|
Expansion Pack: Stat Discussion
|
| admirschleck |
Posted on 25-05-2013 17:18
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6690
Joined: 11-10-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Pellizotti2 wrote:
admirschleck wrote:
I wouldn't touch his MO/HIL stats,and maybe put him at 5/6 potential,or something.
I hope that's "don't touch" as in "leave it at 76, where it currently is", and not "bump it back up to > 80".
Right. I was talking about leaving it at 76.  |
| |
|
|
| ziga007 |
Posted on 25-05-2013 17:23
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 388
Joined: 24-06-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
What about Luka Mezgec ?
Better in sprint and hill .
Alberto Contador
|
| |
|
|
| ppanther |
Posted on 26-05-2013 01:16
|
Domestique
Posts: 482
Joined: 25-12-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Jesleyh wrote:
I agree with Jesleyh, and i don't expected that, on Gesink. I always were on of the people criticising Gesink, but stats like 74 Mo, as mentioned, are just ridiculous. A guy still doing around 1000 cq points year for year couldn't be that bad, even if some want to see him as total loser. 77 Mo and maybe low Rec stat, as he always seems to fade away, may be fine.
Edited by ppanther on 26-05-2013 01:17
|
| |
|
|
| Kritzo |
Posted on 26-05-2013 15:10
|
Domestique
Posts: 624
Joined: 12-10-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
What would you give Majka in mountain?
Is 77 reasonable?
Proud Member of the Leeds United Army!
RAFAL MAJKA |
| |
|
|
| Alakagom |
Posted on 26-05-2013 15:11
|
World Champion
Posts: 10891
Joined: 19-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Kritzo wrote:
What would you give Majka in mountain?
Is 77 reasonable?
That is exactly what he's getting 
|
| |
|
|
| Kritzo |
Posted on 26-05-2013 15:12
|
Domestique
Posts: 624
Joined: 12-10-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Alakagom wrote:
Kritzo wrote:
What would you give Majka in mountain?
Is 77 reasonable?
That is exactly what he's getting
Great.
Proud Member of the Leeds United Army!
RAFAL MAJKA |
| |
|
|
| cio93 |
Posted on 26-05-2013 15:18
|
World Champion
Posts: 10845
Joined: 29-10-2007
PCM$: 500.00
|
A minor thing, but Patrick Gretsch deserves a MO and REC update.
30th in Tre Cime ahead of Rabottini, Stetina, De Greef, Morabito, Serpa...
37th up Galibier ahead of Serpa, Kruijswijk, Weening...
He didn't climb well in the first weeks, so obviously rather a REC issue, but his MO has to be in the 70's to perform like that.
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 25-11-2024 04:59
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| Miguel98 |
Posted on 26-05-2013 15:23
|
World Champion
Posts: 10497
Joined: 23-06-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
HIL as well shoud be higher. |
| |
|
|
| gotlandrules |
Posted on 26-05-2013 15:40
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1358
Joined: 07-05-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
ppanther wrote:
Jesleyh wrote:
I agree with Jesleyh, and i don't expected that, on Gesink. I always were on of the people criticising Gesink, but stats like 74 Mo, as mentioned, are just ridiculous. A guy still doing around 1000 cq points year for year couldn't be that bad, even if some want to see him as total loser. 77 Mo and maybe low Rec stat, as he always seems to fade away, may be fine.
What has Gesink done in the last couple of years to warrant 77MO? i'd say maximum 76, maybe even 75. He is not a better climber then Majka, Pozzo, Duarte etc. |
| |
|
|
| Jesleyh |
Posted on 26-05-2013 15:43
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15274
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
gotlandrules wrote:
ppanther wrote:
Jesleyh wrote:
I agree with Jesleyh, and i don't expected that, on Gesink. I always were on of the people criticising Gesink, but stats like 74 Mo, as mentioned, are just ridiculous. A guy still doing around 1000 cq points year for year couldn't be that bad, even if some want to see him as total loser. 77 Mo and maybe low Rec stat, as he always seems to fade away, may be fine.
What has Gesink done in the last couple of years to warrant 77MO? i'd say maximum 76, maybe even 75. He is not a better climber then Majka, Pozzo, Duarte etc.
Sorry, but what? Duarte is better than Gesink?
6th in the Vuelta still justifies 77MO to me. Those guys being better than Gesink in the Giro doesn't mean that they are always better climbers. Although I wouldn't say that Pozzo is worse than Gesink.
Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy
PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
|
| |
|
|
| fickman |
Posted on 26-05-2013 16:08
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1627
Joined: 25-07-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Ok Giro is over and it’s time for some stats suggestion.
After been ignored for long time about Gesinks been way overrated its nice to see that Gesink fanboy stats times are finally over. I was a little concerned Alakagom will say Giro wasn’t Gesink main objective of the season and want to wait till Tour to see Gesink fail over again.
I would say 76 MO for Gesink its ok there is no way he should get same MO stats as guys like Pozzovivo / Santabrogio / Majka / Intxausti who demonstrated to be stronger not only by seconds but by minutes in the Mountains. Also giving him 77 MO will means that he will get better results in the game than guys like Pozzovivo or Santabrogio in the game because of Gesink TT wich isnt realistic. Gesink also has been week in the Mountains not only in the Giro but in the whole season, been dropped in the Mountains and in Hills by weaker riders in the paper.
Also we all know u can achieve good results in the game at Vuelta with 76 MO (more than enaugh to get a poor 6th place at Vuelta)
I would gave him 76 MO, 74 TT (he hasn’t any significant results in TT this season and imo he is not as good as Nibali who has at the moment 75 in TT) 74 END, 72 RES, 74 REC and 75 Hil
Nibs – 81
Betancur 79 (without 2 mechanicals in stage 20 he might have been able to follow nibalis weel and imo second best climber at Giro without the TT in Stage 8 were he lost 5:19 no doubt he would have been on the Podium)
Uran / Scarponi / Evans / Niemiec - 78
Pozzovivo / Santabrogio / Majka / Intxausti - 77
Trofimov / Sanchez / Pellizotti / Duarte / Gesink - 76
Agnoli / Kangert - 75 |
| |
|
|
| fcancellara |
Posted on 26-05-2013 16:09
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 5194
Joined: 18-08-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Seriously? Betancur 79 MO? 
|
| |
|
|
| Spilak23 |
Posted on 26-05-2013 16:14
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7357
Joined: 22-08-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
He's better as WAY better as Scarponi so why not?
|
| |
|
|
| Kritzo |
Posted on 26-05-2013 16:20
|
Domestique
Posts: 624
Joined: 12-10-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Well if Betancur needs to have 79 then Majka should definitely have 78. Betancur have not been 2 stats better IMO! He has been one, yes, but not two. He just has a huge advantage cuz of his amazing acceleration.
Proud Member of the Leeds United Army!
RAFAL MAJKA |
| |
|
|
| Jesleyh |
Posted on 26-05-2013 16:20
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15274
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Betancur 78(maybe 77 MO) for me and then high hills(78) and ACC.
And you shouldn't think like 'We all know that Gesink can get a 6th Vuelta with 76MO in game'. That's just because the game is fucked up at that moment . 76 MO shouldn't be enough to get 6th at the Vuelta, 77MO would be. If you reason like that, you can better play stage-race mode, where it'd be very hard to get 6th with 76 MO 
And give Gesink bad energy stats as well(he already has, but yeah )
And Pozzo & Santa have nationality bonus anyway.
Sanchez can move up to 77MO as well, and then I think I agree.
Edited by Jesleyh on 26-05-2013 16:21
Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy
PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
|
| |
|
|
| fickman |
Posted on 26-05-2013 16:21
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1627
Joined: 25-07-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Jesleyh wrote:
Although I wouldn't say that Pozzo is worse than Gesink.
Jesleyh it's impossible to take you seriously with ur subjective biased stats opinions on dutch riders 
What about this:
https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/1...l-Montasio
https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/1...rdonecchia
https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/1...r-Valloire
Even injured was Pozzovivo better than Gesink
fcancellara wrote:
Seriously? Betancur 79 MO?
https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/1...l-Montasio
https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/1...rdonecchia
https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/1...r-Valloire
https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/1...e-Lavaredo
As u can notice he was the most consistent rider in the Mountains. |
| |
|
|
| Miguel98 |
Posted on 26-05-2013 16:21
|
World Champion
Posts: 10497
Joined: 23-06-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
76 is enough to get 6th at the Vuelta, especially with good planning can tell you that much. |
| |
|
|
| Jesleyh |
Posted on 26-05-2013 16:23
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15274
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
I said that Pozzo isn't worse than Gesink even in my opinion, and you confirm that, so I don't get your point?
And look at my post 3 minutes ago.
@Miguel98 Yes, but I just said, you shouldn't reason like that. That's not because it's enough when everyone is on equal form, just because the game is fucked up at that moment.
Edited by Jesleyh on 26-05-2013 16:24
Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy
PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
|
| |
|
|
| gotlandrules |
Posted on 26-05-2013 16:27
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1358
Joined: 07-05-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Jesleyh wrote:
Betancur 78(maybe 77 MO) for me and then high hills(78) and ACC.
And you shouldn't think like 'We all know that Gesink can get a 6th Vuelta with 76MO in game'. That's just because the game is fucked up at that moment . 76 MO shouldn't be enough to get 6th at the Vuelta, 77MO would be. If you reason like that, you can better play stage-race mode, where it'd be very hard to get 6th with 76 MO
And give Gesink bad energy stats as well(he already has, but yeah )
And Pozzo & Santa have nationality bonus anyway.
Sanchez can move up to 77MO as well, and then I think I agree.
Are you seriously wanting Betancur at the same MO stats as Gesink? you are deluded, it should be minimum 2 stats inbetween them for MO... probably 3 |
| |
|
|
| Kritzo |
Posted on 26-05-2013 16:27
|
Domestique
Posts: 624
Joined: 12-10-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Nibali
MO: 81
HIL: 80
TT: 76
Uran
BJ: 79
BAK: 77
TK: 73
Evans
MO: 78
HIL: 76
TT: 76
Scarponi:
MO: 77-78 (Can't decide)
HIL: 77
TT: 71
Betancur
MO: 78
HIL: 79
TT: 63
Niemiec:
MO: 77-78
HIL: 76
TT: 70
Majka
MO: 77
HIL: 76
TT: 69
Intxausti:
MO: 76
HIL: 78
TT: 68
Santambrogio:
MO: 76
HIL: 75
TT: 67
Pozzovivo:
MO: 77
HIL: 76
TT: 70. (He showed potiential on the long TT, but I know it was a technical TT)
Proud Member of the Leeds United Army!
RAFAL MAJKA |
| |
|
