PCM.daily banner
28-11-2024 15:14
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 45

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,847
· Newest Member: RobertTar
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Cycling
 Print Thread
News in August
Ad Bot
Posted on 28-11-2024 15:14
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
TheManxMissile
Let us not forget that a single whereabouts violation can lead, by itself, to a 12 month minimum ban (24month max). And that a second can lead to a 4 year ban alone. This is something that a lot of ADA's don't quite seem to get and frankly we should have a lot more banned riders than we do, because i can guarantee the number of athletes who've missed one test is much bigger than we think.
i.imgur.com/UmX5YX1.jpgi.imgur.com/iRneKpI.jpgi.imgur.com/fljmGSP.jpgi.imgur.com/qV5ItIc.jpgimgur.com/dr2BAI6.jpgimgur.com/KlJUqDx.jpg[/img[img]]https://imgur.com/yUygrQ.jpgi.imgur.com/C1rG9BW.jpgi.imgur.com/sEDS7gr.jpg
 
Shonak
ringo182 wrote:
[quote] what the tester was else to do when entry is forbidden and the athlete does not react..[quote]

Ask the hotel staff to go and get her?

... and give her time to react. It's fundamental for doping testing that athletes DO NOT know prior to the test when they will be tested, not even a minute before, and when the doping tester is with the athlete they are not to leave sight at any point.

When hotel staff pick up her up at 6am and tell her a guy wants to see her, Armistead knows what's going on and who it is.

It's really not difficult to keep your phone on.

Yes, it's super bureaucratic mindset that follow this logic but they are here for a reason since the sport needs strict treatment. It's a child that will never learn.
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
Spilak23
jt1109 wrote:
3: It's now not possible in UKAD at least to change your location from a 48 hour deadline hence the violation for a sick family member and not changing her location when she knew beforehand


If there is an unplanned, last minute emergency change, you may text (if you have activated this function in your ADAMS profile) or email () up to one minute before the start of your specified time slot. Patterns of last-minute Whereabouts updates may be investigated.


https://www.ukad.org.uk/education/athl...ereabouts/
 
Ollfardh
ringo182 wrote:
[quote] what the tester was else to do when entry is forbidden and the athlete does not react..[quote]

Ask the hotel staff to go and get her?


That's no way to work. Athletes/teams should inform the hotel manager that doping tests can be possible and that people should be allowed to knock on her door. Otherwise you leave too much room for abuse.

Hotel staff cannot be forced to cooperate with doping officials, so if the rider (aka, the paying customer) tells them not to allow visitors, the official can't do anything about that. The staff will tell him that they don't want to disturb their customer so early (which probably happened in this case) and all he can do is sit and wait.

If he is forced to announce his job at the reception, the rider can disappear "on a training run" by a backdoor before he's anywhere near her room, or is given some time to manipulate the results. Again, no way to work.
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
ringo182
I don't know the ins and out of the rules regarding the out of competition testing. But CAS do and they have overruled the decision so this whole discussion is mute. Armistead obviously didn't break the rules otherwise the decision would not have been overturned.
 
jt1109
Spilak23 wrote:
jt1109 wrote:
3: It's now not possible in UKAD at least to change your location from a 48 hour deadline hence the violation for a sick family member and not changing her location when she knew beforehand


If there is an unplanned, last minute emergency change, you may text (if you have activated this function in your ADAMS profile) or email () up to one minute before the start of your specified time slot. Patterns of last-minute Whereabouts updates may be investigated.


https://www.ukad.org.uk/education/athl...ereabouts/


Jesus I should read are own rules as soon as it passes 48 hours it locks on the input and you can't change it there
 
ringo182
Ollfardh wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
[quote] what the tester was else to do when entry is forbidden and the athlete does not react..[quote]

Ask the hotel staff to go and get her?


That's no way to work. Athletes/teams should inform the hotel manager that doping tests can be possible and that people should be allowed to knock on her door. Otherwise you leave too much room for abuse.

Hotel staff cannot be forced to cooperate with doping officials, so if the rider (aka, the paying customer) tells them not to allow visitors, the official can't do anything about that. The staff will tell him that they don't want to disturb their customer so early (which probably happened in this case) and all he can do is sit and wait.

If he is forced to announce his job at the reception, the rider can disappear "on a training run" by a backdoor before he's anywhere near her room, or is given some time to manipulate the results. Again, no way to work.


Sounds like a bit of a security risk to me. Someone might show up, refuse to tell you who they are but you have to take them wherever they want to go in the hotel. If that's how it works I could get into any athletes hotel room.

Surely these testers get turned away from hotels and other places numerous times. They must have a better back up plan then "giving her phone a try" Smile
 
Ollfardh
ringo182 wrote:
Ollfardh wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
[quote] what the tester was else to do when entry is forbidden and the athlete does not react..[quote]

Ask the hotel staff to go and get her?


That's no way to work. Athletes/teams should inform the hotel manager that doping tests can be possible and that people should be allowed to knock on her door. Otherwise you leave too much room for abuse.

Hotel staff cannot be forced to cooperate with doping officials, so if the rider (aka, the paying customer) tells them not to allow visitors, the official can't do anything about that. The staff will tell him that they don't want to disturb their customer so early (which probably happened in this case) and all he can do is sit and wait.

If he is forced to announce his job at the reception, the rider can disappear "on a training run" by a backdoor before he's anywhere near her room, or is given some time to manipulate the results. Again, no way to work.


Sounds like a bit of a security risk to me. Someone might show up, refuse to tell you who they are but you have to take them wherever they want to go in the hotel. If that's how it works I could get into any athletes hotel room.

Surely these testers get turned away from hotels and other places numerous times. They must have a better back up plan then "giving her phone a try" Smile


Such as? In this case, the official tried the hotel and her phone. What other option is there? If the official can't reach her despite his best efforts, it should be a missed test.
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
ringo182
Ollfardh wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
Ollfardh wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
[quote] what the tester was else to do when entry is forbidden and the athlete does not react..[quote]

Ask the hotel staff to go and get her?


That's no way to work. Athletes/teams should inform the hotel manager that doping tests can be possible and that people should be allowed to knock on her door. Otherwise you leave too much room for abuse.

Hotel staff cannot be forced to cooperate with doping officials, so if the rider (aka, the paying customer) tells them not to allow visitors, the official can't do anything about that. The staff will tell him that they don't want to disturb their customer so early (which probably happened in this case) and all he can do is sit and wait.

If he is forced to announce his job at the reception, the rider can disappear "on a training run" by a backdoor before he's anywhere near her room, or is given some time to manipulate the results. Again, no way to work.


Sounds like a bit of a security risk to me. Someone might show up, refuse to tell you who they are but you have to take them wherever they want to go in the hotel. If that's how it works I could get into any athletes hotel room.

Surely these testers get turned away from hotels and other places numerous times. They must have a better back up plan then "giving her phone a try" Smile


Such as? In this case, the official tried the hotel and her phone. What other option is there? If the official can't reach her despite his best efforts, it should be a missed test.


Phone her team manager? Phone her agent. Phone her sports national governing body? Just wait in the lobby. At the end of the day if it's their policy not to tell hotels who they are then they should be ready to be refused entry.

They are a professional body and their tactics for getting hold of atheletes are the same as me when I was 15 and I went to call for my mate round his house. His mom says he's not there so I try his phone. He doesn't answer, oh well, that's all I can do!?!?!

Obviously it shouldn't count as a missed test otherwise she would be banned at this moment Smile
 
Ollfardh
ringo182 wrote:
Ollfardh wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
Ollfardh wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
[quote] what the tester was else to do when entry is forbidden and the athlete does not react..[quote]

Ask the hotel staff to go and get her?


That's no way to work. Athletes/teams should inform the hotel manager that doping tests can be possible and that people should be allowed to knock on her door. Otherwise you leave too much room for abuse.

Hotel staff cannot be forced to cooperate with doping officials, so if the rider (aka, the paying customer) tells them not to allow visitors, the official can't do anything about that. The staff will tell him that they don't want to disturb their customer so early (which probably happened in this case) and all he can do is sit and wait.

If he is forced to announce his job at the reception, the rider can disappear "on a training run" by a backdoor before he's anywhere near her room, or is given some time to manipulate the results. Again, no way to work.


Sounds like a bit of a security risk to me. Someone might show up, refuse to tell you who they are but you have to take them wherever they want to go in the hotel. If that's how it works I could get into any athletes hotel room.

Surely these testers get turned away from hotels and other places numerous times. They must have a better back up plan then "giving her phone a try" Smile


Such as? In this case, the official tried the hotel and her phone. What other option is there? If the official can't reach her despite his best efforts, it should be a missed test.


Phone her team manager? Phone her agent. Phone her sports national governing body? Just wait in the lobby. At the end of the day if it's their policy not to tell hotels who they are then they should be ready to be refused entry.

They are a professional body and their tactics for getting hold of atheletes are the same as me when I was 15 and I went to call for my mate round his house. His mom says he's not there so I try his phone. He doesn't answer, oh well, that's all I can do!?!?!

Obviously it shouldn't count as a missed test otherwise she would be banned at this moment Smile


Again, this gives the rider time to cover up if he was doing something illegal. I mean, if you had to phone Bruyneel because you couldn't reach Lance, would he just say "np, Lance will be down in two minutes"? Of course not, he would say "Oh my, I have no idea where Lance could be. I'll go find him right away! In the mean time, have a few drinks in the hotel bar, put it on my tab!"

I think you're being very naive here, this system will only work if the doping officials have immediate access to the riders, otherwise they could just call in the day before that they'll be visiting the next day.
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
Shonak
ringo182 wrote:
Ollfardh wrote:
Such as? In this case, the official tried the hotel and her phone. What other option is there? If the official can't reach her despite his best efforts, it should be a missed test.


Phone her team manager? Phone her agent. Phone her sports national governing body? Just wait in the lobby. At the end of the day if it's their policy not to tell hotels who they are then they should be ready to be refused entry.

These things are not even close to being a option. Call the team manager, you are funny... "hello, I am doping tester, I would like to test your athlete, could you call her, but please don't tell her it's about a doping test.."

How about Armistead makes sure that the hotel staff knows that doping tests can happen? Athletes have to make sure they can be reached. It's their responsibility if they want to compete in this sport professionally.

Wait in lobby lol
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
Spilak23
jt1109 wrote:
Spilak23 wrote:
jt1109 wrote:
3: It's now not possible in UKAD at least to change your location from a 48 hour deadline hence the violation for a sick family member and not changing her location when she knew beforehand


If there is an unplanned, last minute emergency change, you may text (if you have activated this function in your ADAMS profile) or email () up to one minute before the start of your specified time slot. Patterns of last-minute Whereabouts updates may be investigated.


https://www.ukad.org.uk/education/athl...ereabouts/


Jesus I should read are own rules as soon as it passes 48 hours it locks on the input and you can't change it there


Are you in the system?
 
Shonak
Again: If doping controls would work on the premise that the athletes can determine when and where they will be tested, we would have no positive test results at all. For doping control to work they need to be able to catch the athletes when they are still glowing. This can only happen when they have access at all time to the athletes.. even when at 6am in the morning when their phone is silent lol. Any notification just minutes before, or not even a clear sight during the doping testing, can alter the test results and give athletes a chance to manipulate in theory. To fault the tester for lazy behavior is just bizarre when it's the athletes responsibilty.
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
ringo182
Ollfardh wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
Ollfardh wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
Ollfardh wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
[quote] what the tester was else to do when entry is forbidden and the athlete does not react..[quote]

Ask the hotel staff to go and get her?


That's no way to work. Athletes/teams should inform the hotel manager that doping tests can be possible and that people should be allowed to knock on her door. Otherwise you leave too much room for abuse.

Hotel staff cannot be forced to cooperate with doping officials, so if the rider (aka, the paying customer) tells them not to allow visitors, the official can't do anything about that. The staff will tell him that they don't want to disturb their customer so early (which probably happened in this case) and all he can do is sit and wait.

If he is forced to announce his job at the reception, the rider can disappear "on a training run" by a backdoor before he's anywhere near her room, or is given some time to manipulate the results. Again, no way to work.


Sounds like a bit of a security risk to me. Someone might show up, refuse to tell you who they are but you have to take them wherever they want to go in the hotel. If that's how it works I could get into any athletes hotel room.

Surely these testers get turned away from hotels and other places numerous times. They must have a better back up plan then "giving her phone a try" Smile


Such as? In this case, the official tried the hotel and her phone. What other option is there? If the official can't reach her despite his best efforts, it should be a missed test.


Phone her team manager? Phone her agent. Phone her sports national governing body? Just wait in the lobby. At the end of the day if it's their policy not to tell hotels who they are then they should be ready to be refused entry.

They are a professional body and their tactics for getting hold of atheletes are the same as me when I was 15 and I went to call for my mate round his house. His mom says he's not there so I try his phone. He doesn't answer, oh well, that's all I can do!?!?!

Obviously it shouldn't count as a missed test otherwise she would be banned at this moment Smile


Again, this gives the rider time to cover up if he was doing something illegal. I mean, if you had to phone Bruyneel because you couldn't reach Lance, would he just say "np, Lance will be down in two minutes"? Of course not, he would say "Oh my, I have no idea where Lance could be. I'll go find him right away! In the mean time, have a few drinks in the hotel bar, put it on my tab!"

I think you're being very naive here, this system will only work if the doping officials have immediate access to the riders, otherwise they could just call in the day before that they'll be visiting the next day.


And your being very cynical to assume that every cyclist is cheating and has something to cover. Sometimes genuine admin errors or acts of god will prevent an athlete being where the testers think they should be. Hence the 3 strike system.

There is obviously no perfect system. Especially if the testers refuse to say who they are. Why couldn't the tester say "she's not available now, she has 1 hour to get here otherwise it is a missed test". Then there would be no excuse for missing it. Obviously they could take masking agents but they would be so new in the system they would show up more easily.
 
ringo182
This is getting very off topic.

Armistead had been cleared, end of.
 
Ollfardh
ringo182 wrote:
Ollfardh wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
Ollfardh wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
Ollfardh wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
[quote] what the tester was else to do when entry is forbidden and the athlete does not react..[quote]

Ask the hotel staff to go and get her?


That's no way to work. Athletes/teams should inform the hotel manager that doping tests can be possible and that people should be allowed to knock on her door. Otherwise you leave too much room for abuse.

Hotel staff cannot be forced to cooperate with doping officials, so if the rider (aka, the paying customer) tells them not to allow visitors, the official can't do anything about that. The staff will tell him that they don't want to disturb their customer so early (which probably happened in this case) and all he can do is sit and wait.

If he is forced to announce his job at the reception, the rider can disappear "on a training run" by a backdoor before he's anywhere near her room, or is given some time to manipulate the results. Again, no way to work.


Sounds like a bit of a security risk to me. Someone might show up, refuse to tell you who they are but you have to take them wherever they want to go in the hotel. If that's how it works I could get into any athletes hotel room.

Surely these testers get turned away from hotels and other places numerous times. They must have a better back up plan then "giving her phone a try" Smile


Such as? In this case, the official tried the hotel and her phone. What other option is there? If the official can't reach her despite his best efforts, it should be a missed test.


Phone her team manager? Phone her agent. Phone her sports national governing body? Just wait in the lobby. At the end of the day if it's their policy not to tell hotels who they are then they should be ready to be refused entry.

They are a professional body and their tactics for getting hold of atheletes are the same as me when I was 15 and I went to call for my mate round his house. His mom says he's not there so I try his phone. He doesn't answer, oh well, that's all I can do!?!?!

Obviously it shouldn't count as a missed test otherwise she would be banned at this moment Smile


Again, this gives the rider time to cover up if he was doing something illegal. I mean, if you had to phone Bruyneel because you couldn't reach Lance, would he just say "np, Lance will be down in two minutes"? Of course not, he would say "Oh my, I have no idea where Lance could be. I'll go find him right away! In the mean time, have a few drinks in the hotel bar, put it on my tab!"

I think you're being very naive here, this system will only work if the doping officials have immediate access to the riders, otherwise they could just call in the day before that they'll be visiting the next day.


And your being very cynical to assume that every cyclist is cheating and has something to cover. Sometimes genuine admin errors or acts of god will prevent an athlete being where the testers think they should be. Hence the 3 strike system.

There is obviously no perfect system. Especially if the testers refuse to say who they are. Why couldn't the tester say "she's not available now, she has 1 hour to get here otherwise it is a missed test". Then there would be no excuse for missing it. Obviously they could take masking agents but they would be so new in the system they would show up more easily.


Where did I say every cyclist is cheating and has something to cover? They're not, in case I needed to stress that. But those who do, need to be caught. And that's why this is needed, even if you have to give innocent riders extra work because of that.

The system is good as it is and for me, that's a missed test. If that's the third one, she should get a suspension. If she wins the gold in Rio, it will always be tainted medal (and cycling does not need another one after Vino 2012).
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
ringo182
Ollfardh wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
Ollfardh wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
Ollfardh wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
Ollfardh wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
[quote] what the tester was else to do when entry is forbidden and the athlete does not react..[quote]

Ask the hotel staff to go and get her?


That's no way to work. Athletes/teams should inform the hotel manager that doping tests can be possible and that people should be allowed to knock on her door. Otherwise you leave too much room for abuse.

Hotel staff cannot be forced to cooperate with doping officials, so if the rider (aka, the paying customer) tells them not to allow visitors, the official can't do anything about that. The staff will tell him that they don't want to disturb their customer so early (which probably happened in this case) and all he can do is sit and wait.

If he is forced to announce his job at the reception, the rider can disappear "on a training run" by a backdoor before he's anywhere near her room, or is given some time to manipulate the results. Again, no way to work.


Sounds like a bit of a security risk to me. Someone might show up, refuse to tell you who they are but you have to take them wherever they want to go in the hotel. If that's how it works I could get into any athletes hotel room.

Surely these testers get turned away from hotels and other places numerous times. They must have a better back up plan then "giving her phone a try" Smile


Such as? In this case, the official tried the hotel and her phone. What other option is there? If the official can't reach her despite his best efforts, it should be a missed test.


Phone her team manager? Phone her agent. Phone her sports national governing body? Just wait in the lobby. At the end of the day if it's their policy not to tell hotels who they are then they should be ready to be refused entry.

They are a professional body and their tactics for getting hold of atheletes are the same as me when I was 15 and I went to call for my mate round his house. His mom says he's not there so I try his phone. He doesn't answer, oh well, that's all I can do!?!?!

Obviously it shouldn't count as a missed test otherwise she would be banned at this moment Smile


Again, this gives the rider time to cover up if he was doing something illegal. I mean, if you had to phone Bruyneel because you couldn't reach Lance, would he just say "np, Lance will be down in two minutes"? Of course not, he would say "Oh my, I have no idea where Lance could be. I'll go find him right away! In the mean time, have a few drinks in the hotel bar, put it on my tab!"

I think you're being very naive here, this system will only work if the doping officials have immediate access to the riders, otherwise they could just call in the day before that they'll be visiting the next day.


And your being very cynical to assume that every cyclist is cheating and has something to cover. Sometimes genuine admin errors or acts of god will prevent an athlete being where the testers think they should be. Hence the 3 strike system.

There is obviously no perfect system. Especially if the testers refuse to say who they are. Why couldn't the tester say "she's not available now, she has 1 hour to get here otherwise it is a missed test". Then there would be no excuse for missing it. Obviously they could take masking agents but they would be so new in the system they would show up more easily.


Where did I say every cyclist is cheating and has something to cover? They're not, in case I needed to stress that. But those who do, need to be caught. And that's why this is needed, even if you have to give innocent riders extra work because of that.

The system is good as it is and for me, that's a missed test. If that's the third one, she should get a suspension. If she wins the gold in Rio, it will always be tainted medal (and cycling does not need another one after Vino 2012).


Obviously not if the decision has been overturned by people who know far more about it then you or me.
 
ivaneurope
Would you knock it off? Angry

The CAS has decided
Armistead has been cleared
THE END

I don't want to enter into who's doper or not debate as yesterday I had to deal with such BS on Facebook.
i.imgur.com/rrQH4R2.png
i.imgur.com/KoxIGiG.png
 
ringo182
ivaneurope wrote:
Would you knock it off? Angry

The CAS has decided
Armistead has been cleared
THE END

I don't want to enter into who's doper or not debate as yesterday I had to deal with such BS on Facebook.


My sentiments exactly. I've somehow been drawn into a discussion with conspiracy theorists all afternoon Smile
 
Shonak
ivaneurope wrote:
Would you knock it off? Angry

The CAS has decided
Armistead has been cleared
THE END

I don't want to enter into who's doper or not debate as yesterday I had to deal with such BS on Facebook.

Who cares what you have to deal with on facebook. This is an issue and I like to discuss it on daily, so I discuss it.

My sentiments exactly. I've somehow been drawn into a discussion with conspiracy theorists all afternoon Smile

You mean us? I don't understand you if you consider discussion of doping rules as a conspiracy theory.
Edited by Shonak on 02-08-2016 16:44
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Australian Championship
Australian Championship
PCM13: General Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,476 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,445 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,900 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.37 seconds