|
Giro d'Italia 2018
|
| tsmoha |
Posted on 25-05-2018 16:37
|
Directeur Sportif
Posts: 11819
Joined: 19-07-2010
PCM$: 300.00
|
Yeah. So. Coming home from work and watching soon-to-be-banned doper finishing off an 80km solo ride. Fun day.
|
| |
|
|
| Paul23 |
Posted on 25-05-2018 16:40
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4411
Joined: 10-08-2011
PCM$: 400.00
|
Well....why not? I'm never a fan of such big form changes. Like Aru f.e.
|
| |
|
|
| Forever the Best |
Posted on 25-05-2018 16:47
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3803
Joined: 27-06-2014
PCM$: 400.00
|
TheManxMissile wrote:
Boy, if Froome somehow manages to defend his Salbutamol case and comes away with no sanction and a clearence from the UCI/WADA/CAS this will go down as one of the best ranged attacks ever!
But that's a lot of if to get through.
And at least no-ones still calling Yates a doper  Eh, today just made me even more sure about my thoughts that Yates is a doper tbh. I think the doping program went wrong somewhere, like Zülle at '98 Giro.
The user formerly known as 'The Schleck Fan'
Gracias Alberto.
|
| |
|
|
| Shonak |
Posted on 25-05-2018 16:48
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15615
Joined: 16-07-2013
PCM$: 350.00
|
Nice day: Froome doing legendary stuff. Me just getting my new job confirmed. Win some, lose some.
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
|
| |
|
|
| Forever the Best |
Posted on 25-05-2018 16:48
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3803
Joined: 27-06-2014
PCM$: 400.00
|
Hahahahaha 
How wrong I was
The user formerly known as 'The Schleck Fan'
Gracias Alberto.
|
| |
|
|
| deek12345 |
Posted on 25-05-2018 16:57
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 2761
Joined: 13-06-2009
PCM$: 360.00
|
tsmoha wrote:
Yeah. So. Coming home from work and watching soon-to-be-banned doper finishing off an 80km solo ride. Fun day.
Cycling crediitability must be close to 0% now |
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 24-11-2024 21:45
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| Ulrich Ulriksen |
Posted on 25-05-2018 16:58
|
Directeur Sportif
Posts: 3264
Joined: 02-11-2010
PCM$: 300.00
|
Shonak wrote:
Nice day: Froome doing legendary stuff. Me just getting my new job confirmed. Win some, lose some.
Congrats on the job. |
| |
|
|
| Avin Wargunnson |
Posted on 25-05-2018 16:59
|
World Champion
Posts: 14236
Joined: 20-06-2011
PCM$: 300.00
|
As others said, what a legendary ride and what a champion Froome proved to be by this. But how can we support him, dirty cheater, who would be most likely mediocre without SKY program. Really mixed feelings for the longlife cycling fan. I guess this is the reality, you cant see someone doing incredible things with credible career. 
|
| |
|
|
| Guido Mukk |
Posted on 25-05-2018 17:12
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15830
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Terrible day for cycling.
My as giro hard core fan is double desperate today
Vegni should by fired for that. Great for Giro?
What a fucking giro is that. Shit taste just wont go away.
Edited by Guido Mukk on 25-05-2018 17:21
|
| |
|
|
| bike 42 |
Posted on 25-05-2018 17:30
|
Under 23
Posts: 69
Joined: 21-05-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
I mean Schleck did a similar move in 2011 Tour, stage 18 and not one called him a doper after that |
| |
|
|
| cio93 |
Posted on 25-05-2018 17:38
|
World Champion
Posts: 10845
Joined: 29-10-2007
PCM$: 500.00
|
bike 42 wrote:
I mean Schleck did a similar move in 2011 Tour, stage 18 and not one called him a doper after that
Yeah, we call Froome a doper before, during and after this because he got caught.
|
| |
|
|
| ianrussell |
Posted on 25-05-2018 17:42
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3440
Joined: 09-10-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
What happened to Ben O'Connor?
PCMDaily Velogames Has Been 2016 & 2017
|
| |
|
|
| roturn |
Posted on 25-05-2018 17:43
|
Team Manager
Posts: 22246
Joined: 24-11-2007
PCM$: 3900.00
|
He crashed on the descent of Sestriere. Didn`t look bad at first and he was back on his bike, but must be injured. |
| |
|
|
| Aquarius97 |
Posted on 25-05-2018 17:52
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4191
Joined: 13-09-2015
PCM$: 300.00
|
bike 42 wrote:
I mean Schleck did a similar move in 2011 Tour, stage 18 and not one called him a doper after that
"Similar". Froome doing a 80 km solo in mostly not-uphill roads and not losing after any time in the final climb is similar to attacking in the penultimate climb and being helped by various team-mates all the way to the steep part of Galibier, and then lose 2 minutes only in the final 10 kms of his original gap?
|
| |
|
|
| Ulrich Ulriksen |
Posted on 25-05-2018 17:54
|
Directeur Sportif
Posts: 3264
Joined: 02-11-2010
PCM$: 300.00
|
bike 42 wrote:
I mean Schleck did a similar move in 2011 Tour, stage 18 and not one called him a doper after that
Aquarius beat me to it on most of this but my take:
Plenty of folks have accused Schleck of doping although perhaps not in association with that ride. I think a number of things make that ride less incredible:
1. Nobody chased him for a while - because of the GC situation.
2. Schleck had teammates in a break ahead of him and got help on the flat.
3. His lead maxed out at over 4 minutes but ended up at 2 as he tired and others behind him caught.
Froome did not have the advantages of #1 or #2 yet he was putting time into all the riders behind him pretty much the whole time and ended up with a bigger margin than Schleck. Despite the fact most of the groups behind had more than 1 rider working.
I don't know if Froome is a doper in the Armstrong sense but there are legitimate questions and Sky was/is clearly pushing the TUE rules to their limits (and beyond).
So the combination of a really incredible ride and legitimate question marks leave many folks here with a bad taste. |
| |
|
|
| ianrussell |
Posted on 25-05-2018 18:09
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3440
Joined: 09-10-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
roturn wrote:
He crashed on the descent of Sestriere. Didn`t look bad at first and he was back on his bike, but must be injured.
Thanks very much.
PCMDaily Velogames Has Been 2016 & 2017
|
| |
|
|
| bike 42 |
Posted on 25-05-2018 18:10
|
Under 23
Posts: 69
Joined: 21-05-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
Ulrich Ulriksen wrote:
bike 42 wrote:
I mean Schleck did a similar move in 2011 Tour, stage 18 and not one called him a doper after that
Aquarius beat me to it on most of this but my take:
Plenty of folks have accused Schleck of doping although perhaps not in association with that ride. I think a number of things make that ride less incredible:
1. Nobody chased him for a while - because of the GC situation.
2. Schleck had teammates in a break ahead of him and got help on the flat.
3. His lead maxed out at over 4 minutes but ended up at 2 as he tired and others behind him caught.
Froome did not have the advantages of #1 or #2 yet he was putting time into all the riders behind him pretty much the whole time and ended up with a bigger margin than Schleck. Despite the fact most of the groups behind had more than 1 rider working.
I don't know if Froome is a doper in the Armstrong sense but there are legitimate questions and Sky was/is clearly pushing the TUE rules to their limits (and beyond).
So the combination of a really incredible ride and legitimate question marks leave many folks here with a bad taste.
Sorry if I have read it wrong but I do believe in due process and nothing yet has been proven in a place that matter. Maybe Froome should have self-suspended himself but he hasn't so we just have to live with this |
| |
|
|
| Shonak |
Posted on 25-05-2018 18:19
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15615
Joined: 16-07-2013
PCM$: 350.00
|
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
|
| |
|
|
| Shonak |
Posted on 25-05-2018 18:25
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15615
Joined: 16-07-2013
PCM$: 350.00
|
Edited by Shonak on 25-05-2018 18:25
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
|
| |
|
|
| Paul23 |
Posted on 25-05-2018 18:25
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4411
Joined: 10-08-2011
PCM$: 400.00
|
bike 42 wrote:
Ulrich Ulriksen wrote:
bike 42 wrote:
I mean Schleck did a similar move in 2011 Tour, stage 18 and not one called him a doper after that
Aquarius beat me to it on most of this but my take:
Plenty of folks have accused Schleck of doping although perhaps not in association with that ride. I think a number of things make that ride less incredible:
1. Nobody chased him for a while - because of the GC situation.
2. Schleck had teammates in a break ahead of him and got help on the flat.
3. His lead maxed out at over 4 minutes but ended up at 2 as he tired and others behind him caught.
Froome did not have the advantages of #1 or #2 yet he was putting time into all the riders behind him pretty much the whole time and ended up with a bigger margin than Schleck. Despite the fact most of the groups behind had more than 1 rider working.
I don't know if Froome is a doper in the Armstrong sense but there are legitimate questions and Sky was/is clearly pushing the TUE rules to their limits (and beyond).
So the combination of a really incredible ride and legitimate question marks leave many folks here with a bad taste.
Sorry if I have read it wrong but I do believe in due process and nothing yet has been proven in a place that matter. Maybe Froome should have self-suspended himself but he hasn't so we just have to live with this
Well, there's always the Salbutamol case and the way, Sky operates in general. Mediocre riders come there and develop climbing abilities, no-one has seen before off them. Puccio, Porte, Poels, Roche, Froome, Wiggins, Moscon, Thomas, Rowe, Deignan, Lopez are all good examples. Maybe also Rogers and Knees.
Also, the fact that they started out as a mediocre team and only got good after they hired a doctor who had already a doping background. 0-Tolerance-Policy....great
Also we know the thing with TUEs currently. Froome got asthma...to be completely honest, sport is for comparing body and mind of different athletes and if you got asthma or other problems with your body, well....that's bad luck then. Then your body isn't made for that type of sport. That's the way how life is. I can also not just take some stuff, because my VOâ‚‚Max is not high enough, or because i lack talent or whatever. No excuses.
|
| |
|
