PCM.daily banner
23-11-2024 01:28
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 56

· Members Online: 1
Booker

· Total Members: 161,788
· Newest Member: Robertner
View Thread
PCM.daily » Pro Cycling Manager 2006-2020 » Pro Cycling Manager 2013
 Print Thread
PCM.daily DB Stats discussion
TomBoonen007
romaniangoat wrote:
Froome 83
Quintana 82
Rodriguez 81(high rec)
Valverde 80
Porte 80
Contador 80/79

Continuation in my opinion

Kreuziger 79
Mollema 78(low rec)
Fuglsang 78
Talansky 78
Nieve 78(also low very low acc and high ftr)
Kwiatkowski 76 or maybe 77
Ten Dam 77

Nibali is ok at 81.He isn't on Quintana level.Also for me Purito is better than him.The level of competition in Giro was very low.


Yes Giro was very low. The Giro was a survivor. It does not show the real statistics.

Kreuziger for me high FTR he worked for Contador a lot.
 
gotlandrules
Alakagom wrote:
juju33 wrote:
when will the next uptodate pcmdaily available as the TDF is finished now?
and if it is possible someone could give me the stats of top 10 climbers.


Few days after the Tour I expect to release a cdb. here.


anything for PCM 12 going to be released or should i start updating myself?Pfft
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 23-11-2024 01:28
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
Alakagom
Btw, again matter of personal opinion but how are you rating Van Der Broeck? 78 or 79? Tough too call, I so far went with 78 but you then gotta argue he did get some consistent results at Tour in past years wchich make me reconsider him to possibly 79.
Edited by Alakagom on 20-07-2013 17:07
pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/avatar.png


pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/admin.png
 
Alakagom
gotlandrules wrote:
Alakagom wrote:
juju33 wrote:
when will the next uptodate pcmdaily available as the TDF is finished now?
and if it is possible someone could give me the stats of top 10 climbers.


Few days after the Tour I expect to release a cdb. here.


anything for PCM 12 going to be released or should i start updating myself?Pfft


That's up to Luigi and whetever he conversts the stats to PCM 12 format, but I think it should be possible.
pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/avatar.png


pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/admin.png
 
fernando97
For me he is a 78. No real results outside of the TDF, which he didn't finish this year.
 
Kentaurus
Alakagom wrote:
Froome 83
Quintana 82
Rodriguez 81
Valverde 80
Porte 80
Contador 80/79

Likely to be stats for the top climbers after the Tour. Contador is a tough one, a difficult choice.


I think I would have Froome and Quintana on the at the same level, most stages Quintana seemed to be the better climber of the two, though inexperience or team tactics (Ax 3 Domains) caused him not to win the stage.
AZTECA - NBCSN pcmdaily.com/files/Micros16/azt.png
 
Ollfardh
Alakagom wrote:
Btw, again matter of personal opinion but how are you rating Van Der Broeck? 78 or 79? Tough too call, I so far went with 78 but you then gotta argue he did get some consistent results at Tour in past years.


He finished 4th in his last 2 TDF's (where he didn't crash out) without decent TT skills. He's pretty consistent in the Tour, maybe even worth an 80. His lack of results in other stage races means 79 is probably best for him though.
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
baseballlover312
Guys don't forget about Wiggins.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/avatar.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/forumthread.png
i.imgur.com/VCXYUyF.png
i.imgur.com/4osUjkI.png
 
romaniangoat
Van den Broeck 79 and Wiggins 78.
Edited by romaniangoat on 20-07-2013 17:29
ex Ventoux
 
carmelobymelo
Froome
--------
Quintana, Purito
-------------------------
Nibali, Valverde, Porte
-----------------------------------
Contador, Kreuziger, Uran, VDB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Betancur, Wiggins, Fuglsang, Mollema, Ten Dam, Scarponi, Nieve, Hesjedal, Evans, Majka, Moreno
[PCM13]PCM.daily 2013 Expansion Pack DB Updated Stats + startlists (Last update 17.10.2013) - https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....d_id=30591

[PCM13]2013 Startlists (Last update 24.08.2013 - Vuelta a Espana): https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....d_id=30693

[PCM12]PCM.daily 2012 Expansion Pack Updated Stats + 78 startlists (Last update 07.10.2012) - https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....d_id=23810

[PCM11]PCM.daily 2012 Stat updates + startlists (Last update 07.10.2012) - https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....ost_499156

[PCM12]2012 Startlists (Last update 05.10.2012 - Giro dell'Emilia): https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....ost_562321
 
romaniangoat
carmelobymelo wrote:
Froome
--------
Quintana, Purito
-------------------------
Nibali, Valverde, Porte
-----------------------------------
Contador, Kreuziger, Uran, VDB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Betancur, Wiggins, Fuglsang, Mollema, Ten Dam, Scarponi, Nieve, Hesjedal, Evans, Majka, Moreno


Henao is better than Ten Dam,Scarponi,Evans and Moreno.Don't forget he was sick in Giro,
ex Ventoux
 
carmelobymelo
romaniangoat wrote:
carmelobymelo wrote:
Froome
--------
Quintana, Purito
-------------------------
Nibali, Valverde, Porte
-----------------------------------
Contador, Kreuziger, Uran, VDB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Betancur, Wiggins, Fuglsang, Mollema, Ten Dam, Scarponi, Nieve, Hesjedal, Evans, Majka, Moreno


Henao is better than Ten Dam,Scarponi,Evans and Moreno.Don't forget he was sick in Giro,


Probably yes, but with that we have to wait for Vuelta
[PCM13]PCM.daily 2013 Expansion Pack DB Updated Stats + startlists (Last update 17.10.2013) - https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....d_id=30591

[PCM13]2013 Startlists (Last update 24.08.2013 - Vuelta a Espana): https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....d_id=30693

[PCM12]PCM.daily 2012 Expansion Pack Updated Stats + 78 startlists (Last update 07.10.2012) - https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....d_id=23810

[PCM11]PCM.daily 2012 Stat updates + startlists (Last update 07.10.2012) - https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....ost_499156

[PCM12]2012 Startlists (Last update 05.10.2012 - Giro dell'Emilia): https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....ost_562321
 
Kristoffer
carmelobymelo wrote:
Froome
--------
Quintana, Purito
-------------------------
Nibali, Valverde, Porte
-----------------------------------
Contador, Kreuziger, Uran, VDB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Betancur, Wiggins, Fuglsang, Mollema, Ten Dam, Scarponi, Nieve, Hesjedal, Evans, Majka, Moreno


Betancur is way above Ten Dam, probably above Mollema, Fuglsang, Nieve and Hesjedal as well. Def above Evans and also above Scarponi as well. A bit over Moreno, and maybe +1 on Majka, even thought ending up pretty close in the Giro.

Wiggins hasn't showed anything this year, will not show up at the Giro and is probably finished as a GT-rider if you ask me.

Rest looks fine to me, just dont give Quintana to high ACC, as I dont think hes very impressive there.
 
juju33
and in the next pcmdaily are there any variants or it's to us to search.
 
carmelobymelo
Kristoffer wrote:
carmelobymelo wrote:
Froome
--------
Quintana, Purito
-------------------------
Nibali, Valverde, Porte
-----------------------------------
Contador, Kreuziger, Uran, VDB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Betancur, Wiggins, Fuglsang, Mollema, Ten Dam, Scarponi, Nieve, Hesjedal, Evans, Majka, Moreno


Betancur is way above Ten Dam, probably above Mollema, Fuglsang, Nieve and Hesjedal as well. Def above Evans and also above Scarponi as well. A bit over Moreno, and maybe +1 on Majka, even thought ending up pretty close in the Giro.

Wiggins hasn't showed anything this year, will not show up at the Giro and is probably finished as a GT-rider if you ask me.

Rest looks fine to me, just dont give Quintana to high ACC, as I dont think hes very impressive there.


Did not show it at the Giro, maybe in third week but still finished after Evans.
[PCM13]PCM.daily 2013 Expansion Pack DB Updated Stats + startlists (Last update 17.10.2013) - https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....d_id=30591

[PCM13]2013 Startlists (Last update 24.08.2013 - Vuelta a Espana): https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....d_id=30693

[PCM12]PCM.daily 2012 Expansion Pack Updated Stats + 78 startlists (Last update 07.10.2012) - https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....d_id=23810

[PCM11]PCM.daily 2012 Stat updates + startlists (Last update 07.10.2012) - https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....ost_499156

[PCM12]2012 Startlists (Last update 05.10.2012 - Giro dell'Emilia): https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....ost_562321
 
ruben
I disagree giving Mollema low rec just because he became ill.
In the Vuelta 2011 he was still very strong at the end (Pena Cabarga).

You'd better give him low RES instead.
 
baseballlover312
ruben wrote:
I disagree giving Mollema low rec just because he became ill.
In the Vuelta 2011 he was still very strong at the end (Pena Cabarga).

You'd better give him low RES instead.


Resistance has no effect.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/avatar.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/forumthread.png
i.imgur.com/VCXYUyF.png
i.imgur.com/4osUjkI.png
 
valverde321
baseballlover312 wrote:
ruben wrote:
I disagree giving Mollema low rec just because he became ill.
In the Vuelta 2011 he was still very strong at the end (Pena Cabarga).

You'd better give him low RES instead.


Resistance has no effect.


Am I missing something? I thought it had an effect in the game or else it would be useless to include as a stat....
 
baseballlover312
valverde321 wrote:
baseballlover312 wrote:
ruben wrote:
I disagree giving Mollema low rec just because he became ill.
In the Vuelta 2011 he was still very strong at the end (Pena Cabarga).

You'd better give him low RES instead.


Resistance has no effect.


Am I missing something? I thought it had an effect in the game or else it would be useless to include as a stat....


According to tests it has no effect. Check out the attributes thread.

Edit: At least not in 3D.
Edited by baseballlover312 on 20-07-2013 18:58
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/avatar.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/funniest.png
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/forumthread.png
i.imgur.com/VCXYUyF.png
i.imgur.com/4osUjkI.png
 
Riis123
Kentaurus wrote:
Alakagom wrote:
Froome 83
Quintana 82
Rodriguez 81
Valverde 80
Porte 80
Contador 80/79

Likely to be stats for the top climbers after the Tour. Contador is a tough one, a difficult choice.


I think I would have Froome and Quintana on the at the same level, most stages Quintana seemed to be the better climber of the two, though inexperience or team tactics (Ax 3 Domains) caused him not to win the stage.


I agree with that. Also, I dont think that Conta should be lower than 80, even though he clearly is on the decline
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Free Element to Free Element
Free Element to Free Element
PCM10: Funny screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.44 seconds