|
Expansion Pack: Stat Discussion
|
| Jesleyh |
Posted on 02-06-2013 12:11
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15274
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Alakagom wrote:
dev4ever wrote:
Fabio Aru?
And you got the last one.
It's iffy a bit, he has 75 (MO) already so potential of 7 may be too high, but I think he's out of all talents most guaranteed to actually have massive success in the future and for me is a GT winner in years to come.
FroomeDog99 Good shouts there, both are potential of 6.
So so far, potentials 7 are credited to Jungels, Ewan, Dombrowski, Aru and Lutsenko. Quite a select group. Few othersmight join them, we'll have to see.
However many of the talents mentioned here are potential 6, so they aren't far behind.
Uhm... Am I going to be shouted at when I mention Kelderman? 
Probably potential 6, no? 
Edited by Jesleyh on 02-06-2013 12:12
Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy
PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
|
| |
|
|
| Alakagom |
Posted on 02-06-2013 14:46
|
World Champion
Posts: 10891
Joined: 19-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Cio, Silvo isn't potential 7 as he isn't in the DB. Might add him as a free agent though  Then he's definitely will be close to that potential 7, same with Ludvigsson.
Keldermann potential of 6 indeed
Edited by Alakagom on 02-06-2013 14:47
|
| |
|
|
| Selwink |
Posted on 02-06-2013 14:47
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8856
Joined: 17-05-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Jesleyh wrote:
Alakagom wrote:
dev4ever wrote:
Fabio Aru?
And you got the last one.
It's iffy a bit, he has 75 (MO) already so potential of 7 may be too high, but I think he's out of all talents most guaranteed to actually have massive success in the future and for me is a GT winner in years to come.
FroomeDog99 Good shouts there, both are potential of 6.
So so far, potentials 7 are credited to Jungels, Ewan, Dombrowski, Aru and Lutsenko. Quite a select group. Few othersmight join them, we'll have to see.
However many of the talents mentioned here are potential 6, so they aren't far behind.
Uhm... Am I going to be shouted at when I mention Kelderman?
Probably potential 6, no?
Yep, stats are too high for 7
|
| |
|
|
| Jesleyh |
Posted on 02-06-2013 14:49
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15274
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
And Van Poppel or Groenewegen maybe? Van Baarle? Olivier?
Come on, at least one of them?
But Kelderman 6 is ok, understand the reasoning.
Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy
PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
|
| |
|
|
| Selwink |
Posted on 02-06-2013 14:51
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8856
Joined: 17-05-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Jesleyh wrote:
And Van Poppel or Groenewegen maybe? Van Baarle? Olivier?
Come on, at least one of them?
But Kelderman 6 is ok, understand the reasoning.
I agree with you on Van Poppel, he has shown a hell of a lot talent for a 19-year-old. Even Sporza agreed
|
| |
|
|
| Alakagom |
Posted on 02-06-2013 14:53
|
World Champion
Posts: 10891
Joined: 19-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Selwink wrote:
Jesleyh wrote:
And Van Poppel or Groenewegen maybe? Van Baarle? Olivier?
Come on, at least one of them?
But Kelderman 6 is ok, understand the reasoning.
I agree with you on Van Poppel, he has shown a hell of a lot talent for a 19-year-old. Even Sporza agreed
He's already 75/75 in stats, at least I edidted them last few days, hence potential of 6 should be enough for him to be a sprinter in the 80's. Others are potentials of 6, and should be enough for them.
|
| |
|
|
| admirschleck |
Posted on 02-06-2013 14:54
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6690
Joined: 11-10-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Selwink wrote:
ven Sporza agreed
They said that Van Popel should get 7 potential in PCMdaily's database? Really?   |
| |
|
|
| Jesleyh |
Posted on 02-06-2013 14:54
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15274
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Okay, good.
Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy
PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
|
| |
|
|
| Selwink |
Posted on 02-06-2013 15:00
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8856
Joined: 17-05-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
admirschleck wrote:
Selwink wrote:
ven Sporza agreed
They said that Van Popel should get 7 potential in PCMdaily's database? Really?
No,
he has shown a hell of a lot talent for a 19-year-old. Even Sporza agreed.
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 25-11-2024 00:48
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| GerardoGomCas |
Posted on 02-06-2013 18:49
|
Amateur
Posts: 12
Joined: 02-08-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Damiano Caruso? |
| |
|
|
| admirschleck |
Posted on 02-06-2013 18:51
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6690
Joined: 11-10-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Selwink wrote:
admirschleck wrote:
Selwink wrote:
ven Sporza agreed
They said that Van Popel should get 7 potential in PCMdaily's database? Really?
No,
he has shown a hell of a lot talent for a 19-year-old. Even Sporza agreed.
Oh c'mon! That was joke... |
| |
|
|
| Jesleyh |
Posted on 02-06-2013 18:51
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15274
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
GerardoGomCas wrote:
Damiano Caruso?
What about him?
You want him 7 potential?! Or just want his stats to be changed? And what stats? Be more specific
Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy
PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
|
| |
|
|
| Selwink |
Posted on 02-06-2013 18:56
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8856
Joined: 17-05-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
admirschleck wrote:
Selwink wrote:
admirschleck wrote:
Selwink wrote:
ven Sporza agreed
They said that Van Popel should get 7 potential in PCMdaily's database? Really?
No,
he has shown a hell of a lot talent for a 19-year-old. Even Sporza agreed.
Oh c'mon! That was joke...
Well, I thought you misread it and made a joke about that
|
| |
|
|
| GerardoGomCas |
Posted on 02-06-2013 19:06
|
Amateur
Posts: 12
Joined: 02-08-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Jesleyh wrote:
GerardoGomCas wrote:
Damiano Caruso?
What about him?
You want him 7 potential?! Or just want his stats to be changed? And what stats? Be more specific
I think I was very specific some days ago but the gesink/kelderman/dutch riders conversation took all the attention.
GerardoGomCas wrote:
How about Damiano Caruso? He was pretty good and consistent, especially considering he was called 2-3 days before the start of the Giro. He finished well ahead of Intxausti in all mountain stages but the Montasio one, and that's probably cause he was still building form. |
| |
|
|
| Jesleyh |
Posted on 02-06-2013 19:11
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15274
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
I believe it was only a Gesink discussion, no other riders really involved
But yeah, Caruso did a good job.
But he's already 74MO/76HI. Could get 75MO IMO, maybe 76MO, but not higher than that, would say 75. Don't forget that he had a team behind him, at least he didn't have to work.
Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy
PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
|
| |
|
|
| Alakagom |
Posted on 02-06-2013 19:12
|
World Champion
Posts: 10891
Joined: 19-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Jesleyh wrote:
I believe it was only a Gesink discussion, no other riders really involved
But yeah, Caruso did a good job.
But he's already 74MO/76HI. Could get 75MO IMO, maybe 76MO, but not higher than that, would say 75. Don't forget that he had a team behind him, at least he didn't have to work.
You're talking about the wrong Caruso
And about Damiano, 76 I think is good, 77 possibly due to circumstances as you said GerardoGomCas, but I'll wait till Vuelta ( as I guess he'll target that as well ) to see about that or maybe earlier
|
| |
|
|
| Spilak23 |
Posted on 02-06-2013 19:13
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7357
Joined: 22-08-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Jesleyh wrote:
I believe it was only a Gesink discussion, no other riders really involved
But yeah, Caruso did a good job.
But he's already 74MO/76HI. Could get 75MO IMO, maybe 76MO, but not higher than that, would say 75. Don't forget that he had a team behind him, at least he didn't have to work.
That's Gianpaolo. But I think your are correctly talking about Damiano who was third on the MTT. 76 sounds about right for him.
|
| |
|
|
| Jesleyh |
Posted on 02-06-2013 19:14
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15274
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Alakagom wrote:
Jesleyh wrote:
I believe it was only a Gesink discussion, no other riders really involved
But yeah, Caruso did a good job.
But he's already 74MO/76HI. Could get 75MO IMO, maybe 76MO, but not higher than that, would say 75. Don't forget that he had a team behind him, at least he didn't have to work.
You're talking about the wrong Caruso
And about Damiano, 76 I think is good, 77 possibly due to circumstances as you said GerardoGomCas, but I'll wait till Vuelta ( as I guess he'll target that as well ) to see about that or maybe earlier
Oh shit. Used Damiano's result and Gianpaolo's stats. Well, their MO stats are equal anyway. 76 seems good, wouldn't give him 77.
Wouldn't say the MTT makes a huge difference, look who finished 8th. The guy has 66MO
Edited by Jesleyh on 02-06-2013 19:16
Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy
PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
|
| |
|
|
| GerardoGomCas |
Posted on 02-06-2013 21:13
|
Amateur
Posts: 12
Joined: 02-08-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Alakagom wrote:And about Damiano, 76 I think is good, 77 possibly due to circumstances as you said GerardoGomCas, but I'll wait till Vuelta ( as I guess he'll target that as well ) to see about that or maybe earlier
Thanks for your response. I was thinking the same about Damiano, he really surprise me. |
| |
|
|
| AiZaK |
Posted on 02-06-2013 22:42
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1190
Joined: 13-04-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Any update coming soon??? |
| |
|
