Tour de France 2017 | Stage 1 | Düsseldorf - Düsseldorf (ITT)
|
Ollfardh |
Posted on 02-07-2017 09:17
|
World Champion
Posts: 14563
Joined: 08-08-2011
PCM$: 9100.00
|
LuckyLukas wrote:
Now, UCI will do nothing as Sky uses these since the Giro, but it's interesting nonetheless as the rules are pretty clear imo.
I agree. Those bubbles on the suit clearly violate the rule that says: "It is prohibited to wear clothing or skinsuits to which non-essential elements have been added with a view to improving their aerodynamic properties..."
It wouldn't be the first time that the UCI is inconsequent in following their own rules.
Apparently they argue the dots (or whatever I should call them) are already part of the clothing and therefore it isn't "added".
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
|
|
|
|
fjhoekie |
Posted on 02-07-2017 09:25
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4476
Joined: 25-07-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
It is a feature added to the clothing with no other intentions than reducing the air resistance or at least artificially improve the aerodynamics, and should therefore be illegal according to the rules. It's very clear, but UCI also have a rule in which they can overrule rules, and that's just stupid.
Manager of Team Popo4Ever p/b Morshynska in the PCM.Daily Man-Game
|
|
|
|
Ian Butler |
Posted on 02-07-2017 09:35
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 21854
Joined: 01-05-2012
PCM$: 400.00
|
Latour 17th.
I expected more from you, PCMDaily |
|
|
|
Miguel98 |
Posted on 02-07-2017 09:43
|
World Champion
Posts: 10497
Joined: 23-06-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
fjhoekie wrote:
It is a feature added to the clothing with no other intentions than reducing the air resistance or at least artificially improve the aerodynamics, and should therefore be illegal according to the rules. It's very clear, but UCI also have a rule in which they can overrule rules, and that's just stupid.
>UCI
>kering
Pick one and only one. |
|
|
|
Ad Bot |
Posted on 24-11-2024 18:27
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
IP: None |
|
|
ianrussell |
Posted on 03-07-2017 11:07
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3440
Joined: 09-10-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Usual good insight re: the Sky/Movistar skinsuits here:
https://inrng.com/.../#comments
PCMDaily Velogames Has Been 2016 & 2017
|
|
|
|
ringo182 |
Posted on 03-07-2017 13:52
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3472
Joined: 03-01-2008
PCM$: 1348.00
|
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cycling/40...g/40478007
Lets move on now
"Ringo is exactly right", Shonak - 8 September 2016
|
|
|
|
Paul23 |
Posted on 03-07-2017 14:11
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4411
Joined: 10-08-2011
PCM$: 400.00
|
How about no. It's like VW saying, that their emissions weren't cheated.
|
|
|
|
matt17br |
Posted on 03-07-2017 14:54
|
Directeur Sportif
Posts: 10525
Joined: 28-09-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
Seriously now, you are all looking for the little things here and you're not even being consistent. Movistar had the same outfit at Il Giro and no one bat an eyelid.
|
|
|
|
TheManxMissile |
Posted on 03-07-2017 15:10
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
matt17br wrote:
Seriously now, you are all looking for the little things here and you're not even being consistent. Movistar had the same outfit at Il Giro and no one bat an eyelid.
It's like a few years ago at the Olympics when teams claimed GB had rounder wheels...
Can't wait for the moto-doping claims to come once we hit the mountains. That's next up on the list of pathetic claims?
|
|
|
|
Paul23 |
Posted on 03-07-2017 15:19
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4411
Joined: 10-08-2011
PCM$: 400.00
|
TheManxMissile wrote:
matt17br wrote:
Seriously now, you are all looking for the little things here and you're not even being consistent. Movistar had the same outfit at Il Giro and no one bat an eyelid.
It's like a few years ago at the Olympics when teams claimed GB had rounder wheels...
Can't wait for the moto-doping claims to come once we hit the mountains. That's next up on the list of pathetic claims?
Doesn't change the fact that it's forbidden and that Skys results are suspicious.
|
|
|