PCM.daily banner
26-11-2024 20:32
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 38

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,823
· Newest Member: equilibrFrime
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Football
 Print Thread
English Premier League
sutty68
Welcome to Liverpool

i1214.photobucket.com/albums/cc489/sutty68/303488_243175749124542_100002963555188_439778_1954693315_n.jpg
 
Alakagom
Watching Aston Villa's press conference with Lambert - surreal Pfft
pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/avatar.png


pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/admin.png
 
Avin Wargunnson
Arsenal are reported to be very close to 12mil. signing of Olivier Giroud, that would be focking fantastic.Smile Dont know if it means Robin is going out, but with Podolski and Giuroud, it would not be such a tragedy than...

25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5m1euN1Qb1r4jyumo1_500.jpg

I'll be back
 
Avin Wargunnson
24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5m38oMTTQ1r1pauho1_500.png

I'll be back
 
Spilak23
Gunners fan Avin? Great! Grin

I hope Van Persie stays, I could see him tandem with Podolski to form a great duo for Arsenal!
 
Avin Wargunnson
Spilak23 wrote:
Gunners fan Avin? Great! Grin

I hope Van Persie stays, I could see him tandem with Podolski to form a great duo for Arsenal!

It is hard to miss that i am Gunners fan Grin
I am gooner for life, i also hope Robin will stay, but i fear he will not...
I'll be back
 
issoisso
Just finished reading the excellent book "Pay as you play", basically a financial analysis of the transfers in the Premier League since it started in 1992

The thing that really stuck with me was that all the Wenger myths are false:

1. He fields younger teams. He doesn't. His teams' average age is higher than the league average. He gets that reputation from playing the players in meaningless league cup games

2. He makes a profit in the transfer market. He doesn't. It seems like he does if you just add up the fees, but if you account for the inflation of transfer fees (the same player cost now over triple the fee that he costed when Wenger took charge), he has made a transfer market LOSS of around €27.4 Million

3. He makes great teams on the cheap.
He doesn't. Take the total fees that the players on each team were bought for, adjust them for inflation, and calculate the average amount of money the players on the team cost for each championship point earned, and Wenger's teams were ludicrously expensive.....until 2005 when they became much cheaper and he stopped winning. Only Abramovich's Chelski megamillion superstar teams were more expensive, and in occasional seasons the Man Utd squad or Newcastle ( :lol: )

In other words, Wenger will get you a great team who plays brilliant football....but unless he has absurd amounts of money to buy star players with, he won't actually win anything

Why do I mention this? Because Wenger has just made the hilarious claim to the media that rich teams are poaching his players :lol:

Tell me another joke, Mr. 16 Million euros for Francis Jeffers Pfft
Edited by issoisso on 25-06-2012 23:57
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
Avin Wargunnson
issoisso wrote:
Just finished reading the excellent book "Pay as you play", basically a financial analysis of the transfers in the Premier League since it started in 1992

The thing that really stuck with me was that all the Wenger myths are false:

1. He fields younger teams. He doesn't. His teams' average age is higher than the league average. He gets that reputation from playing the players in meaningless league cup games

2. He makes a profit in the transfer market. He doesn't. It seems like he does if you just add up the fees, but if you account for the inflation of transfer fees (the same player cost now over triple the fee that he costed when Wenger took charge), he has made a transfer market LOSS of around €27.4 Million

3. He makes great teams on the cheap.
He doesn't. Take the total fees that the players on each team were bought for, adjust them for inflation, and calculate the average amount of money the players on the team cost for each championship point earned, and Wenger's teams were ludicrously expensive.....until 2005 when they became much cheaper and he stopped winning. Only Abramovich's Chelski megamillion superstar teams were more expensive, and in occasional seasons the Man Utd squad or Newcastle ( :lol: )

In other words, Wenger will get you a great team who plays brilliant football....but unless he has absurd amounts of money to buy star players with, he won't actually win anything

Why do I mention this? Because Wenger has just made the hilarious claim to the media that rich teams are poaching his players :lol:

Tell me another joke, Mr. 16 Million euros for Francis Jeffers Pfft


Isso are you a politician?Smile
Because you are one of the best i have ever seens in putting his own claims to apper as being thruth, meanwhile they have true basics but the rest is your own construction or a bit twisted facts...and that book probably added to that with one-sided attitude.

You are right wit the loss he made during all that years, but if we had comparsion with another clubs in PL they would have hundreds of millions of loss, because 27,4 loss on players trades is nothing i think, when for example Barca has loss of more than 100 millions only during era of Guardiola.

And it is true Wenger had some bad buys, everyone has (Jeffers i just LOL), but he has so many great buys that this is easily forgotten.

Before 2005 Arsenal was splashing the cash much more and they were enormously successful, now they stoped also because of building the new stadium which is very very costly. But give Wenger some money and he will make you the team of champions, look at how many great young players he developed.

And you thing rich teams poaching Arsenal players is not true? Do you know these names who left Arsenal because of better payment anywhere and even often sitting on the bench there?
A.Cole, Toure, Gallas, Adebayor, Nasri, Fabregas
These all were poached or demnded payment that was ridicolous so they left to the teams that support ridicolous wages (Man city, Barca,Chelsea).
Edited by Avin Wargunnson on 26-06-2012 06:04
I'll be back
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 26-11-2024 20:32
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
Michal4444
Avin Wargunnson wrote:
issoisso wrote:
Just finished reading the excellent book "Pay as you play", basically a financial analysis of the transfers in the Premier League since it started in 1992

The thing that really stuck with me was that all the Wenger myths are false:

1. He fields younger teams. He doesn't. His teams' average age is higher than the league average. He gets that reputation from playing the players in meaningless league cup games

2. He makes a profit in the transfer market. He doesn't. It seems like he does if you just add up the fees, but if you account for the inflation of transfer fees (the same player cost now over triple the fee that he costed when Wenger took charge), he has made a transfer market LOSS of around €27.4 Million

3. He makes great teams on the cheap.
He doesn't. Take the total fees that the players on each team were bought for, adjust them for inflation, and calculate the average amount of money the players on the team cost for each championship point earned, and Wenger's teams were ludicrously expensive.....until 2005 when they became much cheaper and he stopped winning. Only Abramovich's Chelski megamillion superstar teams were more expensive, and in occasional seasons the Man Utd squad or Newcastle ( :lol: )

In other words, Wenger will get you a great team who plays brilliant football....but unless he has absurd amounts of money to buy star players with, he won't actually win anything

Why do I mention this? Because Wenger has just made the hilarious claim to the media that rich teams are poaching his players :lol:

Tell me another joke, Mr. 16 Million euros for Francis Jeffers Pfft


Isso are you a politician?Smile
Because you are one of the best i have ever seens in putting his own claims to apper as being thruth, meanwhile they have true basics but the rest is your own construction or a bit twisted facts...and that book probably added to that with one-sided attitude.

You are right wit the loss he made during all that years, but if we had comparsion with another clubs in PL they would have hundreds of millions of loss, because 27,4 loss on players trades is nothing i think, when for example Barca has loss of more than 100 millions only during era of Guardiola.

And it is true Wenger had some bad buys, everyone has (Jeffers i just LOL), but he has so many great buys that this is easily forgotten.

Before 2005 Arsenal was splashing the cash much more and they were enormously successful, now they stoped also because of building the new stadium which is very very costly. But give Wenger some money and he will make you the team of champions, look at how many great young players he developed.

And you thing rich teams poaching Arsenal players is not true? Do you know these names who left Arsenal because of better payment anywhere and even often sitting on the bench there?
A.Cole, Toure, Gallas, Adebayor, Nasri, Fabregas
These all were poached or demnded payment that was ridicolous so they left to the teams that support ridicolous wages (Man city, Barca,Chelsea).


I'm sorry but i still don't see any flaw in isso logic. And i don't see anything about poaching in isso article. About the rest - it seems to me that you agreed with that in your article so why should be isso politician?
 
Avin Wargunnson
He was speaking about Wenger saying that other teams poach their players and that is right, i dont see what you dont like on it, i was reffering to his second to last sentence...

And i was not looking for flaws, just pointing out some facts that isso cleverly jumped over. That is why i am joking with word politician, because they are always speaking about what they exactly want, overlooking the details that speak against their truth with intence. I respect isso, from what i read here on the site, he is very smart person and smart people know how tu put the facts Wink

I'll be back
 
Avin Wargunnson
For example isso stated this: 1. He fields younger teams. He doesn't. His teams' average age is higher than the league average. He gets that reputation from playing the players in meaningless league cup games


And it is not true, or it maybe was someday, but last season they had 4th lowest average age with starting lineup. So isso is maybe talking about years around 2000 but he does not say it smartly enough, so it looks like it fits now also...

And the rest of the information is similar arguable but i dont have all day to disscuss it.
I'll be back
 
Michal4444
Avin Wargunnson wrote:
He was speaking about Wenger saying that other teams poach their players and that is right, i dont see what you dont like on it, i was reffering to his second to last sentence...

And i was not looking for flaws, just pointing out some facts that isso cleverly jumped over. That is why i am joking with word politician, because they are always speaking about what they exactly want, overlooking the details that speak against their truth with intence. I respect isso, from what i read here on the site, he is very smart person and smart people know how tu put the facts Wink


i am sorry - i missed that sentence...
 
Aquarius
Avin Wargunnson wrote:
He was speaking about Wenger saying that other teams poach their players and that is right, i dont see what you dont like on it, i was reffering to his second to last sentence...

Still it's very ironic to have Wenger complaining about that, when himself is very prone to plundering French teams or French youngsters teams, who don't have the financial power to retain their talents.
I guess now he knows what it feels like.
 
Avin Wargunnson
Thierry Henry: profit 5.6 mil. pounds and best Arsenal player ever.

Samir Nasri: 6.2 mil. pounds profit during three years.

Gael Clichy: 6.75 mil. pounds profit, bought for 250k.

Patrick Vieira: 10.2 mil. pounds profit and rock solid midfielder who brought success bought just for 3.5mil.

Kolo Touré: 15.85 mil. pounds profit, bought for 150k.

Adebayor: 18 mil. pounds profit in three years.

Marc Overmars: 18 mil. pounds profit in three years.

Nicolas Anelka: 22.5 mil. pounds profit in just 2!! years in the club. Bought for 500k.

Fabregas: 32.75 mil. pounds profit to silly Barcelona who did not see his potential and sold him to Arsenal for 3 mil. to bring him later for ten times as much.

Sure there should be some inflation considered, but i woul like to see manager who make similar profits from the players. I think you numbers concerning his overall loss are bad, because he made around 130mil. pounds profit just on these 9 players...Smile






I'll be back
 
Avin Wargunnson
Aquarius wrote:
Avin Wargunnson wrote:
He was speaking about Wenger saying that other teams poach their players and that is right, i dont see what you dont like on it, i was reffering to his second to last sentence...

Still it's very ironic to have Wenger complaining about that, when himself is very prone to plundering French teams or French youngsters teams, who don't have the financial power to retain their talents.
I guess now he knows what it feels like.

That is true, completly, but i am not defending that.
I'll be back
 
Avin Wargunnson
Banana

www.arsenal.com/assets/_files/images/jun_12/gun__1340701272_Giroud2.jpg

I'll be back
 
cunego59
Hmm, I wouldn't be too euphoric about him. He still has to prove what he's worth on a higher level. I don't know too much about him but when he was linked to Bayern Munich, I followed the discussion and most people, especially those who have some knowledge about the French league, said that he was a bit overrated, a Gomez kind of player but not nearly that good. I mean, with all due respect, but he was successful in the French league, which is not the olymp of football.
 
Alakagom
But that's exactly what Arsenal needs Smile Gomze kind of player.

If you watched Arsenal last year, they create chances. A lot of them. But they couldn't finish most of them in matches. ( even with RvP ) With Giroud they will have a poacher, and that's what Arsenal really needed. RvP if stays also will have more rest with him and Poldi, and that will keep him playing well the whole season ( even better than last year ).

For Arsneal, he's a really good signing. Now they need to strengthen their defence and they will be okay Pfft

But I agree he has to prove his worth. He might turn out like another Chamakh :lol:
Edited by Alakagom on 26-06-2012 10:36
pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/avatar.png


pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/admin.png
 
litllemagnum
No not Giroud Sad We don't need another Chamakh. Why don't we buy a midfielder.
Pozzato sucks!
 
Avin Wargunnson
litllemagnum wrote:
No not Giroud Sad We don't need another Chamakh. Why don't we buy a midfielder.
Dont worry, if the things will go right, MVila will be on his way to be the gooner too and we will be complete Wink
I agree with Alakagom, Giroud and Podolski are both players which Arsenal needs, if RvP will stay he will have more freedom to play the shadow striker.
And we need someone who can head the ball obviously,as Chamakh is just a clown, who needs to be sold. I hope Giroud will live up to expectations, good luck to him!

But the biggest win is that it seems Arsenal changed their policy a bit and are not waiting for the last possible moment to buy someone.
I'll be back
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
TITAN05 # 7
TITAN05 # 7
PCM 07: Beautiful Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,476 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,445 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,900 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.37 seconds