PCM.daily banner
24-11-2024 13:35
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 74

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,800
· Newest Member: Willemverstichel
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Cycling
 Print Thread
Sky Doping/Hate Thread
issoisso
Mont Ventoux, last 6.15 km, 8.00 %, 492 m 2002 | Lance Armstrong: 17 min 53 sec 2013 | Chtris Froome: 17 min 41 sec

The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
Waghlon
Brian Holm can speak?!
THE THOMAS VOECKLER PROPHET OF PCM DAILY


pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/funniest.png
 
http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com
issoisso
Waghlon wrote:
Brian Holm can speak?!


Found it. It's not the real Brian Holm
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
Roozeken
Question for all the haters??
Do u hate the fact that it's Froome who is winning and not your favorite??
Would u prefere them to get to last 500 meters with a bunch of 20 and start sprinting??


Like this we finally get something to see...

And if he was taking something, toen why wasn't he able to catch Cavendish's wheel?? Or are u implying he did that on purpose because he was sure his "dope" was getting him the ventoux win?????
 
superider2010
spassermongol wrote:
https://www.youtub...nf4DhXy9oU


pretty catchy
if i would be a doped rider,i would sing in peleton this melody
i.imgur.com/tMctmFo.png
 
Ithaca
Roozeken wrote:
Question for all the haters??
Do u hate the fact that it's Froome who is winning and not your favorite??
Would u prefere them to get to last 500 meters with a bunch of 20 and start sprinting??


Like this we finally get something to see...

And if he was taking something, toen why wasn't he able to catch Cavendish's wheel?? Or are u implying he did that on purpose because he was sure his "dope" was getting him the ventoux win?????


The "not catching Cav's wheel" could easily be Froome's lack of technique and/or his awareness of the development at the time. He isn't exactly a brilliant cyclist if you take away his power output.

I didn't really want to join this discussion, but I am going to. Froome is just a bit too obvious, and something is definitely wrong when even Danish TV2 (who are notoriously bad at being critical about anything) begins to suspect something.

Honestly, if Froome and Sky wanted to blow suspicion and doubt out of the water, why don't they release Froome's Watt/Kg figures and other readings?

It smells stinkable.
 
VoetsT
spassermongol wrote:
https://www.youtub...nf4DhXy9oU


HAHA :lol: that must be the only song that comes out the radio on the Sky-teambus Pfft
 
Aquarius
Ithaca wrote:
Honestly, if Froome and Sky wanted to blow suspicion and doubt out of the water, why don't they release Froome's Watt/Kg figures and other readings?

It smells stinkable.

Most likely they don't release them because his actual performance capability is probably one step ahead what he's shown in the Tour so far.
Well, maybe in the ITT was his real power, which was, according to La Gazetta dello Sport around 450 W (real Watts), produced by a 66 kg guy. 6,9 W/kg during 33 minutes.
That's a performance that ranges along with Ullrich's Arcalis power (albeit Ullrich's was at the end of a mountain stage).
 
Waghlon
Roozeken wrote:
Question for all the haters??



We prefer the term "cynics", thank you very much.
THE THOMAS VOECKLER PROPHET OF PCM DAILY


pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/funniest.png
 
http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com
issoisso
Ithaca wrote:
The "not catching Cav's wheel" could easily be Froome's lack of technique and/or his awareness of the development at the time. He isn't exactly a brilliant cyclist if you take away his power output.


Or you know, it could be some moron asking why a climber wasn't able to grab the wheel of the world's best sprinter in a crosswind
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 24-11-2024 13:35
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
Stromeon
Roozeken wrote:
Question for all the haters??
Do u hate the fact that it's Froome who is winning and not your favorite??
Would u prefere them to get to last 500 meters with a bunch of 20 and start sprinting??


Like this we finally get something to see...

And if he was taking something, toen why wasn't he able to catch Cavendish's wheel?? Or are u implying he did that on purpose because he was sure his "dope" was getting him the ventoux win?????


I am quite impartial in that I'm definitely not a fanboy of any cyclist/country/team; and I don't really have any favourite riders.
I don't think if you removed Froome you would get a bunch sprint of 20; you don't have to have a rider dominating to thin out the field - look at the Vuelta last year where the top three were separated by around a minute and a half but there wasn't a bunch sprint up any of the climbs there.

As for the incident on Friday, Froome made a half-hearted attempt [by his standards] to get onto Cav's wheel before dropping back and he said that he had full confidence that his team could bring that escape group back. He also didn't realise that Mollema and Ten Dam were in there, so he was counting on the support of Belkin to reel Contador in.
i.imgur.com/55sT7og.png Coldeportes i.imgur.com/55sT7og.png

Vamos Nairo! #SueƱoAmarillo
 
Ithaca
Aquarius wrote:
Ithaca wrote:
Honestly, if Froome and Sky wanted to blow suspicion and doubt out of the water, why don't they release Froome's Watt/Kg figures and other readings?

It smells stinkable.

Most likely they don't release them because his actual performance capability is probably one step ahead what he's shown in the Tour so far.
Well, maybe in the ITT was his real power, which was, according to La Gazetta dello Sport around 450 W (real Watts), produced by a 66 kg guy. 6,9 W/kg during 33 minutes.
That's a performance that ranges along with Ullrich's Arcalis power (albeit Ullrich's was at the end of a mountain stage).


So, if I'm understanding this correctly, what you're saying is that they don't release the data because it's highly suspicious? Oh, dear me. I never saw that coming.
 
Ithaca
issoisso wrote:
Ithaca wrote:
The "not catching Cav's wheel" could easily be Froome's lack of technique and/or his awareness of the development at the time. He isn't exactly a brilliant cyclist if you take away his power output.


Or you know, it could be some moron asking why a climber wasn't able to grab the wheel of the world's best sprinter in a crosswind


Well, yeah. I use too many words and forget important points, it seems Wink
Edited by Ithaca on 14-07-2013 19:46
 
tommyuk
Ive been reading this thread and laughing at some of the idiotic posts some people are making...

I have a question?

Why is no one bashing Quintana? His performances are a little .... out there as well?

The world doesnt like the British!

Rule Britannia! The rest of you with your "eurozone" need to catch up I suppose eh Wink
 
tommyuk
Ive been reading this thread and laughing at some of the idiotic posts some people are making...

I have a question?

Why is no one bashing Quintana? His performances are a little .... out there as well?

The world doesnt like the British!

Rule Britannia! The rest of you with your "eurozone" need to catch up I suppose eh Wink

OH and another Thing.. Old Alberto doesnt look to hot without the dope eh?
Edited by tommyuk on 14-07-2013 19:51
 
cosmic
Roozeken wrote:
Question for all the haters??
Do u hate the fact that it's Froome who is winning and not your favorite??
Would u prefere them to get to last 500 meters with a bunch of 20 and start sprinting??


Like this we finally get something to see...

And if he was taking something, toen why wasn't he able to catch Cavendish's wheel?? Or are u implying he did that on purpose because he was sure his "dope" was getting him the ventoux win?????


So you saying doping is fine as long as it gives spectacular performances ? Froome's performances are on par with a souped up Armstrong, so it's painfully obvious it ain't legit.
 
arthon
If I could only slap people through a standard TCP/IP connection.
 
tommyuk
Hasnt this been one hell of a TDF though?

Im gripped by it!!
 
Waghlon
tommyuk wrote:
Rule Britannia! The rest of you with your "eurozone" need to catch up I suppose eh Wink


Cycling was chugging along just nice until you guys and Sky showed up...
THE THOMAS VOECKLER PROPHET OF PCM DAILY


pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/funniest.png
 
http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com
superider2010
don't listen a noob like roozeken
when his picture screams
armstrong: guilty!!!! and pointing to froome
Edited by superider2010 on 14-07-2013 20:02
i.imgur.com/tMctmFo.png
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Jack Black Fan
Jack Black Fan
PCM 07: Funny Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.49 seconds