|
PCM.daily DB Stats discussion
|
| baseballlover312 |
Posted on 10-07-2013 02:13
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 16429
Joined: 27-07-2011
PCM$: 10438.70
|
I agree with the mountain stuff, but not cobbles. I think that those cobbles guys are just way above the rest, so that's how they show it.
RIP Exxon Duke, David Veilleux, Double Feature, and Monster Energy |
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 23-11-2024 00:23
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| Ollfardh |
Posted on 10-07-2013 07:40
|
World Champion
Posts: 14563
Joined: 08-08-2011
PCM$: 9100.00
|
Well, you say it's very hard to beat Canc and Boonen, but that's pretty much how it is. I think we should go for realism, and if you want some easier wins, just edit the stats yourself 
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
|
| |
|
|
| Cossack |
Posted on 10-07-2013 09:40
|
Domestique
Posts: 582
Joined: 16-07-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
valverde321 wrote:
Niemiec 78->77 MO imo
I don't see the need for that, Niemiec peaked for Giro and didn't start between Giro and Tour at all, so no wonder he's not that great here. On his blog he wrote that he will have a free role in Alps, so we can expect him in breakaways.
Ollfardh wrote:
Well, you say it's very hard to beat Canc and Boonen, but that's pretty much how it is. I think we should go for realism, and if you want some easier wins, just edit the stats yourself
Or change difficulty from extreme. |
| |
|
|
| warchex |
Posted on 10-07-2013 14:11
|
Under 23
Posts: 63
Joined: 25-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Ollfardh wrote:
Well, you say it's very hard to beat Canc and Boonen, but that's pretty much how it is. I think we should go for realism, and if you want some easier wins, just edit the stats yourself
It's not very hard, it's impossible.
Hard is way to easy again, owned everyone in Amstel and Fleche Wallone. 8 of mine top 23 in Amstel. 1,4 and 5 in Fleche. Cyanide should create a new difficulty, between hard and extreme. |
| |
|
|
| Teddy The Creator |
Posted on 10-07-2013 14:45
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2253
Joined: 19-10-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
I'm not sure if Goss should be downgraded hugely, he has said he has no idea what's wrong with him this tour, he just seems out of position and fails to keep up in the peloton. Remember he won a stage at Tirreno and has had high finishes at the Giro and TdS Stats should be like
Cav 83
Greipel 82
Kittel 81
Sagan 79
Goss 79
Edited by Teddy The Creator on 10-07-2013 14:47
|
| |
|
|
| Miguel98 |
Posted on 10-07-2013 14:46
|
World Champion
Posts: 10497
Joined: 23-06-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Cav shouldn't get 83 imo. |
| |
|
|
| Pellizotti2 |
Posted on 10-07-2013 14:47
|
World Champion
Posts: 10121
Joined: 01-05-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
You can't possibly still think that Goss is equal to Sagan and better than everyone except "the big four".
|
| |
|
|
| Teddy The Creator |
Posted on 10-07-2013 14:52
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2253
Joined: 19-10-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Actually you're right about Sagan, he should be 80-81, as for others I feel like Goss is equal to guys like Demare, Bouhanni, Degenkolb who all have stats around 80.
|
| |
|
|
| Ollfardh |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:44
|
World Champion
Posts: 14563
Joined: 08-08-2011
PCM$: 9100.00
|
I give up on De Gendt, you'll need some kind of consistency stat to get him right on PCM.
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
|
| |
|
|
| Alakagom |
Posted on 10-07-2013 16:46
|
World Champion
Posts: 10891
Joined: 19-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Teddy The Creator wrote:
Actually you're right about Sagan, he should be 80-81, as for others I feel like Goss is equal to guys like Demare, Bouhanni, Degenkolb who all have stats around 80.
No, they don't. Those 3 have sprint stats of 78.Right now Goss in the DB is 78/78, which could easily change in opposite ways.
For Sagan 79 is fine, considering his other stats, especially hill.
Edited by Alakagom on 10-07-2013 16:47
|
| |
|
|
| Cossack |
Posted on 11-07-2013 19:04
|
Domestique
Posts: 582
Joined: 16-07-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
I think Rojas should be 76 sprint again. He scored top 10s even on completely flat stages. |
| |
|
|
| Miguel98 |
Posted on 11-07-2013 19:05
|
World Champion
Posts: 10497
Joined: 23-06-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Omar Bertazzo should get an update. He beated the likes of Sutton, Ponzi and others, all 70 SP+. Should get 73 SP and 73 ACC. |
| |
|
|
| valverde321 |
Posted on 13-07-2013 02:58
|
World Champion
Posts: 12986
Joined: 20-05-2009
PCM$: 530.00
|
Jose Joaquin Rojas 74 SPR -> 76/77
I'm not sure why he went as low as 74 tbh, he's always been a pretty good sprinter, and he repeatedly gets Top 5 places without any support at all.
He's not go the top end speed I guess, so when playing with him 74 might be alright, but with 74 for the AI, he's just never in the picture at all, when he really should be.
Well, just wrote this all up and noticed Cossack's post  I agree with him though.
|
| |
|
|
| Ian Butler |
Posted on 13-07-2013 08:31
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 21854
Joined: 01-05-2012
PCM$: 400.00
|
Alakagom: How much are you rating Coquard? |
| |
|
|
| DaDa_Dave |
Posted on 13-07-2013 19:26
|
Amateur
Posts: 2
Joined: 20-05-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
What are you guys thinking of the sprint/acceleration stats for sprinters with the new acceleration system?
I experienced in the few tours I've played that guys like Contador or Rodriguez regulary get good positions in mass sprints if they have good positioning before the sprint.
So what about giving guys like Rojas, who get alot of solid results without being fast enough to win stages stats around 74/80 Spr/Acc and guys like Renshaw or Steegmans who are good lead out men, but lack the positioning to win themselves, stats around 77/71 Spr/Acc?
Edited by DaDa_Dave on 13-07-2013 19:27
|
| |
|
|
| schleckfreak |
Posted on 14-07-2013 14:50
|
Free Agent
Posts: 148
Joined: 23-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Bakelandts need a good boost!!! |
| |
|
|
| Chipolino |
Posted on 14-07-2013 15:30
|
Amateur
Posts: 12
Joined: 01-04-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Froome
Doping 85!!! |
| |
|
|
| binga58 |
Posted on 15-07-2013 11:46
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 339
Joined: 03-08-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Chipolino wrote:
Froome
Doping 85!!!
This!
Also Sagan should be better.
Cadel whilst old is still better than TJ.
Quintana will be fun to play with in the next couple of years. |
| |
|
|
| Kirill Klimenkov |
Posted on 15-07-2013 19:57
|
Junior Rider
Posts: 30
Joined: 09-03-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Some continental team stats
Atlas
Team has 3 sprinters: Brambilla - 71, Averin - 71, Chiocca - 70. But Averin is better in hills. Brambilla is pure flat sprinter
Polivoda is master of breakaways and very good at flat: FL - 70, HIL - 68
Baldo won some hilly races and was good in TT: HIL - 72, TT - 69
Klimiankou is not bad climber and hilly racer - 69 for MO and HIL
Amore e Vita
They have polish climber Dabrowski - 70
Free agents BLR
Krasilnikau won RR and was 2nd in TT in Belarus champ and had some top-10 in GC in 2.2. 68 for MO, 69 HIL, 70 TT
Papok is not bad in sprints (68) and master of hilly breakaways (HIL - 68), TT - 67
Kunitski, Bazhkou, Novikau, Sobal retired. Almost all free kazakhs retired too, so that`s have reason to change them by Astana CT riders
Edited by Kirill Klimenkov on 15-07-2013 19:58
|
| |
|
|
| AiZaK |
Posted on 17-07-2013 19:33
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1190
Joined: 13-04-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
J.J. Rojas, the best for him I think is 76 (SPR) |
| |
|
