Not in the next update where he already was upped for 77 hill

Good spot though.

Ah good.Because he deserves 77 Hill.

Hah, I guess I should abstain from commenting until the next update is out, it seems like the most important stuff is already taken care of. Ewan at 70HIL seems more correct. In my experience with PCM14, hill stats doesn't really matter much in slightly uphill sprints if the stage is flat and the sprinters are fresh. Guys like Cavendish are still beasting it.

I don't think Izagirre should get 78 MO more like 77.

Why? Isn't 5th at Nice and 3rd at Romandie with riders with all higher mountain stats in front of him enough to get him 78 paired with low REC?

He also got a good 2nd overall place at Algarve in front of people like Conta and Pinot and only behind Thomas. 4th at Com Valenciana is not exactly crap either. I mean surely he is not as bad as Anacona TSF?

Should be looking at a downgrade for Nibali. Was bad last year, and the same is happening this year. Nowhere near as strong as Contadors 82 MTN stat.

He's been downgraded to 81 just today, obviously still possible to revert that change if something exceptional happens.

What about Benoot? 82 MO?

And Bob Jungels in Mountain??? 76? 77?

I think this guys in Conti need a little up no? :

PLANCKAERT Baptiste https://www.cqrank...;current=0
PL 71>73 ; PAV 69>71 ; END 68>70

EIBEGGER Markus https://www.cqrank...;current=0
MO 70>72 ; VAL 71>72 ; BAR 67>70 ; END 69>70 ; REC 69>70 ; RES 66>68

BRANDAO Joni https://www.cqrank...;current=0
MO 71>72 ; VAL 69>71 END 68>70 ; RES 66>68 ; REC 69>72

BRAVO OIARBIDE Garikoitz https://www.cqrank...erid=12121
VAL 70>72 ; END 67>70 ; RES 66>68 ; REC 66>68

And you can add WILMANN Frederik to ColoQuick Cult
https://www.cqrank...derid=2595

Thanks for your work guys

Very well spotted! Most of the guys enjoyed updates already on our planned db, which you will see in the very next update

Not all as harsh as you are suggesting, but pointing at this direction.

Well, Clarke proved me kinda wrong today.

Chaves and Kruij, 80 on mountains for sure right?
Probably Kruij with a bad descent stat

chaves downhill 77??
kruij 67??

One crash (even if it's so memorable) shouldn't necessary mean that he is a bad downhiller, I actually could say quite the opposite. Now Zakarin on the other hand... completely misses trajectories enough so that you can say that he is not a good descender.

Come on now, don't tell me Kruijswik is now a bad descender because of one crash! He descends quite good, and to me he ain't worst than Chaves, but even if was worse, a 67?! I don't think the downhill stat means crash frequency.

Oops didn't see ur comment!!!

Just summing up on a few of the questions and comments I've seen here.

Kruijswijk will be on 80 mtn with improved Res while Chaves will be on 79 mtn largely because 1) Krujiswijk is at least a point superior in mtn and 2) because Chaves has an amazing acc which makes him dangerous when going uphill to compensate.

Kruijswijk I actually think is a poor DH rider and that is even without the crash but Zakarin is just plain terrible. Chaves though is a good DH rider and the stats will show this.

All this though of course is still dependent on tomorrow's big mtn stage.

Yeah I tend to agree, Kruijswijk even without considering the crash, was gonna be in the high 60s of the DH stat, he never showed he was a good descender.

Can someone explain me the phenomenon of Anacona and how his MTN rating actually should be switched with Visconti's.