PCM.daily Projects WT Stat Discussion
|
haasje33 |
Posted on 19-06-2016 23:36
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1679
Joined: 08-08-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
As always, we attached the .cdb file of the latest release to the first post.
Inactive due to personal reasons.
|
|
|
|
marcoplv95 |
Posted on 20-06-2016 00:30
|
Stagiare
Posts: 210
Joined: 18-05-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
is that cdb newer than db present in EP Lite? |
|
|
|
matt17br |
Posted on 20-06-2016 00:33
|
Directeur Sportif
Posts: 10525
Joined: 28-09-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
It's the one included in the EP lite.
|
|
|
|
Skullsmasher |
Posted on 23-06-2016 00:11
|
Amateur
Posts: 4
Joined: 03-06-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
What about finetuning the brothers kragh Andersen a little bit?
Soren actually is more "a one day , give it all"rider and then needs to lay low for a bit. Maybe pinch off a bit off that REC and give him a bit more in downhill as he would surely deserve.
His brother Asbjorn the sprinter should get a bit more on prologe because 63 is really low for a guy who rid Top 3 in the prologue of the l'avenir 2 years ago.
Maybe also add Anthon Charmig?
Edited by Skullsmasher on 23-06-2016 00:49
|
|
|
|
matt17br |
Posted on 23-06-2016 00:14
|
Directeur Sportif
Posts: 10525
Joined: 28-09-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
...English please
|
|
|
|
Skullsmasher |
Posted on 23-06-2016 00:48
|
Amateur
Posts: 4
Joined: 03-06-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
updated |
|
|
|
Jorge14 |
Posted on 24-06-2016 16:42
|
Stagiare
Posts: 184
Joined: 15-03-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
Vanstad(3º on Norway) and the guy who on the Denmark ITT could be upgraded on Time Trial, dont you think |
|
|
|
Arberg27 |
Posted on 25-06-2016 11:01
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1070
Joined: 21-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Why do Froome only 77 REC? Only Quintana is better in the last week. |
|
|
|
Selwink |
Posted on 25-06-2016 11:05
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8856
Joined: 17-05-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Because the REC stat is not about absolute quality in later stages, but about relative decline. For Froome, this is worse than for the others with a higher REC than him.
|
|
|
|
Arberg27 |
Posted on 25-06-2016 11:19
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1070
Joined: 21-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Then he had 84 in the mountains, he is the best in the first two weeks and only Quintana is better in the last week. Or 83 of the mountain and the second best REC.
Edited by Arberg27 on 25-06-2016 11:26
|
|
|
|
Selwink |
Posted on 25-06-2016 11:23
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8856
Joined: 17-05-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Froome's higher HI and RES should make him perform better in the mountains under normal circumstances.
|
|
|
|
Ad Bot |
Posted on 22-11-2024 07:36
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
IP: None |
|
|
marcoplv95 |
Posted on 26-06-2016 15:43
|
Stagiare
Posts: 210
Joined: 18-05-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
What about Nizzolo 73HIL and 78DHI?
Edited by marcoplv95 on 26-06-2016 15:49
|
|
|
|
Skullsmasher |
Posted on 02-07-2016 17:13
|
Amateur
Posts: 4
Joined: 03-06-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
What the hell is up with this guy called Backofen? 70KL? 21y . Hasn't rode a top 20 in any mountain race at u23 or junior.... Ending behind pelotons..
Same for paret-peintre , its not cuz cyanide loves him that he rides results... |
|
|
|
Jorge14 |
Posted on 03-07-2016 20:54
|
Stagiare
Posts: 184
Joined: 15-03-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
Aurelien Paret Peintre is awesome and very talented on the climbs, he have strong performances, dont talk if dont know the rider. Could be one of the better riders of the french in future. |
|
|
|
BenjiNaesen |
Posted on 04-07-2016 15:59
|
Domestique
Posts: 546
Joined: 09-03-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Oliver Naesen's cobble stats should be way higher. Something like 85. Or atleast 80+ His sprint should be around 82, his Hill around 83, Recuperation 75... Oh well, just put every stat on 80+. That should be about right. |
|
|
|
irdalopez |
Posted on 04-07-2016 23:33
|
Under 23
Posts: 75
Joined: 06-04-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
update DB June¿?
Thanks! |
|
|
|
matt17br |
Posted on 04-07-2016 23:51
|
Directeur Sportif
Posts: 10525
Joined: 28-09-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
We will update stats once the 1.0 comes, after that, we'll hopefully be able to come back at you with monthly stat/bugfix updates like with the 2016 DB.
|
|
|
|
Tafiolmo |
Posted on 05-07-2016 12:28
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1962
Joined: 10-04-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
Notice
To give you guys a bit more feedback with what's going on here, don't expect a stats update till after the Tour at earliest, for the simple reason as most know, we have problems adapting the new PCM16 climbing stats to our DB. Not only are these not compatible with our current climbing stat matrix but have also raised big issues when even playing with the official DB as well.
Two options now remain 1) Cyanide release a fix patch or 2) We do our own fix to make everything compatible with our DB again. If we decide on the latter the good news is that it's actually going very well and Kentaurus has come up with a formula that is testing well and if continues to do so that will be our own fix and everything should work fine.
For those that don't know, the problem is centered around how dominant the mtn stat is now compared to the hill stat on all climbing terrain. For example the worst affected have been Ardennes type riders with low mtn like Gilbert and Gerrans etc who just can't perform anywhere near how they should do. Also the problem has affected some other types of riders as well.
So once the testing is finalized it will be ready to be implemented to the stats if needed.
|
|
|
|
Ollfardh |
Posted on 05-07-2016 12:46
|
World Champion
Posts: 14563
Joined: 08-08-2011
PCM$: 9100.00
|
Tafiolmo wrote:
For those that don't know, the problem is centered around how dominant the mtn stat is now compared to the hill stat on all climbing terrain. For example the worst affected have been Ardennes type riders with low mtn like Gilbert and Gerrans etc who just can't perform anywhere near how they should do.
I would say that reflects the 2016 situation pretty well
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
|
|
|
|
Tafiolmo |
Posted on 05-07-2016 12:50
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1962
Joined: 10-04-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
Ollfardh wrote:
Tafiolmo wrote:
For those that don't know, the problem is centered around how dominant the mtn stat is now compared to the hill stat on all climbing terrain. For example the worst affected have been Ardennes type riders with low mtn like Gilbert and Gerrans etc who just can't perform anywhere near how they should do.
I would say that reflects the 2016 situation pretty well
Well yer those two didn't race Ardennes well for different reasons but we do need a game that recognizes that an Ardennes rider doesn't have to be a great mtn climber to win hilly races.
|
|
|