|
PCMdaily DB Stat Discussion - PCM15
|
| matt17br |
Posted on 24-05-2016 20:54
|
Directeur Sportif
Posts: 10525
Joined: 28-09-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
Not in the next update where he already was upped for 77 hill 
Good spot though.
|
| |
|
|
| Forever the Best |
Posted on 24-05-2016 20:54
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3803
Joined: 27-06-2014
PCM$: 400.00
|
matt17br wrote:
Not in the next update where he already was upped for 77 hill
Good spot though. Ah good.Because he deserves 77 Hill. |
| |
|
|
| Squire |
Posted on 24-05-2016 20:58
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1404
Joined: 24-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Hah, I guess I should abstain from commenting until the next update is out, it seems like the most important stuff is already taken care of. Ewan at 70HIL seems more correct. In my experience with PCM14, hill stats doesn't really matter much in slightly uphill sprints if the stage is flat and the sprinters are fresh. Guys like Cavendish are still beasting it.
|
| |
|
|
| Forever the Best |
Posted on 24-05-2016 21:02
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3803
Joined: 27-06-2014
PCM$: 400.00
|
Squire wrote:
Right, Izagirre might actually need 78MO to replicate those results. I don't think Izagirre should get 78 MO more like 77. |
| |
|
|
| matt17br |
Posted on 24-05-2016 21:08
|
Directeur Sportif
Posts: 10525
Joined: 28-09-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
Why? Isn't 5th at Nice and 3rd at Romandie with riders with all higher mountain stats in front of him enough to get him 78 paired with low REC?
He also got a good 2nd overall place at Algarve in front of people like Conta and Pinot and only behind Thomas. 4th at Com Valenciana is not exactly crap either. I mean surely he is not as bad as Anacona TSF?
|
| |
|
|
| AndreasEng |
Posted on 24-05-2016 21:43
|
Free Agent
Posts: 108
Joined: 25-09-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Should be looking at a downgrade for Nibali. Was bad last year, and the same is happening this year. Nowhere near as strong as Contadors 82 MTN stat. |
| |
|
|
| matt17br |
Posted on 24-05-2016 21:49
|
Directeur Sportif
Posts: 10525
Joined: 28-09-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
AndreasEng wrote:
Should be looking at a downgrade for Nibali. Was bad last year, and the same is happening this year. Nowhere near as strong as Contadors 82 MTN stat.
He's been downgraded to 81 just today, obviously still possible to revert that change if something exceptional happens.
|
| |
|
|
| Alakagom |
Posted on 24-05-2016 21:56
|
World Champion
Posts: 10891
Joined: 19-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
What about Benoot? 82 MO?
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 22-11-2024 20:33
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| AiZaK |
Posted on 26-05-2016 20:44
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1190
Joined: 13-04-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
And Bob Jungels in Mountain??? 76? 77? |
| |
|
|
| Geslin-bouygues |
Posted on 26-05-2016 21:40
|
Amateur
Posts: 5
Joined: 02-06-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
I think this guys in Conti need a little up no? :
PLANCKAERT Baptiste https://www.cqrank...;current=0
PL 71>73 ; PAV 69>71 ; END 68>70
EIBEGGER Markus https://www.cqrank...;current=0
MO 70>72 ; VAL 71>72 ; BAR 67>70 ; END 69>70 ; REC 69>70 ; RES 66>68
BRANDAO Joni https://www.cqrank...;current=0
MO 71>72 ; VAL 69>71 END 68>70 ; RES 66>68 ; REC 69>72
BRAVO OIARBIDE Garikoitz https://www.cqrank...erid=12121
VAL 70>72 ; END 67>70 ; RES 66>68 ; REC 66>68
And you can add WILMANN Frederik to ColoQuick Cult
https://www.cqrank...derid=2595
Thanks for your work guys |
| |
|
|
| Croatia14 |
Posted on 26-05-2016 21:55
|
Directeur Sportif
Posts: 9099
Joined: 13-03-2013
PCM$: 2100.00
|
Very well spotted! Most of the guys enjoyed updates already on our planned db, which you will see in the very next update 
Not all as harsh as you are suggesting, but pointing at this direction.
|
| |
|
|
| Anderis |
Posted on 27-05-2016 19:21
|
Domestique
Posts: 471
Joined: 13-09-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Anderis wrote:
I think 73 mountain for Clarke is a bit too much. He isn't better climber in high mountains than Moser (72 MO) or Brown (71 MO).
Well, Clarke proved me kinda wrong today.  |
| |
|
|
| Jorge14 |
Posted on 27-05-2016 20:40
|
Stagiare
Posts: 184
Joined: 15-03-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
Chaves and Kruij, 80 on mountains for sure right?
Probably Kruij with a bad descent stat |
| |
|
|
| sasijaski |
Posted on 27-05-2016 21:15
|
Junior Rider
Posts: 42
Joined: 12-08-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Jorge14 wrote:
Chaves and Kruij, 80 on mountains for sure right?
Probably Kruij with a bad descent stat
chaves downhill 77??
kruij 67?? |
| |
|
|
| I_Mayo |
Posted on 27-05-2016 21:35
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1481
Joined: 25-05-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
sasijaski wrote:
Jorge14 wrote:
Chaves and Kruij, 80 on mountains for sure right?
Probably Kruij with a bad descent stat
chaves downhill 77??
kruij 67??
One crash (even if it's so memorable) shouldn't necessary mean that he is a bad downhiller, I actually could say quite the opposite. Now Zakarin on the other hand... completely misses trajectories enough so that you can say that he is not a good descender. |
| |
|
|
| DS7SN13 |
Posted on 27-05-2016 21:40
|
Under 23
Posts: 84
Joined: 16-08-2015
PCM$: 700.00
|
sasijaski wrote:
Jorge14 wrote:
Chaves and Kruij, 80 on mountains for sure right?
Probably Kruij with a bad descent stat
chaves downhill 77??
kruij 67??
Come on now, don't tell me Kruijswik is now a bad descender because of one crash! He descends quite good, and to me he ain't worst than Chaves, but even if was worse, a 67?! I don't think the downhill stat means crash frequency. |
| |
|
|
| DS7SN13 |
Posted on 27-05-2016 21:41
|
Under 23
Posts: 84
Joined: 16-08-2015
PCM$: 700.00
|
I_Mayo wrote:
sasijaski wrote:
Jorge14 wrote:
Chaves and Kruij, 80 on mountains for sure right?
Probably Kruij with a bad descent stat
chaves downhill 77??
kruij 67??
One crash (even if it's so memorable) shouldn't necessary mean that he is a bad downhiller, I actually could say quite the opposite. Now Zakarin on the other hand... completely misses trajectories enough so that you can say that he is not a good descender.
Oops didn't see ur comment!!!  |
| |
|
|
| Tafiolmo |
Posted on 27-05-2016 22:06
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1962
Joined: 10-04-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
Just summing up on a few of the questions and comments I've seen here.
Kruijswijk will be on 80 mtn with improved Res while Chaves will be on 79 mtn largely because 1) Krujiswijk is at least a point superior in mtn and 2) because Chaves has an amazing acc which makes him dangerous when going uphill to compensate.
Kruijswijk I actually think is a poor DH rider and that is even without the crash but Zakarin is just plain terrible. Chaves though is a good DH rider and the stats will show this.
All this though of course is still dependent on tomorrow's big mtn stage.
|
| |
|
|
| matt17br |
Posted on 28-05-2016 08:38
|
Directeur Sportif
Posts: 10525
Joined: 28-09-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
Yeah I tend to agree, Kruijswijk even without considering the crash, was gonna be in the high 60s of the DH stat, he never showed he was a good descender.
|
| |
|
|
| I_Mayo |
Posted on 28-05-2016 15:31
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1481
Joined: 25-05-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Can someone explain me the phenomenon of Anacona and how his MTN rating actually should be switched with Visconti's. |
| |
|
