|
Café Pedro 9: Nein, nein, nein!
|
| Jesleyh |
Posted on 23-10-2014 16:12
|
World Champion
Posts: 14744
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Yes, I agree with Admir on that.
Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy
PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
|
| |
|
|
| Bosskardo |
Posted on 23-10-2014 18:24
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1437
Joined: 07-04-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Jesleyh wrote:
(Partly an attempt to bring the "joy" back to the cafe:
aidanvn13 wrote:
Well, I got my Learner's Licence today! In South Africa, the minimum age for a Learner's Licence is 17, Driver's Lic is 18, btw. So, in about 6 months I'll be able to do the Driver's exam. 
Congrats!
Gonna start my driver's lessons soon, you can ride at 17 here, but under supervision. So I want to have it ready at 18, when you can ride on your own. Some guys from my class already have 1 though, so at least I can take advantage of them 
Onco saw a show about driving in South Africa, so
Stay alive and don't drive in Europe
All funn n games, no offence
|
| |
|
|
| aidanvn13 |
Posted on 23-10-2014 19:17
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 2784
Joined: 06-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Bosskardo wrote:
Jesleyh wrote:
(Partly an attempt to bring the "joy" back to the cafe:
aidanvn13 wrote:
Well, I got my Learner's Licence today! In South Africa, the minimum age for a Learner's Licence is 17, Driver's Lic is 18, btw. So, in about 6 months I'll be able to do the Driver's exam.
Congrats!
Gonna start my driver's lessons soon, you can ride at 17 here, but under supervision. So I want to have it ready at 18, when you can ride on your own. Some guys from my class already have 1 though, so at least I can take advantage of them
Onco saw a show about driving in South Africa, so
Stay alive and don't drive in Europe
All funn n games, no offence
Oh gosh, the driving is terrible here. It's mostly due to the Police and Traffic Department being the most corrupt entity known to man. Or perhaps it's due to the millions of minibus drivers who have a total disregard for all rules (and I mean they don't follow any rules at all, no exaggeration); or maybe it's that half of the impoverished native population insists on buying fake licenses from their local dealer?
No offense taken, our roads have alarmingly high accident and death rates. Oh, well, makes us tougher
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 06-12-2025 13:39
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| baseballlover312 |
Posted on 23-10-2014 19:45
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 16553
Joined: 27-07-2011
PCM$: 13638.70
|
acac wrote:
ive got a driver license for about 9 months now and free gas
How does that work?
Meanwhile, I must add, that I am desperate. I beg and I plead for you to nominate me for something in the awards. I can't last another year without that minor and surface value satisfaction in my life.
Edited by baseballlover312 on 23-10-2014 19:49
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy |
| |
|
|
| Dippofix |
Posted on 23-10-2014 20:16
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3930
Joined: 29-01-2013
PCM$: 300.00
|
Paul23 wrote:
Lachi wrote:
1. @The Schleck Fan: Advice? That's a compilation of adultery jokes which in my opinion deserve a ban.
@cactus-jack: Can you please think before posting or are you really that low when it comes to getting laughs.
2. Edit: I thought it is save to come back to the Café after Admir was gone. 
1. I agree
2. Someone always has to fill his spot here...Although i didn't think admir was that bad...
Seriously, what is happening here? First Admir gets banned for two weeks over nothing (though his permaban was justified), then you want someone to be banned over THAT. And it's not even just anyone, it's one of the most liked members of the community.
Lachi, just because you're Swiss, doesn't mean you need to live up to the stereotype.
|
| |
|
|
| acac |
Posted on 23-10-2014 21:02
|
Domestique
Posts: 639
Joined: 20-09-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
baseballlover312 wrote:
acac wrote:
ive got a driver license for about 9 months now and free gas
How does that work?
Meanwhile, I must add, that I am desperate. I beg and I plead for you to nominate me for something in the awards. I can't last another year without that minor and surface value satisfaction in my life.
theres a gas station network here called paz that sells a chip that lets you take as much gas as you want if you have it. my dad got this chip from his company as bonus, so free gas
did you consider going for biggest baseball fan?  |
| |
|
|
| cactus-jack |
Posted on 23-10-2014 21:08
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3648
Joined: 31-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Lachi wrote:
@The Schleck Fan: Advice? That's a compilation of adultery jokes which in my opinion deserve a ban.
@cactus-jack: Can you please think before posting or are you really that low when it comes to getting laughs.
Edit: I thought it is save to come back to the Café after Admir was gone.
While I do see that some people might take offence to the jokes I posted, I assure you that most people have allready seen far worse on the Internet, perhaps even today. I see no reason to appologize for what someone might mistakenly be offended by.
Far worse things have been posted on this forum, things which have not resulted in talks off a possible ban, let alone an actual ban.
If my post is deemed too offensive then let an admin delete it, because I have no intention of doing so. I consider myself to be a contributing member of this community, a member who have not stepped over any arbitrary line in the past, atleast not to my knowledge.
There's a fine line between "psychotherapist" and "psycho the rapist"
|
| |
|
|
| Paul23 |
Posted on 23-10-2014 21:17
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4394
Joined: 10-08-2011
PCM$: 400.00
|
Dippofix wrote:
Paul23 wrote:
Lachi wrote:
1. @The Schleck Fan: Advice? That's a compilation of adultery jokes which in my opinion deserve a ban.
@cactus-jack: Can you please think before posting or are you really that low when it comes to getting laughs.
2. Edit: I thought it is save to come back to the Café after Admir was gone.
1. I agree
2. Someone always has to fill his spot here...Although i didn't think admir was that bad...
Seriously, what is happening here? First Admir gets banned for two weeks over nothing (though his permaban was justified), then you want someone to be banned over THAT. And it's not even just anyone, it's one of the most liked members of the community.
Lachi, just because you're Swiss, doesn't mean you need to live up to the stereotype.
Thats the reaction i wanted to see...because i don't think admirs ban was justified and cactus-jacks comment was not much different...so if admir is banned, cactus should be, too...(personally i don't want them banned)
|
| |
|
|
| baseballlover312 |
Posted on 23-10-2014 21:18
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 16553
Joined: 27-07-2011
PCM$: 13638.70
|
acac wrote:
baseballlover312 wrote:
acac wrote:
ive got a driver license for about 9 months now and free gas
How does that work?
Meanwhile, I must add, that I am desperate. I beg and I plead for you to nominate me for something in the awards. I can't last another year without that minor and surface value satisfaction in my life.
theres a gas station network here called paz that sells a chip that lets you take as much gas as you want if you have it. my dad got this chip from his company as bonus, so free gas
did you consider going for biggest baseball fan?
Don't think the admins would go for that category.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy |
| |
|
|
| aidanvn13 |
Posted on 23-10-2014 21:21
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 2784
Joined: 06-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
30 years on and Daily members will still debate the largest controversy in Daily-history: the banning of Admir Schleck.
|
| |
|
|
| SSJ2Luigi |
Posted on 23-10-2014 21:21
|
World Champion
Posts: 11469
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 400.00
|
baseballlover312 wrote:
Meanwhile, I must add, that I am desperate. I beg and I plead for you to nominate me for something in the awards. I can't last another year without that minor and surface value satisfaction in my life.
Jesleyh was nominated for Kelderman last year, you should be nominated for Martin this year imo
|
| |
|
|
| Paul23 |
Posted on 23-10-2014 21:28
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4394
Joined: 10-08-2011
PCM$: 400.00
|
SSJ2Luigi wrote:
baseballlover312 wrote:
Meanwhile, I must add, that I am desperate. I beg and I plead for you to nominate me for something in the awards. I can't last another year without that minor and surface value satisfaction in my life.
Jesleyh was nominated for Kelderman last year, you should be nominated for Martin this year imo
But for Daniel Martin, not for Tony!
|
| |
|
|
| TheManxMissile |
Posted on 23-10-2014 21:45
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 17833
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
Paul23 wrote:
Thats the reaction i wanted to see...because i don't think admirs ban was justified and cactus-jacks comment was not much different...so if admir is banned, cactus should be, too...(personally i don't want them banned)
Wow... ... ...
Took me a good 10minutes to find the post that cause trouble (that's how normal the post was) and when i did figure it out all i did was laugh. Cactus could not have made that any less serious unless he dressed it in a big red nose and started the post with "THIS IS A JOKE. THIS IS NOT SERIOUS"
|
| |
|
|
| Cycleman123 |
Posted on 23-10-2014 21:50
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4428
Joined: 30-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Paul23 wrote:
Lachi wrote:
1. @The Schleck Fan: Advice? That's a compilation of adultery jokes which in my opinion deserve a ban.
@cactus-jack: Can you please think before posting or are you really that low when it comes to getting laughs.
2. Edit: I thought it is save to come back to the Café after Admir was gone.
1. I agree
2. Someone always has to fill his spot here...Although i didn't think admir was that bad...
Are we fucking kidding here!? You can't_even compare this to Admir! I mean,are we all so immature now that if someone makes that sort of joke we go tits up? I mean,who in their right mind would take that seriously!?
(Spacebar_broken)
EDIT: Next time i'm jsut deleteing the comment tmm
Edited by TheManxMissile on 23-10-2014 21:52
|
| |
|
|
| Paul23 |
Posted on 23-10-2014 21:52
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4394
Joined: 10-08-2011
PCM$: 400.00
|
TheManxMissile wrote:
Paul23 wrote:
Thats the reaction i wanted to see...because i don't think admirs ban was justified and cactus-jacks comment was not much different...so if admir is banned, cactus should be, too...(personally i don't want them banned)
Wow... ... ...
Took me a good 10minutes to find the post that cause trouble (that's how normal the post was) and when i did figure it out all i did was laugh. Cactus could not have made that any less serious unless he dressed it in a big red nose and started the post with "THIS IS A JOKE. THIS IS NOT SERIOUS"
And in admirs post, he made it obvious as hell, that he is NOT serious...
I don't think admir or cactus-jack should be banned for "trying to be funny".
Maybe my not so good english doesn't allow a better explanation, but i just tried to make clear how idiotic it was, to ban admir, and how idiotic it would be to ban cactus-jack for this...i actually enjoyed cactus-jacks post somehow(i know it was useless and i did not really help)
EDIT: the other reason why admir is banned permanently now, is justified imo...but the 2 week ban somehow wasn't...
Edited by Paul23 on 23-10-2014 21:55
|
| |
|
|
| TheManxMissile |
Posted on 23-10-2014 21:55
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 17833
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
So you're comparing a one-off, clearly signalled joke, to multiple counts of abusive and disrespectful behavior against members of the site?
|
| |
|
|
| Paul23 |
Posted on 23-10-2014 21:57
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4394
Joined: 10-08-2011
PCM$: 400.00
|
TheManxMissile wrote:
So you're comparing a one-off, clearly signalled joke, to multiple counts of abusive and disrespectful behavior against members of the site?
Ok....could be my fault then...i just saw a few "jokes", like that above and some stuff with TTspecialist and the thing with Marsu from admir...if there is more, then i am sorry for comparing this.
|
| |
|
|
| Dippofix |
Posted on 23-10-2014 21:57
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3930
Joined: 29-01-2013
PCM$: 300.00
|
TheManxMissile wrote:
Paul23 wrote:
Thats the reaction i wanted to see...because i don't think admirs ban was justified and cactus-jacks comment was not much different...so if admir is banned, cactus should be, too...(personally i don't want them banned)
Wow... ... ...
Took me a good 10minutes to find the post that cause trouble (that's how normal the post was) and when i did figure it out all i did was laugh. Cactus could not have made that any less serious unless he dressed it in a big red nose and started the post with "THIS IS A JOKE. THIS IS NOT SERIOUS"
TMM actually did that for a while. 
But wait a minute. Why does everyone suddenly think Admir should never have been banned? That's not quite the sentiment that existed at the time...
|
| |
|
|
| Jesleyh |
Posted on 23-10-2014 21:58
|
World Champion
Posts: 14744
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Try digging up SN's post from a few pages ago.
It's explained well there. It weren't just a few jokes
Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy
PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
|
| |
|
|
| CountArach |
Posted on 23-10-2014 22:53
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8205
Joined: 14-07-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
cactus-jack wrote:
Lachi wrote:
@The Schleck Fan: Advice? That's a compilation of adultery jokes which in my opinion deserve a ban.
@cactus-jack: Can you please think before posting or are you really that low when it comes to getting laughs.
Edit: I thought it is save to come back to the Café after Admir was gone.
While I do see that some people might take offence to the jokes I posted, I assure you that most people have allready seen far worse on the Internet, perhaps even today. I see no reason to appologize for what someone might mistakenly be offended by.
Far worse things have been posted on this forum, things which have not resulted in talks off a possible ban, let alone an actual ban.
If my post is deemed too offensive then let an admin delete it, because I have no intention of doing so. I consider myself to be a contributing member of this community, a member who have not stepped over any arbitrary line in the past, atleast not to my knowledge.
I don't want to be exposed to them though. There is a reason I avoid the dark, dank corners of the internet - because the material is incredibly confronting. Just think before you post something that was utterly fucking shameful and for which, had you said it in real life, any decent human being would have cut off all contact with you.
Edited by CountArach on 23-10-2014 22:54
|
| |
|
