Tour de France-Poll
|
Dippofix |
Posted on 10-06-2014 18:44
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3906
Joined: 29-01-2013
PCM$: 300.00
|
SSJ2Luigi wrote:
Dippofix wrote:
Shonak wrote:
Dippofix wrote:
nutter453 wrote:
Heart says Contador, head says Froome...
Nah, heart says Gesink.
Hm, not sure if this is just usual Gesink trolling or a dig at his heart condition? If it's the latter I feel bad for grinning for a second.
A bit of both. Just can't stop ever since Jesleyh edited my post.
And I actually think Gesink will come back stronger, and might at last actually do something at the Vuelta.
because 7th and 6th twice is doing nothing
Not for somebody who was talked up to be ridiculously talented, no. It's a bit like EBH. He did do stuff, but really, he disappointed.
|
|
|
|
SSJ2Luigi |
Posted on 10-06-2014 18:45
|
World Champion
Posts: 11971
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 400.00
|
jsh312mufc wrote:
nutter453 wrote:
Heart says Contador, head says Froome...
Head or heart, the result is a doped winner
when was the last time it wasn't won by a doped winner. not before 1902 for sure
edit: and not until 3415 or something like that
Edited by SSJ2Luigi on 10-06-2014 18:45
|
|
|
|
Kirchen_75 |
Posted on 10-06-2014 20:32
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7702
Joined: 24-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
voted Gesink coz YOLO. (Actually he won't even start) |
|
|
|
Jesleyh |
Posted on 10-06-2014 20:32
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15274
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Kirchen_75 wrote:
voted Gesink coz YOLO. (Actually he won't even start)
You spoiled it
Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy
PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
|
|
|
|
Ad Bot |
Posted on 25-11-2024 05:48
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
IP: None |
|
|
jph27 |
Posted on 10-06-2014 20:42
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7339
Joined: 20-03-2010
PCM$: 900.00
|
Peraud. Because despite being only about the 6th best French climber, he still can win |
|
|
|
Alakagom |
Posted on 10-06-2014 20:43
|
World Champion
Posts: 10891
Joined: 19-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
jph27 wrote:
Peraud. Because despite being only about the 6th best French climber, he still can win
Bit harsh considering by far the best French rider this season bar Bouhanni.
Edited by Alakagom on 10-06-2014 20:43
|
|
|
|
Keeperodd |
Posted on 10-06-2014 20:51
|
Stagiare
Posts: 170
Joined: 03-06-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Well, i see that i wont stay on PCM long since everyone is pessimistic idiots that think that everyone is doped. No one seen the development in cycling? Its apparently not allowed to be optimistic here.
Sport freak. Mostly interested in Football (Liverpool, Rosenborg with more), increasing interest in cycling.
Also big Formula 1 fan. Ferrari <3
|
|
|
|
Jesleyh |
Posted on 10-06-2014 20:53
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15274
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Keeperodd wrote:
Well, i see that i wont stay on PCM long since everyone is pessimistic idiots that think that everyone is doped. No one seen the development in cycling? Its apparently not allowed to be optimistic here.
To say that based on this thread is not a good thing, most people in this thread are trolling
But yeah, the general opinion is that at least Froome is doped. I can't see what that has to do with playing PCM though.
Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy
PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
|
|
|
|
Dippofix |
Posted on 10-06-2014 20:57
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3906
Joined: 29-01-2013
PCM$: 300.00
|
Alakagom wrote:
jph27 wrote:
Peraud. Because despite being only about the 6th best French climber, he still can win
Bit harsh considering by far the best French rider this season bar Bouhanni.
Yeah, because fuck Rolland and the Giro.
|
|
|
|
Alakagom |
Posted on 10-06-2014 21:00
|
World Champion
Posts: 10891
Joined: 19-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Dippofix wrote:
Alakagom wrote:
jph27 wrote:
Peraud. Because despite being only about the 6th best French climber, he still can win
Bit harsh considering by far the best French rider this season bar Bouhanni.
Yeah, because fuck Rolland and the Giro.
While Rolland did a good ride, Peraud has been far more consistent. 2nd Tour Med, 4th Tirreno, 1st CI, 3rd Pais Vasco. Yea, for me consistency is big part of it and Peraud takes it so far.
If Rolland repeats his results from Giro elsewhere, my opinion will change.
|
|
|
|
admirschleck |
Posted on 10-06-2014 21:01
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6690
Joined: 11-10-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Keeperodd wrote:
Well, i see that i wont stay on PCM long since everyone is pessimistic idiots that think that everyone is doped. No one seen the development in cycling? Its apparently not allowed to be optimistic here.
You're stupid if you believe that what some guys (you know who they are) are doing is normal and they're not taking some illegal food, drugs or anything similar that makes them having quite big advantage over the others and us, normal people. Please do not come up with the arguements that they're working hard to get to that level, it's the story for little kids.
Also, I think he meant PCMdaily instead of PCM, Jesley.
|
|
|
|
TheManxMissile |
Posted on 10-06-2014 21:06
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
admirschleck wrote:
Keeperodd wrote:
Well, i see that i wont stay on PCM long since everyone is pessimistic idiots that think that everyone is doped. No one seen the development in cycling? Its apparently not allowed to be optimistic here.
You're stupid if you believe that what some guys (you know who they are) are doing is normal and they're not taking some illegal food, drugs or anything similar that makes them having quite big advantage over the others and us, normal people. Please do not come up with the arguements that they're working hard to get to that level, it's the story for little kids.
Reference to "The Sky Doping/Hate Thread", most posts by "Aquarius" or "issoisso" and any thread on Lance Armstrong for the reasoning behind a lot of peoples pessimistic attitudes to pro-cycling. We don't jump to conclusions (mostly) just that we've been burned before and can provide a solid basis for a lot of the allegations against dopers.
I wholeheartedly recommend you go and look up some of these prior discussions before writing us off as a community.
[better than saying you're stupid to believe other things than us]
|
|
|
|
Martial1 |
Posted on 10-06-2014 21:08
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 388
Joined: 30-04-2014
PCM$: 200.00
|
admirschleck wrote:
Keeperodd wrote:
Well, i see that i wont stay on PCM long since everyone is pessimistic idiots that think that everyone is doped. No one seen the development in cycling? Its apparently not allowed to be optimistic here.
You're stupid if you believe that what some guys (you know who they are) are doing is normal and they're not taking some illegal food, drugs or anything similar that makes them having quite big advantage over the others and us, normal people. Please do not come up with the arguements that they're working hard to get to that level, it's the story for little kids.
Also, I think he meant PCMdaily instead of PCM, Jesley.
To defend Keeperodd, it is also stupid to definitively say that Froome is on drugs only based on circumstantial evidence.
Yes, he is probably doped. But he is not definitely doped. I think that Keeperodd was talking about the fact that the atmosphere on Daily is if you don't admit Froome is doped (even though there is no definitive evidence) you are stupid. I don't think it's fair to bash people for having a little faith/not assuming the worst based on circumstantial evidence. (Personally, I think Froome is doped, or at least dopes during training. But that doesn't mean I have to tell people their stupid for disagreeing with me).
Just my two cents. (And yes, this is very off topic)
Edit: Zabel'd by TMM. I totally agree with him.
Edited by Martial1 on 10-06-2014 21:09
|
|
|
|
SSJ2Luigi |
Posted on 10-06-2014 21:27
|
World Champion
Posts: 11971
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 400.00
|
Keeperodd wrote:
Well, i see that i wont stay on PCM long since everyone is pessimistic idiots that think that everyone is doped. No one seen the development in cycling? Its apparently not allowed to be optimistic here.
I still don't know why I still actually go to the cycling threads. 90% is blaiming people of cheating. |
|
|
|
Roextro |
Posted on 10-06-2014 21:41
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2370
Joined: 24-01-2014
PCM$: 200.00
|
Robert Gesink is not going to the Tour de France https://www.cyclin...ert-gesink |
|
|
|
Riis123 |
Posted on 10-06-2014 21:47
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 5075
Joined: 07-08-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
SSJ2Luigi wrote:
Keeperodd wrote:
Well, i see that i wont stay on PCM long since everyone is pessimistic idiots that think that everyone is doped. No one seen the development in cycling? Its apparently not allowed to be optimistic here.
I still don't know why I still actually go to the cycling threads. 90% is blaiming people of cheating.
^^
I dont like the attitude on the forum when ppl get absolutely bashed for believing Froome, Porte, Contador etc. arent doped. I think the reason why is some of this forum's most respected persons (aquarius, issoisso and so on) kinda have dictated this forum's opinion through - very well argumented - accusations against those riders. If you are not on this wagon, you are basically stupid and naive. |
|
|
|
Shonak |
Posted on 10-06-2014 21:52
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15615
Joined: 16-07-2013
PCM$: 350.00
|
Martial1 wrote:
admirschleck wrote:
Keeperodd wrote:
Well, i see that i wont stay on PCM long since everyone is pessimistic idiots that think that everyone is doped. No one seen the development in cycling? Its apparently not allowed to be optimistic here.
You're stupid if you believe[..]
Yes, he is probably doped. But he is not definitely doped. I think that Keeperodd was talking about the fact that the atmosphere on Daily is i f you don't admit Froome is doped (even though there is no definitive evidence) you are stupid. I don't think it's fair to bash people for having a little faith
On the contrary, do we need someone who calls the forum pessimistic idiots after reading some posts? No one bashes people here, everyone is entitled to their opinion. The only guy who really is below acceptable discussion level is... well, you know, that one kiddo with a usa city nickname (... and he supports you know who
Edited by Shonak on 10-06-2014 21:53
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
|
|
|
|
jacobjc88 |
Posted on 10-06-2014 21:55
|
Domestique
Posts: 424
Joined: 13-03-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Riis123 wrote:
SSJ2Luigi wrote:
Keeperodd wrote:
Well, i see that i wont stay on PCM long since everyone is pessimistic idiots that think that everyone is doped. No one seen the development in cycling? Its apparently not allowed to be optimistic here.
I still don't know why I still actually go to the cycling threads. 90% is blaiming people of cheating.
^^
I dont like the attitude on the forum when ppl get absolutely bashed for believing Froome, Porte, Contador etc. arent doped. I think the reason why is some of this forum's most respected persons (aquarius, issoisso and so on) kinda have dictated this forum's opinion through - very well argumented - accusations against those riders. If you are not on this wagon, you are basically stupid and naive.
Hitting'em in the heart!
Present:
Tinkoff-Saxo - AG2R - Colombian riders
Past:
Francisco Mancebo - Illes balears - Carlos Sastre - Kelme - Robbie McEwen
|
|
|
|
Martial1 |
Posted on 10-06-2014 22:12
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 388
Joined: 30-04-2014
PCM$: 200.00
|
Shonak wrote:
No one bashes people here
Look at Admir's post
But yes, it is a two way street (everyone needs to be nice), I agree with you. I was just saying that generally the opinion/feeling on the forum is that it is right to think Froome is doped and wrong to think he isn't. |
|
|
|
Stromeon |
Posted on 10-06-2014 22:20
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3507
Joined: 06-10-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Speaking of issoisso, what's come of him lately? Hasn't posted since the Ronde
|
|
|