nielsboy1998 wrote:
Looks good, but why has everybody so high flat stat?
Dear Nielsboy,
I've created a stats matrix in which every rider has at least 73 for the Flat stats. That's because I wanted to create a stats matrix that's based on small differences. In that way, we can create a large (sub) top of riders so there are smaller differences just like in real life.
I've given Leukemans 80 on cobbles (because he deserves it) but the best Cobblestones rider is of course Cancellara with 84.
nielsboy1998 wrote:
Looks good, but why has everybody so high flat stat?
Dear Nielsboy,
I've created a stats matrix in which every rider has at least 73 for the Flat stats. That's because I wanted to create a stats matrix that's based on small differences. In that way, we can create a large (sub) top of riders so there are smaller differences just like in real life.
I've given Leukemans 80 on cobbles (because he deserves it) but the best Cobblestones rider is of course Cancellara with 84.
I understand! I has maked my Databese at the Same way, but Daniel Moreno has by my for example 65 in flat While he is 82 in mountain. (Froome, Quintana, Nibali, and Rodriguez are by my the strongest with 84 in MO)
nielsboy1998 wrote:
Looks good, but why has everybody so high flat stat?
Dear Nielsboy,
I've created a stats matrix in which every rider has at least 73 for the Flat stats. That's because I wanted to create a stats matrix that's based on small differences. In that way, we can create a large (sub) top of riders so there are smaller differences just like in real life.
I've given Leukemans 80 on cobbles (because he deserves it) but the best Cobblestones rider is of course Cancellara with 84.
I understand! I has maked my Databese at the Same way, but Daniel Moreno has by my for example 65 in flat While he is 82 in mountain. (Froome, Quintana, Nibali, and Rodriguez are by my the strongest with 84 in MO)
Je kunt ons trouwens gewoon in het Nederlands benaderen hoor Niels.
cunego59 wrote:
I would really like to see some results of played and/or simulated races to see how the stat matrix works out.
+1
Yes, that'd be really helpful and nice. Looks fantastic so far.
To speak for myself, I haven't helped out with the testing cause the testing I did with this stats matrix began in early 2010. But I don't know if the others have any results from ridden races, I haven't had any notice of it to be honest.
nielsboy1998 wrote:
Looks good, but why has everybody so high flat stat?
Dear Nielsboy,
I've created a stats matrix in which every rider has at least 73 for the Flat stats. That's because I wanted to create a stats matrix that's based on small differences. In that way, we can create a large (sub) top of riders so there are smaller differences just like in real life.
I've given Leukemans 80 on cobbles (because he deserves it) but the best Cobblestones rider is of course Cancellara with 84.
I understand! I has maked my Databese at the Same way, but Daniel Moreno has by my for example 65 in flat While he is 82 in mountain. (Froome, Quintana, Nibali, and Rodriguez are by my the strongest with 84 in MO)
Je kunt ons trouwens gewoon in het Nederlands benaderen hoor Niels.
But, it's a english forum, so I thought, now understands (hopely, with my bad english) everybody it
