PCM.daily banner
25-11-2024 11:28
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 73

· Members Online: 2
Laurens147, redordead

· Total Members: 161,811
· Newest Member: eganyu
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Cycling
 Print Thread
Tour De France '13 Stage 4: July 2, Nice-Nice
Jesleyh
SSJ2Luigi wrote:
Jesleyh wrote:
Spoiler
ianrussell wrote:
Metriz- wrote:
CountArach wrote:
chrisw_bwfc wrote:
I don't even see (based on their PCM stats :lolSmile how that OGE time is possible! What a joke.

The team has a lot of track cyclists and has largely been built from the Australian track program. While that isn't where most of the riders here have come from, it does mean that the team structure puts a lot of effort into riding in formation and into the TTT discipline. Strength as a TTist doesn't mean as much as it does in PCM, it is alll about team cohesion (which is why Garmin are brilliant at this discipline usually).

Exactly. Notice how all the teams with great leadout trains also did well today.


Except Argos ofc Smile

Well, I don't want to defend Argos' horrible time today too much, but they didn't want to go for it anyway, they just wanted to finish in the time-limit, and finish the TTT with a good feeling, yet saving a bit energy(That's hard, but I guess he means not giving 100% but 90%) for the upcoming days. At least their DS said that in an interview on the Dutch television.


then don't do it

I didn't defend it, I just explained their team plan for today Wink
i1326.photobucket.com/albums/u660/jesleyh/Junk/0ca5fb14-ed59-44b1-8eb0-596097ba5c01_zps8e97f370.jpg

Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy


PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 25-11-2024 11:28
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
wogsrus
Noval from Saxo off to hospital after accident.
 
SSJ2Luigi
Jesleyh wrote:
SSJ2Luigi wrote:
Jesleyh wrote:
Spoiler
ianrussell wrote:
Metriz- wrote:
CountArach wrote:
chrisw_bwfc wrote:
I don't even see (based on their PCM stats :lolSmile how that OGE time is possible! What a joke.

The team has a lot of track cyclists and has largely been built from the Australian track program. While that isn't where most of the riders here have come from, it does mean that the team structure puts a lot of effort into riding in formation and into the TTT discipline. Strength as a TTist doesn't mean as much as it does in PCM, it is alll about team cohesion (which is why Garmin are brilliant at this discipline usually).

Exactly. Notice how all the teams with great leadout trains also did well today.


Except Argos ofc Smile

Well, I don't want to defend Argos' horrible time today too much, but they didn't want to go for it anyway, they just wanted to finish in the time-limit, and finish the TTT with a good feeling, yet saving a bit energy(That's hard, but I guess he means not giving 100% but 90%) for the upcoming days. At least their DS said that in an interview on the Dutch television.


then don't do it

I didn't defend it, I just explained their team plan for today Wink


Seems to me that something dutch was mentioned and you needed to say something about it Rolling Eyes
 
Jesleyh
SSJ2Luigi wrote:
Jesleyh wrote:
SSJ2Luigi wrote:
Jesleyh wrote:
Spoiler
ianrussell wrote:
Metriz- wrote:
CountArach wrote:
chrisw_bwfc wrote:
I don't even see (based on their PCM stats :lolSmile how that OGE time is possible! What a joke.

The team has a lot of track cyclists and has largely been built from the Australian track program. While that isn't where most of the riders here have come from, it does mean that the team structure puts a lot of effort into riding in formation and into the TTT discipline. Strength as a TTist doesn't mean as much as it does in PCM, it is alll about team cohesion (which is why Garmin are brilliant at this discipline usually).

Exactly. Notice how all the teams with great leadout trains also did well today.


Except Argos ofc Smile

Well, I don't want to defend Argos' horrible time today too much, but they didn't want to go for it anyway, they just wanted to finish in the time-limit, and finish the TTT with a good feeling, yet saving a bit energy(That's hard, but I guess he means not giving 100% but 90%) for the upcoming days. At least their DS said that in an interview on the Dutch television.


then don't do it

I didn't defend it, I just explained their team plan for today Wink


Seems to me that something dutch was mentioned and you needed to say something about it Rolling Eyes

Yes.
i1326.photobucket.com/albums/u660/jesleyh/Junk/0ca5fb14-ed59-44b1-8eb0-596097ba5c01_zps8e97f370.jpg

Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy


PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
 
Metriz-
Jesleyh wrote:
SSJ2Luigi wrote:
Seems to me that something dutch was mentioned and you needed to say something about it Rolling Eyes

Yes.

The point is, they would have done badly even if they had gone for it, so no need to explain anything.
Edited by Metriz- on 02-07-2013 16:36
 
Jesleyh
True that Metriz.
But this was just horrible. Then, they maybe would've been 20th or 21th Pfft
i1326.photobucket.com/albums/u660/jesleyh/Junk/0ca5fb14-ed59-44b1-8eb0-596097ba5c01_zps8e97f370.jpg

Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy


PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
 
Malkael
Words cannot describe, they just cannot. Nor even the banana emote.

Speechless.
 
http://www.theroar.com.au/author/matthew-boulden/
Jesleyh
Malkael wrote:
Words cannot describe, they just cannot. Nor even the banana emote.

Speechless.

Congratulations Wink
i1326.photobucket.com/albums/u660/jesleyh/Junk/0ca5fb14-ed59-44b1-8eb0-596097ba5c01_zps8e97f370.jpg

Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy


PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
 
fosforgasXIII
VdB is in good position after this TTT, only losing time to Froome and Contador. And then people say it's a bad decision from Lotto to send no climbers to the Tour.
 
issoisso
So, saturday this guy will be in yellow


Spoiler
3.bp.blogspot.com/-dYhK8Vtaiw4/UVnIzVMJ4xI/AAAAAAAAAG0/TRIDL1vBjGc/s320/Chris_Froome6.jpg
cdn4.media.cyclingnews.futurecdn.net//2012/07/07/2/bettiniphoto_0115582_1_full_600.jpg

Edited by issoisso on 02-07-2013 17:53
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
Tjoertszc
issoisso wrote:
So, saturday this guy will be in yellow


Spoiler
3.bp.blogspot.com/-dYhK8Vtaiw4/UVnIzVMJ4xI/AAAAAAAAAG0/TRIDL1vBjGc/s320/Chris_Froome6.jpg
cdn4.media.cyclingnews.futurecdn.net//2012/07/07/2/bettiniphoto_0115582_1_full_600.jpg


And I reckon that Thursday we will see Impey in yellow?

Gerrans at 32 stage classifications (not including TTT) total with Impey at 41 total.
 
MartijnVDD
fosforgasXIII wrote:
VdB is in good position after this TTT, only losing time to Froome and Contador. And then people say it's a bad decision from Lotto to send no climbers to the Tour.

There's only one short TTT, while there are six mountain stages.
Those few seconds he gained today can easily be lost starting this Saturday if he gets isolated.
 
Aquarius
Jesleyh wrote:
Malkael wrote:
Words cannot describe, they just cannot. Nor even the banana emote.

Speechless.

Congratulations Wink

For being Australian ? Great achievement, kudos, you really dug yourself to get that one.
 
Spilak23
ianrussell wrote:
ianrussell wrote:
So biggest GC losers today? (my loose, vague interpretation):

Fuglsang +56
Rolland +1:13
Navarro +1:20

Froome and Contador happiest of all with solid times and no yellow to defend.


Probably Valverde would've taken that before today too at just +16.


I'd say Rodriguez is thewinner of the podium contenders today. The best timetrialist in his team is Kristoff. And they are riding on canyon bikes. He was probably expecting to lose a lot more.

Lampre did very well also! Cool
 
felix_29
Spilak23 wrote:
ianrussell wrote:
ianrussell wrote:
So biggest GC losers today? (my loose, vague interpretation):

Fuglsang +56
Rolland +1:13
Navarro +1:20

Froome and Contador happiest of all with solid times and no yellow to defend.


Probably Valverde would've taken that before today too at just +16.


I'd say Rodriguez is thewinner of the podium contenders today. The best timetrialist in his team is Kristoff. And they are riding on canyon bikes. He was probably expecting to lose a lot more.

Lampre did very well also! Cool


What have Canyon bikes to do with their performance?
 
Aquarius
CountArach wrote:
chrisw_bwfc wrote:
I don't even see (based on their PCM stats :lolSmile how that OGE time is possible! What a joke.

The team has a lot of track cyclists and has largely been built from the Australian track program. While that isn't where most of the riders here have come from, it does mean that the team structure puts a lot of effort into riding in formation and into the TTT discipline. Strength as a TTist doesn't mean as much as it does in PCM, it is alll about team cohesion (which is why Garmin are brilliant at this discipline usually).

That, plus if I may add, explosive riders (sprinters and climbers) are usually an useful addition to the team because of their ability to change pace.
ITT's performance mostly depends on a power and position factor of course, but also about how steady the delivered power is.
TTT performance rather depends on the ability of riders to increase their power many times for a few dozen of seconds and to cope with the decreasing power during a minute or so. Very different effort, especially with large teams like there are in Grand Tours.
 
valverde321
felix_29 wrote:
Spilak23 wrote:
ianrussell wrote:
ianrussell wrote:
So biggest GC losers today? (my loose, vague interpretation):

Fuglsang +56
Rolland +1:13
Navarro +1:20

Froome and Contador happiest of all with solid times and no yellow to defend.


Probably Valverde would've taken that before today too at just +16.


I'd say Rodriguez is thewinner of the podium contenders today. The best timetrialist in his team is Kristoff. And they are riding on canyon bikes. He was probably expecting to lose a lot more.

Lampre did very well also! Cool


What have Canyon bikes to do with their performance?


I think its more that the others are on Pinarello's and Specialized's
 
Schleck96
issoisso wrote:
So, saturday this guy will be in yellow


Spoiler
3.bp.blogspot.com/-dYhK8Vtaiw4/UVnIzVMJ4xI/AAAAAAAAAG0/TRIDL1vBjGc/s320/Chris_Froome6.jpg
cdn4.media.cyclingnews.futurecdn.net//2012/07/07/2/bettiniphoto_0115582_1_full_600.jpg


I got surprised it didn't happen already today.....
 
Spilak23
felix_29 wrote:
Spilak23 wrote:
ianrussell wrote:
ianrussell wrote:
So biggest GC losers today? (my loose, vague interpretation):

Fuglsang +56
Rolland +1:13
Navarro +1:20

Froome and Contador happiest of all with solid times and no yellow to defend.


Probably Valverde would've taken that before today too at just +16.


I'd say Rodriguez is thewinner of the podium contenders today. The best timetrialist in his team is Kristoff. And they are riding on canyon bikes. He was probably expecting to lose a lot more.

Lampre did very well also! Cool


What have Canyon bikes to do with their performance?


Not really top quality compared to Specialized, Pinarello or Cervelo
 
BritPCMFan
Aquarius wrote:
CountArach wrote:
chrisw_bwfc wrote:
I don't even see (based on their PCM stats :lolSmile how that OGE time is possible! What a joke.

The team has a lot of track cyclists and has largely been built from the Australian track program. While that isn't where most of the riders here have come from, it does mean that the team structure puts a lot of effort into riding in formation and into the TTT discipline. Strength as a TTist doesn't mean as much as it does in PCM, it is alll about team cohesion (which is why Garmin are brilliant at this discipline usually).

That, plus if I may add, explosive riders (sprinters and climbers) are usually an useful addition to the team because of their ability to change pace.
ITT's performance mostly depends on a power and position factor of course, but also about how steady the delivered power is.
TTT performance rather depends on the ability of riders to increase their power many times for a few dozen of seconds and to cope with the decreasing power during a minute or so. Very different effort, especially with large teams like there are in Grand Tours.


Yeah, ITT is all about riding just on the limit. TTT is all about riding just over the limit then recovering quickly.

Most the Orica team are pretty good in a Scratch race. And TTT a very similar disipline in what they require of you. Stamina, burst pace and high recovery.

Omega are so good because of this. They generally have 2-3 anchors (Martin and their other awesome TT guys) and then a big old sprint train. The sprinters are able to get the speeds up very quick before the TT guys take a long burst whilst the sprinters recover for the next burst. People will always talk about Martin when OPQ win TTTs, but Cavendish is probably one the best TTTers in the world.
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Slipstream and Gerolsteiner at the back
Slipstream and Gerolsteiner at the back
PCM 08: Official Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,445 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,900 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 1.64 seconds