP: None |
|
|
Ian Butler |
Posted on 11-10-2012 09:50
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 21854
Joined: 01-05-2012
PCM$: 400.00
|
Well, those 95... Very hard to deny now |
|
|
|
TheManxMissile |
Posted on 11-10-2012 10:14
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
@ kay
mostly nice response actually
thank god i'm not a little kid...
I hate it when you try and have a discussion and people make jokes
USADA sheep? I referenced WADA, any response to that? They carry out almost all of the tests in cycling...
Saying you're not going to defend yourself is like admitting you cant... but ignoring stupid rebuttals is fair
What facts do you have that say he wasn't doped?
|
|
|
|
KayZeroX |
Posted on 11-10-2012 10:31
|
Under 23
Posts: 95
Joined: 23-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
@TheManxMissile
euh i was actualy not talking about your responses. You made some good points. I need to think about them.
@Felix_29 also made some good statements. Thanks for the respons.
I did however read the whole thing. But i guess you're right that my opinion is not 100% neutral. About those 09 claims, i see those as stories from people i do not trust.
Rest of your post did not interest me. |
|
|
|
Bookie |
Posted on 11-10-2012 10:32
|
Under 23
Posts: 83
Joined: 24-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
KayZeroX wrote:
hmmmm
Most of you are probably just little kids, so i'll take it easy on you.
Making jokes about somebody that gives his honest opinion in a serious thread is really unrespectfull.
But whatever, anybody that can't act like an adult is not worth my time. So i'm not gonna answer all those stupid posts by you USADA sheep. I'm also not gonna defend myself, cause you guys are not worth defending against.
LOL I think i understand Amrstrong even better now.
I'm just gonna read posts by people that do care about a good confersation, people who come with actual facts. Not the BS the USADA has written.
Big middle finger to all of you that have something bad to say about this opinion.
Wow, your aggressive way of 'argument' seems to be so much like 'The Boss'. Calling everybody else stupid & unthrustworthy, and then placing yourself above that without actually rebutting anything - The Boss has taught you well, young Skyw... whatever. People coming with facts? What about the simple fact that a dozen of people directly involved have testified against Armstrong? They're all liars? They have what to gain exactly.
Really, this is beyond delusional. Thanks for the middle finger btw, that's really all grown up there man.
Edited by Bookie on 11-10-2012 10:33
|
|
|
|
Heine |
Posted on 11-10-2012 10:39
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4116
Joined: 08-04-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
I considered voting no on the poll. Why? Becuse the new events didn't make me believe he doped, I've believed so for years :-p
|
|
|
|
Bookie |
Posted on 11-10-2012 10:56
|
Under 23
Posts: 83
Joined: 24-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Calling other people kids, sheep and giving them the finger is not aggressive. Duly noted.
Testimonies of a dozen people directly connected to Armstrong is not an argument. Duly noted again. |
|
|
|
ShortsNL |
Posted on 11-10-2012 11:06
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 898
Joined: 17-11-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
For people who are still replying to KayZero's posts, there is no point. The guy is obviously just a troll trying to get on your nerves and he will just keep arguing when you reply. Just ignore the guy. |
|
|
|
KayZeroX |
Posted on 11-10-2012 11:08
|
Under 23
Posts: 95
Joined: 23-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Sir bookie did i hurt your feelings ? if so ....i'm sorry man, i was not my intention.
Testimonies of a dozen people directly connected to Armstrong is not an argument. Duly noted again.
<< funny how you try to be smart. Let's talk again when Armstrong is convicted for all his crimes. I'll congratulate you personally on your victory.
hahahahha |
|
|
|
KayZeroX |
Posted on 11-10-2012 11:10
|
Under 23
Posts: 95
Joined: 23-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
yeah you're right ShortsNL , my opinion is not worth a penny.
Why am i even responding to all of this ?
en bedankt medehollander voor je support |
|
|
|
cio93 |
Posted on 11-10-2012 11:13
|
World Champion
Posts: 10845
Joined: 29-10-2007
PCM$: 500.00
|
toreaxe wrote:
What i find strange is why did Armstrong give $100,000 to the UCI? Why would a competitor give away money? Generous? I'll think i'll look up Lance's number and give him a ring, i'm a bit short at the moment
You really do? I believe it is pretty certain it was "donated" to cover up his 2001 TdS positive.
|
|
|
|
Ian Butler |
Posted on 11-10-2012 11:15
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 21854
Joined: 01-05-2012
PCM$: 400.00
|
I think he was being sarcastic, though
|
|
|
|
CountArach |
Posted on 11-10-2012 11:22
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8290
Joined: 14-07-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
KayZeroX wrote:
I'm just gonna read posts by people that do care about a good confersation, people who come with actual facts. Not the BS the USADA has written.
Okay. I didn't make jokes nor anything like that and thus I feel that I deserve some sort of response. Can you respond to my post here:
CountArach wrote:
Failed tests ? You mean the negative tests that suddenly turn out positive (from whoever they were!) after many years.
I haven't got time to go through everything else but this is really easy. The EPO test didn't exist. Then it was invented and they retested old samples and what do you know? He was positive.
I would like you to rebut this proof that Armstrong doped. He tested positive retrospectively using a test that could detect a drug that previously could not be detected. Sounds like proof to me.
|
|
|
|
cio93 |
Posted on 11-10-2012 11:27
|
World Champion
Posts: 10845
Joined: 29-10-2007
PCM$: 500.00
|
Ian Butler wrote:
I think he was being sarcastic, though
There are some guys around who obviously aren't, he has too few smileys to clarify that
|
|
|
|
Aquarius |
Posted on 11-10-2012 11:30
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 5220
Joined: 29-11-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
KayZeroX wrote:
hmmmm
Most of you are probably just little kids, so i'll take it easy on you.
How old are you, boy ?
KayZeroX wrote:Making jokes about somebody that gives his honest opinion in a serious thread is really unrespectfull.
Lacking humour or self-derision is also quite sad, IMHO.
Voicing opinions without any fact to back it up might look ridiculous to some people, hence they make jokes about it. Life's unfair.
KayZeroX wrote:
But whatever, anybody that can't act like an adult is not worth my time. So i'm not gonna answer all those stupid posts by you USADA sheep. I'm also not gonna defend myself, cause you guys are not worth defending against.
LOL I think i understand Amrstrong even better now.
I'm just gonna read posts by people that do care about a good confersation, people who come with actual facts. Not the BS the USADA has written.
Big middle finger to all of you that have something bad to say about this opinion.
What's an actual fact, by the way, that sounds like a pleonasm to me ?
You surely know, because you've read it all, that there's much more in this case than just people's testimony. Then please explain us why Armstrong paid Ferrari when he claimed he didn't. Explain us all the odd blood values. Explain us the positive retroactive tests, etc.
I'm all ears, always ready to learn new things. Please enlighten me, sincerely. |
|
|